scholarly journals SOME ASPECTS OF THE APPEAL IN ECONOMIC JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS

2021 ◽  
pp. 3-9
Author(s):  
V.S. Shcherbyna ◽  
◽  
V.V. Bodnar ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Appellate Court ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Organizational Changes ◽  
Current Version ◽  
Judicial Proceedings ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Right ◽  
Court Of First Instance ◽  
Court Of Appeal

The issues of organizational changes that the courts of appellate instance have undergone, as well as the content of the norms of economic procedural legislation, which enshrine the features of appellate proceedings. The peculiarities of appellate proceedings as an independent stage of economic litigation are considered, which include the following: a) an appeal is filed against a decision of a court of first instance that has not entered into force; b) review of court decisions on appeal is carried out by the courts of appeal; c) the right to appeal has the participants, as well as persons who did not participate in the case, if the court has decided on their rights, interests and (or) responsibilities; d) the appeal is filed directly with the court of appeal; e) the subject of review of the case by the court of appellate instance is the verification of the legality and validity of the decision of the court of first instance; f) the limits of review of the case in the court of appeal, as a rule, are limited by the arguments and requirements of the appeal; g) in the court of appellate instance cases are reviewed according to the rules of consideration of cases in the order of simplified claim proceedings, taking into account the features provided by the Code. It is proposed in order to avoid (reduce) cases of unfounded filing of appeals to supplement Art. 254 Code of Economic Procedure of Ukraine norm on the grounds of appeal of court decisions such as defined in Part 2 of Art. 287 of the Code of Economic Procedure of Ukraine on the grounds of cassation appeal. It is noted that the current version of the Code of Economic Procedure of Ukraine does not contain rules that would determine what procedural actions and within what period the appellate court should take to recover the case from the court of first instance, and during what period the court of first instance should consider the case her appellate court. Arguments are made against the use by courts of the so-called "procedural analogy" in cases. Other proposals are being made to improve the current procedural legislation.

scholarly journals Some gaps in criminal procedural legislation at the time of court decisions appeal

2021 ◽  
pp. 155-164
Author(s):  
V. I. Maryniv ◽  
O. Leiba
Keyword(s):  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Practical Implementation ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Research Attention ◽  
Judicial Proceedings ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Right ◽  
The Given ◽  
Appeal Procedure

The article is dedicated to the explanation of such legislative defects as gaps in the criminal procedural legislation during court decisions appeal. Within the framework of the study the attention focuses on the fact that regulatory rulemaking of the court decisions appeal in criminal proceeding contains multiple gaps that affect negatively at its practical implementation. Detailed analysis of the gaps in the criminal procedure legislation has been carried out. By reference to specific aspects of the judicial review implementation, the gaps classification according to their subject is proposed.  More specifically the following gaps in the rulemaking of the court decisions appeal in criminal proceedings are identified: 1) concerning the object of appeal; 2) concerning the appealer; 3) concerning the subject of appeal; 4) concerning the appeal procedure, etc. It is pointed out that number of legal regulation gaps regarding the identification of the object of appeal is quite significant. Such gaps arise in response to the determining a list of court decisions by the legislator that are subject to appeal consequently making impossible reviewing those court decisions that are not directly enlisted. Such matter is illustrated by the example of the establishment of restrictions on the ability to appeal the investigating magistrate decisions. Considering the gaps concerning the appealer it is pointed out that in some cases the legislation does not provide the right of relevant parties for court decisions appeal or does not provide them with sufficient legal opportunities which limits a person’s constitutional privilege for court decision appeal review and his/her access to judicial proceedings. The analysis of gaps concerning the subject of appeal was also carried out. It is concluded with reason that such gaps arise due to the disadvantageous legislative determining of the issues which are allowed to appeal procedure. In the course of the research attention is drawn to the fact that the criminal procedural legislature furthermore contains other gaps in the rulemaking of court decisions appeal. In particular they concern the appeal procedure itself, implementation of the rights of its participants and some other issues. By way of illustration of the given type of gap it is indicated that the opportunity of implementation of the right to appeal for those persons who are directly granted with it by the law may be complicated due to the shortage of the actual opportunity to appeal against the judgment, in light of the high requirements for its content and format, advanced by the domestic lawmaking body. In the article motions considering eliminating and overcoming the enlisted legislative defects are formulated.

scholarly journals The right to appeal on criminal procedure under international acts and jurisprudence

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
MSc. Vilard Bytyqi
Keyword(s):  
Best Practice ◽  
Second Phase ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Advanced Level ◽  
The World ◽  
The Right ◽  
Court Of First Instance ◽  
Comparative Description ◽  
Procedural Aspect

The right to appeal, respectively the right on complaint as per our legal vocabulary, constitutes the basic trunk of the second phase of court decisions in a certain procedure, in particular the criminal proceedings.The aim of this paper is to emphasize the main notions of appeal, but also in other aspects through the comparative description it aims to bring more clarity in differences and similarities that exist in between the appeal which is used in our criminal proceedings and the appeal which is used in the criminal proceedings that take place in the supranational courts. It is known that in courts which consist of international elements, the appeal is positioned in a more advanced level, due to the fact that there are grounds of suspicion used over every element that could be used in any national criminal proceedings.Overall, in any place of the world, the appeal has the goal to remedy court decisions brought by the court of first instance, while, in the procedural aspect it has more or less differences depending on the regulations of criminal procedures of that state. Such difference due to the diversity of the legal systems today are also accepted as the universal legal value, since establishment of international tribunals provides the best practice in this field. 

scholarly journals Implementation of the Right of Appeal of Judicial Decisions in Civil Cases

2019 ◽  
pp. 60-71
Author(s):  
Oksana Trach
Keyword(s):  
Court Decision ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Significant Group ◽  
Large Group ◽  
Judicial Decisions ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Civil Cases ◽  
And Performance ◽  
The Right ◽  
Court Of First Instance

The mechanisms for reviewing judgments in civil cases should include additional guarantees to ensure the implementation of the right of appeal, conditioned by the specificity of the court decision, which will serve as the subject of verification. There is a need to establish implementation peculiarities of the right of appeal, as well as the procedures for revising court decisions made in lawsuits against a large group of persons, an indefinite number of persons that are not defined by the current civil procedural law. It has been substantiated the necessity to fix on a legislative level the two-step procedure for implementation of the right of appeal of judicial decisions on such claims. The exercise of the right to appeal depends on the knowledge of the decision on the case by the court of the first instance, as well as the direct involvement of the participant in the process. Particular significance has got the commission of these actions in relation to potential participants of the case. It has been established that the implementation of the right of appeal against the decision on these types of claims will facilitate the creation of options called «Claims for a large group of people», «Claims for an uncertain circle of persons» on the official web site of the judiciary. It was determined that informing the participants of the case, their representatives about the opening of appeal proceedings is important for the possibility of exercising the right to review court decisions in the court of appellate instance, and the use in this regard of procedural opportunities provided by law. It was established that excluding the representative from the participants of the case, the legislator did not regulate properly all procedural aspects of his participation in the process, the exercise of his procedural rights, and performance of duties. There is no clear timetable for the court of appellate instance to determine the issue whether the court decision of the court of first instance concerns the rights, freedoms, interests and / or duties of a person if it was not examined in the trial by the court of first instance and who filed a complaint, as well as the procedural form of its examination. It is necessary to consolidate the possibility to close the appeal proceedings in a case and the possibility to close proceedings against a specific appeal. Preparation of a case for an appeal on a complaint to a court decision on a suit against a significant group of persons should be marked according to its specifics. For this type of claim, it is necessary to change its procedural form in order to hold the preparatory meeting and foresee the necessity of preparing a panel of three judges. The preparatory meeting will expand the procedural capabilities of the participants and their representatives.

scholarly journals Appropriate subject of obtaining evidence of a criminal offense in the opinion of the court

2021 ◽  
Vol 66 ◽  
pp. 224-228
Author(s):  
A.-M.Y. Anheleniuk
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Evidence Base ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Criminal Offense ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Evidence Collection ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Right ◽  
Operational Unit

The article considers the collection of evidence by the prosecution, because it is in this order that the evidence base of criminal proceedings is most often formed. Thus, the prosecutor, investigator (investigator) acting under Articles 36, 40, 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine, as well as an employee of the operational unit pursuant to Article 41 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine on behalf of the investigator or prosecutor have the right to collect evidence. The purpose of the article is to study the affiliation of the subjects of evidence collection as part of the procedural form of the criminal process of Ukraine, taking into account the analysis of court decisions, namely the assessment of the evidence base as a basis for deciding on the merits of criminal proceedings. Cases of involvement of an improper subject in the pre-trial investigation, which are common and typical, are systematized. There are two types of improper subjects within the investigative (search) or procedural actions, namely the subject: 1) is not appointed in the manner prescribed by law, although according to current legislation according to the list of its powers may be appropriate; 2) does not have the authority under the law to make a specific decision or to conduct investigative (search) or procedural actions. An analysis of court decisions according to which courts provide an assessment of the procedural activities of the subjects of evidence collection in criminal proceedings at the stage of pre-trial investigation, including their relevance and admissibility. Thus, attention is paid to the assessment of courts on the legality of the presence of persons during investigative (investigative) or procedural actions; the correctness of fixing such a presence. In addition, the situations of appointment of relevant subjects in criminal proceedings to fulfill their powers are considered. It is proposed to supplement the first part of Article 236 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine with a provision that clarifies the grounds for the stay and authority of the employee of the operational and investigative service during the search.

scholarly journals Novelization of Civil Procedural Legislation of Ukraine in Cassation Review: Panacea or Illusion?

2020 ◽  
pp. 209-225
Keyword(s):  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Appellate Court ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Civil Proceedings ◽  
Civil Proceeding ◽  
The Right ◽  
Positive Step ◽  
Excessive Number

The article analyzes the novelties introduced to the civil procedural legislation in the cassation review. Cassation proceedings in Ukraine’s current civil proceedings engender a post-appellate court decision review, the content and purpose of which are to ensure civil proceeding implementation based on the latter principle application. The author evaluates cassation filters as a positive step in forming the cassation appeal institution. They constitute self-limitation of the Supreme Court’s jurisdiction and are designed to relieve it from reviewing an excessive number of cases. Simultaneously, the current legal regulation of cassation filters (grounds for appealing court decisions) is far from ideal and needs to be improved, given the shortcomings highlighted in the study. The non-parties to the case, possessing the right to cassation appeal, are not always burdened with participation in the case. Using the example of prosecutor participation in the cassation proceedings, the author illustrates how national law confers such rights on persons who did not take part in the case.

scholarly journals Court Decision Publication and Judicial Reform Based on Electronic Court and Its Implication to Public Trust in Indonesia

2020 ◽  
pp. 365-373
Author(s):  
Amran Suadi
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Information Disclosure ◽  
Public Information ◽  
Public Trust ◽  
Appellate Court ◽  
Judicial Reform ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
General Description ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Right

This paper is motivated by the spirit of judicial reform in Indonesia in the reformation era. The right to access information on judicial institutions is an integral part of the constitutional rights that guaranteed by the Indonesian Constitution and must be fulfilled. The question proposed in this paper is how far the court decisions publication and judicial reform based on electronic courts implicated to increase public trust to judicial institutions in Indonesia? On the one hand, public information disclosure is a demand for democracy, transparency, and accountability of judicial institutions to gain the public trust. On the other hand, the level of public trust to the judicial institution is still low. The research objective is to provide a general description the judicial information system services based on electronic court through the Supreme Court Decisions Directory and its implication to increase the public trust to the judicial institutions in Indonesia. The results of this study indicate that the public can now easily access all court information ranging from case administration service procedures to issuing court decisions, which also has implications to increase the public trust to the judicial institutions itself. The evidence can be seen in the decision-making filing program in the last ten years, in which the Indonesian Supreme Court has also succeeded in publishing 4,661,021 court decisions, consisting of 4,403,428 at first-level court decisions, 123,995 at appellate court decisions, 100,863 at verdict decisions, and 32,735 at reconsi¬deration decisions.

scholarly journals Dopuszczalność orzeczenia przez sąd odwoławczy wyrokiem łącznym kary łącznej po raz pierwszy albo orzeczenia jej w zakresie innym niż orzekł sąd pierwszej instancji. Glosa do uchwały składu 7 sędziów Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 28 czerwca 2018 r. (I KZP 3/18, OSNKW 2018, nr 8, poz. 55)

2021 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 655
Author(s):  
Dawid Marko
Keyword(s):  
European Convention ◽  
Appellate Court ◽  
Political Rights ◽  
Appeal Court ◽  
Special Part ◽  
Civil And Political Rights ◽  
Court Proceedings ◽  
The Right ◽  
Court Of First Instance ◽  
First Time

<p>The commentary raises the problem of the admissibility of the issuing cumulative penalty in cumulative judgement by appeal court for the first time or issuing that penalty within the different scope of punishment, from the perspective of the power to alter decisions of a court of the first instance, the principle of two-instance court proceedings, access to court and the right of defence. By discussing the essence of the constitutional and convention provisions, the author attempts to answer the question what the scope of the appeal court’s power is to alter cumulative judgement issued in the first instance, by concluding that neither Article 176 (1) of the Polish Constitution, nor Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and Article 2 of Protocol no. 7 to the ECHR supplementing its content, as well as Article 14 (5) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights in principle stand in the way of such an approach, which should be reflected in the process of interpretation of Article 437 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. However, in the author’s opinion, doubts arise, from the perspective discussed above, if the appellate court were to take into account, when imposing the cumulative penalty, a unit judgement unknown, for various reasons, to the court of first instance, to which a special part of the considerations and critical remarks is devoted.</p>

scholarly journals Problematic aspects of the correlation of civil and tax legislation in the context of inheritance succession in tax legal relations

2019 ◽  
pp. 87-98
Author(s):  
Oleh Pecheniy
Keyword(s):  
Scientific Publication ◽  
Tax Law ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Tax Legislation ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Theory Of Law ◽  
Correct Application ◽  
The Right ◽  
Law Of Succession

In the article the analysis of the correlation of civil and tax legislation on the example of inheritance succession in tax legal relations. The problematic perspective of the interaction and influence of civil and tax law is one of the constant problems of the national legal system, which is modified under the influence of various factors. As this problem has been the subject of scientific research in the theory of law, relevant sectoral directions, the task of this scientific publication focuses on the issues of determining the ratio of civil and tax law in the interaction of hereditary and tax relations, burdened by succession in succession. The author probed the questions practice of courts in resolving disputes regarding the collection of tax debt in the event of the death of the defendant, procedural actions and court decisions. The author studies court decisions and relevant practice on closing the proceedings or refusing to open in the event of the death of the defendant, when the disputed tax relations do not allow succession. The article explores the application of civil legislation to relations that arose before entry into force. The features of the simplified production are examined in matters about an inheritance. In the article are formulated the signs of judicial cases about an inheritance and tax, related to subject composition, matter of action, inheritance time, other descriptions. The author affected the questions of forming of judicial practice, roles of Supreme Court in correct application of legislation courts about an inheritance. A circleof legally meaningful actions, which may be inherited from the side of subjectsof the inherited legal relationships, is outlined. Composition of inheritance, the right and obligations, whose carrier during the life was the testatorhimself, is analyzed. It is proved, that the composition of inheritance besidesrights and obligations can also includes possibilities and permissions, given bythe law. Key words: inheritance, heirs, tax legal relationship, law of succession.

Provision of the access to justice for consideration of criminal procedure dispute in the court of cassation

2021 ◽  
pp. 37-48
Author(s):  
Tatiana Topilina
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Time Constraint ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Access To Justice ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Right ◽  
Right Of Access ◽  
Court Hearing

This article analyzes the problems of exercising the right of access to justice for consideration of criminal procedure dispute in the court of cassation. The author examines the legislation of post-Soviet countries in terms of provision the access to justice for consideration of criminal procedure dispute in the court of cassation. The subject of this research is the norms of Russian and foreign legislation that regulate to right of access to justice in criminal proceedings. The object of this research is the legal relations that emerge in implementation of the right of access to justice. It its demonstrated that the restriction on access to justice for consideration of criminal procedure dispute in the court of cassation instance is the time constraint for filing cassation appeal for the convict; and for consideration of interlocutory court decisions &ndash; the procedure for assessing cassation appeal without holding a court hearing. The conclusion is substantiated on the need to waive the time constraint for filing cassation appeal for the convict against final court decisions that have entered into force, and for consideration of interim court decisions, the procedure for assessing cassation appeal against the interlocutory court decision should be eliminated without holding a court hearing.

Rule 242 Decision of the Court of Appeal

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tilmann Büttner
Keyword(s):  
Subject Matter ◽  
Legal Aspects ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Court Of First Instance ◽  
Court Of Appeal

Although the subject matter relevant for the appeal proceedings is limited pursuant to Rule 222, the obligation of the Court of Appeal to decide on the basis of the relevant subject matter is as comprehensive as that of the Court of First Instance. The Court of Appeal is not limited to merely reviewing legal aspects or to the cassation of decisions of first instance. It is a completely new instance on factual and legal matters.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document