scholarly journals Tinjauan Yuridis Penerapan Tindakan Keberi Kimia Terhadap Pelaku Persetubuhan Pada Anak Di Kejaksaan Negeri Kabupaten Bogor (Studi Kasus Perkara Atas Nama Hendra Iskandar dengan Nomor Berkas Perkara: B/60/X/2018/Reskrim)

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fahmi Azis ◽  
Febby Irwani ◽  
Bayu Eka Putra ◽  
Vikram Surya Husada

Indonesia has ratified the Convention on the Rights of the Child which means that Indonesia is bound by international law to implement provisions in the CRC to adopt legislative, administrative and programmatic measures to ensure children's rights are realized with the issuance of Government Regulation in Lieu of Law Number 1 Year 2016 which was passed into law as the second revision to Child Protection Law Number 23 of 2002 on Child Protection. The ratification of Government Regulation in Lieu of Law Number 1 Year 2016 is a form of crunch against the high cases of child sex abuse because the criminal sanctions imposed on perpetrators of child sexual abuse have not had a deterrent effect and have not been able to comprehensively prevent the occurrence of sexual violence against children, so it is necessary to immediately amend Law Number 23 of 2002 on Child Protection. Government Regulation in Lieu of Law Number 1 Year 2016 imposes sanctions for perpetrators of sexual crimes that add to the basic penalty of death and life imprisonment and additional criminal acts of chemical castration, the addition of provisions on the act of chemical castration is a form of legal reform because punishing violators with the death penalty is no longer constitutional and those who are released often return and end up in prison, therefore it is necessary to find other rule of law and humane methods to treat these offenders.

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 53
Author(s):  
Subaidah Ratna Juita

<p>Penjatuhan sanksi pidana terhadap pelaku kejahatan kesusilaan pada anak di Indonesia belum seimbang dengan dampak yang ditimbulkannya. Adapun anak sebagai korban dari kejahatan kesusilaan tentu mengalami trauma yang berkepanjangan hingga dewasa bahkan seumur hidupnya. Salah satu upaya yang dapat ditempuh dalam menghadapi problematika penegakan hukum adalah dengan cara pembenahan sistem hukum. Oleh karna itu perlu adanya pembaharuan sanksi pidana bagi pelaku kejahatan kesusilaan sebagai bagian dari sistem hukum. Pembaharuan ini perlu dilakukan karena sanksi pidana yang ada saat ini tidak memberikan efek jera bagi pelaku. Upaya pembaruan hukum pidana yang berkaitan dengan sanksi pidana dalam kasus kejahatan kesusilaan pada anak dapat ditelusuri berdasarkan perumusan sanksi pidana berdasarkan KUHP, UU Nomor 23 Tahun 2002 tentang Perlindungan Anak, UU Nomor 35 Tahun 2014 tentang perubahan pertama atas UU Nomor 23 Tahun 2002 tentang Perlindungan Anak, dan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang (Perppu) No. 1 Tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2002 tentang Perlindungan Anak. Dengan demikian tulisan ini secara fokus mengkaji urgensi pembaharuan hukum pidana, khususnya hukum pidana materiil tentang sanksi pidana bagi pelaku kejahatan seksual dalam rangka untuk memberikan perlindungan pada anak korban kejahatan seksual.</p><p><em>The imposition of criminal sanctions against the perpetrators of morality in children in Indonesia has not been balanced by its impact. As for the child as a victim of crime decency certainly traumatized prolonged until adulthood even a lifetime. One effort that can be taken in dealing with the problem of law enforcement is to reform the legal system. By because it is necessary to reform criminal sanctions for the perpetrators of decency as part of the legal system. These reforms need to be done because there is a criminal sanction which does not currently provide a deterrent effect on perpetrators. Efforts to reform the criminal law relating to criminal sanctions in cases of crimes of morality in children can be traced by the formulation of criminal sanctions under the penal law, Law No. 23 of 2002 on Child Protection, Law No. 35 of 2014 on the First Amendment of Law No. 23 of 2002 on Child Protection, and Government Regulation in Lieu of Law (Perppu) Number 1 Year 2016 Concerning Second Amendment Act No. 23 of 2002 about Child Protection. So this paper examines the urgency updates operating focus criminal law, especially criminal law substantive about criminal sanctions for dader of sexual crimes in order to provide protection for child victims of sexual crimes.</em></p><p> </p>


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 121-132
Author(s):  
Krismiyarsi Krismiyarsi

In Article 28 B paragraph (2) of the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, it is stated that the State guarantees the rights of children to survival, to grow and develop and to protect them from violence and discrimination. Along with the rapid flow of globalization and the negative impact of the development of information technology and telecommunications, sexual violence against children is increasing. The Indonesian Child Protection Commission (KPAI), stated that in 2015 there were 218 cases, in 2016 there were 120 cases, and in 2017 there were 116 cases. To address the phenomenon of sexual violence against children, the President of Indonesia issued a Government Regulation in Lieu of Law No. 17 of 2016, which was subsequently upgraded to Law namely Law No. 17 of 2016 concerning Stipulation of Government Regulation in lieu of Law No. 1 of 2016 concerning the second Amendment to Law No. 23 of 2002 concerning Child Protection becomes Law. The contents of criminal offenses against perpetrators of criminal acts of sexual violence against children can be subject to additional criminal sanctions in the form of announcing the identity of the perpetrators, and can be subjected to acts of chemical castration accompanied by rehabilitation and installation of electronic detectors. The basic consideration for the issuance of this Perppu is to minimize sexual crimes, give a deterrent effect to perpetrators of sexual crimes and prevent any intention for anyone to commit sexual crimes. However, the issuance of this Perppu invites pros and cons of how to implement it, considering that until now there has been no further Government Regulation regulating, especially the Indonesian Medical Association has refused to do chemical castration. This paper wants to explore the existence of the Perppu seen from the study of criminal law politics.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 145-164
Author(s):  
Endik Wahyudi ◽  
Gerry Gerry Joe

The crime of sexual violence in Indonesia is increasing every year. Criminal penalties for perpetrators of sexual violence as stated in the Penal Code and Child Protection Act were considered ineffective until the Government issued The Replacement Government Regulation No. 1 of 2016 that applies criminal sanctions to perpetrators of sexual violence among others by chemically applying castration. This is the background to conducting normative research on the policy of chemicalbirth sanction formulations that apply in Indonesia today. His arrangement of chemical castration and rehabilitation as an additional punishment, to date has not been published, so the mechanisms and technicalities are unknown. In addition, interested sectors are not involved in the establishment of such rules resulting in rejection as executors.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 769
Author(s):  
Kevin Setiawan ◽  
Aji Wibowo

Sexual crime is happening in various countries, especially in Indonesia. In general, sexual crimes, especially against children, are a concern by the government because when a child becomes a victim of sexual crimes it can cause life-long trauma and at worst, death. Therefore, the preventive ways has been arranged by the Governement in Law of Republic Indonesia Number 17 of 2016 concerning Determination of Substitute Government Regulations in Law of Republic Indonesia Number 1 of 2016 concerning the second amandement of Law number 23 of 2002 Regarding Child Protection where there are sanctions for chemical castration against perpetrators who commit sexual crimes against children, in order to provide a punishment that can make a deterrent effect on someone who commits sexual crimes against children. However, in the determination of sanctions for the act of chemical castration, the community and various parties have contradictions where it must be seen in terms of the human rights of the perpetrator and the effectiveness of the sanctions.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-63
Author(s):  
Debora Anggie Noviana ◽  
Bambang Waluyo ◽  
Rosalia Dika Agustanti

 AbstrakPelaksanaan Kebiri Kimia merupakan hukuman yang baru di Indonesia, terjadi pro kontra terkait pelaksanaan tindakan tersebut, dari salah satu sisi pelaksanaan pidana kebiri diharapkan mampu memberikan efek jera bagi pelaku kekerasan seksual pada anak dan juga menjadi salah satu bentuk pencegahan agar tidak kembali terjadi kasus yang sama, serta diharapkan agar dapat mengurangi tingkat kejahatan seksual terhadap anak. Penelitian ini hendak mengkaji pelaksanaan kebiri kimia dilihat dari perspektif yuridis dan kedokteran. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif. Pendekatan masalah dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus, sumber utama berasal dari literatur serta menggunakan sumber data sekunder yang dianalisis secara kualitatif. Dengan masih banyaknya pro kontra yang terjadi terkait penerapan eksekusi kebiri kimia yang dikarenakan Ikatan Dokter Indonesia (IDI) menolak untuk melakukan eksekusi karena alasan kemanusiaan. Perlu adanya peraturan yang mengatur mengenai pelaksanaan eksekusi kebiri kimia agar dapat memberikan kepastian hukum dan keadilan baik bagi korban dan juga pelaku pelecehan seksual pada anak, dan juga  memberikan dasar hukum yang sah bagi eksekutor kebiri kimia yaitu dokter untuk melakukan eksekusi kebiri kimia tersebut tanpa harus bertentangan dengan kode etik kedokteran sehingga pidana kebiri kimia dapat segera diberlakukan secara lebih efektif sesuai dengan tujuannya yaitu menggurangi angka kasus kekerasan seksual pada anak di Indonesia. Kata Kunci : Kebiri Kimia, Perlindungan anak, Pidana AbstractThe implementation of castration chemistry is a new punishment in Indonesia, there are pros and cons related to the implementation of these actions, from one side of the implementation of castration criminal is expected to be able to provide a deterrent effect for perpetrators of sexual violence against children and also be a form of prevention so as not to re-occur the same case , and is expected to be able to reduce the level of sexual crimes against children. This study wants to examine the implementation of chemical castration from a juridical and medical perspective. The research method used is normative juridical. Approach the problem by using the legislative approach and case approach, the main source comes from the literature and uses secondary data sources that are analyzed qualitatively. With the many pros and cons that occur related to the implementation of chemical castration execution due to the Indonesian Doctors Association (IDI) refused to carry out executions due to humanitarian reasons. There is a need for regulations governing the implementation of chemical castration execution in order to provide legal certainty and justice for both victims and also perpetrators of sexual abuse on children, and also provide a legal basis for chemical castration executors namely doctors to carry out chemical castration execution without having to contradict with a code of ethics in medicine so that the chemical castration crime can be immediately applied more effectively in accordance with its goal of reducing the number of cases of sexual violence against children in Indonesia.Keywords: Chemical castration, child protection, criminal


2018 ◽  
Vol 52 ◽  
pp. 00006
Author(s):  
Azmiati Zuliah ◽  
Madiasa Ablisar

The criminal act against children is a gross violation of human rights. The criminal act committed by the offenderis intolerable because it can affect their survival as well as growth and development. Therefore, the victim deserves legal protection. Restitution is one of forms of protection and fulfillment of the rights of the child to compensate any damages. So far, child victim of criminal act suffers not only material loss (countable) but also immaterial loss (uncountable) such as shame, loss of self-esteem, depression and/or traumatic anxiety.It is the fact that so far the rights of child victims to restitution are very often violated. Therefore, the child victim and his or her family feel that they do not given justice. It is hoped Government Regulation Number 43 Year 2017 will be able to give legal certainty to the victim to ensure that he or she can enjoy his or her rights to restitution for any loss he or she suffers as stipulated in Law Number 35 Year 2014 on the Revision of Law Number 23 Year 2002 on Child Protection. This research uses theory of justice as grand theory, law enforcement as middle range theory and theory of victimology as applied theory.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 201
Author(s):  
Louisa Elsie Heathcote

In 2016, the Indonesian government enacted Government Regulation in Lieu of Law Number 1 of the year 2016, adapted into Law number 17 of the year 2016. This regulation introduces chemical castration as a criminal sanction for child sex offenders, spurring human rights concerns. This article aims to assess whether chemical castration constitutes cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment from the perspective of Article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and whether such a human rights violation can be justified. This article employs the normative research method, studying principles of law, systems of law, the synchronization of the law, the history of the law and policies, and laws in comparison to one another. The article bases its findings on laws, books, journals, judgments, and other documents.This article finds that firstly, chemical castration constitutes cruel, degrading, or inhuman treatment and secondly, that such a violation can be justified according to the limitations of human rights. The significance of this article is the basis for the increased limitation of human rights to advance the cause of child protection.


2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 41
Author(s):  
M Nur Rasyid

<p class="Authors"><em>The government has obligation to protect the rights of the child. In the second amendment of Indonesian Constitution of 1945 in 2000 it was added one chapter, namely Chapter XA on human rights. The rights of the child is incorporated in the Article 28B that stipulated every child entitles to life, growth, develop and to get protection from violence and discrimination.</em></p><p class="Authors"><em>The problem is how the legislative measure of the rights of the child as the implementation of Article 28B. The data were obtained through library research consist of acts related to protection and judiciary of the rights of the child and the related conventions.</em></p><em>The result of the research shows that the government has undertaken legislative measures by making act on child protection, Act Number 23 of 2002 on child protection that has been revised as Act Number 35 of 2014, and the second revision by Act Number 17 of 2016  following the Government Regulation substituted  Act Number 1 of 2016. Act Number 3 of 1997 has been revised on Child Judiciary become Act Number 11 of 2012 on Child Criminal Justice System. It needs synchronization of various related regulations and capacity building for the institutions of child protection.</em>


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-34
Author(s):  
Messy Rachel Mariana Hutapea

Children are still victims of sexual violence by perpetrators who are stronger than victims. Children who are victims of sexual violence have a negative impact on the psychic and mental, so that children will have trauma that is difficult to be eliminated or even prolonged trauma. So that the government established the Law Number 17 of 2016 concerning the Establishment of the Government Regulation in Lieu of Law Number 1 of 2016 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 23 of 2002 concerning Child Protection into Law. In the laws and regulations, it has been regulated regarding the castration penalty of chemistry. Indonesia is a country that still upholds all human rights possessed by every community in Indonesia without discrimination. This chemical castration execution raises the pros and cons in people's lives. So this chemical castration is considered to have violated the Human Rights of perpetrators of sexual violence against children. This research wants to dig deeper about the use of chemical castration punishment in perpetrators of recurrent crimes in the human rights perspective. This study uses normative research methods with conceptual and legislative approaches. Chemical castration has not been one of the effective penalties and provides a deterrent for perpetrators of sexual violence, so the laws governing chemical castration punishment need to be reviewed.Anak masih menjadi korban kekerasan seksual yang dilakukan oleh para pelaku yang lebih kuat dari korban. Anak yang menjadi korban kekerasan seksual mendapatkan dampak yang negatif terhadap psikis dan batinnya, sehingga anak akan memiliki trauma yang susah untuk dihilangkan atau bahkan trauma tersebut berkepanjangan. Sehingga pemerintah membentuk peraturan Undang-Undang Nomor 17 tahun 2016 tentang Penetapan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 1 tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Undang-undang Nomor 23 tahun 2002 tentang Perlindungan Anak menjadi Undang-Undang. Didalam peraturan perundang-undangan tersebut, telah diatur tentang hukuman kebiri kimia. Indonesia adalah negara yang masih menjunjung setiap Hak Asasi Manusia yang dimiliki oleh setiap masyarakat di Indonesia tanpa adanya diskriminasi. Eksekusi kebiri kimia ini menimbulkan pro dan kontra didalam kehidupan masyarakat. Sehingga kebiri kimia ini dianggap telah melanggar Hak Asasi Manusia dari pelaku kekerasan seksual terhadap anak. Penelitian ini ingin menggali lebih dalam tentang penggunaan hukuman kebiri kimia pada pelaku kejahatan berulang dalam persektif hak asasi manusia. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian normative dengan endekatan konseptual dan perundang-undangan. Kebiri kimia belum menjadi salah satu hukuman yang efektif dan membuat jera untuk pelaku kekerasan seksual, Sehingga undang-undang yang mengatur tentang hukuman kebiri kimia perlu dikaji ulang.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 196
Author(s):  
Mompang L Panggabean

<p>The act of chemical castration is now one of the sanctions in Indonesia's positive law. However, it is still limited to child protection based on Law Number 17 of 2016, which can be imposed on perpetrators of sexual crimes against children if the victim is more than one person, is seriously injured, has mental disorders, suffers from infectious diseases, reproductive system disorders, and lose their life. This paper analyzes criminal policy and people's reactions to castration concerning the objectives of punishment. This research is doctrinal research as prescriptive research using a legal approach regarding legal categories regarding castration, the relationship between rules, difficulties that arise and predicting future developments on criminal policy regarding castration in positive law as one of the new sanctions in the criminal system. The results of the study is that the birth of chemical castration in criminal policy reform is based on a balance between the interests of child victims of sexual crimes and perpetrators of crime, but its existence in positive law does not necessarily make the whole community accept even though the pros and cons of castration are still balanced based on the purpose of punishment based on Pancasila. The recommendations put forward are the need for socialization of castration for all levels of society in a balance between the interests of child victims of sexual crimes and the interests of criminals, increasing non-penal efforts and the application of selective castration sanctions, and providing assistance for child victims of sexual crimes.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document