scholarly journals La justicia penal militar colombiana y los principios procesales constitucionales de independencia e imparcialidad, después de la separación de la función de jurisdicción con la función de comando

Justicia ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 19 (26) ◽  
Author(s):  
Consuelo Amparo Henao Toro ◽  
Ingrid Regina Petro Gonz ◽  
Felipe Andrés Mar
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Third Parties ◽  
Penal Code ◽  
Security Forces ◽  
Origin And Evolution ◽  
The Creation ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Military ◽  
Legal Training

El presente artículo analiza la Justicia Penal Militar colombiana, su origen y evolución desde la vigencia del Decreto 2550 de 1988, según el cual los miembros de la Fuerza Pública podían ejercer simultáneamente las funciones de comando con las funciones de jurisdicción, toda vez que quien juzgaba no se encontraba técnicamente habilitado para desarrollar esa función por carecer de formación jurídica profesional y debía depender de terceras personas para emitir sus fallos, situación que contrariaba los principios de independencia e imparcialidad. Posteriormente, con la creación de la Ley 522 de 1999, actual Código Penal Militar, esas funciones fueron separadas y prohibidas, lo que amerita analizar estos principios a la luz de esta normativa penal militar.   AbstractThis article analyzes the Penal Military Colombian Justice system, its origin and evolution from the enforcement of Decree 2550 of 1988 according to which members of the security forces could exercise the functions of command simultaneously with the functions of jurisdiction, since he was deemed not technically qualified to perform that function due to lack of professional legal training and had to rely on third parties to issue their decisions, a situation that went against the principles of independence and impartiality. Later, with the creation of the Law 522 of 1999 current Military Penal Code, these functions were separated and thus deserving prohibited discuss these principles in light of the military criminal law.

scholarly journals THE JUDICIAL CONSTRUCTION RELATING TO THE TERRORISM CASES (REALITY AND PROSPECTS)

2021 ◽  
Vol 03 (03) ◽  
pp. 473-482
Author(s):  
Fawzi Abdelsalam Mohammed AL-KILNI ◽  
Ebtisam Hassan Salem Ben ISSA
Keyword(s):  
Working Conditions ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Criminal Policy ◽  
Developed Countries ◽  
The Other ◽  
High Concern ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Developed Countries ◽  
The Military

The current study aims to discuss and investigate one of the most prominent and important issues that has been in constant debate in all the previous researches and studies dine in the scope of criminal law ; especially those regarding the juridical construction relating to the terrorism cases. The main attempt of this research is to evaluate the criminal policy of the Libyan Legislation issuing law no.3 for the year 2014 concerning Terrorism combating. Disregarding the recent issuing of the law in subject, the above-mentioned law is of great importance due to its high concern of the juridical apparatus of combating terrorism. However, what makes a wonder herewith is the Libyan legislation has been taking a step backwards when the law (4) was issued in 2017 in regarding of the amendment of the provisions of both the Military Penal Code and the Code of Military Procedures which has already mandated the judiciary of offenders of terrorism according to the terms identified in Article 3. Herewith, the perception of the effectiveness and functionality of the above-mentioned law is not possible without paying the attention to reviewing the jurisdiction from one hand and the working conditions of the judges from the other hand. However, the good conduct of the judges’ work depends heavily on doing several improvements for these apparatus, in addition to promoting the juridical capabilities by supporting these apparatus with the modern facilities, utilizing the experience of the developed countries in this regard. Therefore, the prospects are addressed to developing the juridical construction properly according to the principles of the defense rights and the fair trial as these principles are the constitution fundamentals and the traits of the criminal-justice system.

scholarly journals Legality Letter of Statement of Khilaf in Indonesia Criminal Justice System

FIAT JUSTISIA ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 128
Author(s):  
Rugun Romaida Hutabarat
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Primary Source ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Criminal Offense ◽  
Criminal Procedure Law ◽  
The Law ◽  
Criminal Matters

In criminal law, a person charged with a criminal offense may be punished if it meets two matters, namely his act is unlawful, and the perpetrator of a crime may be liable for the indicated action (the offender's error) or the act may be dismissed to the perpetrator, and there is no excuse. The reasons may result in the death or the removal of the implied penalty. But it becomes a matter of how if the Letter of Statement Khilaf is the answer to solve the legal problems. The person who refuses or does not do what has been stated in the letters is often called "wanprestasi" because the statement is categorized as an agreement. The statement includes an agreement which is the domain of civil law or criminal law, so its application in the judicial system can be determined. This should be reviewed in the application of the law, are there any rules governing wrong statements in the criminal justice system. By using a declaration of khilaf as a way out of criminal matters, then the statement should be known in juridical rules. This study uses normative juridical methods, by conceptualizing the law as a norm rule which is a benchmark of human behavior, with emphasis on secondary data sources collected from the primary source of the legislation. The result of this research is that the statement of khilaf has legality, it is based on Jurisprudence No. 3901 K / Pdt / 1985 jo Article 189 Paragraph (1) of Indonesian criminal procedure law. However, this oversight letter needs to be verified in front of the court to be valid evidence, but this letter of error is not a deletion of a criminal offense, because the culpability of the defendant has justified the crime he committed. Such recognition, cannot make it free from the crime that has been committed.Keywords: Legality, Letter of Statement, Criminal Justice System

scholarly journals The History of the Development of the French Laws on Criminal Liability of Legal Entities

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 46-56
Author(s):  
Aleksandr V. Fedorov ◽  
◽  
Mikhail V. Krichevtsev ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Economic Crime ◽  
Penal Code ◽  
Criminal Prosecution ◽  
History Of ◽  
The Law ◽  
Legal Entities

The article reviews the history of development of French laws on criminal liability of legal entities. The authors note that the institution of criminal liability of legal entities (collective criminal liability) dates back to the ancient times and has been forming in the French territory for a long time. Initially, it was established in the acts on collective liability residents of certain territories, in particular, in the laws of the Salian Franks. This institution was inherited from the Franks by the law of the medieval France, and got transferred from the medieval period to the French criminal law of the modern period. The article reviews the laws of King Louis XIV as an example of establishment of collective criminal liability: the Criminal Ordinance of 1670 and the Ordinances on Combating Vagrancy and Goods Smuggling of 1706 and 1711. For the first time ever, one can study the Russian translation of the collective criminal liability provisions of the said laws. The authors state that although the legal traditions of collective liability establishment were interrupted by the transformations caused by the French Revolution of 1789 to 1794, criminal liability of legal entities remained in Article 428 of the French Penal Code of 1810 as a remnant of the past and was abolished only as late as in 1957. The publication draws attention to the fact that the criminal law codification process was not finished in France, and some laws stipulating criminal liability of legal entities were in effect in addition to the French Penal Code of 1810: the Law on the Separation of Church and State of December 9, 1905; the Law of January 14, 1933; the Law on Maritime Trade of July 19, 1934; the Ordinance on Criminal Prosecution of the Press Institutions Cooperating with Enemies during World War II of May 5, 1945. The authors describe the role of the Nuremberg Trials and the documents of the Council of Europe in the establishment of the French laws on criminal liability of legal entities, in particular, Resolution (77) 28 On the Contribution of Criminal Law to the Protection of the Environment, Recommendation No. R (81) 12 On Economic Crime, the Recommendation No. R (82) 15 On the Role of Criminal Law in Consumer Protection and Recommendation No. (88) 18 of the Committee of Ministers to Member States Concerning Liability of Enterprises Having Legal Personality for Offences Committed in the Exercise of Their Activities. The authors conclude that the introduction of the institution of criminal liability of legal entities is based on objective conditions and that research of the history of establishment of the laws on collective liability is of great importance for understanding of the modern legal regulation of the issues of criminal liability of legal entities.

Die Entwicklung des Strafrechts der Ukraine

2020 ◽  
Vol 66 (3) ◽  
pp. 380-396
Author(s):  
Rainer Birke
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Penal Code ◽  
Science And Society ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Law System ◽  
The Law ◽  
Simplified Procedure ◽  
Procedural Rights

In 2001, a new penal code was adopted in Ukraine after a comprehensive discussion in politics, legal science and society, replacing a codification of the Soviet era dating back to 1960, obviously unsuitable for the new realities. The new penal code of 2001 has been changed many times since then. This also applies to the criminal law provisions against corruption, evaluated and commended by GRECO. However, there is criticism of the criminal law system in Ukraine. A large number of the issues have little or nothing to do with the text of the penal code itself, but with deficits in the application of the law and the resulting loss of confidence in the activities of the law enforcement authorities. The judiciary is said to have a significant corruption problem and is significantly overloaded. The latter is to be counteracted by the introduction of the class of misdemeanor (“kryminalnyj prostupok”) in 2019 that can be investigated in a simplified procedure, which has been criticized, inter alia, because it bears the risk of the loss of quality and possibly infringes procedural rights. Also in 2019, the work on a once again completely new codification of the penal code was commenced, which is not entirely surprising in view to the existing criticism of manual errors or inadequacies of the recent code. It is to be hoped that Ukraine, with the existing will and the necessary strength, will succeed in the creation of a criminal law system that is fully in compliance with the rule of law and that a penal code will be drafted that finally finds full recognition in the society.

Some Aspects of the Sudan Law of Homicide

1974 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 92-103
Author(s):  
Amin M. Medani
Keyword(s):  
19Th Century ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Penal Code ◽  
Present Writer ◽  
Legal Systems ◽  
Time And Space ◽  
The Law ◽  
Indian Penal Code ◽  
Changing Society

The Sudan Penal Code (henceforth abbreviated as S.P.C.) was, with minor modifications, copied in 1899 from the Indian Penal Code (henceforth abbreviated as I.P.C.), which in its turn was to some extent based on 19th-century English criminal law. Since its enactment, the S.P.C. has been revised and re-enacted once in 1925, but no significant changes were then effected. Law makers in the Sudan are at present engaged in the revision and reformulation of the laws of the country in an attempt to bring them into line with the modern needs of a changing society. It is the feeling of the present writer that the field of criminal law warrants the least intervention or modification because the S.P.C has, in its 75 years of existence, been largely satisfactorily interpreted and applied, resulting in what could legitimately be called the criminal law of the Sudan. This, however, is by no means tantamount to saying that the Code is satisfactory in all aspects and that there is no room for improvement. At any rate, it is not intended to discuss in this article what possible changes should be brought about in the Code as a whole, a task which would evidently need much more time and space. It is merely hoped to discuss critically some aspects of the law of homicide as laid down in the Code (and applied by the courts). In so doing it is hoped to show that in some respects the Sudanese law of homicide calls for modification of some of the provisions, while other provisions of the Code are so satisfactory that they may contribute to the resolution of problems faced by other legal systems.

The Law of Sentencing in International Criminal Law: The Purposes of Sentencing and the Applicable Method for the Determination of the Sentence

2001 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 87-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Christoph Nemitz
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Justice System ◽  
International Criminal ◽  
International Criminal Law ◽  
Law Of Nature ◽  
Objective Understanding ◽  
The Law ◽  
And Control ◽  
Legal Grounds

‘Sentencing is an art and not a science’. This statement of Lord Lane expresses, with all due respect, what sentencing should not be. Although it cannot be denied that the process of determining a sentence is far from being a mathematical exercise, the result of which can be verified or falsified by reference to some unquestionable law of nature, both the legislator and the judiciary must strive for the development of a law of sentencing which is based on a comprehensive set of statutory provisions. The very term ‘lawof sentencing’ indicates that the meting out of a sentence is more than the exercise of a skill that only judges are vested with. The use of the term ‘art’, conversely, to describe sentencing gives the impression that the act of sentencing is beyond objective understanding and control. When we speak of art, we acknowledge that while views on the outcome can be manifold, objective criteria for a ‘correct’ assessment are few: there's no accounting for taste. This is unacceptable when looking at the significance of the law of sentencing for the pursuit of various sentencing purposes. To base the determination of the sentence on legal grounds enhances the review possibilities with regard to sentencing judgments. This contributes to an even sentencing practice, which in turn leads to just and comprehensible sentencing judgments. Such a practice is necessary in order to achieve public acceptance of the criminal justice system in general and of sentencing verdicts in particular. Such acceptance is imperative for the achievement of several sentencing purposes, especially that of affirmative (or positive) general prevention.

Character merchandising: aspects of legal protection

Legal Studies ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 226-250
Author(s):  
Andrew McGee ◽  
Sarah Gale ◽  
Gary Scanlan
Keyword(s):  
Present State ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Trade Mark ◽  
Third Parties ◽  
Trade Marks ◽  
Passing Off ◽  
Legal Control ◽  
The Creation ◽  
The Law ◽  
Special Circumstances

The article considers the present state of the law of character merchandising. It questions whether the law relating to character merchandising should be further developed and extended so as to give an individual a comprehensive right to prevent the unauthorised use of aspects of his personality by third parties in connection with the promotion or sale of goods or services. In this context the article rejects the creation of new comprehensive remedies such as a tort of appropriation of personality as being undesirable and impractical. The article maintains that unauthorised acts of personality appropriation or use are already subject to adequate legal control through the law of trade marks and passing off. In this regard the article further suggests that tortious remedies such as defamation, malicious falsehood, and, in restricted circumstances copyright, provide effective sanctions against the unauthorised use of an individual's persona in commercial enterprises in particular and special circumstances. These remedies supplement and complement the principal remedies provided by trade mark protection and passing off.

scholarly journals Akibat Hukum bagi Kreditur Setelah Perjanjian Perkawinan Dibuat dan Telah Disahkan

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 55
Author(s):  
William Surya Putra Handoko
Keyword(s):  
Legal Status ◽  
Third Parties ◽  
Analysis Approach ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Analysis Techniques ◽  
Personal Property ◽  
Legal Problems ◽  
The Creation ◽  
The Law ◽  
Joint Property

This study aimed to analyze legal problems due to the change in the legal status of the debtor’s property in marriage which was previously a joint property into the personal property of each husband or wife.  This study used a statutory approach and an analysis approach, while the analysis techniques used grammatical interpretation and systematic interpretation. After the decision of the Constitutional Court was issued, the creation of marriage agreements that had been ratified would result in the law of separation of property and applied to third parties. The marriage agreement should not harm third parties.

scholarly journals Islamic criminal procedure law: human rights issues

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (10) ◽  
pp. 47-57
Author(s):  
Yusif Mamedov
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Due Process ◽  
Economic Status ◽  
Burden Of Proof ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right

It has been established that harsh Islamic punishments are practically not applied due to the high burden of proof and the need to involve an exhaustive number of witnesses. It has been proven that the Islamic criminal justice system provides the accused with basic guarantees. It is noted that according to Sharia, Islamic crimes are divided into three categories: Hadd, Qisas and Tazir. It is noted that Islamic criminal law provides that the accused is not guilty if his guilt is not proven. It is noted that equality before the law is one of the main legal principles of the Islamic criminal model, as all persons are equal before the law and are condemned equally regardless of religious or economic status (lack of immunity). There are four main principles aimed at protecting human rights in Islamic criminal law: the principle of legality (irreversible action), the principle of presumption of innocence, the principle of equality and the principle of ultimate proof. In addition, the Islamic criminal justice system provides defendants with many safeguards, which are always followed during detention, investigation, trial and after trial. It is established that such rights are: 1) the right of every person to the protection of life, honor, freedom and property; 2) the right to due process of law; 3) the right to a fair and open trial before an impartial judge; 4) freedom from coercion to self-disclosure; 5) protection against arbitrary arrest and detention; 6) immediate court proceedings; 7) the right to appeal. It is noted that if a person is charged, he/she has many remedies It is noted that the trial must be fair, in which the qadi (judge) plays an important role. It has been established that, in addition to the procedural guarantees, the qualifications and character of the qadi, as well as the strict requirements of Islamic rules of proof, are intended to ensure a fair trial in the case of the accused. Adherence to these principles has been shown to indicate that the rights of the accused are fully guaranteed under Islamic criminal law.

scholarly journals ANALISIS YURIDIS TERHADAP TINDAKAN ABORSI DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM PIDANA INDONESIA (Studi Komparatif; Undang-Undang Kesehatan, KUHP dan HAM)

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rustam Rustam
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Penal Code ◽  
Medical Emergency ◽  
Analysis Approach ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Relationship

Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk melihat tinjaun yuridis terhadap tindakan aborsi yang ditinjau dari Undang-Undang No.36 Tahun 2009, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP), hubungan antara Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) dan UU No. 36 Tahun 2009serta perbandingan pandangan (Perspektif) terhadap aborsi antara UU No.36 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kesehatan, KUHP dan HAM. Berdasarkan aturan  KUHP dan HAM aborsi dilarang sedangkan menurut Undang-Undang No.36 Tahun 2009, aborsi diperbolehkan dengan syarat tertentu. Pendekatan yang digunakan adalah pendekatan analisis yuridis. Perbedaan aturan tentang aborsi yakni antara Undang-Undang No.36 Tahun 2009, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) dan Hak Azazi Manusia ditengahi oleh asas lex posteriori derogat legi priori yang membuat gagasan baru tentang aborsi yakni pada kedaruratan medis yakni provokatus medicalis. Sedangkan abortus provocatus, berdasarkan pandanga ketiga aturan tersebut adalah merupakan tindakan pidana yang dilarang, serta di anggap sebagai pelanggaran terhadap hak azazi manusia. Kata Kunci; Aborsi, Hukum Pidana, KUHP, HAMThe purpose of this study is to  determine at the legal review of abortion actions reviewed from Law No.36 of 2009, Penal Code, the relationship between the , Penal Code and Law No, 36 of 2009 and comparison of perspective on Abortion action among Law no. 36 in 2009 on Health, Penal Code and Human Rights. Based on Penal Code and Human Rights, abortion is prohibited in Indonesia but based on the Law No.36 of 2009 stated that abortioncould be done with certain conditions. The approach used was the juridical analysis approach. Differences  abortion regulation lawsbased on the Law No.36 of 2009, Penal Code and Human Rights were mediated by the principle of “lex posteriori derogat legion priori” which made an issue on abortion regulation lawsonly in medical emergency namely” provokatus medicalis”. Meanwhile “forabortus provocatus”, based on the threelaws’ views,is a prohibited action and considered as a violation of human rights.Keywords; Abortion, Criminal Law, Penal Code, Human Rights

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document