scholarly journals PEER GROUP JUDGING: THE IMPLEMENTATION OF GROUP PIN-UP IN ARCHITECTURE DESIGN STUDIO

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 68
Author(s):  
Trias Megayanti ◽  
Tutin Aryanti ◽  
NItih Indra Komala Dewi
Keyword(s):  
Architectural Design ◽  
Teaching Method ◽  
Peer Group ◽  
Design Studio ◽  
Architecture Design ◽  
Attitudes And Perceptions ◽  
Second Year ◽  
Core Course ◽  
Architecture Profession ◽  
Simulation Practice

The architecture design studio is a core course in architectural learning that trains students' abilities in the architectural design process. Unfortunately, students often fail to meet scheduled task targets, even though the time alloted is sufficient. This article examines the application of the group pin-up as a teaching method and its effectiveness in helping students meet deadlines for completing tasks in the Architecture Design III course, a studio attended by second year students. This study uses documents analysis (reviewing student design drawings to measure student achievement), and interviews (investigating changes in attitudes and perceptions of the students in pin-up group applications). We found that using the group pin-up strategy to impose an in-between deadline leads to improved discipline, better teamwork, and higher motivation due to competition in the group. This method is recommended in architectural design studios as a simulation practice for students before they move up and begin to work in the architecture profession.

scholarly journals Threshold Approaches to Architectural Design Studio

2018 ◽  
Vol 48 ◽  
pp. 01046
Author(s):  
Ebru Alakavuk
Keyword(s):  
Case Studies ◽  
Design Theory ◽  
Architectural Design ◽  
Social Economic ◽  
Design Studio ◽  
Architecture Design ◽  
Architectural Design Studio ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Student Projects

Threshold is a popular design theory in architecture that can be defined in many ways. One definition is “a barrier space that is located for separating the volumes”. This is “dictionary definition” of the threshold, but in fact this term can has various meanings according to the different perspectives. The threshold can be physical, psychological, emotional, social, economic, etc. definitions. There are many ways of expressing threshold in to architectural design considering the terms mentioned above. In this paper different ways of expressing “threshold” term in to the architectural design is discussed. For this purpose third year architecture design studio is taken as a case study. The student projects by the ways of defining and expressing the threshold term in to design is taken in consideration. The aim of this paper to put forward the integration of various meanings of threshold in to the architectural design by the case studies that are obtained from the architectural design studio.

scholarly journals Adaptation of the proposed unit system for third year architectural design studio

2018 ◽  
Vol 48 ◽  
pp. 01040
Author(s):  
Eray Bozkurt
Keyword(s):  
Architectural Design ◽  
Design Thinking ◽  
Teaching Method ◽  
Design Studio ◽  
Adaptation Process ◽  
Positive Outcomes ◽  
Unit System ◽  
Architectural Design Studio ◽  
Fundamental Design

Architectural design studios aim to teach students the fundamental design thinking. Well-structured studio may help the students to explore the global responses and develop projects focused on the current conditions of the society. This study focuses on the adaptation of the proposed unit system for third year architectural design studio. The adaptation process of the proposed unit system analyzed with the description of the previous system. This study discusses the positive outcomes of the new proposed unit teaching method at School of Architecture, Yasar University.

Art of Facilitating ‘Problem-Driven Outcomes’ in an Architectural Design Studio

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (11) ◽  
pp. 93-106
Author(s):  
Arulmalar Ramaraj
Keyword(s):  
Design Problem ◽  
Architectural Design ◽  
Time Frame ◽  
Design Studio ◽  
Qualitative And Quantitative Analysis ◽  
Problem Structuring ◽  
Subjective Knowledge ◽  
Current Scenario ◽  
Second Year ◽  
Architectural Design Studio

Studies reveal that subjective knowledge and irrational creativity dominate architectural design studios in the current scenario. With an intention to facilitate ‘problem-driven outcomes’ in a design studio, we framed a series of tasks specific to the framed design problem planned. The tasks were introduced sequentially at the beginning of design studio. For this purpose, a design problem with a time frame of 12 weeks of focusing on ‘multifunctional spaces’ was introduced to two groups of students pursuing second-year architecture To examine the effectiveness of the strategy, 39 students participated voluntarily in framed tasks like ‘story boards’, ‘reels to reality’, ‘collage’ and ‘dialogue between known and unknown context’ to construct appropriate knowledge. Triangulation of qualitative and quantitative analysis of the emergent outcomes processes from three different perspectives was investigated. The performances of the two groups display a stark difference in problem structuring, design processes and the outcomes. Keywords: Art, facilitate, effectiveness, design studio, problem-driven outcome.

Studio culture / war culture: pedagogical strategies for reconstructing Beirut's southern suburbs

2013 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 167-176
Author(s):  
Robert Saliba
Keyword(s):  
Teaching Method ◽  
Culture War ◽  
Design Studio ◽  
Political Environment ◽  
Architecture Design ◽  
Pedagogical Strategies ◽  
Post Conflict ◽  
Critical Teaching ◽  
Insight Into

The article focuses on a critique of three different approaches to undergraduate architecture design studio teaching around the scenario of post-conflict reconstruction in Lebanon following the Hezbollah-Israeli war in 2006. Broadly, the author argues for the value of their own politically-engaged/critical teaching method over politically ‘neutral’ humanitarian, or radical but politically pre-disposed approaches. In addition to the relevance of how the topic of post-conflict reconstruction in architectural teaching relates to questions of political ‘positionality’, the article also offers an insight into the challenging political environment faced by academics in Lebanon and how this highlights the ethical limits of ‘apoliticality’.

scholarly journals INNOVATIONS FOR STRUCTURAL SYSTEM EDUCATION IN ARCHITECTURE

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 263-270
Author(s):  
Saniye Karaman Öztaş ◽  
Cahide Aydin İpekçi
Keyword(s):  
Design Process ◽  
Architectural Design ◽  
Teaching Method ◽  
System Modeling ◽  
Architectural Education ◽  
Design Stage ◽  
Design Studio ◽  
Structural System ◽  
Function Form ◽  
Spring Semester

Structural systems, which play an important role in today’s architectural education, have become an issue that is analyzed by mega structures using different disciplines in the process from the design stage to the construction stage. While design and structural system studies are performed together in practice, architecture students usually have difficulty in reflecting their learning from the structural system course into their design studio in architectural education. In this study, information about education method for "Structural System and Technologies I" course, carried out in the fourth semester (second class) in Department of Architecture in Gebze Technical University, was primarily given. Unlike previous teaching methods in this course scope, a structural system modeling to solve the given design problem was requested from the students during spring semester 2015. It was aimed to provide the students with an understanding of general design principles involving structural elements and learning about the necessity in which the structural system should be considered in conjunction with the architectural design, concluding with a two-week assignment. A survey was conducted among 55 architecture students in order to evaluate the outcomes of the assignment. According to the survey results, 61% of the students stated that function, form, and structural system affect on another. 20% of them stated that function, form, and structural system, respectively, have an order of importance in the design process. 9% of them stated that structural system determine form and function. 6 % of them stated that form, function, and structural system, respectively, have an order of importance in the design process. Finally, 4 % of them stated that their relations change depending on the condition. Innovative teaching method in this study is found to be successful because the students have experienced the importance of materials in structural system and learned how to integrate structural system course to architectural design studio. It is intended that this study will benefit architecture students and educators.

scholarly journals Articulating tectonic: From iteration to nexus

ARSNET ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mochammad Mirza Yusuf Harahap
Keyword(s):  
Design Process ◽  
Architectural Design ◽  
Design Method ◽  
Architectural Education ◽  
Design Studio ◽  
Potential Basis ◽  
Second Year ◽  
Multiple Stages ◽  
The Way

This paper explores the articulation of tectonic as a potential basis for developing and understanding architectural programme in the context of architectural education. The piece delivers a reflective discussion that puts tectonic beyond the art of joining. Instead, tectonic, which informs the way material performs, insinuates a capacity in supporting the students to generate the spatial programme and atmospheric quality for the development of their architecture project. In particular, the study suggests the importance of tectonic articulation in generating the above spatialities. The study investigates such tectonic articulation by reflecting through a second-year design studio project in Universitas Indonesia, which focuses on developing dwellings designs driven by tectonic-based architectural design method. Through reflecting the students' projects this paper put forward three aspects of tectonic articulation, each of which explores the formal iteration, the tectonic-programme relationship, and the tectonic-atmosphere relationship. The study demonstrates contribution in understanding how tectonic is explored throughout the design process, informing multiple stages of design.

THE IMPLEMENTATION MODEL OF INTEGRATING THE THREE SUSTAINABILITY ASPECTS INTO THE UNDERGRADUATE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN STUDIO

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 217-238
Author(s):  
Kamal Eldin Mohamed
Keyword(s):  
Architectural Design ◽  
Teaching Method ◽  
Sustainable Design ◽  
Course Evaluation ◽  
Design Studio ◽  
Design Elements ◽  
Implementation Model ◽  
Institute Of Technology ◽  
Architectural Design Studio ◽  
The Impact

ABSTRACT The concept of sustainability in design is meant to ensure that the product of the design is in harmony with humans and nature by taking into consideration the three aspects of sustainability: environmental, social and economic. The objective of this experiment was to integrate the three aspects of sustainability principles into the architectural design studio to train future architects to be able to design sustainable buildings. The study aimed to create an integration method that could be validated through the junior students’ work in the innovative Sustainable Architecture Design Studio (SADS) at Izmir Institute of Technology. The impact of the pedagogy on the students’ ability to integrate sustainable design principles into their projects was measured through the evaluation tools formulated for this purpose by the instructor. Further, the students’ feedback through course evaluation, questionnaire, and colloquium at the end of the term was used to assess the method. The findings of this research demonstrated that the innovative studio pedagogy and teaching method were successful in integrating the sustainable design elements into design studio projects, while the level of sustainable elements integration was 68%.

scholarly journals An evaluation of physical model-making as a teaching method in the architectural design studio – A case study at Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hazem M. Nour Afify ◽  
Mohammed A.M. Alhefnawi ◽  
Mohamad J. Istanbouli ◽  
Aymen H. Alsayed ◽  
Zeinab A. Abd ElGhaffar Elmoghazy
Keyword(s):  
Physical Model ◽  
Architectural Design ◽  
Teaching Method ◽  
Design Studio ◽  
Architectural Design Studio
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document