Vehicle safety in Australia using real world crash data

1998 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-52
Author(s):  
Brian Fildes
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Uli Schmucker ◽  
Melissa Beirau ◽  
Matthias Frank ◽  
Dirk Stengel ◽  
Gerrit Matthes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tayseer A. Aldaghlas ◽  
Christine Burke ◽  
Jeffrey Jenkins ◽  
Louis J. Brown ◽  
Anne Rizzo
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Guibing Li ◽  
Jinming Liu ◽  
Kui Li ◽  
Hui Zhao ◽  
Liangliang Shi ◽  
...  

Head-to-vehicle contact boundary condition and criteria and corresponding thresholds of head injuries are crucial in evaluation of vehicle safety performance for pedestrian protection, which need a constantly updated understanding of pedestrian head kinematic response and injury risk in real-world collisions. Thus, the purpose of the current study is to investigate the characteristics of pedestrian head-to-vehicle contact boundary condition and pedestrian AIS3+ (Abbreviated Injury Scale) head injury risk as functions of kinematic-based criteria, including HIC (Head Injury Criterion), HIP (Head Impact Power), GAMBIT (Generalized Acceleration Model for Brain Injury Threshold), RIC (Rotational Injury Criterion), and BrIC (Brain Injury Criteria), in real-world collisions. To achieve this, 57 vehicle-to-pedestrian collision cases were employed, and a multi-body modeling approach was applied to reconstruct pedestrian kinematics in these real-world collisions. The results show that head-to-windscreen contacts are dominant in pedestrian collisions of the analysis sample and that head WAD (Wrap Around Distance) floats from 1.5 to 2.3 m, with a mean value of 1.84 m; 80% of cases have a head linear contact velocity below 45 km/h or an angular contact velocity less than 40 rad/s; pedestrian head linear contact velocity is on average 83 ± 23% of the vehicle impact velocity, while the head angular contact velocity (in rad/s) is on average 75 ± 25% of the vehicle impact velocity in km/h; 77% of cases have a head contact time in the range 50–140 ms, and negative and positive linear correlations are observed for the relationships between pedestrian head contact time and WAD/height ratio and vehicle impact velocity, respectively; 70% of cases have a head contact angle floating from 40° to 70°, with an average value of 53°; the pedestrian head contact angles on windscreens (average = 48°) are significantly lower than those on bonnets (average = 60°); the predicted thresholds of HIC, HIP, GAMBIT, RIC, BrIC2011, and BrIC2013 for a 50% probability of AIS3+ head injury risk are 1,300, 60 kW, 0.74, 1,470 × 104, 0.56, and 0.57, respectively. The findings of the current work could provide realistic reference for evaluation of vehicle safety performance focusing on pedestrian protection.


2000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven E. Meyer ◽  
Stephen Forrest ◽  
Joshua Hayden ◽  
Brian Herbst ◽  
Anthony Sances

Abstract Contemporary production seatbelt retractors have been proven very effective in the crash environment for which they have been primarily designed and most adequately tested, that is, in the full frontal crash mode. The National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 1966 outlines specific crash test and occupant injury measure requirements for testing and evaluation of seatbelt systems in production vehicles. Automobile manufacturers routinely test exhaustively in compliance of these requirements with respect to full frontal barrier crashes. However, government requirements are not nearly as complete for alternative accident modes often seen in the real world. Offset, angled, override, underride, and rollover crashes will often require seatbelt retractors to manage acceleration pulses in varying directions, including the vertical plane. Occupant motions during these real world accident modes may also impart loads into the belts and belt hardware (webbing and buckle assemblies) that also may not be immediately apparent in the frontal barrier test mode.


2012 ◽  
Vol 134 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Aditya Belwadi ◽  
John H. Siegel ◽  
Aadarsh Singh ◽  
Joyce A. Smith ◽  
King H. Yang ◽  
...  

Traumatic rupture of the aorta (TRA) remains the second most common cause of death associated with motor vehicle crashes, only less prevalent than brain injury. On average, nearly 8000 people die annually in the United States due to blunt injury to the aorta. It is observed that over 80% of occupants who suffer an aortic injury die at the scene due to exsanguination into the chest cavity. In the current study, eight near side lateral impacts, in which TRA occurred, were reconstructed using a combination of real world crash data reported in the Crash Injury Research and Engineering Network (CIREN) database, finite element (FE) models of vehicles, and the Wayne State Human Body Model - II (WSHBM). For the eight CIREN cases reconstructed, the high strain regions in the aorta closely matched with the autopsy data provided. The peak average maximum principal strains in all of the eight CIREN cases were localized in the isthmus region of the aorta, distal to the left subclavian artery, and averaged at 22 ± 6.2% while the average maximum pressure in the aorta was found to be 117 ± 14.7 kPa.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-24
Author(s):  
MohammadReza Seyedi ◽  
MohammadReza Koloushani ◽  
Sungmoon Jung ◽  
Arda Vanli

In this study, we selected four real-world rear-end crash scenarios with different crash characteristics. The vehicles involved in those crashes were not equipped with any crash avoidance systems. We then used the accident reconstruction method to build those crash scenarios in PC-Crash software. Then, different FCW/AEB safety algorithms have been defined for a subject vehicle model in each crash scenario and each scenario was simulated for a set of input parameters such as vehicle speed, brake intensity, and driver reaction time. The range and distribution of input parameters were extracted from the related field crash data and available literature. A total number of 16000 simulations have been conducted which produced input-output datasets for further investigations. Finally, the effects of input parameters on simulation outcomes including crash occurrence, AEB activation, injury risk, and vehicle damage have been quantified using the Boruta algorithm. The results indicated that the overall effectiveness of the AEB system was a 57% reduction of rear-end crashes, a 52% reduction of injury severity (striking vehicle’s passengers), and a 47% reduction of damages for striking vehicles. The results also showed that the available AEB algorithms were more effective for the average speed equal to or less than 80 kmph. The speed of the subject vehicle, type of AEB algorithm, sensor detection range, and driver reaction time were the most important parameters on crash outcomes. In addition, the results indicated that the performance of FCW had a direct impact on the effectiveness of the AEB system for the integrated FCW + AEB system.


2010 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 587-593 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anders Kullgren ◽  
Anders Lie ◽  
Claes Tingvall
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document