scholarly journals Comparative study of fly ash/sugarcane fiber reinforced polymer composites properties

BioResources ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 5514-5531
Author(s):  
Elammaran Jayamani ◽  
Md. Rezaur Rahman ◽  
Deshan Anselam Benhur ◽  
Muhammad Khusairy Bin Bakri ◽  
Akshay Kakar ◽  
...  

This paper discusses mechanical, morphological, infrared spectral, and thermal properties of fly ash/sugarcane fiber reinforced epoxy polymer composites. Samples were prepared with and without the addition of 2 wt% of fly ash. Sugarcane fiber additions were varied from 0 wt% to 10 wt% (with an increment of 2 wt% for each sample), while the epoxy was used as a binder. A comparative study of these properties was completed on samples with and without the addition of fly ash in the composites. Based on the results obtained, the addition of 2 wt% of fly ash improved the tensile strength and hardness properties but reduced the flexural strength of the composites. Additions of fly ash reduced bubble or void formation in the composites, while toughening the composites and improving adhesion between the fiber and matrix. Samples with 4 w% of fiber and 2 wt% of fly ash composites showed high tensile strength and hardness properties, while 2 wt% of fiber composites showed high flexural strength.

2021 ◽  
Vol 891 ◽  
pp. 125-130
Author(s):  
Subrata Chandra Das ◽  
Debasree Paul ◽  
Mubarak Ahmad Khan ◽  
Sotirios A. Grammatikos ◽  
Styliani Papatzani

Recently, natural fiber reinforced polymer composites have become popular over traditional synthetic fiber reinforced polymer composites for automotive, low demanding structural and semi-structural applications. In this work, a comparative study of a natural fiber composite such as jute fabric composite (JFRP) and synthetic fiber composite such as glass fiber composite (GFRP) is presented. The composites were manufactured using hand lay-up and then curing at 90°C for 10 min in a hot press, followed by 24 h room temperature post-curing. The mechanical properties such as tensile and bending of JFRP and GFRP composites, were evaluated and compared. It was revealed that even if GFRPs exhibited significantly higher mechanical properties than JFRPs, environmental impact would still favor JFRPs for non-structural and low load bearing applications.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document