Training To Ensure Healthy Child Day-Care Programs

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 94 (6) ◽  
pp. 1108-1110
Author(s):  
Abby Shapiro Kendrick

Training in child care assumes a number of forms. There is pre-service training (needed before entering the field); orientation training (received when first on the job, highlighting the most essential skills, tasks and knowledge needed to begin the job); and ongoing training (required by regulation or recommended periodically for current staff). Despite the fact that training is known to have a positive effect on the field of early care and education, the current training system is fraught with problems. A 1991 national survey conducted by the Wheelock College Center for Career Development in Early Care and Education found that at least one of three key informants in 59% of states said "training is fragmented, random, scattershot, and not based on the needs of the field."1 The licensing system requires minimal training and experience. For teachers in child-care centers, five states require no training, four states require pre-service training, 29 states require only ongoing training, and 14 states require both pre-service and ongoing training. Few states require more than 10 hours of annual ongoing training for any child-care professionals. For family child-care providers, the numbers are even lower: 24 states require no training and only 12 states require annual ongoing training.1 If first aid and cardiaopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) certification are required, there is little time for any other training. In addition to limited funds to support training and limited incentives for providers, administrators, on funders to invest in training, other well-known barriers to implementing systematic and coordinated training efforts include the following items:

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 213-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katie Loth ◽  
Amy Shanafelt ◽  
Cynthia Davey ◽  
Allison Anfinson ◽  
Marguerite Zauner ◽  
...  

Licensed child care providers, and the early care and education settings in which they operate, are uniquely situated to influence children’s healthy eating and physical activity through practices, attitudes, and supportive physical and social environments. However, preliminary research indicates that child-, family-, and provider-level characteristics affect adherence to best practices across early care and education settings. The current article used survey data ( n = 618) to characterize differences in child care providers’ adherence to nutrition, physical activity, and mealtime best practices, based on child-, family- and provider-level characteristics, and to describe secular trends in adherence to nutrition and physical activity best practices between 2010 and 2016. Results indicate that differences exist across certain characteristics, including child race/ethnicity, family’s use of child care assistance, language spoken at home, and provider educational attainment; however, it is notable that in most cases providers serving children of minority race and children in low-income families have a higher rate of compliance with the nutrition and physical activity best practices studied. Additionally, the comparison of adherence to best practices from 2010 to 2016 suggests that, while there was an increase in mean adherence from 2010 to 2016, overall trends in adherence across child-, family- and provider-level characteristics have been consistent across time. Public health professionals should continue to advocate for opportunities for providers to learn how to best incorporate best practices within their setting (e.g., education and training opportunities) as well as for the development and adoption of systems-level changes (e.g., expansion of food assistance programs) to reduce barriers to adherence to best practices.


2020 ◽  
pp. 105381512093965
Author(s):  
Alison Hooper ◽  
Rena Hallam

This study examines the prevalence of home-based child care providers who report serving at least one child whom they identify as having a disability. Although many families choose home-based child care, researchers know very little about how many home-based providers care for young children with disabilities. Through secondary analysis of the National Survey of Early Care and Education (NSECE) data about home-based child care providers, we examined the prevalence and predictors of serving children with provider-reported disabilities among listed and unlisted home-based providers. Descriptive analyses showed that 21.7% of listed providers, 20.5% of unlisted paid providers, and 10.1% of unlisted unpaid providers reported serving at least one child whom they identified as having a disability. These providers reported relatively low rates of connecting families to outside resources and utilizing outside resources to support them in their work with children. Providers who reported higher enrollment and who received child care subsidies were more likely to report serving a child with a disability.


2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jo Anne Kock ◽  
Olga Soto ◽  
Murial Sanders

2021 ◽  
pp. 0192513X2110223
Author(s):  
Adrienne M. Davidson ◽  
Samantha Burns ◽  
Delaine Hampton ◽  
Linda White ◽  
Michal Perlman

Many children in Canada and the United States experience poor-quality child care on a regular basis. Under the rubric of “parent choice,” governments continue to permit a variety of licensed care providers (centers and homes) as well as unlicensed home child care providers. Research suggests, however, that parents are not well-informed consumers about child care services, unaware of even the basic characteristics of their child’s care. In this study, we provide findings from a latent profile analysis based on a conjoint survey conducted in Toronto, Canada to better understand the factors that influence parents’ decisions in selecting child care services. Based on responses from over 700 parents, we identify five classes of parents that reflect a range of preferences in selecting child care. However, most groups show a strong preference for licensed early childhood education and care (ECEC) options. Limitations of this study and implications for policy are discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document