scholarly journals Functional characterization and kinetic studies of an ancestral lamprey GnRH-III selective type II GnRH receptor from the sea lamprey, Petromyzon marinus

2006 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 601-610 ◽  
Author(s):  
M R Silver ◽  
S A Sower

The recently cloned lamprey GnRH receptor was shown to have several unique features, including the longest intracellular C-terminal tail (120 amino acids (aa)) of any previously described GnRH receptor. In the current study, a series of experiments were performed examining cAMP responses, binding kinetics, whole cell competitive binding assays and internalization studies of the lamprey GnRH receptor using a series of three C-terminal tail truncations (80 aa, 40 aa and 0 aa) to better describe the functional significance of this unique vertebrate GnRH receptor. Activation of the lamprey GnRH receptor was shown to stimulate cAMP production in a dose-dependant manner when treated with either lamprey GnRH-I (LogEC50 −6.57±0.15) or lamprey GnRH-III (LogEC50 −8.29±0.09). Truncation analysis indicated that the membrane proximal 40 aa of the lamprey GnRH receptor C-terminal tail contain a motif required for cAMP accumulation. Saturation binding assays using the wild type and truncated lamprey GnRH receptors revealed that all of three truncated lamprey GnRH receptors were capable of binding lamprey GnRH-I. Competitive, intact cell-binding assays suggested that the lamprey GnRH receptor is lamprey GnRH-III selective, based on the observed pharmacological profile: lamprey GnRH-III (Inhibitory constant (Ki) 0.708±0.245 nM)=chicken GnRH-II (Ki 0.765±0.160 nM) > mammalian GnRH (Ki 12.9±1.96 nM) > dAla6Pro9NEt mammalian GnRH (Ki 21.6±9.68 nM) > lamprey GnRH-I (Ki 118.0±23.6). Finally, the lamprey GnRH receptor was shown to undergo rapid ligand-dependant internalization, which was significantly diminished in the tail-less truncated form. We have shown from our current and our previous structural studies that this unique lamprey GnRH receptor shares several characteristics of both type I and type II GnRH receptors which suggests that this receptor has retained ancestral characteristics that can provide insight into the function and evolution of the vertebrate GnRH receptor family.

2007 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 281-292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sipho Mamputha ◽  
Zhi-liang Lu ◽  
Roger W. Roeske ◽  
Robert P. Millar ◽  
Arieh A. Katz ◽  
...  

Abstract GnRH I regulates reproduction. A second form, designated GnRH II, selectively binds type II GnRH receptors. Amino acids of the type I GnRH receptor required for binding of GnRH I (Asp2.61(98), Asn2.65(102), and Lys3.32(121)) are conserved in the type II GnRH receptor, but their roles in receptor function are unknown. We have delineated their functions using mutagenesis, signaling and binding assays, immunoblotting, and computational modeling. Mutating Asp2.61(97) to Glu or Ala, Asn2.65(101) to Ala, or Lys3.32(120) to Gln decreased potency of GnRH II-stimulated inositol phosphate production. Consistent with proposed roles in ligand recognition, mutations eliminated measurable binding of GnRH II, whereas expression of mutant receptors was not decreased. In detailed analysis of how these residues affect ligand-dependent signaling, [Trp2]-GnRH I showed lesser decreases in potency than GnRH I at the Asp2.61(97)Glu mutant. In contrast, [Trp2]-GnRH II showed the same loss of potency as GnRH II at this mutant. This suggests that Asp2.61(97) contributes to recognition of His2 of GnRH I, but not of GnRH II. GnRH II showed a large decrease in potency at the Asn2.65(101)Ala mutant compared with analogs lacking the C⋕O group of Gly10NH2. This suggests that Asn2.65(101) recognizes Gly10NH2 of GnRH II. GnRH agonists showed large decreases in potency at the Lys3.32(120)Gln mutant, but antagonist activity was unaffected. This suggests that Lys3.32(120) recognizes agonists, but not antagonists, as in the type I receptor. These data indicate that roles of conserved residues are similar, but not identical, in the type I and II GnRH receptors.


Reproduction ◽  
2003 ◽  
pp. 271-278 ◽  
Author(s):  
AJ Pawson ◽  
K Morgan ◽  
SR Maudsley ◽  
RP Millar

Humans may be particularly unusual with respect to the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) control of their reproductive axis in that they possess two distinct GnRH precursor genes, on chromosomes 8p11-p21 and 20p13, but only one conventional GnRH receptor subtype (type I GnRH receptor) encoded within the genome, on chromosome 4. A disrupted human type II GnRH receptor gene homologue is present on chromosome 1q12. The genes encoding GnRH ligand precursors and GnRH receptors have now been characterized in a broad range of vertebrate species, including fish, amphibians and mammals. Ligand precursors and receptors can be categorized into three phylogenetic families. Members of each family exist in primitive vertebrates, whereas mammals exhibit selective loss of ligand precursor and receptor genes. One interpretation of these findings is that each ligand-cognate receptor family may have evolved to fulfil a separate function in reproductive physiology and that species-specific gene inactivation, modification or loss may have occurred during evolution when particular roles have become obsolete or subject to regulation by a different biochemical pathway. Evidence in support of this concept is available following the characterization of the chromosomal loci encoding the human type II GnRH receptor homologue, a rat type II GnRH receptor gene remnant (on rat chromosome 18) and a mouse type II GnRH ligand precursor gene remnant (on mouse chromosome 2). Whether type I GnRH and type II GnRH peptides elicit different signalling responses in humans by activation of the type I GnRH receptor in a cell type-specific fashion remains to be shown. Recent structure-function studies of GnRH ligands and GnRH receptors and their expression patterns in different tissues add further intrigue to this hypothesis by indicating novel roles for GnRH such as neuromodulation of reproductive function and direct regulation of peripheral reproductive tissues. Surprises concerning the complexities of GnRH ligand and receptor function in reproductive endocrinology should continue to emerge in the future.


1928 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alvan L. Barach ◽  

1. The antigenic function of a pneumococcus vaccine made from the intact cell was compared with that derived fron a watery extract of the cell free from formed elements. In each instance, the immunity produced was dependent upon type-specific protective substance and not upon the elaboration of the common protein antibody. 2. The vaccine made from the intact cell resulted in both active and passive immunity which began on the 3rd day, increased markedly to the 5th, and remained approximately stationery to the 7th day. In the case of the Berkefeld filtrate of the shaken bacteria and the filtrate of the broth culture, the immunity began on the 4th day, increased to the 5th, and remained approximately stationery to the 7th day. The immunity produced by Pneumococcus Type I vaccine is greater than that produced by Type II. On the 3rd day, mice vaccinated with Type I vaccine resisted 100,000 minimal lethal doses, whereas mice immunized with Type II resisted 10,000 minimal lethal doses. On the 5th day, a larger percentage of mice survived these doses than on the 3rd day. 3. Certain factors related to the preparation and dosage of the vaccine are discussed. 4. As far as the time interval and the degree of immunity produced are concerned, these results suggest the possibility of employing pneumococcus vaccine in suitable doses in the treatment of lobar pneumonia. That an earlier activity of the immunity mechanism could actually be initiated in a patient with lobar pneumonia has still to be demonstrated.


Reproduction ◽  
2002 ◽  
pp. 799-806 ◽  
Author(s):  
KF Rodriguez ◽  
RM Petters ◽  
AE Crosier ◽  
CE Farin

The aims of this study were to examine the role of transcription and the coincident involvement of type I and type II protein kinase A (PKA) in the resumption of meiosis in murine cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs) using the transcriptional inhibitors 5,6-dichloro-1-beta-D-ribofuranosylbenzimidazole (DRB) and alpha-amanitin. The first series of experiments was designed to: (i) characterize the role of transcription in gonadotrophin-mediated and spontaneous maturation of murine oocytes; (ii) examine the roles of specific gonadotrophins (FSH versus hCG) and cumulus cells in transcriptionally mediated oocyte maturation; and (iii) determine the reversibility of the transcriptional arrest of meiosis. In the presence of FSH, transcriptional inhibitors arrested germinal vesicle breakdown (GVBD) (DRB: 2 +/- 2% and control: 76 +/- 2%; alpha-amanitin: 4 +/- 4% and control: 70 +/- 4%). Furthermore, cumulus cells were required for transcriptional inhibitors to arrest GVBD (DRB with cumulus cells: 0 +/- 15%; DRB without cumulus cells: 94 +/- 13%; alpha-amanitin with cumulus cells: 15 +/- 2%; alpha-amanitin without cumulus cells: 99 +/- 2%). Thus, in mice, FSH-mediated GVBD uses a transcriptional mechanism, which probably occurs within the cumulus cell compartment. In a second series of experiments, the role of transcription in mediating the resumption of meiosis after activation of either type I or type II PKA was examined. Activation of type I PKA in murine COCs resulted in an arrest of GVBD that was independent of a transcriptional event (with DRB: 7 +/- 9% GVBD; without DRB: 11 +/- 9% GVBD). In contrast, activation of type II PKA resulted in a resumption of meiosis, which required the occurrence of gene transcription (with DRB: 12 +/- 9% GVBD; without DRB: 80 +/- 9% GVBD). As FSH binding to cumulus cells activates the PKA second messenger system, our results indicate that, in cultured murine COCs, FSH binding to cumulus cells results in the activation of type II PKA, which, in turn, mediates a downstream transcriptional event required for the initiation of GVBD.


1988 ◽  
Vol 34 (10) ◽  
pp. 2053-2057 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Raam ◽  
D M Vrabel

Abstract We present evidence to show that monoclonal antibodies to estrogen receptors (ER) in solid phase recognize the secondary estrogen binding sites with moderate to low affinity for estradiol (E2). An excellent quantitative agreement was found in five cytosols between the ER values obtained by the enzyme immunoassay (ER-EIA) and the amount of secondary estrogen binding sites measured by the assay involving dextran-coated charcoal (Clin Chem 1986;32:1496). The immunoreactive protein recognized by the antibody-coated beads, when allowed to react with ER(+) cytosols, is shown to bind [3H]estradiol only when the ligand concentration exceeds 8 nmol/L. Further biochemical and functional characterization of the immunoreactive protein is required to establish similarities/dissimilarities between this protein, high-affinity Type I ER sites, and the secondary sites such as Type II sites.


1990 ◽  
Vol 259 (3) ◽  
pp. E405 ◽  
Author(s):  
A H Miller ◽  
R L Spencer ◽  
M Stein ◽  
B S McEwen

Type I and II adrenal steroid receptor binding was measured in spleen and thymus of adrenalectomized (ADX) rats and intact rats at basal levels of corticosterone after 1 h of restraint stress or after exogenous administration of dexamethasone (DEX). Concurrent receptor determinations were made in the hippocampus and pituitary. Receptor binding measures in immune tissues and pituitary were less responsive to varying levels of endogenous hormones than binding measures in hippocampus. Compared with ADX rats, type I binding in spleen and pituitary of intact rats at basal levels of corticosterone was unchanged, whereas type I binding in the hippocampus was significantly decreased. Furthermore, despite peak levels of corticosterone, type II binding in spleen, thymus, and pituitary of stressed rats was also unchanged, whereas type II binding in the hippocampus of stressed animals was significantly lower. In contrast, DEX, a well-known immunosuppressant, reduced type II binding in immune tissues more than in the hippocampus. Because a decrease in receptor binding measured in vitro may reflect receptor activation in vivo, these results suggest that there may be considerable heterogeneity in the degree of activation of adrenal steroid receptor subtypes in immune, pituitary, and hippocampal tissue by endogenous and exogenous glucocorticoids.


Endocrinology ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 149 (3) ◽  
pp. 1415-1422 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam J. Pawson ◽  
Elena Faccenda ◽  
Stuart Maudsley ◽  
Zhi-Liang Lu ◽  
Zvi Naor ◽  
...  

Regulatory elements present in the cytoplasmic carboxyl-terminal tails of G protein-coupled receptors contribute to agonist-dependent receptor desensitization, internalization, and association with accessory proteins such as β-arrestin. The mammalian type I GnRH receptors are unique among the rhodopsin-like G protein-coupled receptors because they lack a cytoplasmic carboxyl-terminal tail. In addition, they do not recruit β-arrestin, nor do they undergo rapid desensitization. By measuring the internalization of labeled GnRH agonists, previous studies have reported that mammalian type I GnRH receptors undergo slow agonist-dependent internalization. In the present study, we have measured the internalization of epitope-tagged GnRH receptors, both in the absence and presence of GnRH stimulation. We demonstrate that mammalian type I GnRH receptors exhibit a low level of constitutive agonist-independent internalization. Stimulation with GnRH agonist did not significantly enhance the level of receptor internalization above the constitutive level. In contrast, the catfish GnRH and rat TRH receptors, which have cytoplasmic carboxyl-terminal tails, displayed similar levels of constitutive agonist-independent internalization but underwent robust agonist-dependent internalization, as did chimeras of the mammalian type I GnRH receptor with the cytoplasmic carboxyl-terminal tails of the catfish GnRH receptor or the rat TRH receptor. When the carboxyl-terminal Tyr325 and Leu328 residues of the mammalian type I GnRH receptor were replaced with alanines, these two mutant receptors underwent significantly impaired internalization, suggesting a function for the Tyr-X-X-Leu sequence in mediating the constitutive agonist-independent internalization of mammalian type I GnRH receptors. These findings provide further support for the underlying notion that the absence of the cytoplasmic carboxyl-terminal tail of the mammalian type I GnRH receptors has been selected for during evolution to prevent rapid receptor desensitization and internalization to allow protracted GnRH signaling in mammals.


Endocrinology ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 149 (6) ◽  
pp. 3118-3129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin D. G. Pfleger ◽  
Adam J. Pawson ◽  
Robert P. Millar

GnRH and its structural variants bind to GnRH receptors from different species with different affinities and specificities. By investigating chimeric receptors that combine regions of mammalian and nonmammalian GnRH receptors, a greater understanding of how different domains influence ligand binding and receptor activation can be achieved. Using human-catfish and human-chicken chimeric receptors, we demonstrate the importance of extracellular loop conformation for ligand binding and agonist potency, providing further evidence for GnRH and GnRH II stabilization of distinct active receptor conformations. We demonstrate examples of GnRH receptor gain-of-function mutations that apparently improve agonist potency independently of affinity, implicating a role for extracellular loops in stabilizing the inactive receptor conformation. We also show that entire extracellular loop substitution can overcome the detrimental effects of localized mutations, thereby demonstrating the importance of considering the conformation of entire domains when drawing conclusions from point-mutation studies. Finally, we present evidence implicating the configuration of extracellular loops 2 and 3 in combination differentiating GnRH analog binding modes. Because there are two endogenous forms of GnRH ligand but only one functional form of full-length GnRH receptor in humans, understanding how GnRH and GnRH II can elicit distinct functional effects through the same receptor is likely to provide important insights into how these ligands can have differential effects in both physiological and pathological situations.


2010 ◽  
Vol 24 (11) ◽  
pp. 2193-2206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathalie di Clemente ◽  
Soazik P. Jamin ◽  
Alexey Lugovskoy ◽  
Paul Carmillo ◽  
Christian Ehrenfels ◽  
...  

Abstract TGF-β family ligands are translated as prepropeptide precursors and are processed into mature C-terminal dimers that signal by assembling a serine/threonine kinase receptor complex containing type I and II components. Many TGF-β ligands are secreted in a latent form that cannot bind their receptor, due to the pro-region remaining associated with the mature ligand in a noncovalent complex after proteolytic cleavage. Here we show that anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), a TGF-β family ligand involved in reproductive development, must be cleaved to bind its type II receptor (AMHRII), but dissociation of the pro-region from the mature C-terminal dimer is not required for this initial interaction. We provide direct evidence for this interaction by showing that the noncovalent complex binds to a soluble form of AMHRII in an ELISA format and to AMHRII immobilized on Sepharose. Binding of the noncovalent complex to Sepharose-coupled AMHRII induces dissociation of the pro-region from the mature C-terminal dimer, whereas no dissociation occurs after binding to immobilized AMH antibodies. The pro-region cannot be detected after binding of the AMH noncovalent complex to AMHRII expressed on COS cells, indicating that pro-region dissociation may occur as a natural consequence of receptor engagement on cells. Moreover, the mature C-terminal dimer is more active than the noncovalent complex in stimulating Sma- and Mad-related protein activation, suggesting that pro-region dissociation contributes to the assembly of the active receptor complex. AMH thus exemplifies a new mechanism for receptor engagement in which interaction with the type II receptor promotes pro-region dissociation to generate mature ligand.


Endocrinology ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 140 (3) ◽  
pp. 1423-1431 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lazar Z. Krsmanovic ◽  
Antonio J. Martinez-Fuentes ◽  
Krishan K. Arora ◽  
Nadia Mores ◽  
Carlos E. Navarro ◽  
...  

Abstract Episodic hormone secretion is a characteristic feature of the hypothalamo-pituitary-gonadal system, in which the profile of gonadotropin release from pituitary gonadotrophs reflects the pulsatile secretory activity of GnRH-producing neurons in the hypothalamus. Pulsatile release of GnRH is also evident in vitro during perifusion of immortalized GnRH neurons (GT1–7 cells) and cultured fetal hypothalamic cells, which continue to produce bioactive GnRH for up to 2 months. Such cultures, as well as hypothalamic tissue from adult rats, express GnRH receptors as evidenced by the presence of high-affinity GnRH binding sites and GnRH receptor transcripts. Furthermore, individual GnRH neurons coexpress GnRH and GnRH receptors as revealed by double immunostaining of hypothalamic cultures. In static cultures of hypothalamic neurons and GT1–7 cells, treatment with the GnRH receptor antagonist, [d-pGlu1, d-Phe2, d-Trp3,6]GnRH caused a prominent increase in GnRH release. In perifused hypothalamic cells and GT1–7 cells, treatment with the GnRH receptor agonist, des-Gly10-[d-Ala6]GnRH N-ethylamide, reduced the frequency and increased the amplitude of pulsatile GnRH release, as previously observed in GT1–7 cells. In contrast, exposure to the GnRH antagonist analogs abolished pulsatile secretion and caused a sustained and progressive increase in GnRH release. These findings have demonstrated that GnRH receptors are expressed in hypothalamic GnRH neurons, and that receptor activation is required for pulsatile GnRH release in vitro. The effects of GnRH agonist and antagonist analogs on neuropeptide release are consistent with the operation of an ultrashort-loop autocrine feedback mechanism that exerts both positive and negative actions that are necessary for the integrated control of GnRH secretion from the hypothalamus.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document