scholarly journals Tumor size estimation of the breast cancer molecular subtypes using imaging techniques

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gulten Sezgın ◽  
Melda Apaydın ◽  
Demet Etıt ◽  
Murat Kemal Atahan
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Molecular Subtypes ◽  
Imaging Techniques ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
Size Estimation ◽  
Luminal A ◽  
Luminal B ◽  
Cancer Management ◽  
Underestimation Rate

Background and aim. In medical practice the classification of breast cancer is most commonly based on the molecular subtypes, in order to predict the disease prognosis, avoid over-treatment, and provide individualized cancer management. Tumor size is a major determiner of treatment planning, acting on the decision-making process, whether to perform breast surgery or administer neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Imaging methods play a key role in determining the tumor size in breast cancers at the time of the diagnosis. We aimed to compare the radiologically determined tumor sizes with the corresponding pathologically determined tumor sizes of breast cancer at the time of the diagnosis, in correlation with the molecular subtypes. Methods. Ninety-one patients with primary invasive breast cancer were evaluated. The main molecular subtypes were luminal A, luminal B, HER-2 positive, and triple-negative. The Bland–Altman plot was used for presenting the limits of agreement between the radiologically and the pathologically determined tumor sizes by the molecular subtypes. Results. A significantly proportional underestimation was found for the luminal A subtype, especially for large tumors. The p-values for the magnetic resonance imaging, mammography, and ultrasonography were 0.020, 0.030, and <0.001, respectively. No statistically significant differences were observed among the radiologic modalities in determining the tumor size in the remaining molecular subtypes (p > 0.05). Conclusion. The radiologically determined tumor size was significantly smaller than the pathologically determined tumor size in the luminal A subtype of breast cancers when measured with all three imaging modalities. The differences were more prominent with ultrasonography and mammography. The underestimation rate increases as the tumor gets larger.

Expression of BCRP/ABCG2 Protein in Invasive Breast Cancer and Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Shou Zhang ◽  
Chao Yang ◽  
Lei Han ◽  
Lei Liu ◽  
Yun Jiang Liu
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Breast Carcinoma ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Hormone Receptor ◽  
Molecular Subtypes ◽  
Therapy Response ◽  
Luminal A ◽  
Luminal B ◽  
Response To Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Background: Breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP), or ABCG2 (ATP-binding cassette sub-family G member 2), is an ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter that mediates energy-dependent transport of substrate drugs out of the cell. Its overexpression may contribute to intrinsic drug resistance in vitro. However, the current literature has not yet clarified the clinical significance of BCRP/ABCG2 in invasive breast carcinoma. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to validate the expression of BCRP/ABCG2 in invasive breast carcinoma and its role in response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: In this study, a pretherapeutic core biopsy was performed in 222 patients. BCRP/ABCG2 expression in carcinoma tissue was measured by immunohistochemistry. BCRP/ABCG2 expression correlations with clinicopathological features, molecular subtypes, and therapy response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy were investigated. Results: The results showed that BCRP/ABCG2 was expressed in different molecular subtypes. The proportions of patients with high BCRP/ABCG2 expression were similar in luminal A and luminal B tumors (Luminal B, 80%; Luminal A, 78%), compared with other molecular subtypes (Triple-negative, 63%; HER-2+, 58%. P=0.05). BCRP/ABCG2 expression and the number of lymphatic metastases (&#119875;=0.001) and tumor size (&#119875;=0.011) demonstrated a statistically significant correlation. Low BCRP/ABCG2 expression was associated with an increased pathological complete response (pCR) rate of 38%, higher than the 19% in tumors with high BCRP/ABCG2 expression (P=0.002). In multivariable analysis, BCRP/ABCG2 and hormone receptor (HR) expression were identified as independent risk factors of pCR (P=0.003, P=0.013. respectively). Conclusions: BCRP/ABCG2 is highly expressed in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. High BCRP/ABCG2 expression is associated with lymphatic metastasis, tumor size, and poor pCR. BCRP/ABCG2 may be a novel potential biomarker that can predict clinical progression and therapy response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

scholarly journals Expression of glutamine metabolism-related proteins according to molecular subtype of breast cancer

2013 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 339-348 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sewha Kim ◽  
Do Hee Kim ◽  
Woo-Hee Jung ◽  
Ja Seung Koo
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Molecular Subtypes ◽  
Molecular Subtype ◽  
Glutamine Metabolism ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Luminal A ◽  
Luminal B ◽  
Related Proteins ◽  
Glutaminase 1

The aim of this study was to investigate the expression of glutamine metabolism-related proteins to determine whether glutamine is metabolized differently according to breast cancer molecular subtype. We generated a tissue microarray of 702 breast cancer patients and performed immunohistochemical staining for glutamine metabolism-related proteins, including glutaminase 1 (GLS1 (GLS)), glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH (H6PD)), and amino acid transporter-2 (ASCT2 (SLC1A5)), which were separately evaluated in tumor and stroma compartments and then analyzed by breast cancer molecular subtypes. Breast cancers were classified as follows: 293 luminal A (41.7%), 166 luminal B (23.6%), 67 HER2 type (9.6%), and 176 TNBC (25.1%). HER2 type showed the highest stromal GLS1 (P=0.001), tumoral GDH (P=0.001), stromal GDH (P<0.001), and tumoral ASCT (P<0.001) expression. We identified differential expression of glutamine metabolism-related proteins according to molecular subtype of breast cancer. The highest glutamine metabolic activity was seen in HER2-type breast cancer.

scholarly journals MCM6 Versus Ki-67 in Diagnosis of Luminal Molecular Subtypes of Breast Cancers

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dorsay Sadeghian ◽  
Hana Saffar ◽  
Pouya Mahdavi Sharif ◽  
Vahid Soleimani ◽  
Behnaz Jahanbin
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cellular Proliferation ◽  
Molecular Subtypes ◽  
Surrogate Marker ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
Luminal A ◽  
Ki 67 ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Luminal B ◽  
Prognostic Features

Abstract Background: Currently, breast cancers are divided into four major molecular subtypes. The distinction between the luminal A and luminal B subtypes is mainly based on the cellular proliferation indices and is assessed by the Ki-67 scoring. Due to the limitations in the assessment and expression of Ki-67, we hypothesized that minichromosome maintenance protein 6 (MCM6) can be taken as a surrogate marker to differentiate molecular subtypes and aid in more precise grading of tumors. Methods: We performed a retrospective, cross-sectional study on 124 samples of breast cancer and 40 samples of normal breast tissue. Relevant clinical information was retrieved from the relevant Cancer Institute database.Results: MCM6 could discriminate between different histologic grades. The luminal B subtype exhibited a higher MCM6 score in comparison to luminal A (P=0.01). There were significantly higher MCM6 scores in the hormone receptor (HR) negative, in comparison to luminal breast cancers (P<0.001). MCM6 score had a significant correlation with the mitotic count (P<0.001).Conclusion: MCM6 can reliably differentiate luminal A and luminal B subtypes and was correlated with the mitotic counts. More studies are needed to standardize its assessment methods, determine more robust cut-off values, and evaluate its associations with prognostic features of breast cancer.

scholarly journals Molecular Subtypes of Breast Cancer Patients According to St Gallen Classification

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-58
Author(s):  
Shafatujjahan ◽  
Ifatujjahan ◽  
Rajat Sanker Roy Biswas
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Molecular Subtypes ◽  
Hormonal Treatment ◽  
Left Breast ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Luminal A ◽  
Luminal B ◽  
Her 2

Introduction: Breast cancer is a common malignancy among female in Bangladesh.But its molecular subtypes are not evaluated due to lack of expert investigationsupport. So objectives of the present study are to evaluate the molecular subtypesof breast cancer patients according to St Gallen classification in our contest. Materials and methods: It is retrospective study done among histopathologicallyproved 40 breast cancer patients visiting Medical Oncology and Radiotherapydepartment of Chattogram Maa-O-Shishu Hospital. Molecular subtypes wasevaluated by immunohistochemistry according to St Gallen Classification. Results: In this study a total of 40 cases of invasive female breast cancers wereincluded. Age of the patients ranged from 31-62 years, with a mean age of 41 ±13.5 years. ER expression was seen in 60% and PR in 55% of cases and Her-2/neupositivity in 16%. Majority (52.5%) of the tumors were located in the left breast. Thepercentage of ER but not PR positivity increased with age, though this differencewas not statistically significant. Majority of the cases were diagnosed at stage IIwith a percentage of 42.5%. Stage II tumors showed more ER and PR positivity.Among all 57.9% of ER positive and 49.5% of PR positive tumors were present while72.2% of tumors were negative for Her-2/neu. The triple-negative breast tumorswere more commonly found at grade 2. Regarding luminal status 14(35%) wasLuminal A, 5(12.5%) was Luminal B, 9(22.5%) was TNBC and 12(30%) was HER 2positive. Conclusion: In this study luminal A was the commonest molecular subtypes. LuminalA subtypes tumors had a long term risk of distant matastatic disease which can bereduced by hormonal treatment. Chatt Maa Shi Hosp Med Coll J; Vol.19 (1); January 2020; Page 55-58

scholarly journals Inflammatory Breast Cancer: Clinical Characteristics and Influence of Molecular Subtypes on Treatment Response

2021 ◽  
Vol 107 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 12-12
Author(s):  
D Aissaoui ◽  
M Bohli ◽  
R Ben Amor ◽  
J Yahyaoui ◽  
A Hamdoun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Treatment Response ◽  
Inflammatory Breast Cancer ◽  
Hormone Receptor ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Molecular Subtypes ◽  
Luminal A ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Luminal B ◽  
Significant Difference

Introduction: Inflammatory Breast Cancer (IBC) is a rare and very aggressive breast cancer with poor prognosis. The prevalence is different from a country to another. In Tunisia, it is about 5 to 7% of breast cancer. The aim of this study is to describe the epidemiological and histopathological features of patients with inflammatory breast cancer and to evaluate the treatment response according to the molecular subtypes. Methods: This retrospective review identified 31 patients with no metastatic IBC treated in our radiotherapy department between December 2019 and November 2020. IBC was confirmed using the clinical criteria. Baseline clinic-pathological and treatment information was retrieved from medical records. Statistical analysis was performed with IBM SPSS V.20. Results: Median age was 51.3 years [27-68]. 48% of tumors were grade 3. The average tumor size was 36mm [10-90]. The histological type was ductal carcinoma in 97%. Vascular invasion was noted in 24 patients (77%). Thirty patients were classified as stage IIIB and one patient was IIIC. 74% were hormone receptor positive and 45% were HER2 positive. Luminal B was the predominant subtype (52%) followed by Her2 positive (32%), Luminal A (23%), and triple negative (3%) All patients had chemotherapy: neoadjuvant for 26 patients (84%) and adjuvant for 5 patients (16%). Nine patients (29%) had tumor pathological complete response (pCR). Partial response was observed in 18 patients (58%). Lymph node pCR was noted in 16% of cases (n=5). Endocrine therapy and trastuzumab were given to 76% and 45% of patients, respectively. The influence of the molecular subtype was not statistically significant on the response to neoadjuvant treatment. The highest rate of pCR were 43% for Her2positive, then 27%, 21% and 9% for Luminal B, Luminal A and Triple negative, respectively (p=0.2). Conclusion: Our study showed a high percentage of hormone receptor and Her2+ (74% and 45% respectively) in IBC. Luminal B was the most frequent subtype. Anthracycline-based chemotherapy and trastuzumab improved the pCR rate: 44% for Her2positive. Triple negative showed poorer pCR than other breast cancer subtype without a significant difference. A larger study is warranted to confirm our findings.

scholarly journals Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of Different Breast Cancer Molecular Subtypes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Breast Care ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Hans-Jonas Meyer ◽  
Andreas Wienke ◽  
Alexey Surov
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Diffusion Weighted Imaging ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Molecular Subtypes ◽  
Luminal A ◽  
Diagnose Breast Cancer ◽  
Luminal B ◽  
Diffusion Weighted ◽  
Adc Values

Background: Magnetic resonance imaging can be used to diagnose breast cancer (BC).Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) can be used to reflect tumor microstructure. Objectives: This analysis aimed to compare ADC values between molecular subtypes of BC based on a large sample of patients. Method: The MEDLINE library and Scopus database were screened for the associations between ADC and molecular subtypes of BC up to April 2020. The primary end point of the systematic review was the ADC value in different BC subtypes. Overall, 28 studies were included. Results: The included studies comprised a total of 2,990 tumors. Luminal A type was diagnosed in 865 cases (28.9%), luminal B in 899 (30.1%), human epidermal growth factor receptor (Her2)-enriched in 597 (20.0%), and triple-negative in 629 (21.0%). The mean ADC values of the subtypes were as follows: luminal A: 0.99 × 10–3 mm2/s (95% CI 0.94–1.04), luminal B: 0.97 × 10–3 mm2/s (95% CI 0.89–1.05), Her2-enriched: 1.02 × 10–3 mm2/s (95% CI 0.95–1.08), and triple-negative: 0.99 × 10–3 mm2/s (95% CI 0.91–1.07). Conclusions: ADC values cannot be used to discriminate between molecular subtypes of BC.

Association between molecular subtype of local advanced breast cancer with Ca 15-3 level

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Dony Ruswendro ◽  
Salman Ardi Syamsu ◽  
Rudy Thabry ◽  
Arifin Seweng ◽  
Andi Nilawati Usman
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Tumor Marker ◽  
Molecular Subtypes ◽  
Locally Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Tissue Growth ◽  
Advanced Breast ◽  
Luminal A ◽  
Luminal B

BACKGROUND: Neoplasm is an abnormal mass of tissue that grows excessively and not coordinated with normal tissue growth and continues to do so even though the stimulation that triggered the change has stopped. Breast cancer can be known by using tumor marker, which has been used is mucin-like glycoprotein Carcinoma Antigen (CA 15-3) which is a tumor marker that is specific to breast cancer. METHOD: This study is a cross-sectional study to determine the association between molecular subtypes of locally advanced breast cancer with CA 15-3 level at Abdul Wahab Sjahranie Samarinda Hospital. The population in this study were all breast cancer patients that were confirmed by histopathological examination. RESULTS: A total of 75 patients were included for this study, 29 patients (38.7%) known as Overexpression HER2, 18 patients (24.0%) were Luminal B with HER2 (+), 11 patients (14.7%) were Luminal B with HER2 (−), 11 patients (14.7%) were Basal-like/TNBC, and 6 patients (8,0%) were Luminal A. From the ANOVA test, the value of p = 0.045 (p < 0.05) means there was an association between Ca 15-3 level and molecular subtypes in patients with locally advanced breast cancer at the Abdul Wahab Sjahranie Hospital in Samarinda 2017. In this study Ca 15-3 levels were obtained on average for Luminal A 16.98 U/mL, Luminal B with HER2 (−) 42.41 U/mL, Luminal B with HER2 (+) 73.75 U/mL, Overexpression HER2 47.73 U/mL, and Basal Like /TNBC 63.50 U/mL. CONCLUSION: Statistically, it was found that there was an association between Ca 15-3 levels and molecular subtypes in patients with locally advanced breast cancer at the Abdul Wahab Sjahranie Hospital in Samarinda 2017.

Trends in breast cancer mortality according to molecular subtypes: A population-based study.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 572-572
Author(s):  
Yunan Han ◽  
Shuai Xu ◽  
Graham A. Colditz ◽  
Adetunji T. Toriola
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Mortality ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Molecular Subtypes ◽  
Breast Cancer Mortality ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Luminal A ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Mortality Trends ◽  
Luminal B

572 Background: Breast cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in U.S. women. On the molecular level, breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease. Heterogeneous expressions of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) are etiologically and clinically meaningful, as they map to distinct risk factors and different treatment strategies. Although breast cancer mortality has been declining since 1990, little is known about mortality trends according to molecular subtypes at the population level. Methods: We examined the incidence-based mortality rates and trends among women who were diagnosed with invasive breast cancer from 2010 through 2017 using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. We defined incidence-based mortality using a moving 5-year calendar period starting in 2014. We further assessed mortality according to breast cancer molecular subtypes: luminal A (ER and/or PR positive, HER2 negative), luminal B (ER and/or PR positive, HER2 positive), HER2-enriched (HER2 over-expressed or amplified, ER and PR negative) and triple-negative (ER and PR negative, HER2 negative) tumors. We calculated annual percent changes (APC) in incidence-based mortality using joinpoint regression models. Results: Overall, incidence-based mortality for breast cancer significantly decreased by 1.5% annually from 2014 through 2017 (APC, -1.5%; 95% coefficient interval [CI], -2.3% to -0.7%; p<0.001). Incidence-based mortality decreased annually by 2.0% for luminal A breast cancer (APC, -2.0%; 95% CI, -3.7% to -0.3%; p<0.001), 2.1% for luminal B breast cancer (APC, -2.1%; 95% CI, -5.4% to 1.4%; p=0.1), 1.1% for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) (APC, -1.1%; 95% CI, -2.1% to -0.0%; p<0.001). However, incidence-based mortality for HER2-enriched breast cancer increased 2.3% annually during the study period (APC, 2.3%; 95% CI, -2.4% to 7.2%; p=0.2). Conclusions: Between 2014 and 2017, incidence-based mortality for luminal A, luminal B, and TNBC decreased among U.S. women, with a larger decrease observed for luminal tumors. However, incidence-based mortality for HER2-enriched breast cancer increased. The favorable incidence-based mortality trends for luminal tumors and TNBC are likely due to the continuing improvement in treatments and early detection. The increasing trend of incidence-based mortality for HER2-enriched breast cancer constitutes a priority for cancer control activities and further research.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document