scholarly journals Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Comparator (Darbepoetin Alfa) Study of Oral Roxadustat in CKD Patients with Anemia on Hemodialysis in Japan

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (7) ◽  
pp. 1628-1639 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tadao Akizawa ◽  
Manabu Iwasaki ◽  
Yusuke Yamaguchi ◽  
Yoshikatsu Majikawa ◽  
Michael Reusch
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Darbepoetin Alfa ◽  
Binding Capacity ◽  
Transferrin Saturation ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Maintenance Rate ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Average Hemoglobin

BackgroundRoxadustat is an oral hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor approved in China for dialysis-dependent CKD anemia.MethodsThis phase 3, 24-week, double-blind, double-dummy study evaluated roxadustat’s noninferiority to darbepoetin alfa for hemodialysis-dependent CKD anemia. We randomly assigned Japanese patients to oral roxadustat three times weekly or to darbepoetin alfa injections once weekly, titrating doses to maintain hemoglobin between 10–12 g/dl. The primary end point was change of average hemoglobin from baseline to weeks 18–24 (∆Hb18–24). Secondary end points were average hemoglobin and proportion of patients with hemoglobin between 10–12 g/dl (maintenance rate) at weeks 18–24, and iron parameters. Safety assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events and adjudicated ophthalmologic findings.ResultsWe randomly assigned 303 patients to roxadustat (n=151) or darbepoetin alfa (n=152). The difference between roxadustat and darbepoetin alfa in ∆Hb18–24 was −0.02 g/dl (95% confidence interval, –0.18 to 0.15), confirming roxadustat’s noninferiority to darbepoetin alfa. Average hemoglobin at weeks 18–24 with roxadustat was 10.99 g/dl (95% confidence interval: 10.88 to 11.10), confirming its efficacy. Among patients with one or more hemoglobin value during weeks 18–24, the maintenance rate was 95.2% with roxadustat and 91.3% with darbepoetin alfa. Serum iron, ferritin, and transferrin saturation remained clinically stable with roxadustat; transferrin and total iron binding capacity increased through week 4 before stabilizing. Common treatment-emergent adverse events were nasopharyngitis, shunt stenosis, diarrhea, contusion, and vomiting. The proportion of patients with new or worsening retinal hemorrhage was 32.4% with roxadustat and 36.6% with darbepoetin alfa. We observed no clinically meaningful changes in retinal thickness groups.ConclusionsRoxadustat maintained hemoglobin within 10–12 g/dl in patients on hemodialysis and was noninferior to darbepoetin alfa. Treatment-emergent adverse events were consistent with previous reports.Clinical Trial registry name and registration numberA Study of Intermittent Oral Dosing of ASP1517 in Hemodialysis Chronic Kidney Disease Patients with Anemia, NCT02952092 (ClinicalTrials.gov)

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of Daprodustat Compared with Darbepoetin Alfa in Japanese Hemodialysis Patients with Anemia

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (8) ◽  
pp. 1155-1165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tadao Akizawa ◽  
Masaomi Nangaku ◽  
Taeko Yonekawa ◽  
Nobuhiko Okuda ◽  
Shinya Kawamatsu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Darbepoetin Alfa ◽  
Binding Capacity ◽  
Geometric Mean ◽  
Japanese Patients ◽  
Target Range ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Group Frequency ◽  
Intent To Treat ◽  
Treat Population

Background and objectivesDaprodustat is an oral hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor that stimulates erythropoiesis and regulates genes related to iron metabolism. The efficacy (noninferiority) and safety of daprodustat compared with standard therapy (darbepoetin alfa) was evaluated.Design, setting, participants, & measurements This was a randomized, phase 3, double-blind, active-control study in Japanese patients receiving hemodialysis with anemia of CKD. Participants’ treatment was switched from current erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) to daprodustat 4 mg once daily or darbepoetin alfa 10–60 μg once weekly (on the basis of the prestudy ESA dose). Dose was adjusted every 4 weeks for daprodustat or every 2 weeks for darbepoetin alfa, according to a protocol-specified algorithm. The primary end point was mean hemoglobin during weeks 40–52 in the intent-to-treat population.ResultsOf 332 participants screened, 271 participants were randomized (safety evaluation: 271 participants; efficacy evaluation: 267 intent-to-treat population). The mean hemoglobin during weeks 40–52 were maintained within the target range in both groups (10.9 g/dl [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 10.8 to 11.0] for daprodustat, and 10.8 g/dl [95% CI, 10.7 to 11.0] for darbepoetin alfa). Daprodustat was noninferior to darbepoetin alfa, as the lower bound of the confidence interval for the treatment difference (0.1 g/dl; 95% CI, −0.1 to 0.2 g/dl) was greater than the noninferiority criterion of −1.0 g/dl. For most participants, hemoglobin was maintained within the target range (10.0–12.0 g/dl) during weeks 40–52 (88% daprodustat; 90% darbepoetin alfa). Geometric mean hepcidin levels decreased more at week 52 with daprodustat (−37%; 95% CI, −49 to −23) than with darbepoetin alfa (−20%; 95% CI, −36 to −1), and an increase in total iron-binding capacity was observed in the daprodustat group. Frequency of adverse events were generally similar between daprodustat and darbepoetin alfa.ConclusionsOral daprodustat was noninferior to darbepoetin alfa as measured by mean hemoglobin over weeks 40–52 in Japanese patients receiving hemodialysis switched from ESAs.Clinical Trial registry name and registration number201754, Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02969655.

scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of fremanezumab in clinical trial participants aged ≥60 years with episodic or chronic migraine: pooled results from 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 studies

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie J. Nahas ◽  
Steffen Naegel ◽  
Joshua M. Cohen ◽  
Xiaoping Ning ◽  
Lindsay Janka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Chronic Migraine ◽  
Preventive Treatment ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Double Blind Placebo ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Trial Participants

Abstract Background Although migraine is less common in older people, preventive treatment of migraine in these individuals may be more challenging due to the presence of multiple comorbidities and polypharmacy. Additionally, evidence for migraine treatment efficacy, safety, and tolerability is limited in this population. We evaluated efficacy, safety, and tolerability of fremanezumab, a fully humanized monoclonal antibody (IgG2Δa) that selectively targets calcitonin gene–related peptide (CGRP), in clinical trial participants aged ≥60 years with episodic migraine (EM) or chronic migraine (CM). Methods This analysis included data from 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 studies: the HALO EM study, HALO CM study, and FOCUS study in participants with EM or CM and prior inadequate response to 2–4 migraine preventive medication classes. Participants in all studies were randomized 1:1:1 to receive 12 weeks of subcutaneous treatment with quarterly fremanezumab (Months 1/2/3: EM/CM, 675 mg/placebo/placebo), monthly fremanezumab (Months 1/2/3: EM, 225 mg/225 mg/225 mg; CM, 675 mg/225 mg/225 mg), or matched monthly placebo. Results These pooled analyses included 246 participants aged ≥60 years. Reductions in monthly migraine days from baseline over 12 weeks were significantly greater with fremanezumab (least-squares mean change from baseline [standard error]: quarterly fremanezumab, − 4.3 [0.59]; monthly fremanezumab, − 4.6 [0.54]) versus placebo (placebo, − 2.3 [0.57]; both P < 0.01 vs placebo). As early as Week 1, significant reductions from baseline in weekly migraine days were observed with fremanezumab versus placebo (both P < 0.01). With fremanezumab treatment versus placebo, a significantly higher proportion of participants achieved ≥50% reduction in monthly migraine days, and significant improvements in disability and quality-of-life outcomes were observed (P < 0.05). Proportions of participants experiencing serious adverse events and adverse events leading to discontinuation were low and similar in the fremanezumab and placebo groups. Efficacy and safety results were comparable to the overall pooled population (N = 2843). Conclusions This pooled subgroup analysis demonstrates that fremanezumab treatment is efficacious and well-tolerated over 12 weeks in participants aged ≥60 years with EM or CM. These data may help healthcare providers with clinical decision making and preventive treatment selection for older patients with migraine. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: HALO CM: NCT02621931; HALO EM: NCT02629861; FOCUS: NCT03308968.

scholarly journals Phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of lasmiditan for acute treatment of migraine

Brain ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 142 (7) ◽  
pp. 1894-1904 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter J Goadsby ◽  
Linda A Wietecha ◽  
Ellen B Dennehy ◽  
Bernice Kuca ◽  
Michael G Case ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Acute Treatment ◽  
Moderate Intensity ◽  
Primary Analysis ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Post Dose ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Bothersome Symptom

Abstract Lasmiditan, a serotonin 5-HT1F receptor agonist, was effective for acute treatment of patients with migraine in a phase 3 double-blind randomized controlled study. The current study was designed to replicate these findings in a generalizable population of patients with migraine, including those with a cardiovascular medical history. This prospective, double-blind, phase 3 multicentre study randomly assigned patients with migraine with and without aura (1:1:1:1 ratio) to oral lasmiditan 200 mg, 100 mg, 50 mg, or placebo. Patients were instructed to dose at home within 4 h of onset of migraine attack of at least moderate intensity and not improving. The primary objective was to assess the proportion of patients’ headache pain-free and most bothersome symptom-free at 2 h post-dose for each dose of lasmiditan versus placebo (NCT02605174). Patients (n = 3005) were assigned and treated (n = 2583, safety population): 1938 lasmiditan (200 mg n = 528, 100 mg n = 532, and 50 mg n = 556 included in primary analysis) and 645 placebo (540 included in primary analysis). Most patients (79.2%) had ≥1 cardiovascular risk factor at baseline, in addition to migraine. Lasmiditan was associated with significantly more pain freedom at 2 h (lasmiditan 200 mg: 38.8%, odds ratio 2.3, 95% confidence interval 1.8–3.1, P < 0.001; 100 mg: 31.4%, odds ratio 1.7, 1.3–2.2, P < 0.001; 50 mg: 28.6%, odds ratio 1.5, 1.1–1.9, P = 0.003 versus placebo 21.3%) and freedom from most bothersome symptom at 2 h (lasmiditan 200 mg: 48.7%, odds ratio 1.9, 95% confidence interval 1.4–2.4, P < 0.001; 100 mg: 44.2%, odds ratio 1.6, 1.2–2.0, P < 0.001; 50 mg: 40.8%, odds ratio 1.4, 1.1–1.8, P = 0.009 versus placebo 33.5%). Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 253 of 649 (39.0%), 229 of 635 (36.1%), and 166 of 654 (25.4%) of patients on lasmiditan 200, 100, and 50 mg, respectively, versus 75 of 645 (11.6%) on placebo. Most adverse events were CNS-related and included dizziness, somnolence and paraesthesia. Lasmiditan was effective at 2 h post-dose for acute treatment of migraine at all oral doses tested. Efficacy and safety were consistent with the previous phase 3 study.

scholarly journals Exenatide once weekly over 2 years as a potential disease-modifying treatment for Parkinson’s disease: protocol for a multicentre, randomised, double blind, parallel group, placebo controlled, phase 3 trial: The ‘Exenatide-PD3’ study

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. e047993
Author(s):  
Nirosen Vijiaratnam ◽  
Christine Girges ◽  
Grace Auld ◽  
Marisa Chau ◽  
Kate Maclagan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Parkinson’S Disease ◽  
Parkinson's Disease ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Link Type ◽  
South Central ◽  
Disease Modifying ◽  
Secondary Outcomes

IntroductionParkinson’s disease (PD) is a common neurodegenerative disorder with substantial morbidity. No disease-modifying treatments currently exist. The glucagon like peptide-1 receptor agonist exenatide has been associated in single-centre studies with reduced motor deterioration over 1 year. The aim of this multicentre UK trial is to confirm whether these previous positive results are maintained in a larger number of participants over 2 years and if effects accumulate with prolonged drug exposure.Methods and analysisThis is a phase 3, multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial of exenatide at a dose of 2 mg weekly in 200 participants with mild to moderate PD. Treatment duration is 96 weeks. Randomisation is 1:1, drug to placebo. Assessments are performed at baseline, week 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and 96 weeks.The primary outcome is the comparison of Movement Disorders Society Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale part 3 motor subscore in the practically defined OFF medication state at 96 weeks between participants according to treatment allocation. Secondary outcomes will compare the change between groups among other motor, non-motor and cognitive scores. The primary outcome will be reported using descriptive statistics and comparisons between treatment groups using a mixed model, adjusting for baseline scores. Secondary outcomes will be summarised between treatment groups using summary statistics and appropriate statistical tests to assess for significant differences.Ethics and disseminationThis trial has been approved by the South Central-Berkshire Research Ethics Committee and the Health Research Authority. Results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals, presented at scientific meetings and to patients in lay-summary format.Trial registration numbersNCT04232969, ISRCTN14552789.

SAFETY AND TOLERABILITY OF TERIFLUNOMIDE IN CLINICAL STUDIES

2015 ◽  
Vol 86 (11) ◽  
pp. e4.26-e4
Author(s):  
David Barnes ◽  
Thomas Leist ◽  
Mark Freedman ◽  
Tomas Olsson ◽  
Aaron Miller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pregnancy Outcomes ◽  
Clinical Studies ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Relapsing Remitting ◽  
Tolerability Data ◽  
Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
To Receive

IntroductionTeriflunomide, approved for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, has a well-characterized safety profile based on individual clinical studies. We report pooled safety and tolerability data from four, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of teriflunomide. Post-approval updates on hair thinning and pregnancy outcomes, sometimes concerns for patients initiating teriflunomide, are reported.MethodsData were pooled from phase 2 (NCT01487096) and phase 3 TEMSO (NCT00134563), TOWER (NCT00751881), and TOPIC (NCT00622700) studies. Patients were randomized to receive teriflunomide 14 mg, 7 mg, or placebo. Safety analyses were performed for all patients exposed to teriflunomide.ResultsThe pooled dataset included 3044 patients. Commonly reported adverse events (AEs) were in accordance with individual clinical studies, most being transient and mild-to-moderate in intensity. Incidence of hepatic AEs was higher in teriflunomide groups; however, serious hepatic AEs were similar across groups (∼2–3%). Hair thinning was higher in teriflunomide than placebo groups, but typically resolved on treatment without intervention and led to discontinuation in <2% of patients. No structural or functional abnormalities were reported in 42 newborns from teriflunomide-exposed parents.ConclusionsThese data from >6800 patient-years of teriflunomide exposure were consistent with individual studies and no new, unexpected safety signals were observed. (Study supported by Genzyme, a Sanofi company).

scholarly journals Efficacy and tolerability of the investigational topical cream SD-101 (6% allantoin) in patients with epidermolysis bullosa: a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled trial (ESSENCE study)

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy S. Paller ◽  
◽  
John Browning ◽  
Milos Nikolic ◽  
Christine Bodemer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Epidermolysis Bullosa ◽  
Wound Closure ◽  
Trial Registration ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Topical Cream ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Total Body

Abstract Background Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a rare genetic disorder that manifests as blistering and/or skin erosion. There is no approved treatment for EB; current standard of care consists of wound and pain management. SD-101 6% is a topical cream containing 6% allantoin that was developed for treating skin lesions in patients with EB. The aim of this phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled study was to assess the efficacy and safety of SD-101 6% cream versus vehicle (0% allantoin) on lesions in patients with EB. Methods Eligible patients were ≥1 month old, had a diagnosis of EB (simplex, recessive dystrophic, or intermediate junctional) and a target wound 10–50 cm2 in size that was present for ≥21 days. Patients were randomly assigned to SD-101 6% cream or vehicle, which was applied topically once a day to the entire body for 3 months. Primary efficacy endpoints were time to complete target wound closure within 3 months and the proportion of patients who experienced complete target wound closure within 3 months. Post hoc subgroup analyses were conducted by patient age and in those with body surface area index of total body wound burden ≥5% at baseline. Results In total, 169 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to SD-101 6% (n = 82) or vehicle (n = 87). Baseline demographics and disease characteristics were similar between treatment groups. There were no statistically significant differences between treatment groups in time to target wound closure (hazard ratio, 1.004; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.651, 1.549; P = 0.985) or proportion of patients with complete target wound closure within 3 months (odds ratio [95% CI], 0.733 [0.365, 1.474]; nominal P = 0.390). A positive trend toward faster wound closure with SD-101 6% versus vehicle was observed in patients aged 2 to <12 years and those with total body wound burden ≥5% at baseline. SD-101 6% cream was well tolerated. Conclusions SD-101 6% cream for treatment of EB-associated lesions was not more effective than vehicle in shortening the time to complete target wound closure or achieving complete target wound closure within 3 months. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02384460; Date of trial registration, February 13, 2015; First participant enrolled, March 11, 2015.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document