scholarly journals Prioritization to ensure care in COVID-19 pandemic

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (suppl 2) ◽  
pp. 519-527
Author(s):  
Mirella Rebello Bezerra ◽  
Maria Júlia Gonçalves de Mello ◽  
Jurema Telles de Oliveira Lima ◽  
Zilda do Rêgo Cavalcanti ◽  
Guacyra Magalhães Pires Bezerra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome ◽  
Healthcare System ◽  
Clinical Situation ◽  
Final Phase ◽  
Icu Patients ◽  
Delphi Methodology ◽  
Modified Delphi

Abstract Objectives: to develop a flow to ensure care for all people with severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus 2, offering from intensive care to palliative care, in an equitable and fair manner. Methods: the modified Delphi methodology was used to reach consensus on a flow and a prioritization index among specialists, the regional council of medicine, members of the healthcare system and the local judicial sector. Results: the score was incorporated into the flow as the final phase for building the list of patients who will be referred to intensive care, whenever a ventilator is available. Patients with lower scores should have priority access to the ICU. Patients with higher scores should receive palliative care associated with available curative measures. However, curative measures must be proportionate to the severity of the overall clinical situation and the prognosis. Conclusions: this tool could and will prevent patients from being excluded from access to the necessary health care so that their demands are assessed, their suffering is reduced, and their illnesses are cured, when possible.

scholarly journals Otolaryngology activity in two hospitals in northern and central Italy differently affected by COVID-19 pandemic

2021 ◽  
Vol 104 (2) ◽  
pp. 003685042199848
Author(s):  
Antonio Minni ◽  
Francesco Pilolli ◽  
Massimo Ralli ◽  
Niccolò Mevio ◽  
Luca Roncoroni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome ◽  
Intensive Care Units ◽  
Healthcare System ◽  
Central Italy ◽  
Northern Italy ◽  
Public Hospitals ◽  
Geographical Differences ◽  
Italian Regions

The Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic had a significant impact on the Italian healthcare system, although geographical differences were present; regions in northern Italy have been the most severely affected while regions in the south of the country were relatively spared. Otolaryngologists were actively involved in the management of the pandemic. In this work, we analyzed and compared the otolaryngology surgical activity performed during the pandemic in two large public hospitals located in different Italian regions. In northern Italy, otolaryngologists were mainly involved in performing surgical tracheotomies in COVID-19 positive patients and contributed to the management of these patients in intensive care units. In central Italy, where the burden of the infection was significantly lower, otolaryngologists focused on diagnosis and treatment of emergency and oncology patients. This analysis confirms the important role of the otolaryngology specialists during the pandemic, but also highlights specific differences between two large hospitals in different Italian regions.

Qua pote quisque, in ea conterat arte diem: COVID-19 and Australian and New Zealand intensive care

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 103-104
Author(s):  
Andrew Udy ◽  
◽  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
New Zealand ◽  
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Public Health Emergency ◽  
Care Practice ◽  
Health Care Practice

The current global severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic has thrust intensive care medicine to the forefront of health care practice in Australia and New Zealand. Indeed, reports from other countries and jurisdictions convey highly confronting statistics about the scale of this public health emergency, particularly in terms of the demand on intensive care unit (ICU)services. Whether this occurs here remains to be seen, although if such a scenario does eventuate, it will represent an unprecedented challenge to our community. In parallel, these events offer the opportunity for greater coordination, improved communication, and innovation in clinical care, which are principles that in many ways define our specialty.

Piloting the global capacity education e-tool: can capacity be taught to health care professionals across different international jurisdictions?

2019 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carmelle Peisah ◽  
Yaffa Lerman ◽  
Nathan Herrmann ◽  
Jeremy Rezmovitz ◽  
Kenneth Shulman
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Test Score ◽  
Aged Care ◽  
Care Physician ◽  
Modified Delphi ◽  
Learning Platform ◽  
Delphi Approach ◽  
Post Test

ABSTRACTDetermining decision-making capacity is part of everyday business for health care professionals working with older adults. We used a modified Delphi approach to develop an inclusive curriculum for a capacity education e-tool with global application and clinical relevance to a range of disciplines. The tool comprised: (i) 25 questions forming a “pre-test” for the adaptive and personalized e-Learning platform; (ii) a learning module based on the participant’s response to the “pre-test”; (iii) a “post-test” (the same baseline 25 questions) to test knowledge translation. The tool was tested on 31 health care professionals across Israel (8), Canada (15), and Australia (8) from the following disciplines: General Practitioners (GP) (19), Internal Medicine (1), Palliative Care GP (2); Palliative Care Physician (2), Geriatrician (2); and one of each: Psychologist, Occupational Therapist, Psychiatrist, Aged Care Researcher, and Aged Care Pharmacist. The mean baseline pre-test score was 19.1/25 (S.D. =1.61; range 15–22) and post-test score 21.7/25 (S.D.= 1.42; range 18–24); with a highly significant improvement in test scores (paired t-test P < 0.0001; t=10.81 on 30 df). This is the first such pilot study to demonstrate that generic capacity principles can be taught to health care professionals from different disciplines regardless of jurisdiction.

Palliative care and end-of-life health utilization in elder patients with pancreatic cancer.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 488-488
Author(s):  
Nizar Bhulani ◽  
Ang Gao ◽  
Arjun Gupta ◽  
Jenny Jing Li ◽  
Chad Guenther ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Health Care Utilization ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Cost Of Care ◽  
Care Utilization

488 Background: Prospective trials have shown that palliative care is associated with improved survival and quality of life, with lower rate of end-of-life health care utilization and cost. We examined trends in palliative care utilization in older pancreatic cancer patients. Methods: Pancreatic cancer patients with and without palliative care consults were identified using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked database between 2000 and 2009. Trend of palliative care use was studied. Emergency room and Intensive Care utilization and costs in the last 30 days of life were assessed. Statistical analyses were performed with SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC). Results: Of the 72205 patients with pancreatic cancer, 3383 (4.1%) received palliative care. The proportion of patients receiving palliative care increased from 1.8% in 2000 to 7.8% in 2009 (p for trend < 0.001). Patients with palliative care were more likely to be Asian and women. Of those who received palliative care, 73% received it in the last 30 days of life, and only 11% at least 12 weeks before death. The average number of visits to the ED in the last 30 days of life were significantly higher for patients who received palliative care (0.93±0.62) versus those who did not (0.79±0.61), p < 0.001, and had a significantly higher cost of care ($1317 vs $842, p < 0.001). Intensive care unit length of stay in the last 30 days of life did not differ between patients who did and did not receive palliative care (1.14 days vs 1.04 days, p 0.08). Intensive care unit cost of care was significantly higher for patients with palliative care compared to their counterparts ($5202.641 vs $3896.750, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Palliative care use for pancreatic cancer patients has increased between 2000 and 2009 in this study of Medicare patients. However, it was largely offered close to the end of life and was not associated with reduced health care utilization or cost. Early palliative care referral may be more beneficial.

Palliative care and end-of-life health care utilization of pancreatic cancer patients at an urban safety-net hospital.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 489-489
Author(s):  
Nizar Bhulani ◽  
M. Elizabeth Paulk ◽  
Arjun Gupta ◽  
Kiauna Donnell ◽  
Valorie Harvey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Health Care Utilization ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Safety Net ◽  
Care Utilization ◽  
Safety Net Hospital

489 Background: There has been an increase in Palliative care utilization in cancer patients. We examined trends of palliative care and intensive care utilization in pancreatic cancer patients in an urban setting safety net hospital. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of pancreatic cancer patients seen at the Parkland Health and Hospital System between January 1999 and September 2016. Cancer cases and receipt of palliative care were identified from prospectively maintained registries. Health care utilization including intensive care unit (ICU) was reviewed. All statistical analysis was done using IBM SPSS version 24. Results: We identified 455 new diagnoses of pancreatic cancer, mean age 61 years, 227 (50%) female and 228 (50%) white. Of these, 277 (61%) received palliative care ever. Patient who received palliative care were more likely to be younger (mean age, 59.3+-12 vs 62.8 +- 12 years) and have stage 4 disease vs stage 1-3 disease (p 0.006, and p 0.003 respectively). There was no statistically significant difference in palliative care utilization between gender and ethnicity groups. 140 patients had a DNR order and 29 required ICU admission at any point. A first contact with palliative care consult was obtained < = 7 days before death for 29 (10%) patients, < = 30 days before death for 86 (31%) patients, 30-60 days before death for 50 (18%) and more than 60 days before death for 141 (51%) patients. Patients receiving palliative care were more likely to have a DNR status (p < 0.001) but had no difference in ICU use within the last 30 days of life (p 0.285). Conclusions: The rate of palliative care in patients with pancreatic cancer in this cohort from a safety net hospital is higher than nationally reported studies. Most patients received palliative care > 30 days before death. While patients received early palliative care, it did not result in reduced ICU care. Factors influencing ICU care utilization near the end of life need further study.

scholarly journals Cancer management challenge in a developing country in COVID-19 pandemic: reflection of a group of Moroccan oncologists

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (26) ◽  
pp. 2007-2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hind Mrabti ◽  
Narjiss Berrada ◽  
Ghislaine Raiss ◽  
Hamza Ettahri ◽  
Halima Abahssain ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Developing Countries ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Clinical Situation ◽  
Cancer Management ◽  
First Case ◽  
Medical Oncologists ◽  
Adequate Management ◽  
Management Challenge

Management of cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic is a worldwide challenge – in particular in developing countries where the risk of saturation of health facilities and intensive care beds must be minimized. The first case of COVID-19 was declared in Morocco on 2 March 2020, after which a panel of Moroccan experts, consisting of medical oncologists from universities and regional and private oncology centers, was promptly assembled to conduct a group reflection on cancer patient's management. The main objective is to protect the immunocompromised population from the risk of COVID-19, while maintaining an adequate management of cancer, which can quickly compromise their prognosis. Recommendations are provided according to each clinical situation: patients undergoing treatment, new cases, hospitalized patients, palliative care and surveillance.

scholarly journals Ethical and Social Issues for Health Care Providers in the Intensive Care Unit during the Early Stages of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan: a Questionnaire Survey

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yusuke Seino ◽  
Yayoi Aizawa ◽  
Atsushi Kogetsu ◽  
Kazuto Kato
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Medical Care ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Moral Distress ◽  
Social Issues ◽  
Free Text ◽  
Care Providers

AbstractThis questionnaire-based observational study was conducted in July 2020 with the aim of understanding the ethical and social issues faced by health care providers (HCPs) registered with the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine in intensive care units (ICUs) during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. There were 200 questionnaire respondents, and we analyzed the responses of 189 members who had been involved in COVID-19 treatment in ICUs. The ethical and social issues that HCPs recognized during the pandemic were difficulties in the decision-making process with patients’ families, limitations of life-sustaining treatment, lack of palliative care, and inadequate mental support for patients’ families and HCPs. Regarding decision-making on issues of clinical ethics during the pandemic, more than half of the respondents thought they had failed to provide sufficient palliative care to patients and responded that they experienced moral distress. The free-text responses on moral distress revealed issues such as unusual treatment and care, restricted visits, challenging situations for HCPs, and psychological burden. Additionally, 38.1% of respondents experienced episodes of social prejudice or discrimination and 4.7% experienced a shortage of medical resources. Our study result shows that the moral distress of HCPs was caused by difficulties in patient-centered decision-making and insufficient medical care to patients and their families. These were caused mainly by a lack of communication due to the stronger implementation of infection control measures. We believe that it is important to address ethical and social issues during a pandemic in order to provide appropriate medical care and prevent burnout among HCPs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document