Exogenous gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) stimulates LH secretion in male monkeys (Macaca fascicularis) treated chronically with high doses of a GnRH antagonist

1992 ◽  
Vol 133 (3) ◽  
pp. 439-445 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. F. Weinbauer ◽  
P. Hankel ◽  
E. Nieschlag
Keyword(s):  
Gnrh Antagonist ◽  
Prolonged Exposure ◽  
Receptor Occupancy ◽  
Gnrh Receptor ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Releasing Hormone ◽  
Testosterone Secretion ◽  
Stimulation Tests ◽  
Gonadotrophin Releasing Hormone ◽  
Lh Secretion

ABSTRACT We reported previously that after a single injection of a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist to male monkeys, exogenous GnRH stimulated LH secretion in a time- and dose-dependent manner, indicating that GnRH antagonist-induced blockade of LH secretion resulted from pituitary GnRH receptor occupancy. The present study was performed to investigate whether GnRH can also restore a blockade of LH and testosterone secretion during chronic GnRH antagonist administration. Four adult male cynomolgus monkeys (Macacafascicularis) received daily s.c. injections of the GnRH antagonist [N-Ac-d-pCl-Phe1,2,d-TRP3,d-Arg6,d-Ala10]-GnRH (ORG 30276) at a dose of 1400–1600 μg/kg for 8 weeks. Before the GnRH antagonist was given and during weeks 3 and 8 of treatment, pituitary stimulation tests were performed with 0·5, 5, 50 and 500 μg synthetic GnRH, administered in increasing order at intervals of 24 h. At 8 weeks, a dose of 1000 μg GnRH was also given. All doses of GnRH significantly (P < 0·05) stimulated serum concentrations of bioactive LH (3- to 8-fold) and testosterone (2·6- to 3·8-fold) before the initiation of GnRH antagonist treatment. After 3 weeks of GnRH antagonist treatment, only 50 and 500 μg GnRH doses were able to increase LH and testosterone secretion. Release of LH was significantly (P < 0·05) more elevated with 500 μg compared with 50 μg GnRH. After 8 weeks, only the highest dose of 1000 μg elicited a significant (P < 0·05) rise in LH secretion. Basal hormone levels just before the bolus injection of GnRH were similar (P > 0·10–0·80). This finding eliminated the possibility that the increasing doses of GnRH had primed the pituitary thereby resulting in higher stimulatory effects of the larger doses of GnRH. In conclusion, the present data indicate that, even after prolonged exposure to a GnRH antagonist, the pituitary retains some degree of responsiveness to GnRH. This observation supports the view that the inhibitory effects of chronic GnRH antagonist treatment are also mediated, at least in part, by occupancy of the pituitary GnRH receptor rather than by receptor down-regulation. Journal of Endocrinology (1992) 133, 439–445

Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) overcomes GnRH antagonist-induced suppression of LH secretion in primates

1986 ◽  
Vol 110 (1) ◽  
pp. 145-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. R. Marshall ◽  
F. Bint Akhtar ◽  
G. F. Weinbauer ◽  
E. Nieschlag
Keyword(s):  
Gnrh Antagonist ◽  
Receptor Occupancy ◽  
Gnrh Receptor ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Response Curves ◽  
Gnrh Antagonists ◽  
Releasing Hormone ◽  
Gonadotrophin Secretion ◽  
Gonadotrophin Releasing Hormone ◽  
Lh Secretion

ABSTRACT If the suppressive effects of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists on gonadotrophin secretion are mediated through GnRH-receptor occupancy alone, it should be possible to restore serum gonadotrophin levels by displacing the antagonist with exogenous GnRH. To test this hypothesis, eight adult crab-eating macaques (Macaca fascicularis), weight 4·7–7·6 kg, were subjected to the following treatment regimens. A GnRH-stimulation test was performed before and 4, 12 and 24 h after a single s.c. injection of the GnRH antagonist (N-Ac-d-p-Cl-Phe1,2,d-Trp3,d-Arg6,d-Ala10)-GnRH (ORG 30276). The stimulation tests were performed with 0·5, 5·0 or 50 μg GnRH given as a single i.v. bolus. Blood was taken before and 15, 30 and 60 min after each bolus for analysis of bioactive LH and testosterone. The GnRH-challenging doses were given as follows: 0·5 μg GnRH was injected at 0 and 4 h, followed by 5·0 μg after 12 h and 50 μg after 24 h. One week later, 5·0 μg GnRH were given at 0 and 4 h, followed by 50 μg after 12 h and 0·5 μg after 24 h. Finally, after another week, the GnRH challenges began with 50 μg at 0 and 4 h, followed by 0·5 μg at 12 h and 5·0 μg at 24 h. This design permitted comparison of the LH and testosterone responses with respect to the dose of GnRH and the time after administration of GnRH antagonist. The areas under the response curves were measured and statistical evaluation was carried out by means of non-parametric two-way analysis of variance followed by the multiple comparisons of Wilcoxon and Wilcox. Four hours after the antagonist was injected, the LH and testosterone responses to all three doses of GnRH were suppressed. At the lowest dose of GnRH (0·5 μg) the responses remained reduced even after 24 h, whereas the higher doses of GnRH elicited an LH and testosterone response at 12 and 24 h which was not significantly different from that at 0 h. These data demonstrate that the suppression of LH secretion by a GnRH antagonist in vivo can be overcome by exogenously administered GnRH in a dose- and time-dependent manner, thus strongly supporting the contention that GnRH antagonists prevent gonadotrophin secretion by GnRH-receptor occupancy. J. Endocr. (1986) 110, 145–150

Relationship between gonadotrophin subunit gene expression, gonadotrophin-releasing hormone receptor content and pituitary and plasma gonadotrophin concentrations during the rebound release of FSH after treatment of ewes with bovine follicular fluid during the luteal phase of the cycle

1992 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 109-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Brooks ◽  
W. J. Crow ◽  
J. R. McNeilly ◽  
A. S. McNeilly
Keyword(s):  
Follicular Fluid ◽  
Luteal Phase ◽  
Gnrh Receptor ◽  
Mrna Levels ◽  
Α Subunit ◽  
Luteal Regression ◽  
Releasing Hormone ◽  
Gonadotrophin Releasing Hormone ◽  
Lh Secretion ◽  
Cessation Of Treatment

ABSTRACT The modulation of FSH secretion at the beginning and middle of the follicular phase of the cycle represents the key event in the growth and selection of the preovulatory follicle. However, the mechanisms that operate within the pituitary gland to control the increased release of FSH and its subsequent inhibition in vivo remain unclear. Treatment of ewes with bovine follicular fluid (bFF) during the luteal phase has been previously shown to suppress the plasma concentrations of FSH and, following cessation of treatment on day 11, a rebound release of FSH occurs on days 12 and 13. When luteal regression is induced on day 12, this hypersecretion of FSH results in an increase in follicle growth and ovulation rate. To investigate the mechanisms involved in the control of FSH secretion, ewes were treated with twice daily s.c. injections of 5 ml bFF on days 3–11 of the oestrous cycle and luteal regression was induced on day 12 with prostaglandin (PG). The treated ewes and their controls were then killed on day 11 (luteal), or 16 or 32h after PG and their pituitaries removed and halved. One half was analysed for gonadotrophin and gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor content. Total pituitary RNA was extracted from the other half and subjected to Northern analysis using probes for FSH-β, LH-β and common α subunit. Frequent blood samples were taken and assayed for gonadotrophins. FSH secretion was significantly (P<0.01) reduced during bFF treatment throughout the luteal phase and then significantly (P<0.01) increased after cessation of treatment, with maximum secretion being reached 18– 22h after PG, and then declining towards control values by 32h after PG. A similar pattern of LH secretion was seen after bFF treatment. Pituitary FSH content was significantly (P<0.05) reduced by bFF treatment at all stages of the cycle. No difference in the pituitary LH content was seen. The increase in GnRH receptor content after PG in the controls was delayed in the treated animals. Analysis of pituitary mRNA levels revealed that bFF treatment significantly (P<0.01) reduced FSH-β mRNA levels in the luteal phase. Increased levels of FSH-β, LH-β and α subunit mRNA were seen 16h after PG in the bFF-treated animals, at the time when FSH and LH secretion from the pituitary was near maximum. These results suggest that the rebound release of FSH after treatment with bFF (as a source of inhibin) is related to a rapid increase in FSH-β mRNA, supporting the concept that the rate of FSH release is directly related to the rate of synthesis.

Effects of corticotropin-releasing hormone and its antagonist on the gene expression of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) and GnRH receptor in the hypothalamus and anterior pituitary gland of follicular phase ewes

2011 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 780 ◽  
Author(s):  
Magdalena Ciechanowska ◽  
Magdalena Łapot ◽  
Tadeusz Malewski ◽  
Krystyna Mateusiak ◽  
Tomasz Misztal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Pituitary Gland ◽  
Anterior Pituitary ◽  
Follicular Phase ◽  
Gnrh Receptor ◽  
Corticotropin Releasing Hormone ◽  
Releasing Hormone ◽  
Gonadotrophin Releasing Hormone ◽  
Lh Secretion ◽  
Crh Receptors

There is no information in the literature regarding the effect of corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) on genes encoding gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) and the GnRH receptor (GnRHR) in the hypothalamus or on GnRHR gene expression in the pituitary gland in vivo. Thus, the aim of the present study was to investigate, in follicular phase ewes, the effects of prolonged, intermittent infusion of small doses of CRH or its antagonist (α-helical CRH 9-41; CRH-A) into the third cerebral ventricle on GnRH mRNA and GnRHR mRNA levels in the hypothalamo–pituitary unit and on LH secretion. Stimulation or inhibition of CRH receptors significantly decreased or increased GnRH gene expression in the hypothalamus, respectively, and led to different responses in GnRHR gene expression in discrete hypothalamic areas. For example, CRH increased GnRHR gene expression in the preoptic area, but decreased it in the hypothalamus/stalk median eminence and in the anterior pituitary gland. In addition, CRH decreased LH secretion. Blockade of CRH receptors had the opposite effect on GnRHR gene expression. The results suggest that activation of CRH receptors in the hypothalamus of follicular phase ewes can modulate the biosynthesis and release of GnRH through complex changes in the expression of GnRH and GnRHR genes in the hypothalamo–anterior pituitary unit.

Use of the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist azaline B to control the oestrous cycle in the koala (Phascolarctos cinereus)

2016 ◽  
Vol 28 (11) ◽  
pp. 1686 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Ballantyne ◽  
S. T. Anderson ◽  
M. Pyne ◽  
V. Nicolson ◽  
A. Mucci ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gnrh Antagonist ◽  
Day Treatment ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Phascolarctos Cinereus ◽  
Subcutaneous Injections ◽  
Releasing Hormone ◽  
Gonadotrophin Releasing Hormone ◽  
June July ◽  
Dose Dependent ◽  
Cessation Of Treatment

The present study examined the effectiveness of the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist azaline B to suppress plasma LH and 17β-oestradiol concentrations in koalas and its potential application for oestrous synchronisation. In Experiment 1, single subcutaneous injections of azaline B successfully blocked the LH response to exogenous mammalian (m) GnRH in a dose-dependent manner; specifically, 0 mg (n = 4) did not suppress the LH response, 1 mg azaline B (n = 6) suppressed the LH response for 24 h (P < 0.05), 3.3 mg azaline B (n = 8) suppressed the LH response significantly in all animals only for 3 h (P < 0.05), although in half the animals LH remained suppressed for up to 3 days, and 10 mg azaline B (n = 4) suppressed the LH response for 7 days (P < 0.05). In Experiment 2, daily 1 mg, s.c., injections of azaline B over a 10-day period during seasonal anoestrus (June–July; n = 6) suppressed (P < 0.01) the LH response to mGnRH consecutively over the 10-day treatment period and, 4 days after cessation of treatment, the LH response had not recovered. Experiment 3 was designed to test the efficacy of daily 1 mg, s.c., azaline B over 10 days to suppress plasma LH and 17β-oestradiol concentrations and ultimately synchronise timed return to oestrus during the breeding season. Although azaline B treatment did not suppress basal LH or 17β-oestradiol, oestrus was delayed in all treated females by 24.2 days, but with high variability (range 9–39 days). Overall, the present study demonstrates that the GnRH antagonist azaline B is able to inhibit the LH response in koalas to exogenous mGnRH and successfully delay the return to oestrus. However, although azaline B clearly disrupts folliculogenesis, it has not been able to effectively synchronise return to oestrus in the koala.

Suppression of pituitary-testis function in rats treated neonatally with a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist and antagonist: acute and long-term effects

1989 ◽  
Vol 123 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
K.-L. Kolho ◽  
I. Huhtaniemi
Keyword(s):  
Body Weight ◽  
Gnrh Agonist ◽  
Gnrh Antagonist ◽  
Long Term Effects ◽  
Adult Rats ◽  
Releasing Hormone ◽  
Serum Lh ◽  
Accessory Sex Organs ◽  
Gonadotrophin Releasing Hormone

ABSTRACT The acute and long-term effects of pituitary-testis suppression with a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist, d-Ser(But)6des-Gly10-GnRH N-ethylamide (buserelin; 0·02, 0·1, 1·0 or 10 mg/kg body weight per day s.c.) or antagonist, N-Ac-d-Nal(2)1,d-p-Cl-Phe2,d-Trp3,d-hArg(Et2)6,d-Ala10-GnRH (RS 68439; 2 mg/kg body weight per day s.c.) were studied in male rats treated on days 1–15 of life. The animals were killed on day 16 (acute effects) or as adults (130–160 days; long-term effects). Acutely, the lowest dose of the agonist decreased pituitary FSH content and testicular LH receptors, but with increasing doses pituitary and serum LH concentrations, intratesticular testosterone content and weights of testes were also suppressed (P< 0·05–0·01). No decrease was found in serum FSH or in weights of accessory sex organs even with the highest dose of the agonist, the latter finding indicating continuing secretion of androgens. The GnRH antagonist treatment suppressed pituitary LH and FSH contents and serum LH (P< 0·05–0·01) but, as with the agonist, serum FSH remained unaltered. Testicular testosterone and testis weights were decreased (P <0·01) but testicular LH receptors remained unchanged. Moreover, the seminal vesicle and ventral prostate weights were reduced, in contrast to the effects of the agonists. Pituitary LH and FSH contents had recovered in all adult rats treated neonatally with agonist and there was no effect on serum LH and testosterone concentrations or on fertility. In contrast, in adult rats treated neonatally with antagonist, weights of testis and accessory sex organs remained decreased (P <0·01–0·05) but hormone secretion from the pituitary and testis had returned to normal except that serum FSH was increased by 80% (P <0·01). Interestingly, 90% of the antagonist-treated animals were infertile. It is concluded that treatment with a GnRH agonist during the neonatal period does not have a chronic effect on pituitary-gonadal function. In contrast, GnRH antagonist treatment neonatally permanently inhibits the development of the testis and accessory sex organs and results in infertility. Interestingly, despite the decline of pituitary FSH neonatally, neither of the GnRH analogues was able to suppress serum FSH values and this differs from the concomitant changes in LH and from the effects of similar treatments in adult rats. Journal of Endocrinology (1989) 123, 83–91

Orchidectomy selectively increases follicle-stimulating hormone secretion in gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist-treated male rats

1995 ◽  
Vol 132 (3) ◽  
pp. 357-362 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Tena-Sempere ◽  
L Pinilla ◽  
E Aguilar
Keyword(s):  
Gnrh Antagonist ◽  
Follicle Stimulating Hormone ◽  
Hormone Secretion ◽  
Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone ◽  
Male Rats ◽  
Gonadotropin Secretion ◽  
Releasing Hormone ◽  
Treated Male ◽  
Lh Secretion ◽  
Stimulating Hormone

Tena-Sempere M, Pinilla L, Aguilar E. Orchidectomy selectively increases follicle-stimulating hormone secretion in gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist-treated male rats. Eur J Endocrinol 1995;132: 357–62. ISSN 0804–4643 The pituitary component of the feedback mechanisms exerted by testicular factors on gonadotropin secretion was analyzed in adult male rats treated with a potent gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist. In order to discriminate between androgens and testicular peptides, groups of males were orchidectomized (to eliminate androgens and non-androgenic testicular factors) or injected with ethylene dimethane sulfonate (EDS), a selective toxin for Leydig cells (to eliminate selectively androgens) and treated for 15 days with vehicle or the GnRH antagonist Ac-d-pClPhe-d-pClPhe-d-TrpSer-Tyr-d-Arg-Leu-Arg-Pro-d-Ala-NH2CH3COOH (Org.30276, 5 mg/kg/72 hours). Serum concentrations of luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) were measured 7 and 14 days after the beginning of treatment. We found that: in males treated with GnRH antagonist, orchidectomy or EDS treatment did not induce any increase in LH secretion; and orchidectomy, but not EDS treatment, increased FSH secretion in GnRH-treated males. The present results show that negative feedback of testicular factors on LH secretion is mediated completely through changes in GnRH actions. In contrast, a part of the inhibitory action of the testis on FSH secretion is exerted directly at the pituitary level. It can be hypothesized that non-Leydig cell testicular factor(s) inputs at different levels of the hypothalamic–pituitary axis in controlling LH and FSH secretion. Manuel Tena-Sempere, Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Córdoba, 14004 Córdoba, Spain

90 Effect of the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist on the sheep follicular population

2021 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 152
Author(s):  
H. C. Ferreira ◽  
G. B. Vergani ◽  
J. R. Bevilaqua ◽  
N. V. Rodrigues ◽  
M. E. F. Oliveira
Keyword(s):  
Gnrh Antagonist ◽  
Population Data ◽  
Average Diameter ◽  
Placebo Treatment ◽  
Releasing Hormone ◽  
Treatment Administration ◽  
Gonadotrophin Releasing Hormone ◽  
Post Hoc ◽  
Different Doses ◽  
Synchronization Protocol

The present study was designed to study the follicular population dynamics followed or not by treatment with different doses of the GnRH antagonist in sheep. A total of 18 ewes were submitted to short-term oestrus synchronization protocol (Oliveira et al. 2009 Proc. Braz. Congr. Anim. Reprod.). The animals were 2 or 3 years old, multiparous, and had a body score of 3 to 3.5. On Day 7 after ovulation of synchronized oestrus, females were randomly divided into groups (n=6/group) according to the dose of the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist (Firmagon®, Ferring Pharmaceuticals) subcutaneously administered: G-control: placebo treatment (administration of saline solution); G-lower dose: 215 µg/kg; and G-higher dose: 235 µg/kg of bodyweight. B-mode ultrasound exams of the ovaries were conducted daily from 1 day before treatment with GnRH antagonist until the females showed oestrous behaviour. Ultrasound equipment (MyLab Vet®, Esaote) was used coupled to a transrectal linear transducer with a frequency of 6 and 8MHz to assess the ovarian population. Data were compared between groups, evaluation days, and their interaction by ANOVA with post hoc using Tukey’s test (P&lt;0.05). There was no interaction (P&gt;0.05) between the studied effects (treatments and evaluation days). The number of small follicles (2–3.49mm) was higher (P=0.0002) in the G-lower dose (5.4±0.4) compared with the G-control (4.1±0.3) and G-higher dose (3.5±0.2). The number of large follicles (≥4.5mm) was lower (P=0.01) in the G-higher dose (0.2±0.0) compared with the G-control (0.5±0.1) and G-lower dose (0.4±0.1). The number of medium follicles (3.5– 4.49mm) and the average diameter of the follicles in the 3 categories of diameter did not differ (P&gt;0.05) between groups. The number of medium follicles differed (P=0.0131) between Days 8 and 15 after synchronized oestrus ovulation. The number of large follicles on Day 6 differed (P=0.0002) of Days 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 16, and 17. The average diameter of medium follicles differed (P=0.0095) between Days 8 and 10. The number of small follicles and the average diameter of small and large follicles did not differ (P&gt;0.05) between days. In conclusion, the administration of the GnRH antagonist at a higher dose in sheep suppressed the development of large tertiary or antral follicles, whereas at a lower dose, it led to an increase in the population of small follicles.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document