Advanced Care Planning for Children With Special Health Care Needs: A Survey of Parental Attitudes

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 97 (5) ◽  
pp. 682-687
Author(s):  
Robert H. Wharton ◽  
Karen R. Levine ◽  
Stephen Buka ◽  
Linda Emanuel

Objectives. This study explored parental attitudes about their interactions with their children's providers when decision making involved critical life situations. We evaluated parents' attitudes regarding the following questions: What was the parents' understanding of their children's health care issues, and what was the parental perception of the professionals' understanding of their children and of themselves? Who should be the principal decision makers for the children? What was the parents' knowledge about advance directives? Did parents want to participate in a process of advance planning to assist with critical life decision making for their children? Methods. We surveyed all parents attending a conference sponsored by the Massachusetts Department of Public Health for parents of children with special needs. The questionnaire was provided to all parents attending the conference. An announcement was made at the conference requesting parental participation. The 76 respondents constitute a convenience sample of parents of children with special needs sufficient for this preliminary stage of investigation. Results. Of 177 parents attending the conference, 76 (43%) completed the questionnaire. Eighty-eight percent of the participants strongly agreed that they understood their children's conditions. Twenty-one percent stated that they had sufficient understanding of their children's future medical needs, and 21% thought that they had a sufficient understanding of their children's developmental potential. Ninety-nine percent of parents strongly agreed that physicians should share information with parents no matter how serious or potentially upsetting. Ninety-four percent of those parents who thought that their children's physicians understood their own needs also thought that the physicians understood their children's needs. In contrast, only half (55%) of those parents who thought the physicians did not understand their needs thought the physicians understood their children's needs. Ninety-two percent of parents who thought that the physicians understood their needs agreed that the physicians would make the best decisions in crises versus 60% of those who did not think the physicians understood their needs. Seventy-four percent stated that they would consider written guidelines for their children that dealt with critical life situations. All parents who thought their children's conditions were not understood wanted written guidelines. Of those parents who had thought their children would not survive (15 parents), 94% wanted written guidelines. All seven parents who had been told their children would not survive wanted written guidelines. Conclusions. Parents in this study were generally satisfied with care being provided to their children. Nevertheless, the results clearly suggest goals that could lead to improved capacity for parents and providers to make critical life decisions for and with children. First, physicians must understand the needs of parents to be able to make decisions that would be in the children's best interests. Second, parents should participate fully in critical life decisions for their children and should use written guidelines to assist with the process of these critical life decisions. Our findings strongly support the development of a longitudinal process, initiated early after the onset or discovery of illness and maintained longitudinally throughout the course of a child's illness, to help parents and providers work together in this vital area of health care to children.

2003 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 233-243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sylvie Naar-King ◽  
Patricia T. Siegel ◽  
Marilynn Smyth ◽  
Pippa Simpson

2004 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Bailey

Life saving or life sustaining treatment may not be instigated in the clinical setting when such treatment is deemed to be futile and therefore not in the patient’s best interests. The concept of futility, however, is related to many assumptions about quality and quantity of life, and may be relied upon in a manner that is ethically unjustifiable. It is argued that the concept of futility will remain of limited practical use in making decisions based on the best interests principle because it places such high demands on the individual responsible for decision making. This article provides a critical analysis of futility (in the context of the best interests decision-making principle), and proposes an ethically defensible notion of futility.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 80-98
Author(s):  
M. Amin ◽  
Ahmad Syafi’i ◽  
Ainna Amalia FN ◽  
Lely Ana Ferawati Ekaningsih

Children with special needs require individualized learning services based on the problems they have. Teachers are required to have sufficient capacity in providing services to children with special needs, the services given must be different from the children in general. Especially in designing learning, teachers should accommodate the needs of the team teaching. Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Badrussalam Surabaya is a relatively new pioneering school of inclusion, so the teacher needs to be strengthened with intensive mentoring capacity. As a result, the concept of curriculum integration, lesson plans integration, and the integration of three components of teachers, special assistance teacher, classroom teachers, and subject teachers, who have been assisting children with special needs students can establish more intensive communication and collaboration and mutually reinforcing between one and Others. Teachers provide constructive feedback on the best interests of providing the best service for the students of children with special needs. Each teacher has already felt that the students with the special needs are a shared responsibility, unable to grow only to classroom teachers or Children with special needs only.


2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 251-254
Author(s):  
Sobha Kuriakose ◽  
Soumya Rajan ◽  
Bobby J Varghese ◽  
Firoz Asharaf ◽  
Suprasidh Suprakasam ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 0272989X2110041
Author(s):  
Anja K. Köther ◽  
Katharina U. Siebenhaar ◽  
Georg W. Alpers

Objective The COVID-19 pandemic pushed some of the most well-developed health care systems to their limits. In many cases, this has challenged patient-centered care. We set out to examine individuals’ attitudes toward shared decision making (SDM) and to identify predictors of participation preference during the pandemic. Methods We conducted an online survey with a large convenience sample ( N = 1061). Our main measures of interest were participants’ generic and COVID-19–related participation preference as well as their acceptance and distress regarding a triage vignette. We also assessed anxiety, e-health literacy, and aspects of participants’ health. We conducted group comparisons and multiple linear regression analyses on participation preference as well as triage acceptance. Results In generic decision making, most participants expressed a strong need for information and a moderate participation preference. In the hypothetical case of COVID-19 infection, most preferred physician-led decisions. Generic participation preference was the strongest predictor of COVID-19–related participation preference, followed by age, education, and anxiety. Furthermore, both higher generic and COVID-19–related participation preferences predicted lower triage acceptance. Conclusion Our findings demonstrate potential health care recipients’ attitudes toward SDM during a severe health care crisis and emphasize that participation preference varies according to the context.


2020 ◽  
pp. 247-254
Author(s):  
Cory Ellen Nourie

Pediatrics, by nature, is focused on treating children and their adult caregivers. With deliberate interdisciplinary supports such as therapy services, social work, and the Child Life, pediatrics is designed with the recognition that the patient is rarely autonomous and instead requires the opinions and decision-making of adult caregivers, most often family members. Trained in developmental approaches and pediatric-onset conditions, pediatric teams are the experts and go-to resource for families with children and adolescents with special health care or ongoing medical needs. This chapter addresses what to consider as the patient grows older and moves away from pediatric-based care.


2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 172-183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hazel Biggs

AbstractHealth-care law presents numerous challenges to the conception of the law as a dispassionate arbiter of disputes or protector of rights. Issues relating to end-of-life care, the assessment of mental capacity and decision-making for those who lack capacity, amongst others, epitomise the complex nature of health-care law. They also raise globally applicable questions about discrimination, or equal protection, as well as concerns for relief of suffering, the assessment of best interests and the exercise of individual autonomy. This paper will evaluate the extent to which law's traditional objectivity (dispassion) is undermined by the introduction of concerns about compassion into judicial and executive decisions. Focusing primarily on the law in England and Wales, but with reference to multi-jurisdictional case-law and international instruments, it will consider whether the law provides compassionate approaches and outcomes in end-of-life decision-making, and the implications of compassion for legal certainty.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document