Evaluation of Future Strategic and Energy Efficient Options for the U.S. Capitol Power Plant

2009 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Se-Kwon Jung ◽  
Adam Goodman ◽  
Joe Harrold ◽  
Nawar Alchaar

This paper presents a three-tier, critical section selection methodology that is used to identify critical sections for the U.S. EPR™ Standard Nuclear Power Plant (NPP). The critical section selection methodology includes three complementary approaches: qualitative, quantitative, and supplementary. These three approaches are applied to Seismic Category I structures in a complementary fashion to identify the most critical portions of the building whose structural integrity needs to be maintained for postulated design basis events and conditions. Once the design of critical sections for a particular Seismic Category I structure is complete, the design for that structure is essentially complete for safety evaluation purposes. Critical sections, taken as a whole, are analytically representative of an “essentially complete” U.S. EPR™ design; their structural design adequacy provides reasonable assurance of overall U.S. EPR™ structural design adequacy.


1981 ◽  
Vol 103 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colin F. McDonald ◽  
Murdo J. Smith

For several years, design studies have been underway in the U.S. on a nuclear closed-cycle gas turbine plant (HTGR-GT). This paper presents design aspects of the helium turbo-machine portion of these studies. Gas dynamic and mechanical design considerations are presented for helium turbomachines in the 400 MWe (non-intercooled) and 600 MWe (intercooled) power range. Design of the turbomachine is a key element in the overall power plant program effort, which is currently directed towards the selection of a reference HTGR-GT commercial plant configuration for the U.S. utility market. A conservative design approach has been emphasized to provide for maximum safety and durability. The studies presented for the integrated plant concept outline the necessary close working relationship between the reactor primary system and turbomachine designers. State-of-the-art technology from large industrial gas turbines developed in the U.S., considered directly applicable to the design of a helium turbomachine, particularly in the areas of design methodology, performance, materials, and fabrication methods, is emphasized.


Energy ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 16 (8) ◽  
pp. 1119-1123 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Taşdemiroğlu ◽  
S. Chandra ◽  
S. Moalla
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Jianfeng Yang ◽  
Lixin Yu ◽  
Byounghoan Choi

Reactor internals important to nuclear power plant safety shall be designed to accommodate steady-state and transient vibratory loads throughout the service life of the reactor. Operating experience has revealed failures of reactor internals in both pressurized water reactors (PWRs) and boiling water reactors (BWRs) due to flow-induced vibrations (FIVs). U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Regulatory Guide 1.20 presents a Comprehensive Vibration Assessment Program (CVAP) that the NRC staff considers acceptable for use in verifying the structural integrity of reactor internals for FIV prior to commercial operation. A CVAP supports the NRC reviews of applications for new nuclear reactor construction permits or operating licenses under 10 CFR Part 50, as well as design certifications and combined licenses that do not reference a standard design under 10 CFR Part 52. The overall CVAP should be implemented in conjunction with preoperational and initial startup testing. For prototype reactor internals, the comprehensive program should consist of a vibration and fatigue analysis, a vibration measurement program, an inspection program, and a correlation of their results. Validation and benchmarking processes should be integrated into the CVAP throughout each individual program. Based on the authors’ experiences in Advanced Boiling Water Reactor and AP1000® CVAPs and based on detailed reviews of the U.S. Evolutionary Power Reactor and the U.S. Advanced Pressurized Water Reactor CVAPs, this article summarizes the essential CVAP validation and benchmarking processes with proper consideration of bias errors and random uncertainties. This article provides guidance to a successful CVAP that satisfies the NRC requirements and ensures the reliability of the evaluation of potential adverse flow effects on nuclear power plant components.


Author(s):  
W. Sanz ◽  
Carl-W. Hustad ◽  
H. Jericha

Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) is a recognized technology pathway to curb the increasing emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) from the power generation sector. But most available technologies are still on the study or laboratory-scale level, so that considerable R&D efforts are needed to achieve commercialization level. The Graz Cycle originally presented in 1995 by Jericha [1] is an oxyfuel technology and promises highest efficiency using state-of-the-art turbine materials and improved thermodynamic developments in a comparatively complex interaction of rotating machinery, condensers and heat exchanger components. But although detailed conceptual design for all main components has been presented, there is still a large step towards a Graz Cycle pilot demonstration plant. In order to facilitate construction of a demonstration plant we consider the performance of a near-term Graz Cycle process design based on modest cycle data and available turbomachinery components using a simplified flow scheme. The work is supported by on-going development work for a first generation oxyfuel turbine that has already been undertaken by Clean Energy Systems, Inc. [2]. Their further work on a second generation oxyfuel turbine received $30 million funding support from the U.S. Department of Energy in September 2010 [3]. Two near-term Graz Cycle plants are presented based on basic and advanced operating conditions of the proposed commercially available turbine. Besides the turbine the additional equipment for a first-generation cycle is discussed. The predicted optimum net efficiency is 23.2% (HHV). A near-term zero-emission power plant can only be commercially attractive if it will be deployed in a niche market. Therefore an economic analysis commensurate with an early pre-FEED conceptual study is carried out for the U.S. Gulf Coast where revenue from multiple product streams that could include power, steam, CO2 and water, as well as argon and (potentially) nitrogen from the ASU is provided. The economic analysis suggests that a capital investment of $94 million can secure construction of a 13.2 MWe zero emission oxyfuel power plant and yield a 14.5% (unlevered) return on capital invested.


Author(s):  
Wenzhong Gao ◽  
Tian Tian ◽  
Eduard Muljadi ◽  
Yincheng Zhang ◽  
Mackay Miller ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document