Recognition As a Legal Fact in Civil Law

Legal Concept ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 153-159
Author(s):  
Anatoly Ryzhenkov ◽  

Introduction: the concept of recognition in civil studies is most often identified with one of the methods of protecting civil rights, which is specified among others in Article 12 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. At the same time, the protection of civil rights under the norms of Chapter 2 of Part 1of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation does not imply such purely factual actions that would not create legal consequences, which would contradict the very existence of their legislative consolidation. The purpose of the study is to reveal the concept and legal consequences of recognition as a legal fact in civil law. Tasks: to correlate recognition as a method of protection and as a legal fact; to determine the types, conditions, and subjects of recognition; to reveal the mechanism of connection between recognition and its legal consequences. Methods: system, logic, analysis, synthesis, comparison. Results: recognition as a legal fact in civil law can be defined as follows: it is a public-legal decision of a body with authority on the existence of a legally significant circumstance, either that took place in the past, or that arises as a result of this decision. Recognition is not a legal requirement, since it does not in itself oblige the subjects of legal relations to perform or not perform any actions. Conclusions: the mechanism of connection of recognition with its legal consequences is characterized by the fact that it most often acts as an element of a complex set of facts. Recognition is nothing more than the addition of an imperious authority to the already existing conditions for the emergence, modification or termination of legal relations in order to eliminate the uncertainty associated with them.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Bobrovnikova ◽  
T. Konoplyannikova

The article discusses changes in the legal framework for the introduction and use of information technologies in Russia. The article analyzes the issue of improving the new object of civil rights, taking into account amendments to the Civil code of the Russian Federation and other legal acts.


2021 ◽  
Vol 109 ◽  
pp. 01024
Author(s):  
Armine Mograbyan

The article discusses a new object of civil rights, which appeared as a result of the addition of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation with article 141.1 “Digital rights”. The features of the definition of digital rights in Russian civil law are revealed. Particular attention is paid to the formulation of the concept of digital rights contained in the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. The author draws attention to the fact that according to Russian civil law, digital rights include only those that are directly named as such in the law, which indicates a legislative limitation of their turnover. In addition, the adopted laws on crowdfunding and digital financial assets were reviewed, as well as utilitarian digital rights and digital rights that relate to digital financial assets were analyzed. Attention is also drawn to other problems raised in the science of civil law regarding the modernization of Russian civil legislation in the field of digital rights. The author emphasizes the positive nature of the appearance in the Russian law of norms on digital rights, as an indicator of a legislative response to the digitalization of the economy and law, and a necessary prerequisite for further regulation of civil law relations changing under its influence.


Legal Concept ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 105-109
Author(s):  
Alexey Churilov

Introduction: on October 1, 2019, Article 141.1 “Digital rights” was introduced into the Civil Code by Federal law No. 34-FZ of 18.03.2019. Since January 1, 2020, the so-called utilitarian digital rights have been introduced into civil circulation. In connection with such significant changes in the objects of civil rights, there appears a need for a thorough analysis of innovations in terms of their feasibility and necessity. The tasks set by the author correspond to the goal of analyzing the legal regime of digital rights: to conduct a comparative analysis of securities, primarily non-documentary ones, and digital rights. Methods: the methodological framework for the research is a set of methods of scientific knowledge, among which the main ones are the methods of historicism, systematicity, analysis, and comparison. Results: the paper examines the category “digital rights” introduced in the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, as well as the special legislation regulating the utilitarian digital rights. The comparison of nondocumentary securities and utilitarian digital rights is made. The author studied the property rights that might be the content of digital rights, as well as the specifics of fixing digital rights in comparison with non-documentary securities, and the specifics of transferring digital rights from one person to another. A new non-documentary nonemissive security that mediates the circulation of digital rights – the digital certificate – is studied. Conclusions: the paper substantiates the inexpediency of introducing such an object of civil rights as digital rights into the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. The conclusion is made about the excessive complexity of the structure of digital rights and digital certificates, as well as the difficulties of using them for the investment purposes.


Author(s):  
ALEXANDR A. VEDENIN

One of the most important and discussed topics of Russian civilization is the issue of objects of civil law. The topic under study is not adequately reflected in domestic civil law and judicial arbitration practice. According to legal scholars, the ongoing changes in domestic civil legislation have not eliminated problems that relate to objects of civil law. The constant complication of civil law turnover and the development of domestic science of civil law are forced to carry out targeted work in this direction. The domestic legislator initiates the necessary new norms of civil law. As a result, this entails, among other things, the emergence of new objects of civil law. The expediency of expanding the list of objects of civil law requires a rethinking of existing legal concepts and work on serious theoretical and practical justification of new ones. In legal science and practice, the need to include the legal concept of "single immovable complex" in the current civil legislation of the Russian Federation is proved Legal scholars have formed various opinions that characterize it. Domestic civilizations have identified and analyzed the theoretical and practical shortcomings of a single immovable complex. A comparative legal study of a single real estate complex, an enterprise as a property complex, a complex thing was carried out and it is confirmed that they are not identical. Obviously, a single immovable complex is a necessary and relevant legal concept of domestic scientific thought. In order to create a single real estate complex, some conditions are needed. The rights holder of movable and immovable property by his will decides to create it. The permitting authorities, through State registration, decide to establish. Disadvantages of a single immovable complex, both theoretical and practical, are indicated. Similarities and differences in the design of the enterprise as a property complex, a complex thing, and a single real estate complex made it possible to identify the features of the legal status of the latter and distinguish it as an independent object of civil rights. Despite the fact that in the Civil Code of the Russian Federation there are such legal concepts as "enterprise as a property complex" and "complex thing," the inclusion of a single real estate complex in the current civil legislation is necessary. The legal significance of this concept is unconditional. It justifies its own point of view on the problem and the place of a single immovable complex in the system of objects of civil law. Recognizing the need for the concept of "single immovable complex" in the current civil legislation of the Russian Federation, the domestic legislator should focus on its significant theoretical and practical shortcomings that impede the effective enforcement of the provisions of Art. 1331 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. Domestic legislators need to give them an appropriate legal assessment, as well as suggest effective ways to solve them.


JURIST ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 7-13
Author(s):  
Anatoliy Ya. Ryzhenkov ◽  

The article is devoted to the problem of public promise as a legal fact. The institution of public promise of awards in the structure of the current Russian civil legislation occupies a rather uncertain position. It is shown that the mechanism described in article 1055 of the civil code of the Russian Federation in relation to the public promise of a reward is quite similar to the procedure for concluding a contract. The public promise of a reward, as presented in clause 1 of article 1055, contains all the essential terms of the contract, including its subject (action), term of performance, and price (amount of the reward). Thus, the performance of the action specified in the announcement is an acceptance, the peculiarity of which is that the obligation to pay the reward arises regardless of whether the corresponding action was performed in connection with the announcement made or independently of it (clause 4 of article 1055).


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 7-107
Author(s):  
M.D. TYAZHBIN

The article is dedicated to the category of subordination agreements. Based on the concept of conflict of rights in personam, the author makes an attempt to integrate this category into the system of private law, to determine the legal nature of subordination, and from these positions to assess the effectiveness of Art. 309.1 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, implemented in the course of the civil law reform.


2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Artur Ilfarovich Khabirov ◽  
Gulnara Mullanurovna Khamitova

The Civil Code of the Russian Federation regulates the use of various measures to protect violated rights and interests: first, these include universal methods for protecting civil rights (article 12 of the Civil Code); second, these include provisions of Chapter 25 of the Civil Code regarding the liability for violating one's obligations; both of them jointly comprising the institution of protection of civil rights. This article studies the issue of consequences for violating a party's duties under a loan agreement. The article differentiates safeguarding measures and liability measures to be used in case of an offense. The article also makes a conclusion regarding whether such differentiation is appropriate. Based on such differentiation, we analyze Paragraph 1 of Chapter 42 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation.


Author(s):  
Y. E. Monastyrsky ◽  

Introduction: of all the instruments of protection of subjective property rights, the fundamental role belongs to the institute of indemnification, whose regulatory framework needs to be clarified. The purpose of this paper is comparative description of the important legal aspects of the main type of property liability. In accordance with the purpose, the following objectives were set: to determine the extent to which legal provisions of general regulations on obligations laid down in the Civil Code of the Russian Federation should or can be applied to claims for damages; to formulate the proposals for improving the indemnification court practice. Methods: the methodological framework of the study consists of specific scholarly (special legal, comparative legal) and general scholarly (problem-theory, teleological, and system) methods of analysis. The main trends in the development of the institute of liability and the debatable aspects reflected in the Russian and foreign documents were studied with the use of the problem-theory and system analysis methods. Results: being a summary overview of the available knowledge and comparative regulatory material, this paper allowed us to articulate the ideas aimed at improving the fundamental principles of legal regulation of relations in the sphere of protection of subjective rights, in particular indemnification. Discussion: indemnification is a developing major institute of civil law, invariably attracting the attention of scholars around the world. Lately it has taken on special significance and some of its aspects have become a focus of a separate field of scholarly discussion. Many Russian scholars have written about indemnification in a comparative aspect: О. N. Sadikov, V. V. Baibak and others [2, 15]; this paper focuses on the reform of Russian law of obligations and the new provisions of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation of March 8, 2015 and reveals the consequences of the reform for the institute of damages, discussing this topic in detail as a separate standalone issue. Conclusion: we hope that this paper will contribute to further discussion in the civil law doctrine of the ideas and conclusions presented.


2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 175-181
Author(s):  
Yu. N. Andreev ◽  
A. P. Zolotarev

The work is devoted to topical problems of the civil theory of civil legal liability measures. The authors propose their classification of the measures of civil legal liability, give a brief description of some types of these measures, make reasoned proposals for further development of legislation in the field under studies. The authors of the proposed article refer compensation (recovery) of damages, recovery of penalties (fines, penalties), interests, loss of deposit, payment of deposit in double size, compensation to the measures of civil liability:. There are legitimate, contractual, preclusive, compensation-restorative, and punitive measures of civil legal liability. Civil legal liability measures can be differentiated into the following measures: a) delictual; b) contractual and c) conditional liability; taking into account the subjects of liability they can be classified into: a) measures of liability of individuals; b) measures of liability of legal entities; c) measures of liability of public legal entities, the state. The authors of the article assert that in civil legal there are compensatory payments for: 1) causing moral harm (see, for example, Articles 151, 1099 - 1101 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation); ) diminishing business reputation of legal entities (Article 152 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation); 3) violation of the property rights of consumers (Article 145 of the Law on the Protection of Consumer Rights); 4) violation of exclusive rights to the results of intellectual activity, means of individualization (Article 1252 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation); 5) causing anthropogenic, natural or terrorist harm; 6) infliction of damage by lawful actions of state and municipal bodies (Article 6.1 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation); 7) violation of reasonable time limits for judicial proceedings and enforcement of judicial acts. Professor Yu. .N. Andreev and post-graduate student A.P. Zolotarev also refer measures of corporate liability of the members of the corporation to the corporate organization, and, conversely, liability of the corporations to its members to civil legal measures of liability. At the same time, many measures of civil legal liability are simultaneously measures of civil protection. The authors of the article suggest renaming the ‘compensation of damages’ as a way of protecting civil rights, stipulated in Article 12 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, to ‘recover damages’ or ‘compensation for property damage’, clarify Article 15 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation indicating that compensation for damages is applied with a view to recovering property damage for tortious destruction, damage, diminution, restriction of material benefits, non-performance (improper performance) of contractual obligations, non-compliance with unjust enrichment obligation.


2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (8) ◽  
pp. 52-62
Author(s):  
L. G. Efimova

The paper substantiates the author’s proposal to amend the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, which is explained by the gradual creation of a digital economy in the Russian Federation. In particular, the author has examined and solved the following problems of the legal regulation of civil law relations in the context of digitalization: the problem of identifying the object of digital rights, the problem of legal qualification of the electronic form of the transaction, the problem of using a smart contract in civil transactions, the problem of using blockchain technology to create mixed payment systems. The paper proposes a non-standard solution to each of these problems—the author has prepared a draft federal law "On Amendments to Parts One and Two of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation in terms of legal relations arising in cyberspace." In particular, the author proposes to define digital rights as the absolute and relative rights to digital property named in this capacity, the content and conditions of implementation of which are determined by the law and the rules of the information system (protocol) that meets the characteristics established by the law. In the author’s opinion, an electronic document can exist in the form of a machine information file of any format or a computer program that meets the characteristics of an electronic document.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document