Evidence that the Type-2 Gonadotrophin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH) Receptor Mediates the Behavioural Effects of GnRH-II on Feeding and Reproduction in Musk Shrews

2005 ◽  
Vol 17 (8) ◽  
pp. 489-497 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. S. Kauffman ◽  
A. Wills ◽  
R. P. Millar ◽  
E. F. Rissman
1992 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 109-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Brooks ◽  
W. J. Crow ◽  
J. R. McNeilly ◽  
A. S. McNeilly

ABSTRACT The modulation of FSH secretion at the beginning and middle of the follicular phase of the cycle represents the key event in the growth and selection of the preovulatory follicle. However, the mechanisms that operate within the pituitary gland to control the increased release of FSH and its subsequent inhibition in vivo remain unclear. Treatment of ewes with bovine follicular fluid (bFF) during the luteal phase has been previously shown to suppress the plasma concentrations of FSH and, following cessation of treatment on day 11, a rebound release of FSH occurs on days 12 and 13. When luteal regression is induced on day 12, this hypersecretion of FSH results in an increase in follicle growth and ovulation rate. To investigate the mechanisms involved in the control of FSH secretion, ewes were treated with twice daily s.c. injections of 5 ml bFF on days 3–11 of the oestrous cycle and luteal regression was induced on day 12 with prostaglandin (PG). The treated ewes and their controls were then killed on day 11 (luteal), or 16 or 32h after PG and their pituitaries removed and halved. One half was analysed for gonadotrophin and gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor content. Total pituitary RNA was extracted from the other half and subjected to Northern analysis using probes for FSH-β, LH-β and common α subunit. Frequent blood samples were taken and assayed for gonadotrophins. FSH secretion was significantly (P<0.01) reduced during bFF treatment throughout the luteal phase and then significantly (P<0.01) increased after cessation of treatment, with maximum secretion being reached 18– 22h after PG, and then declining towards control values by 32h after PG. A similar pattern of LH secretion was seen after bFF treatment. Pituitary FSH content was significantly (P<0.05) reduced by bFF treatment at all stages of the cycle. No difference in the pituitary LH content was seen. The increase in GnRH receptor content after PG in the controls was delayed in the treated animals. Analysis of pituitary mRNA levels revealed that bFF treatment significantly (P<0.01) reduced FSH-β mRNA levels in the luteal phase. Increased levels of FSH-β, LH-β and α subunit mRNA were seen 16h after PG in the bFF-treated animals, at the time when FSH and LH secretion from the pituitary was near maximum. These results suggest that the rebound release of FSH after treatment with bFF (as a source of inhibin) is related to a rapid increase in FSH-β mRNA, supporting the concept that the rate of FSH release is directly related to the rate of synthesis.


2011 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 780 ◽  
Author(s):  
Magdalena Ciechanowska ◽  
Magdalena Łapot ◽  
Tadeusz Malewski ◽  
Krystyna Mateusiak ◽  
Tomasz Misztal ◽  
...  

There is no information in the literature regarding the effect of corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) on genes encoding gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) and the GnRH receptor (GnRHR) in the hypothalamus or on GnRHR gene expression in the pituitary gland in vivo. Thus, the aim of the present study was to investigate, in follicular phase ewes, the effects of prolonged, intermittent infusion of small doses of CRH or its antagonist (α-helical CRH 9-41; CRH-A) into the third cerebral ventricle on GnRH mRNA and GnRHR mRNA levels in the hypothalamo–pituitary unit and on LH secretion. Stimulation or inhibition of CRH receptors significantly decreased or increased GnRH gene expression in the hypothalamus, respectively, and led to different responses in GnRHR gene expression in discrete hypothalamic areas. For example, CRH increased GnRHR gene expression in the preoptic area, but decreased it in the hypothalamus/stalk median eminence and in the anterior pituitary gland. In addition, CRH decreased LH secretion. Blockade of CRH receptors had the opposite effect on GnRHR gene expression. The results suggest that activation of CRH receptors in the hypothalamus of follicular phase ewes can modulate the biosynthesis and release of GnRH through complex changes in the expression of GnRH and GnRHR genes in the hypothalamo–anterior pituitary unit.


Stress ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 215-222 ◽  
Author(s):  
James S. Kinsey-Jones ◽  
Xiao Feng Li ◽  
James E. Bowe ◽  
Stafford L. Lightman ◽  
Kevin T. O'Byrne

1986 ◽  
Vol 110 (1) ◽  
pp. 145-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. R. Marshall ◽  
F. Bint Akhtar ◽  
G. F. Weinbauer ◽  
E. Nieschlag

ABSTRACT If the suppressive effects of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists on gonadotrophin secretion are mediated through GnRH-receptor occupancy alone, it should be possible to restore serum gonadotrophin levels by displacing the antagonist with exogenous GnRH. To test this hypothesis, eight adult crab-eating macaques (Macaca fascicularis), weight 4·7–7·6 kg, were subjected to the following treatment regimens. A GnRH-stimulation test was performed before and 4, 12 and 24 h after a single s.c. injection of the GnRH antagonist (N-Ac-d-p-Cl-Phe1,2,d-Trp3,d-Arg6,d-Ala10)-GnRH (ORG 30276). The stimulation tests were performed with 0·5, 5·0 or 50 μg GnRH given as a single i.v. bolus. Blood was taken before and 15, 30 and 60 min after each bolus for analysis of bioactive LH and testosterone. The GnRH-challenging doses were given as follows: 0·5 μg GnRH was injected at 0 and 4 h, followed by 5·0 μg after 12 h and 50 μg after 24 h. One week later, 5·0 μg GnRH were given at 0 and 4 h, followed by 50 μg after 12 h and 0·5 μg after 24 h. Finally, after another week, the GnRH challenges began with 50 μg at 0 and 4 h, followed by 0·5 μg at 12 h and 5·0 μg at 24 h. This design permitted comparison of the LH and testosterone responses with respect to the dose of GnRH and the time after administration of GnRH antagonist. The areas under the response curves were measured and statistical evaluation was carried out by means of non-parametric two-way analysis of variance followed by the multiple comparisons of Wilcoxon and Wilcox. Four hours after the antagonist was injected, the LH and testosterone responses to all three doses of GnRH were suppressed. At the lowest dose of GnRH (0·5 μg) the responses remained reduced even after 24 h, whereas the higher doses of GnRH elicited an LH and testosterone response at 12 and 24 h which was not significantly different from that at 0 h. These data demonstrate that the suppression of LH secretion by a GnRH antagonist in vivo can be overcome by exogenously administered GnRH in a dose- and time-dependent manner, thus strongly supporting the contention that GnRH antagonists prevent gonadotrophin secretion by GnRH-receptor occupancy. J. Endocr. (1986) 110, 145–150


1988 ◽  
Vol 117 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. A. King ◽  
J. S. Davidson ◽  
R. P. Millar

ABSTRACT The presence of two endogenous forms of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) in the chicken hypothalamus (chicken GnRH-I ([Gln8]GnRH) and chicken GnRH-II ([His5,Trp7,Tyr8]GnRH)), and the stimulation of gonadotrophins by both forms, suggests the possible existence of GnRH receptor subtypes and gonadotroph subtypes in the chicken pituitary. This question was investigated by assessing the effects of various combinations of the two known forms of chicken hypothalamic GnRH and antagonist analogues of GnRH on LH release from dispersed chicken anterior pituitary cells in both static and perifused systems. The relative inhibition of chicken GnRH-I-stimulated and chicken GnRH-II-stimulated LH release by 12 GnRH antagonists did not differ significantly, suggesting a single GnRH receptor type. Chicken GnRH-II was approximately sixfold more potent than chicken GnRH-I in releasing LH. Release of LH in response to maximal doses of chicken GnRH-I and chicken GnRH-II and to a mixture of both was similar and the two peptides were not additive in their effects, consistent with the presence of a single type of LH gonadotroph and a GnRH receptor which binds both forms of GnRH. Each form of GnRH desensitized cells to subsequent stimulation with the other form, providing additional evidence for a single type of LH gonadotroph. These findings suggest that chicken GnRH-I and -II stimulate gonadotrophin release through a single GnRH receptor type on a single class of LH gonadotroph in the chicken pituitary. J. Endocr. (1988) 117,43–49


1992 ◽  
Vol 133 (3) ◽  
pp. 439-445 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. F. Weinbauer ◽  
P. Hankel ◽  
E. Nieschlag

ABSTRACT We reported previously that after a single injection of a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist to male monkeys, exogenous GnRH stimulated LH secretion in a time- and dose-dependent manner, indicating that GnRH antagonist-induced blockade of LH secretion resulted from pituitary GnRH receptor occupancy. The present study was performed to investigate whether GnRH can also restore a blockade of LH and testosterone secretion during chronic GnRH antagonist administration. Four adult male cynomolgus monkeys (Macacafascicularis) received daily s.c. injections of the GnRH antagonist [N-Ac-d-pCl-Phe1,2,d-TRP3,d-Arg6,d-Ala10]-GnRH (ORG 30276) at a dose of 1400–1600 μg/kg for 8 weeks. Before the GnRH antagonist was given and during weeks 3 and 8 of treatment, pituitary stimulation tests were performed with 0·5, 5, 50 and 500 μg synthetic GnRH, administered in increasing order at intervals of 24 h. At 8 weeks, a dose of 1000 μg GnRH was also given. All doses of GnRH significantly (P < 0·05) stimulated serum concentrations of bioactive LH (3- to 8-fold) and testosterone (2·6- to 3·8-fold) before the initiation of GnRH antagonist treatment. After 3 weeks of GnRH antagonist treatment, only 50 and 500 μg GnRH doses were able to increase LH and testosterone secretion. Release of LH was significantly (P < 0·05) more elevated with 500 μg compared with 50 μg GnRH. After 8 weeks, only the highest dose of 1000 μg elicited a significant (P < 0·05) rise in LH secretion. Basal hormone levels just before the bolus injection of GnRH were similar (P > 0·10–0·80). This finding eliminated the possibility that the increasing doses of GnRH had primed the pituitary thereby resulting in higher stimulatory effects of the larger doses of GnRH. In conclusion, the present data indicate that, even after prolonged exposure to a GnRH antagonist, the pituitary retains some degree of responsiveness to GnRH. This observation supports the view that the inhibitory effects of chronic GnRH antagonist treatment are also mediated, at least in part, by occupancy of the pituitary GnRH receptor rather than by receptor down-regulation. Journal of Endocrinology (1992) 133, 439–445


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura H. Heitman ◽  
Adriaan P. IJzerman ◽  
Craig A. McArdle ◽  
Adam J Pawson

GnRH1 and GnRH2 receptors (provisonal nomenclature [39], also called Type I and Type II GnRH receptor, respectively [85]) have been cloned from numerous species, most of which express two or three types of GnRH receptor [85, 84, 114]. GnRH I (p-Glu-His-Trp-Ser-Tyr-Gly-Leu-Arg-Pro-Gly-NH2) is a hypothalamic decapeptide also known as luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone, gonadoliberin, luliberin, gonadorelin or simply as GnRH. It is a member of a family of similar peptides found in many species [85, 84, 114] including GnRH II (pGlu-His-Trp-Ser-His-Gly-Trp-Tyr-Pro-Gly-NH2 (which is also known as chicken GnRH-II). Receptors for three forms of GnRH exist in some species but only GnRH I and GnRH II and their cognate receptors have been found in mammals [85, 84, 114]. GnRH1 receptors are expressed by pituitary gonadotrophs, where they mediate the effects of GnRH on gonadotropin hormone synthesis and secretion that underpin central control of mammalian reproduction. GnRH analogues are used in assisted reproduction and to treat steroid hormone-dependent conditions [58]. Notably, agonists cause desensitization of GnRH-stimulated gonadotropin secretion and the consequent reduction in circulating sex steroids is exploited to treat hormone-dependent cancers of the breast, ovary and prostate [58]. GnRH1 receptors are selectively activated by GnRH I and all lack the COOH-terminal tails found in other GPCRs. GnRH2 receptors do have COOH-terminal tails and (where tested) are selective for GnRH II over GnRH I. GnRH2 receptors are expressed by some primates but not by humans [88]. Phylogenetic classifications divide GnRH receptors into three [85] or five groups [129] and highlight examples of gene loss through evolution, with humans retaining only one ancient gene. The structure of the GnRH1 receptor in complex with elagolix has been elucidated [132].


Reproduction ◽  
2003 ◽  
pp. 271-278 ◽  
Author(s):  
AJ Pawson ◽  
K Morgan ◽  
SR Maudsley ◽  
RP Millar

Humans may be particularly unusual with respect to the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) control of their reproductive axis in that they possess two distinct GnRH precursor genes, on chromosomes 8p11-p21 and 20p13, but only one conventional GnRH receptor subtype (type I GnRH receptor) encoded within the genome, on chromosome 4. A disrupted human type II GnRH receptor gene homologue is present on chromosome 1q12. The genes encoding GnRH ligand precursors and GnRH receptors have now been characterized in a broad range of vertebrate species, including fish, amphibians and mammals. Ligand precursors and receptors can be categorized into three phylogenetic families. Members of each family exist in primitive vertebrates, whereas mammals exhibit selective loss of ligand precursor and receptor genes. One interpretation of these findings is that each ligand-cognate receptor family may have evolved to fulfil a separate function in reproductive physiology and that species-specific gene inactivation, modification or loss may have occurred during evolution when particular roles have become obsolete or subject to regulation by a different biochemical pathway. Evidence in support of this concept is available following the characterization of the chromosomal loci encoding the human type II GnRH receptor homologue, a rat type II GnRH receptor gene remnant (on rat chromosome 18) and a mouse type II GnRH ligand precursor gene remnant (on mouse chromosome 2). Whether type I GnRH and type II GnRH peptides elicit different signalling responses in humans by activation of the type I GnRH receptor in a cell type-specific fashion remains to be shown. Recent structure-function studies of GnRH ligands and GnRH receptors and their expression patterns in different tissues add further intrigue to this hypothesis by indicating novel roles for GnRH such as neuromodulation of reproductive function and direct regulation of peripheral reproductive tissues. Surprises concerning the complexities of GnRH ligand and receptor function in reproductive endocrinology should continue to emerge in the future.


1986 ◽  
Vol 108 (3) ◽  
pp. 441-449 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. A. Wilson ◽  
H. J. Herdon ◽  
L. C. Bailey ◽  
R. N. Clayton

ABSTRACT In the long-term castrated rat the negative feedback effect of testosterone is markedly reduced and the raised levels of plasma LH seen in the castrated animals are not suppressed by physiological concentrations of plasma testosterone. In this study we have measured pituitary gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor content as well as plasma and pituitary LH on days 1, 10 and 40 after castration and noted the effect of testosterone replacement on these parameters. We found that the negative feedback effect of physiological concentrations of testosterone on plasma and pituitary LH, pituitary GnRH receptor content and response to exogenous GnRH was attenuated 10 and 40 days after castration. It is suggested that the lack of effect of testosterone in the long-term castrated rat is due to its inability to reduce the pituitary GnRH receptor content. On increasing testosterone to supraphysiological levels, the negative feedback effect was reinstated. We also found that in rats 40 days after castration, physiological and subphysiological concentrations of testosterone significantly increased pituitary GnRH receptor content and this may explain the previous findings that low concentrations of testosterone can enhance the effect of GnRH and increase plasma LH levels. J. Endocr. (1986) 108, 441–449


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document