scholarly journals Proposal for an Urgency Score as General Referral Strategy to Second- Care Rheumatology

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 001-007
Author(s):  
MO Ghazal ◽  
M Schirmer
AIDS Care ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 137-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anil Kumar Gupta ◽  
Girraj Pratap Singh ◽  
Sudha Goel ◽  
Pratap Bhan Kaushik ◽  
Bipin Chandra Joshi ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Valentin Blank ◽  
David Petroff ◽  
Sebastian Beer ◽  
Albrecht Böhlig ◽  
Maria Heni ◽  
...  

Abstract Patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) are at risk for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and associated complications. This study evaluated the performance of international (EASL-EASD-EASO) and national (DGVS) guidelines for NAFLD risk stratification. Patients with T2D prospectively underwent ultrasound, liver stiffness measurement (LSM) and serum-based fibrosis markers. Guideline-based risk classification and referral rates for different screening approaches were compared and the diagnostic properties of simplified algorithms, genetic markers and a new NASH surrogate (FAST score) were evaluated. NAFLD risk was present in 184 of 204 screened patients (age 64.2 ± 10.7 years; BMI 32.6 ± 7.6 kg/m2). EASL-EASD-EASO recommended specialist referral for 60–77% depending on the fibrosis score used, only 6% were classified as low risk. The DGVS algorithm required LSM for 76%; 25% were referred for specialised care. The sensitivities of the diagnostic pathways were 47–96%. A simplified referral strategy revealed a sensitivity/specificity of 46/88% for fibrosis risk. Application of the FAST score reduced the referral rate to 35%. This study (a) underlines the high prevalence of fibrosis risk in T2D, (b) demonstrates very high referral rates for in-depth hepatological work-up, and (c) indicates that simpler referral algorithms may produce comparably good results and could facilitate NAFLD screening.


2010 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 229
Author(s):  
Y. Haneda ◽  
T. Miyamoto ◽  
H. Inuzuka ◽  
M. Kamiyama ◽  
S. Kudo ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 47 (9) ◽  
pp. 797-804 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorena Rodríguez-Alonso ◽  
Francisco Rodríguez-Moranta ◽  
Alexandra Ruiz-Cerulla ◽  
Triana Lobatón ◽  
Clàudia Arajol ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 73 (Suppl 2) ◽  
pp. 425.2-426
Author(s):  
O. Abawi ◽  
R. vd Berg ◽  
D. vd Heijde ◽  
M. de Hooge ◽  
P. Bakker ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 649-660
Author(s):  
Annika Maren Schneider ◽  
Eva-Maria Oppel ◽  
Jonas Schreyögg

AbstractWith hospital budgets remaining tight and healthcare expenditure rising due to demographic change and advances in technology, hospitals continue to face calls to contain costs and allocate their resources more efficiently. In this context, efficiency has emerged as an increasingly important way for hospitals to withstand competitive pressures in the hospital market. Doing so, however, can be challenging given unpredictable fluctuations in demand, a prime example of which are emergencies, i.e. urgent medical cases. The link between medical urgency and hospitals’ efficiency, however, has been neglected in the literature to date. This study therefore aims to investigate the relationship between hospitals’ urgency characteristics and their efficiency. Our analyses are based on 4094 observations from 1428 hospitals throughout Germany for the years 2015, 2016, and 2017. We calculate an average urgency score for each hospital based on all cases treated in that hospital per year and also investigate the within-hospital dispersion of medical urgency. To analyze the association of these urgency measures with hospitals’ efficiency we use a two-stage double bootstrap data envelopment analysis approach with truncated regression. We find a negative relationship between the urgency score and hospital efficiency. When testing for non-linear effects, the results reveal a u-shaped association, indicating that having either a high or low overall urgency score is beneficial in terms of efficiency. Finally, our results reveal that higher within-hospital urgency dispersion is negatively related to efficiency.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 1759720X2095173
Author(s):  
Judith Rademacher ◽  
Denis Poddubnyy ◽  
Uwe Pleyer

Uveitis is the most frequent extra-articular manifestation of axial spondyloarthritis (SpA), occurring in up to one-third of the patients. In the majority of patients, uveitis is acute, anterior and unilateral and presents with photosensitivity, sudden onset of pain and blurred vision. Topical steroids are an effective treatment; however, recurrent or refractory cases may need conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs or biological treatment with monoclonal tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors, thus also influencing treatment strategy of the underlying SpA. Though the exact pathogenesis of SpA and uveitis remains unknown, both seem to result from the interaction of a specific, mostly shared genetical background (among other HLA-B27 positivity), external influences such as microbiome, bacterial infection or mechanical stress and activation of the immune system resulting in inflammation. Up to 40% of patients presenting with acute anterior uveitis (AAU) have an undiagnosed SpA. Therefore, an effective referral strategy for AAU patients is needed to shorten the diagnostic delay of SpA and enable an early effective treatment. Further, the risk for ophthalmological manifestations increases with the disease duration in SpA; and patients presenting with ocular symptoms should be referred to an ophthalmologist. Thus, a close collaboration between patient, rheumatologist and ophthalmologist is needed to optimally manage ocular inflammation in SpA.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document