Bibliometric Indicators of Publication Activities in Research Units of the Institute

This study analyzes the journal impact factor and related bibliometric indicators in Education and Educational Research (E&ER) category, highlighting the main differences among journal quartiles, using Web of Science (Social Sciences Citation Index, SSCI) as the data source. High impact journals (Q1) publish only slightly more papers than expected, which is different to other areas. The papers published in Q1 journal have greater average citations and lower uncitedness rates compared to other quartiles, although the differences among quartiles are lower than in other areas. The impact factor is only weakly negative correlated (r=-0.184) with the journal self-citation but strongly correlated with the citedness of the median journal paper (r= 0.864). Although this strong correlation exists, the impact factor is still far to be the perfect indicator for expected citations of a paper due to the high skewness of the citations distribution. This skewness was moderately correlated with the citations received by the most cited paper of the journal (r= 0.649) and the number of papers published by the journal (r= 0.484), but no important differences by journal quartiles were observed. In the period 2013–2018, the average journal impact factor in the E&ER has increased largely from 0.908 to 1.638, which is justified by the field growth but also by the increase in international collaboration and the share of papers published in open access. Despite their inherent limitations, the use of impact factors and related indicators is a starting point for introducing the use of bibliometric tools for objective and consistent assessment of researcher.

Download Full-text

Evaluating quality of science in CGIAR research programs: Use of bibliometrics

Outlook on Agriculture ◽

10.1177/00307270211024271 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 003072702110242

Author(s):

Max Rünzel ◽

Paolo Sarfatti ◽

Svetlana Negroustoueva

Keyword(s):

Review Process ◽

Research Output ◽

Monitoring And Evaluation ◽

Bibliometric Indicators ◽

Scientific Publications ◽

Practical Utilization ◽

Research Programs ◽

First Time ◽

Quality Of Research

When evaluating Quality of Science (QoS) in the context of development initiatives, it is essential to define adequate criteria. The objective of this perspective paper is to show how altmetric and bibliometric indicators have been used to support the evaluation of QoS in the 2020 Review of the Phase 2-CGIAR Research Programs (CRPs, 2017–2022), where, for the first time, the Quality of Research for Development (QoR4D) frame of reference has been utilized across the entire CGIAR CRP portfolio. Overall, the CRP review showed a significant output of scientific publications during the period 2017–2020, with 4,872 articles, 220,101 references, and 7.1 citations per article. Additionally, wider interest in scientific publications is demonstrated by good to high altmetrics, with average attention scores ranging from 70.8 to 806.9 with an average of 425.1. The use of selected bibliometrics was shown to be an adequate tool, for use together with other qualitative indicators to evaluate the QoS in the 12 CRPs. The CRP review process clearly demonstrated that standardized, harmonized and consistent data on research output is paramount to provide high-quality quantitative instruments and should be a priority throughout the transition toward One CGIAR. Therefore, we conclude that the QoR4D framework should be augmented by standardized bibliometric indicators embedded in measurement frameworks within the new One CGIAR. Finally, its practical utilization in monitoring and evaluation should be supported with clear guidelines.

Download Full-text

Relationship amongst ResearchGate altmetric indicators and Scopus bibliometric indicators

New Library World ◽

10.1108/nlw-03-2015-0017 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 116 (9/10) ◽

pp. 564-577 ◽

Cited By ~ 10

Author(s):

RISHABH SHRIVASTAVA ◽

Preeti Mahajan

Keyword(s):

Sample Size ◽

Correlation Coefficients ◽

Strong Positive Correlation ◽

Bibliometric Indicators ◽

Pearson’S Correlation ◽

Content Type ◽

Positive Correlation ◽

Pearson's Correlation ◽

Different Characteristics ◽

The Relationship

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is twofold. First, the study aims to investigate the relationship between the altmetric indicators from ResearchGate (RG) and the bibliometric indicators from the Scopus database. Second, the study seeks to examine the relationship amongst the RG altmetric indicators themselves. RG is a rich source of altmetric indicators such as Citations, RGScore, Impact Points, Profile Views, Publication Views, etc. Design/methodology/approach – For establishing whether RG metrics showed the same results as the established sources of metrics, Pearson’s correlation coefficients were calculated between the metrics provided by RG and the metrics obtained from Scopus. Pearson’s correlation coefficients were also calculated for the metrics provided by RG. The data were collected by visiting the profile pages of all the members who had an account in RG under the Department of Physics, Panjab University, Chandigarh (India). Findings – The study showed that most of the RG metrics showed strong positive correlation with the Scopus metrics, except for RGScore (RG) and Citations (Scopus), which showed moderate positive correlation. It was also found that the RG metrics showed moderate to strong positive correlation amongst each other. Research limitations/implications – The limitation of this study is that more and more scientists and researchers may join RG in the future, therefore the data may change. The study focuses on the members who had an account in RG under the Department of Physics, Panjab University, Chandigarh (India). Perhaps further studies can be conducted by increasing the sample size and by taking a different sample size having different characteristics. Originality/value – Being an emerging field, not much has been conducted in the area of altmetrics. Very few studies have been conducted on the reach of academic social networks like RG and their validity as sources of altmetric indicators like RGScore, Impact Points, etc. The findings offer insights to the question whether RG can be used as an alternative to traditional sources of bibliometric indicators, especially with reference to a rapidly developing country such as India.

Download Full-text

EDITOR’S PAGE. THE RESEARCH PUBLISHED IN OIL SHALE: HOW IT LOOKS IN BIBLIOMETRIC INDICATORS

Oil Shale ◽

10.3176/oil.2011.4.01 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 28 (4) ◽

pp. 467

Author(s):

V KALM

Keyword(s):

Oil Shale ◽

Bibliometric Indicators

Download Full-text

Bibliometric indicators of university research performance in Flanders

Journal of the American Society for Information Science ◽

10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(1998)49:1<59::aid-asi8>3.0.co;2-2 ◽

1998 ◽

Vol 49 (1) ◽

pp. 59-67 ◽

Cited By ~ 24

Author(s):

Herman Van den Berghe ◽

Josee A. Houben ◽

Renger E. de Bruin ◽

Henk F. Moed ◽

André Kint ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Research Performance ◽

University Research ◽

Bibliometric Indicators

Download Full-text

Bibliometric Assessment of Research Conference Effectiveness: on the proceedings of Ryazan Pedagogical Readings (2015-2020)

Психолого-педагогический поиск ◽

10.37724/rsu.2021.58.2.001 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 7-16

Author(s):

Т.В. Еременко

Keyword(s):

Conference Proceedings ◽

Citation Index ◽

Publication Rate ◽

Minor Effect ◽

Bibliometric Indicators ◽

Russian Science ◽

Russian Science Citation Index ◽

History Of ◽

Pedagogical Research ◽

A Minor

В статье представлены результаты исследования, цель которого заключалась в оценке результативности Рязанских педагогических чтений как формы научной коммуникации с применением метода библиометрического анализа. Основными критериями анализа выступили структура массива публикаций в сборниках трудов конференции и структура массива цитирований трудов конференции. Распределение публикаций и их цитирований проведено с использованием в совокупности шести библиометрических индикаторов. Эмпирическую базу исследования составила подборка из 500 записей, сформированная путем поиска в РИНЦ и включившая статьи сборников конференции за период с 2015 по 2020 год. В результате библиометрического анализа была обнаружена «скачущая динамика» развития Рязанских педагогических чтений, раскрыта география научных связей данного мероприятия c наблюдаемым доминированием авторов-рязанцев, выявлен слабый эффект воздействия продуцируемого на этой конференции научного знания на развитие педагогических исследований и оценен ареал цитирования трудов конференции в научной периодике. The article presents the results of a research whose aim was to assess the effectiveness a scholarly conference Ryazan Pedagogical Readings through bibliometric assessment. The analysis encompasses such parameters as the corpus of articles published in the proceedings of the conference and citation index. The author employs six bibliometric indicators to assess the citation index and the publication rate. The research assesses 500 references cited within the Russian Science Citation Index database (conference proceedings of 2015–2020). Bibliometric analysis shows erratic dynamics in the history of Ryazan Pedagogical Readings, assesses the geography of research connections, reveals the prevalence of Ryazan researchers, detects a minor effect of the conference on the development of pedagogical research, performs citation analysis of journals.

Download Full-text

Bibliometric Study of Scientific Productivity on the Impacts on Mental Health in Times of Pandemic

Medicina ◽

10.3390/medicina58010024 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 58 (1) ◽

pp. 24

Author(s):

Luz Marina Caballero-Apaza ◽

Rubén Vidal-Espinoza ◽

Silvia Curaca-Arroyo ◽

Rossana Gomez-Campos ◽

Zaida Callata-Gallegos ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Mental Health ◽

Mental Health Problems ◽

Scientific Productivity ◽

The United States ◽

Bibliometric Indicators ◽

National Library ◽

Multicenter Studies ◽

Pubmed Database ◽

Number Of Publications ◽

Language Of Publication

Background and Objectives: The presence of the new SARS-CoV-2 virus is causing enormous threats to people’s health and lives, so quantifying the scientific productivity on mental health in times of pandemic is an urgent need, especially to expand the degree of knowledge on mental health problems in regions of low scientific productivity. The aim was to characterize the bibliometric indicators of scientific productivity on mental health during the pandemic in the PubMed Identifier database of the National Library of Medicine in the United States. Materials and Methods: A documentary study (bibliometric) of the scientific productivity on mental health in times of pandemic from January 2020 to June 2021 was carried out. The PubMed database was used to abstract the information from the original scientific articles. The data abstracted were: authors, year of publication, journal name, country, and language of publication. Results: We identified 47 original articles worldwide, which were published in 29 journals and in three languages (English, Spanish, and German). We observed three groups of countries that published on mental health topics. The first group comprised the largest number of publications, which were multicenter studies (six studies), followed by India (five studies), and Italy (four studies). A second group comprised Bangladesh, China, USA, and Spain, with 3 studies each; and a third group comprised 13 countries (Albania, Saudi Arabia, Argentina, Brazil, South Korea, Denmark, Ecuador, Egypt, Greece, Japan, Jordan, Kuwait, and New Zealand) with one study each. Conclusions: Bibliometric indicators of scientific productivity on mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic have ostensibly increased. We verified 47 studies in PubMed, which could serve to improve the understanding and management of COVID-19, as well as serve as a thought-provoking means for other countries and researchers to publish on the state of mental health during and post pandemic.

Download Full-text

BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF PUBLISHED LITERATURE ON TAXATION IN MALAYSIA, BASED ON SCOPUS DATABASE

Vol 10 No 1 (2020) - Journal of Business Management and Accounting ◽

10.32890/jbma2021.11.1.4 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 11 (Number 1) ◽

pp. 59-86

Author(s):

Abba Ya’u ◽

Natrah Saad

Keyword(s):

Bibliometric Analysis ◽

Subject Area ◽

Search Term ◽

Bibliometric Indicators ◽

Research Papers ◽

Research Grants ◽

Publish Or Perish ◽

Tax Practitioners ◽

Scopus Database ◽

Universiti Utara Malaysia

Taxation research has received considerable attention from many scholars, practitioners and policymakers across the globe. Many scholars have also conducted research on taxation in the Malaysian context. However, papers that track the trends of such research are scanty in the existing literature. The aim of this study is to review the trend and frequencies of published literature on taxation in Malaysia based on the Scopus database using the search term “Malaysia and tax”. The design of the study is bibliometric analysis. As of 23rd September 2020, a total of 88 documents were retrieved and analysed using Excel, Hazing’s Publish or Perish and VOSviewer software. Based on the standard bibliometric indicators, this paper reports the research papers and source types, years and language of publications, subject area, most active institutions, most active sources’ titles, keywords, authorship, abstract, title analysis and citation analysis. Findings revealed that there is an increase in growth rate of literature on studies related to taxation in the Malaysian context from 1977 to 2020 published in the Scopos database. The publications reached an all-time peak in 2016 to 2017 but significantly dropped in 2018 and 2019 based on the data retrieved from the Scopus database. The findings further show that Universiti Teknologi MARA is the most influential institution with 18.18% of the total documents retrieved, followed by Universiti Utara Malaysia with 9.1% respectively. Additional findings of the study show that Advance Science Letters is the highest source title with 14.71% of the published documents. The finding also indicates that Adhikari, Derashid and Zhang (2006) are the most influential authors with 187 citations as at 23rd September 2020. The research is limited to the literatures published in Scopus database, other database were not covered in this study. Malaysian policymakers should provide more research grants to tax practitioners and academicians to increase the level of publications in this field.

Download Full-text