scholarly journals ILMU ALLAH BERBANDING ILMU MANUSIA (Studi Deskriptif Ayat-ayat Alquran)

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 37-44
Author(s):  
Muhammad Rezi

The growth of sciences responses the growth of human brain. As mankind,human being gifted by God many bounties and special features more than other Hiscreatures. This growth make many changes and appearances in many aspects suchsocial, culture, and faith. Human always take many efforts to be better than the other oftheir species. Observations, writing, and practicing are the sign that human tend to bemove the brain. But the most important think should be hold is these all of this world isjust the great creatures by someone called Allah who has unlimited access to all of Hisproperties. But the creatures limited verily.

Politeia ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 238-260
Author(s):  
Franco Manni ◽  

From the ideas of Aristotle, De Saussure and Wittgenstein, philosopher Herbert McCabe elaborated an original anthropology. 'Meaning' means: the role played by a part towards the whole. Senses are bodily organs and sensations allow an animal to get fragments of the external world which become 'meaningful' for the behaviour of the whole animal Besides sensations, humans are ‘linguistic animals’ because through words they are able to 'communicate', that is, to share a peculiar kind of meanings: concepts. Whereas, sense-images are stored physically in our brain and cannot be shared, even though we can relate to sense-images by words (speech coincides with thought). However, concepts do not belong to the individual human being qua individual, but to an interpersonal entity: the language system. Therefore, on the one hand, to store images is a sense-power and an operation of the brain, whereas the brain (quite paradoxically!) is not in itself the organ of thought. On the other hand, concepts do not exist on their own.


1951 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 88-107
Author(s):  
J. J. Chevallier

“Mirabeau and Sieyès are the two strongest minds of the Revolution,” said Talleyrand who knew both of them well. This is no doubt true. It is likewise true that Mirabeau and Sieyes were at opposite poles from each other intellectually. Sieyès was a political theorist; they called him the brain. Mirabeau, on the other hand, was the least theoretical of men. When the Estates General opened he had no draft of a Constitution; Sieyès, on the other hand, had thought of one and even several.For the whole course of the Revolution until his death in April, 1791, Mirabeau cannot be described by an invariable formula. He cannot be classified in the pro-English school. He wrote to a minister before the Revolution: “the executive life” suited him better than “the speculative life.” Sieyès, and even Mounier, would have been wonderful professors of Constitutional Law. Not Mirabeau. His culture was enormous but disorganized. An omnivorous reader and always with pen in hand, he had made innumerable excerpts from all sorts of books, and drew upon them with no scruples about plagiarism when he wrote his own works. One must be careful to avoid the temptation, to which some have succumbed, of seeing in these plagiarisms the expression of Mirabeau's own ideas.


1959 ◽  
Vol 63 (588) ◽  
pp. 687-688
Author(s):  
Captain B. O. Prowse

When considering the problems of take-off and landing from the pilot's point of view, the most important fact to remember is that he is a human being. This drawback immediately limits his capabilities in the operation of an aeroplane because the control of a pilot's actions is through the computer we call the brain. This computer, although extremely efficient in almost all functions, has nevertheless serious limitations when it comes, first, to speed of computation, and secondly, the number of functions it can compute at one time.Until now the speed of operation of aircraft has been compatible with the speed of computation of the human brain that is governing the pilot's reactions. Also the size and complexity of the aircraft and the operation have been compatible with the number of functions the brain can compute at one time


1864 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 177-179

The paper is divided into two Parts; the first gives the results of expe­riments on animals; the second, of observations upon the human being. Part I. Assuming that the great divisions of the brain preserve each the same function through the vertebrate kingdom, it is maintained that experiments which can be performed only on such of the lower animals as are very tenacious of life, will afford deductions of universal application. The method of proceeding with regard to each species was to remove, first, the whole encephalon, with the exception of the medulla oblongata; then in a similar animal only the cerebrum was taken away. The only difference between the two cases was in the fact that one animal had a cerebellum, and the other had not. A comparison was believed to show, in the powers which one had more than the other, the function of the organ the possession of which constituted the only difference.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Hakonen ◽  
A. Ikäheimonen ◽  
A. Hultèn ◽  
J. Kauttonen ◽  
M. Koskinen ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTUsing neuroimaging, we studied influence of family cultural background on processing of an audiobook in human brain. The audiobook depicted life of two young Finnish men, one with the Finnish and the other with the Russian family background. Shared family cultural background enhanced similarity of narrative processing in the brain at prelexical, word, sentence, and narrative levels. Similarity was also enhanced in brain areas supporting imagery. The cultural background was further reflected as semantic differences in word lists by which the subjects described what had been on their minds when they heard the audiobook during neuroimaging. Strength of social identity shaped word, sentence, and narrative level processing in the brain. These effects might enhance mutual understanding between persons who share family cultural background and social identity and, conversely, deteriorate between-group mutual understanding in modern multicultural societies wherein native speakers of a language may assume highly similar understanding.


Author(s):  
Roger Penrose ◽  
Martin Gardner

What need we know of the workings of Nature in order to appreciate how consciousness may be part of it? Does it really matter what are the laws that govern the constituent elements of bodies and brains? If our conscious perceptions are merely the enacting of algorithms, as many AI supporters would have us believe, then it would not be of much relevance what these laws actually are. Any device which is capable of acting out an algorithm would be as good as any other. Perhaps, on the other hand, there is more to our feelings of awareness than mere algorithms. Perhaps the detailed way in which we are constituted is indeed of relevance, as are the precise physical laws that actually govern the substance of which we are composed. Perhaps we shall need to understand whatever profound quality it is that underlies the very nature of matter, and decrees the way in which all matter must behave. Physics is not yet at such a point. There are many mysteries to be unravelled and many deep insights yet to be gained. Yet, most physicists and physiologists would judge that we already know enough about those physical laws that are relevant to the workings of such an ordinary-sized object as a human brain. While it is undoubtedly the case that the brain is exceptionally complicated as a physical system, and a vast amount about its detailed structure and relevant operation is not yet known, few would claim that it is in the physical principles underlying its behaviour that there is any significant lack of understanding. I shall later argue an unconventional case that, on the contrary, we do not yet understand physics sufficiently well that the functioning of our brains can be adequately described in terms of it, even in principle. To make this case, it will be necessary for me first to provide some overview of the status of present physical theory. This chapter is concerned with what is called ‘classical physics’, which includes both Newton’s mechanics and Einstein’s relativity.


Mind Shift ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 63-79
Author(s):  
John Parrington

This chapter evaluates the basic unit of the human brain: the nerve cell, or neuron. These cells are also the main units of the peripheral nervous system, which sends messages from the brain to the other tissues and organs that make up our bodies. Neurons are the most well-known cells in the brain but they are not the only type of cell in this organ. The other main types are the glial cells, also known as neuroglia. Recent studies of the role of glial cells in the brain are revealing potentially important differences between humans and other species in the functions of these cells. The chapter then turns to the large-scale structure of the brain. The most dramatic changes in brain size and structure occurred in the final phase of human evolutionary change. Indeed, Neanderthals had brains similar in size to those of modern humans. An important feature of the human brain is that a larger fraction of its growth occurs outside the womb. Although humans reach adult brain size in childhood, brain development continues for decades afterwards.


2011 ◽  
Vol 106 (3) ◽  
pp. 1558-1569 ◽  
Author(s):  
Klaus Wunderlich ◽  
Ulrik R. Beierholm ◽  
Peter Bossaerts ◽  
John P. O'Doherty

Prefrontal cortex has long been implicated in tasks involving higher order inference in which decisions must be rendered, not only about which stimulus is currently rewarded, but also which stimulus dimensions are currently relevant. However, the precise computational mechanisms used to solve such tasks have remained unclear. We scanned human participants with functional MRI, while they performed a hierarchical intradimensional/extradimensional shift task to investigate what strategy subjects use while solving higher order decision problems. By using a computational model-based analysis, we found behavioral and neural evidence that humans solve such problems not by occasionally shifting focus from one to the other dimension, but by considering multiple explanations simultaneously. Activity in human prefrontal cortex was better accounted for by a model that integrates over all available evidences than by a model in which attention is selectively gated. Importantly, our model provides an explanation for how the brain determines integration weights, according to which it could distribute its attention. Our results demonstrate that, at the point of choice, the human brain and the prefrontal cortex in particular are capable of a weighted integration of information across multiple evidences.


2012 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 401-413 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miguel E. Rentería

The longitudinal fissure separates the human brain into two hemispheres that remain connected through the corpus callosum. The left and the right halves of the brain resemble each other, and almost every structure present in one side has an equivalent structure in the other. Despite this exceptional correspondence, the two hemispheres also display important anatomical differences and there is marked lateralization of certain cognitive and motor functions such as language and handedness. However, the mechanisms that underlie the establishment of these hemispheric specializations, as well as their physiological and behavioral implications, remain largely unknown. Thanks to recent advances in neuroimaging, a series of studies documenting variation in symmetry and asymmetry as a function of age, gender, brain region, and pathological state, have been published in the past decade. Here, we review evidence of normal and atypical cerebral asymmetry, and the factors that influence it at the macrostructural level. Given the prominent role that cerebral asymmetry plays in the organization of the brain, and its possible implication in neurodevelopmental and psychiatric conditions, further research in this area is anticipated.


2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 438-454 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lezanne Ooi ◽  
Mirella Dottori ◽  
Anthony L. Cook ◽  
Martin Engel ◽  
Vini Gautam ◽  
...  

Because our beliefs regarding our individuality, autonomy, and personhood are intimately bound up with our brains, there is a public fascination with cerebral organoids, the “mini-brain,” the “brain in a dish”. At the same time, the ethical issues around organoids are only now being explored. What are the prospects of using human cerebral organoids to better understand, treat, or prevent dementia? Will human organoids represent an improvement on the current, less-than-satisfactory, animal models? When considering these questions, two major issues arise. One is the general challenge associated with using any stem cell–generated preparation for in vitro modelling (challenges amplified when using organoids compared with simpler cell culture systems). The other relates to complexities associated with defining and understanding what we mean by the term “dementia.” We discuss 10 puzzles, issues, and stumbling blocks to watch for in the quest to model “dementia in a dish.”


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document