Landmark Positioning on Maxilla of Cleft Lip and Palate Infant — a Reality?

1995 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 434-441 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicky G. Seckel ◽  
Ingeborg Van Der Tweel ◽  
G. Anne Elema ◽  
Tom F.J.M.C. Specken
Keyword(s):  
Measurement Errors ◽  
Learning Effect ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Linear Measurements ◽  
Interobserver Reproducibility ◽  
Intraobserver Reproducibility ◽  
Minimal Data ◽  
Insight Into

In this study, we tested the precision of landmark positioning for a set of landmarks that can be used for the edentulous cleft lip and palate maxilla of the infant, by analyzing intraobserver and interobserver repositioning and measuring on a series of 121 (unilateral and bilateral) study casts. To date, no data on interobserver and only minimal data on intraobserver reproducibility are available. We found intraobserver reproducibility acceptable with total measurement errors ranging from 0.51 to 1.54 mm. Interobserver reproducibility was only slightly less with total measurement errors ranging from 0.63 to 1.57 mm. Total measurement errors were found to be relatively high for some variables. Both the intra- and Interobserver analyses show insight into expected precision of landmark positioning during placement of these points on casts. A learning effect for precise positioning has been demonstrated in both analyses. The points with the highest precision overall are Q and Q’, followed by the linear measurements PL and P'L’. Quality of regular study casts (impressions) is an important factor, with room for improvement. Reproducible landmark positioning on the cleft lip and palate infant's maxilla, can only be a reality if the quality of the cast is optimal and the investigator is experienced. Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility are in the same range, which justifies the comparison of results from different studies and relieves future investigators of the need to have all measurements within a study conducted by the same investigator. Aspects of the biologic meaning of landmarks are also discussed.

Oral Health-Related Quality of Life Among Sudanese Children Treated for Cleft Lip and Palate

2021 ◽  
pp. 105566562098769
Author(s):  
Mecheala Abbas Ali ◽  
Alwaleed Fadul Nasir ◽  
Shaza K. Abass
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Oral Health ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Arabic Version ◽  
Health Related Quality ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Health Related

Objective: This study compared the oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) among children with a cleft lip with or without a cleft palate (CL±P) and a group of their peers. The reliability of the Arabic version of the Child Oral Health Impact Profile Questionnaire (COHIP) was also assessed. Design: A cross-sectional study. Settings: Cleft clinic in a private dental college in Omdurman City, Sudan. Patients: In all, 75 children (mean age 11.3 ± 2.5 years) with a history of CL±P and a group of 150 school children without CL±P (mean age 11.4 ± 2.6 years). Main Outcome Measures: Overall and subscale scores on the Arabic version of the COHIP. Results: Test–retest reliability of COHIP in Arabic was high with an interclass correlation coefficient >0.8. Cronbach α value internal consistency was 0.8 for the total scale and between 0.7 and 0.8 for the subscales. The COHIP score was 89.41 ± 19.97 in children with CL±P and 122.82 ± 9.45 for the control group. Children with CL±P had significantly lower scores on the overall and all subscales when compared to children without CL±P ( P ≤ .001). Among the children with CL±P, there were no statistically significant differences on the COHIP based on age and/or gender ( P ≥ .05). Conclusions: Children with CL±P had a relatively high OHRQoL, which was lower than that of their peers without CL±P in both the overall scale and all subscales. Gender and age differences had no significant impact on the OHRQoL. The COHIP Arabic version showed appropriate reliability.

scholarly journals Atypical Outcomes of Nasal and Lip Appearance After Unilateral Cleft Lip Repair: Judgment by Professionals, Patients, and Laypeople

2021 ◽  
pp. 105566562098280
Author(s):  
Robin A. Tan ◽  
Frans J. Mulder ◽  
Roderic M. F. Schwirtz ◽  
David G. M. Mosmuller ◽  
Henrica C. W. De Vet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Analysis Of Variance ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Old Patients ◽  
Rank Score ◽  
Cleft Lip Repair ◽  
Typical Appearance ◽  
Unilateral Cleft Lip Repair ◽  
Insight Into

Objective: To gain more insight into the assessment of “atypical” nasal and lip appearance outcomes compared to “typical” appearance outcomes after unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) repair, when judged by professionals, patients with repaired UCLP, and laypeople. Design: An online survey containing 3 series of photographs with various degrees of “typical” and “atypical” nasal and lip appearance outcomes after UCLP repair was sent to 30 professionals, 30 patients with repaired UCLP, and 50 laypeople in 2 countries. Participants were instructed to rank the photographs from excellent to poor based on overall appearance. Mean rank positions of photographs were analyzed and differences in mean rank score between “typical” and “atypical” results were assessed using a T-test. Agreement of ranking between the 3 groups was assessed with an analysis of variance analysis. Setting: Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Netherlands and Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, USA. Patients: Photographs of 6- to 18-year-old patients with repaired UCLP. Results: “Atypical” appearance outcomes were ranked significantly less favorably (small nostril: P = 0.00; low vermillion border: P = 0.02; whistling deformity: P = 0.00) compared to “typical” outcomes. Difference between professionals, patients and laypeople in rank positioning the photographs was not statistically significant ( P = 0.89). Conclusions: Noses with a smaller nostril and lips containing a whistling deformity were perceived as poorer outcome compared to the “typical” results. Professionals, patients, and laypeople are in agreement when assessing these outcomes.

Evaluation of Esthetic, Functional, and Quality-of-Life Outcome in Adult Cleft Lip and Palate Patients

2005 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 355-361 ◽  
Author(s):  
Klaus Sinko ◽  
Reinhold Jagsch ◽  
Verena Prechtl ◽  
Franz Watzinger ◽  
Karl Hollmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Clinical Psychologist ◽  
Life Questionnaire ◽  
Health Related Quality ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Health Related

Objective Evaluation of esthetic, functional, and health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) outcomes in adult patients with a repaired cleft lip and palate. The treatment for all patients was based on the so-called Vienna concept. Patients/Design Seventy adult patients with a repaired complete cleft lip and palate, ranging in age from 18 to 30 years, were included in the study. Esthetic and functional outcomes were assessed by the patients themselves and by five experts using a visual analog scale. Patients also completed the MOS Short-Form 36 questionnaire to evaluate health-related quality of life. Results Patients rated their esthetic outcome significantly worse than the experts did. No significant differences were observed in the ratings for function. Female patients, especially, were dissatisfied with their esthetic outcomes. In a personal interview, nearly 63% of them asked for further treatment, particularly for upper-lip and nose corrections. The health-related quality-of-life questionnaire revealed low scores for only two subscales, namely social functioning and emotional role. In most subscales of health-related quality of life, patients who desired further treatment had significantly lower scores than did patients who desired no further treatment. Conclusion Surgery of the lip and nose appears to be of prime importance for patients with a cleft lip and palate. Cleft patients who do not request secondary treatment are not always satisfied with the treatment. Patients with realistic expectations in regard to further treatment should be treated by specialists, whereas those with unrealistic expectations should be referred to a clinical psychologist.

scholarly journals ROLE OF A PEDODONTIST IN CLEFT LIP AND CLEFT PALATE REHABILITATION - AN OVERVIEW

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (07) ◽  
pp. 882-906
Author(s):  
Payel Basu ◽  
◽  
Rani Somani ◽  
Deepti Jawa ◽  
Shipra Jaidka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Multidisciplinary Care ◽  
Vital Role ◽  
Pediatric Dentist ◽  
Orofacial Region ◽  
The Right ◽  
Potential Area

Cleft lip and palate is one of the most common congenital anomalies requiring multidisciplinary care. Such anomaly is associated with many problems such as impaired feeding, defective speech, hearing difficulties, malocclusion, dental abnormalities, gross facial deformity as well severe psychological problems. Cleft of the lip and palate is one of the complex conditions that occur at a functionally potential area in the orofacial region and also at such a crucial time that strategic interventions at the right age by the concerned specialists becomes the need of the hour. Pediatric dentist is an integral part of the cleft rehabilitative process right from the neonatal period upto the phase of permanent dentition. Being well versed with a childs growth and development, both physical and mental, a Pedodontist helps in restoring function and esthetics in a cleft child, in a most empathetic way. This article describes the enormous challenges faced by these innocent souls and the vital role played by a Pedodontist, to provide comprehensive cleft care, be it preventive, restorative, or interventional care, in order to achieve the best possible outcome and meaningfully improve their quality of life.

scholarly journals Atuação Fonoaudiológica e Fisioterápica nas Fissuras Orofaciais não Sindrômicas

UNICIÊNCIAS ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 205-210
Author(s):  
Carla Meliso Rodrigues Silvestre ◽  
Ana Clara Giraldeli ◽  
Luana Borges Estevão ◽  
Eliane Gomes Fernandes de Oliveira ◽  
Cristhiane Almeida Leite da Silva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Speech Therapy ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Functional Independence ◽  
Oral Feeding ◽  
Orofacial Clefts ◽  
Long Term Treatment ◽  
Speech Therapist

A fissura de lábio e ou de palato não sindrômicas são anomalias congênitas craniofaciais mais frequentes. Elas ocasionam problemas estéticos e funcionais que requerem tratamento em longo prazo, envolvendo reabilitação multidisciplinar incluindo a fonoaudiologia e fisioterapia. Este estudo propõem apresentar alguns dos princípios de atuação do fonoaudiólogo e do fisioterapeuta nas fissuras orofaciais não sindrômicas. Realizou-se uma revisão de literatura narrativa com busca na Bireme e Scielo e nas bases Lilacs, Pedro e  PubMed em outubro de 2020, envolvendo a atuação do  fonoaudiólogo e do fisioterapeuta nas fissuras orofaciais não sindrômica, no idioma inglês e português, sem recorte temporal. Os estudos encontrados observaram que a intervenção fonoaudiológica e fisioterapêutica deve ser mais precoce e de acordo com a disfunção apresentada. De modo geral, a atuação do fonoaudiólogo favorece a alimentação oral  e o desenvolvimento global referente à linguagem, a fala, audição e neuropsicomotor, para evitar atrasos e favorecer o melhor desenvolvimento infantil. A atuação fisioterapêutica visa diminuir a hospitalização prolongada, melhorar a qualidade de vida e funcionalidade, bem como assistir as crianças que cursarem com problemas motores, posturais e respiratórios. Conclui-se que a atuação fonoaudiológica nas diferentes fases da reabilitação de indivíduos com fissuras labiopalatinas contribui para alimentação e inteligibilidade da fala, beneficiando assim a comunicação verbal e consequentemente a interação com o meio social; e a assistência fisioterapêutica ajuda e melhorar a sintomatologia e as disfunções respiratórias apresentadas, prevenindo e tratando complicações de forma a melhorar a qualidade de vida e restabelecer a independência funcional.   Palavras-chave: Fissura Palatina. Fenda Labial. Aleitamento Materno. Fala. Fisioterapia.   Abstract Non-syndromic cleft lip and or palate are the most frequent congenital craniofacial anomalies. They cause aesthetic and functional problems that require long-term treatment, involving rehabilitation including speech therapy and physiotherapy. This study proposes to present some of the principles of performance of the speech therapist and physiotherapist in non-syndromic orofacial clefts. A narrative literature review was carried out with searches in Bireme and Scielo and in the Lilacs, Pedro and PubMed databases in October 2020, involving the performance of the speech therapist and physiotherapist in non-syndromic orofacial clefts, in English and Portuguese, with no time frame. The studies observed that speech therapy and physiotherapy intervention should be as earlier and in accordance with the presented dysfunction. In general, the performance of the speech therapist favors oral feeding and the global development related to language, speech, hearing and neuropsychomotor, to avoid delays and favor best child development. Physiotherapeutic action aims to reduce the prolonged hospitalization, improve quality of life and functionality, as well as assist children who are experiencing motor, postural and respiratory problems. It is concluded that the speech therapy performance in the different phases of rehabilitation of individuals with cleft lip and palate contributes to feeding and speech intelligibility, thus benefiting verbal communication and consequently the interaction with the social environment; and physiotherapeutic assistance helps and improves the symptoms and respiratory disorders presented, preventing and treating complications in order to improve the quality of life and restore functional independence.   Keywords: Cleft Palate. Cleft Lip. Breast Feeding. Speech. Physiotherapy.

Upper Airway 3D Changes of Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate After Orthognathic Surgery

2018 ◽  
Vol 56 (3) ◽  
pp. 314-320 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marilia Sayako Yatabe-Ioshida ◽  
Letícia Dominguez Campos ◽  
Renato Yassukata Yaedu ◽  
Ivy Kiemle Trindade-Suedam
Keyword(s):  
Orthognathic Surgery ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Upper Airway ◽  
Cross Sectional Area ◽  
Sectional Area ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Linear Measurements ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Skeletal Class

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to 3-dimensionally assess the airway characteristics of patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) and bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP) who underwent orthognathic surgery. Design: This was a retrospective study. Setting: The study took place at a national referral center for cleft lip and palate rehabilitation. Patients and Participants: The sample comprised cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans obtained before and after orthognathic surgery of 15 individuals (30 CBCT scans), divided into 2 groups: UCLP group (n = 9 patients/18 CBCT scans) and BCLP group (n = 6/12 CBCT scans). All patients had a nonsyndromic UCLP or BCLP and a skeletal class III malocclusion at the preoperative period. Interventions: Airway volume, pharyngeal minimal cross-sectional area (mCSA), location of mCSA, sella-nasion-A point (SNA) and sella-nasion-B point (SNB) angles, and condylion-A point and condyloid-gnathion linear measurements were assessed in open-source software (ITK-SNAP and SlicerCMF). Main Outcome Measure: Airway dimensions of patients with UCLP and BCLP increase after orthognathic surgery. Results: After orthognathic surgery, UCLP group showed a significant 20% increase in nasopharynx volume. Although not significant, BCLP group also showed an increase of 18% in the same region. Minimal cross-sectional area remained dimensionally stable after surgery and was all located in the oropharynx region, on both groups. Additionally, a positive correlation was observed between volume and mCSA on both groups. Conclusion: Overall, individuals with UCLP and BCLP showed an increase in the upper airway after orthognathic surgery and this might explain the breathing and sleep improvements reported by the patients after the surgery.

Quality of Life and Temporomandibular Disorders in Patients With Skeletal Class III Malocclusion With Cleft Lip and Palate

2021 ◽  
pp. 105566562110434
Author(s):  
Bernardo Olsson ◽  
Isabela Polesi Bergamaschi ◽  
Erika Calvano Küchler ◽  
Aline Monise Sebastiani ◽  
Guilherme dos Santos Trento ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Temporomandibular Disorders ◽  
Psychological Factors ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Class Iii Malocclusion ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Better Than

Objective The aim of the study was to assess the quality of life (QOL), oral health-related QOL (OHRQOL), temporomandibular disorders (TMDs), and psychological factors in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion with cleft lip and palate (CLP) and without CLP. Design Case–control. Setting Primary care, institutional practice. Patients One hundred thirty-six patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion with CLP (n = 68) and without CLP (n = 68). Main outcome measures QOL and OHRQOL were assessed using the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) questionnaire and the Oral Health Impact Profile-14 questionnaire, respectively. TMDs and psychological factors were assessed using the Research Diagnostic Criteria for TMD (RDC/TMD). Results No differences in QOL were found between the groups ( P >  0.05). Patients with CLP reported a better OHRQOL ( P = 0.025) in the physical pain, physical disability, and psychological disability domains ( P <  0.05). Patients with CLP presented with less myofascial pain (OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.11-0.71] and other articular conditions (OR 0.24; 95% CI 0.06-0.90]. More patients with CLP reported no chronic pain ( P = 0.012). The QOL of patients with CLP with no depression or with no nonspecific physical symptoms including pain (NSPSIP) was better than that of patients without CLP. The OHRQOL of patients with CLP without TMDs or no psychological factors was better than that of patients without CLP. Conclusions Patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion who require orthognathic surgery with CLP have better OHRQOL and present with fewer TMDs than those patients without CLP.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document