scholarly journals Hormone therapy for premenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer: combinations with cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 30-41
Author(s):  
E. V. Artamonova ◽  
E. I. Kovalenko

This article discusses the problems associated with the search of the most effective treatment strategies for HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer in premenopausal women. Until recently, ovarian suppression and hormone therapy had been the main treatments used in this group of patients. The development of palbociclib, called a “breakthrough therapy”, as well as promising results of trials evaluating the efficacy of cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors added to hormone therapy in postmenopausal women suggested a need for the assessment of this treatment regimen in combination with ovarian suppression in younger patients.According to the results of randomized trials and subgroup analysis, the addition of a CDK4/6 inhibitor to ovarian suppression and hormonal therapy significantly increases survival. The safety profile is similar to that of older patients. Randomized trials comparing the efficacy of palbociclib + ovarian suppression + aromatase inhibitor vs. chemotherapy in premenopausal women demonstrated significant benefits of a new treatment strategy: a CDK4/6 inhibitor as a part of combination therapy reduced the risk of progression by 36 % compared to capecitabine.

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (9) ◽  
pp. 1559-1569 ◽  
Author(s):  
Burak Bilgin ◽  
Mehmet A.N. Sendur ◽  
Didem Şener Dede ◽  
Muhammed Bülent Akıncı ◽  
Bülent Yalçın

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ambrogio Gagliano ◽  
Angela Prestifilippo ◽  
Ornella Cantale ◽  
Gianluca Ferini ◽  
Giacomo Fisichella ◽  
...  

Targeting cell cycle has become the gold standard for metastatic breast cancer (MBC), being cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors (CDKIs) cornerstones of its treatment, alongside radiotherapy (RT). To date, no definite evidence regarding safety and efficacy of the combination of CDKIs plus radiotherapy (RT) is currently available. Purpose of this review is to collect data in favor or against the feasibility of the association of CDKIs + RT, describing its potential adverse events. Our review shows how CDKI + RT allows an overall satisfying disease control, proving to be effective and causing a grade of toxicity mainly influenced by the site of irradiation, leaning to favourable outcomes for sites as liver, spine or brain and to poorer outcomes for thoracic lesions or sites close to viscera; controversial evidence is instead for bone treatment. Toxicity also varies from patient to patient. To sum up, our contribution enriches and enlightens a still indefinite field regarding the feasibility of CDKIs + RT, giving cues for innovative clinical management of hormone-responsive MBC.


Author(s):  
L Cantarelli ◽  
JA Morales Barrios ◽  
S Garcia Gil ◽  
B Del Rosario Garcia ◽  
GJ Nazco Casariego ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 58-67
Author(s):  
I. V. Kolyadina

The luminal HER2-negative subtype is the dominant variant of metastatic breast cancer; modern combined endocrine therapy with CDK4/6 inhibitors due to significantly change the prognosis of the disease, not only for increasing progression free survival, but also for significantly prolonging the life expectancy of patients. This review presents the features of the mechanism of action of CDK4/6 inhibitors, the most significant and updated results of large, randomized trials with ribociclib (MONALEESA-2, MONALEESA-3, and MONALEESA-7) assessing the efficacy and safety of combined endocrine therapy with various endocrine partners in a population of premenopausal women and menopausal patients. The prospects for the use of CDK4/6 inhibitors for therapy patients with visceral crisis are shown.


2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (25) ◽  
pp. 3069-3103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hope S. Rugo ◽  
R. Bryan Rumble ◽  
Erin Macrae ◽  
Debra L. Barton ◽  
Hannah Klein Connolly ◽  
...  

Purpose To develop recommendations about endocrine therapy for women with hormone receptor (HR) –positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Methods The American Society of Clinical Oncology convened an Expert Panel to conduct a systematic review of evidence from 2008 through 2015 to create recommendations informed by that evidence. Outcomes of interest included sequencing of hormonal agents, hormonal agents compared with chemotherapy, targeted biologic therapy, and treatment of premenopausal women. This guideline puts forth recommendations for endocrine therapy as treatment for women with HR-positive MBC. Recommendations Sequential hormone therapy is the preferential treatment for most women with HR-positive MBC. Except in cases of immediately life-threatening disease, hormone therapy, alone or in combination, should be used as initial treatment. Patients whose tumors express any level of hormone receptors should be offered hormone therapy. Treatment recommendations should be based on type of adjuvant treatment, disease-free interval, and organ function. Tumor markers should not be the sole criteria for determining tumor progression; use of additional biomarkers remains experimental. Assessment of menopausal status is critical; ovarian suppression or ablation should be included in premenopausal women. For postmenopausal women, aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are the preferred first-line endocrine therapy, with or without the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor palbociclib. As second-line therapy, fulvestrant should be administered at 500 mg with a loading schedule and may be administered with palbociclib. The mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor everolimus may be administered with exemestane to postmenopausal women with MBC whose disease progresses while receiving nonsteroidal AIs. Among patients with HR-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–positive MBC, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–targeted therapy plus an AI can be effective for those who are not chemotherapy candidates.


Breast Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takamichi Yokoe ◽  
Sasagu Kurozumi ◽  
Kazuki Nozawa ◽  
Yukinori Ozaki ◽  
Tetsuyo Maeda ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) treatment for human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer after taxane with trastuzumab and pertuzumab is standard therapy. However, treatment strategies beyond T-DM1 are still in development with insufficient evidence of their effectiveness. Here, we aimed to evaluate real-world treatment choice and efficacy of treatments after T-DM1 for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. Methods In this multi-centre retrospective cohort study involving 17 hospitals, 325 female HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients whose post-T-DM1 treatment began between April 15, 2014 and December 31, 2018 were enrolled. The primary end point was the objective response rate (ORR) of post-T-DM1 treatments. Secondary end points included disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), time to treatment failure (TTF), and overall survival (OS). Results The median number of prior treatments of post-T-DM1 treatment was four. The types of post-T-DM1 treatments included (1) chemotherapy in combination with trastuzumab and pertuzumab (n = 102; 31.4%), (2) chemotherapy concomitant with trastuzumab (n = 78; 24.0%), (3), lapatinib with capecitabine (n = 63; 19.4%), and (4) others (n = 82; 25.2%). ORR was 22.8% [95% confidence interval (CI): 18.1–28.0], DCR = 66.6% (95% CI 60.8–72.0), median PFS = 6.1 months (95% CI 5.3–6.7), median TTF = 5.1 months (95% CI 4.4–5.6), and median OS = 23.7 months (95% CI 20.7–27.4). Conclusion The benefits of treatments after T-DM1 are limited. Further investigation of new treatment strategies beyond T-DM1 is awaited for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document