scholarly journals Functional Assessment of Problem Behavior: Interview-Informed Synthesized Contingency Analysis (IISCA)

2021 ◽  
Vol 71 (2) ◽  
pp. 6-14
Author(s):  
N.G. Butuzova ◽  
N.S. Polikarpova
Keyword(s):  
Problem Behavior ◽  
Problem Behaviors ◽  
Functional Assessment ◽  
Theory And Practice ◽  
Contingency Analysis ◽  
Modern Approach ◽  
Effective Interventions ◽  
Classical Procedure ◽  
Basic Ideas ◽  
Synthesized Contingencies

The basic ideas underlying the functional approach to assessing and correcting problem behavior are considered, a brief overview of studies related primarily to the modern approach to the analysis of dangerous behavior in children without the use of procedures involving physical intervention is presented. The well-known classical procedure of functional analysis, described by Brian Aywata and colleagues (1982/1994), is undoubtedly the gold standard in the theory and practice of applied behavior analysis. However, at present, specialists are increasingly seeking to use shorter and safer intervention strategies, in contrast to classical one. Today, Gregory Henley’s approach to functional assessment is of great interest among behavioral analysts, and is increasingly used to analyze and develop effective interventions for correcting severe and dangerous problem behaviors. The procedure of functional assessment based on synthesized contingencies, described by G. Henley, is illustrated, the reasons for using this type of assessment, the essence of synthesized contingencies are revealed, and a description of the steps of the methodology with examples is given.

scholarly journals A Predictive Multimodal Framework to Alert Caregivers of Problem Behaviors for Children with ASD (PreMAC)

Sensors ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 370
Author(s):  
Zhaobo K. Zheng ◽  
John E. Staubitz ◽  
Amy S. Weitlauf ◽  
Johanna Staubitz ◽  
Marney Pollack ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Problem Behavior ◽  
Problem Behaviors ◽  
Autism Spectrum ◽  
Training Data ◽  
Contingency Analysis ◽  
Multimodal Signals ◽  
Children With Asd ◽  
Remediation Strategies ◽  
The Us ◽  
High Prediction

Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) impacts 1 in 54 children in the US. Two-thirds of children with ASD display problem behavior. If a caregiver can predict that a child is likely to engage in problem behavior, they may be able to take action to minimize that risk. Although experts in Applied Behavior Analysis can offer caregivers recognition and remediation strategies, there are limitations to the extent to which human prediction of problem behavior is possible without the assistance of technology. In this paper, we propose a machine learning-based predictive framework, PreMAC, that uses multimodal signals from precursors of problem behaviors to alert caregivers of impending problem behavior for children with ASD. A multimodal data capture platform, M2P3, was designed to collect multimodal training data for PreMAC. The development of PreMAC integrated a rapid functional analysis, the interview-informed synthesized contingency analysis (IISCA), for collection of training data. A feasibility study with seven 4 to 15-year-old children with ASD was conducted to investigate the tolerability and feasibility of the M2P3 platform and the accuracy of PreMAC. Results indicate that the M2P3 platform was well tolerated by the children and PreMAC could predict precursors of problem behaviors with high prediction accuracies.

scholarly journals Evaluation of the interactionist model of socioeconomic status and problem behavior: A developmental cascade across generations

2010 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 695-713 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monica J. Martin ◽  
Rand D. Conger ◽  
Thomas J. Schofield ◽  
Shannon J. Dogan ◽  
Keith F. Widaman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Problem Behavior ◽  
Human Development ◽  
Problem Behaviors ◽  
Family Stress ◽  
Individual Characteristics ◽  
Social Selection ◽  
Social Causation ◽  
Adolescent Problem Behavior ◽  
The Social

AbstractThe current multigenerational study evaluates the utility of the interactionist model of socioeconomic influence on human development (IMSI) in explaining problem behaviors across generations. The IMSI proposes that the association between socioeconomic status (SES) and human development involves a dynamic interplay that includes both social causation (SES influences human development) and social selection (individual characteristics affect SES). As part of the developmental cascade proposed by the IMSI, the findings from this investigation showed that Generation 1 (G1) adolescent problem behavior predicted later G1 SES, family stress, and parental emotional investments, as well as the next generation of children's problem behavior. These results are consistent with a social selection view. Consistent with the social causation perspective, we found a significant relation between G1 SES and family stress, and in turn, family stress predicted Generation 2 (G2) problem behavior. Finally, G1 adult SES predicted both material and emotional investments in the G2 child. In turn, emotional investments predicted G2 problem behavior, as did material investments. Some of the predicted pathways varied by G1 parent gender. The results are consistent with the view that processes of both social selection and social causation account for the association between SES and human development.

A Reexamination of Child Problem Behaviors as Measured by ECBI: Factor Structure and Measurement Invariance Across Two Parent Training Interventions

Assessment ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (7) ◽  
pp. 1270-1281 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silje S. Hukkelberg
Keyword(s):  
Parent Training ◽  
Problem Behavior ◽  
Problem Behaviors ◽  
Structural Equation ◽  
Management Training ◽  
Total Sample ◽  
Parent Report ◽  
Parent Management Training ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Oppositional Defiant

The Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory (ECBI) is a widely used instrument that assesses disruptive problem behaviors via parent report. The present study compares three different conceptualizations of problem behaviors using traditional confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), a bifactor–CFA, and a bifactor exploratory structural equation model, whereof the latter two represent novel conceptualizations of disruptive problem behaviors. Data were derived from 353 Norwegian parents assigned to parent management training—the Oregon model (PMTO; N = 137) or brief parent training (BPT; N = 216), who rated their child’s problem behavior (age 3-12 years). The factor models were estimated within the PMTO and BPT samples, and in the total sample. Results showed that the bifactor–CFA, with a general problem behavior factor and three specific factors representing oppositional defiant, conduct problem, and inattentive behavior provided the best model fit. Furthermore, factorial invariance across control/intervention groups and across time (pre/post intervention) was estimated within the PMTO and BPT samples. Results revealed properties of metric and intercept invariance across intervention/control groups and over time, within both interventions. Implications of the results are discussed.

scholarly journals PARENTING STYLES AND THEIR IMPACTS ON CHILD PROBLEM BEHAVIORS

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 269-285
Author(s):  
Agnes Maria Sumargi ◽  
Eli Prasetyo ◽  
Benedicta Winona Ardelia
Keyword(s):  
Problem Behavior ◽  
Problem Behaviors ◽  
Parenting Styles ◽  
Behavioral Problems ◽  
Family Adjustment ◽  
Authoritarian Parenting ◽  
Child Problem Behavior ◽  
Child Emotional Problems ◽  
Child Problem Behaviors ◽  
The Impact

Managing child problem behaviors as early as possible is crucial. Several studies have shown the impact of parenting on child problem behavior; however, the studies did not investigate the influence of paternal and maternal parenting on child behavior separately. This study aimed to test the effect of mothers’ and fathers’ authoritative and authoritarian parenting on child problem behavior. Furthermore, this study examined the influence of family adjustment on parenting styles. Participants were 105 pairs of parents (fathers and mothers). They completed a set of questionnaires assessing their parenting styles, child problem behavior, and family adjustment. Multiple regression analyses resulted in a significant effect of mothers’ authoritative parenting on child emotional problems, as well as significant effects of fathers’ authoritative and authoritarian parenting on child behavioral problems. Another key finding was that parental teamwork predicted the effectiveness of parenting.

scholarly journals Validity Evidences for the Portuguese Version of the Problem Behavior Scale: Preschool and Kindergarten Behavior Scales-2

2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (65) ◽  
pp. 273-281
Author(s):  
Sofia Major ◽  
Maria João Seabra-Santos
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Problem Behavior ◽  
Problem Behaviors ◽  
Early Identification ◽  
Total Sample ◽  
Model Fit ◽  
Portuguese Version ◽  
Confirmatory Factor ◽  
High Internal Consistency ◽  
Behavior Scale

ABSTRACT The early identification of problem behaviors is essential in preschool. This paper presents evidence of validity (confirmatory factor analysis) for the Problem Behavior scale of the Portuguese version of the Preschool and Kindergarten Behavior Scales - Second Edition (PKBS-2). Analyses were performed for the scale's 46 items, which were grouped into 16 item-parcels. Once it was verified that the model fit the total sample (N = 2000; CFI = .98; RMSEA = .06), analyses were replicated for the samples collected at home and at school (n = 1000 per setting). Results indicate a factor structure equivalent to the original version, with five supplemental subscales, distributed into two subscales (Externalizing and Internalizing), stable for the two subsamples, with high internal consistency levels (α = .78-.97). The discussion highlights the utility/validity of the Portuguese version of the Problem Behavior scale among preschoolers.

Basic Parent Management Skills: Using Consequences to Correct Problem Behavior

2017 ◽  
pp. 113-122
Author(s):  
David J. Kolko ◽  
Eric M. Vernberg
Keyword(s):  
Problem Behavior ◽  
Problem Behaviors ◽  
Child Behavior ◽  
Home Practice ◽  
Management Skills ◽  
Home Management ◽  
Correct Problem ◽  
Potential Problems ◽  
Parent Management

This chapter reviews parenting techniques and provides and in depth discussion of the parent’s use of consequences to the child’s behavior. It teaches how to identify problem behaviors and desired behaviors, and provides the use of point systems as a way to improve child behavior. Topics covered include ensuring consequences are logical and suitable; removing a reward or privilege; and making restitution to another person after causing that person to suffer a loss or an injury, particularly by misuse of fire. There is a discussion of a home management (consequence) program, including a rationale for combining positive and problem behaviors in one program. Forms and worksheets from the appendix are used for parents to learn and review the concepts discussed. Potential problems to home practice are addressed.

scholarly journals Student Classroom Misbehavior: An Exploratory Study Based on Teachers' Perceptions

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel C. F. Sun ◽  
Daniel T. L. Shek
Keyword(s):  
Problem Behavior ◽  
Problem Behaviors ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Secondary School Student ◽  
Teachers Perceptions ◽  
Individual Interviews ◽  
Junior Secondary School ◽  
Junior Secondary ◽  
Rule Breaking ◽  
Student Problem

This study aimed to examine the conceptions of junior secondary school student misbehaviors in classroom, and to identify the most common, disruptive, and unacceptable student problem behaviors from teachers' perspective. Twelve individual interviews with teachers were conducted. A list of 17 student problem behaviors was generated. Results showed that the most common and disruptive problem behavior was talking out of turn, followed by nonattentiveness, daydreaming, and idleness. The most unacceptable problem behavior was disrespecting teachers in terms of disobedience and rudeness, followed by talking out of turn and verbal aggression. The findings revealed that teachers perceived student problem behaviors as those behaviors involving rule-breaking, violating the implicit norms or expectations, being inappropriate in the classroom settings and upsetting teaching and learning, which mainly required intervention from teachers.

scholarly journals Combining Tier 2 and Tier 3 Supports for Students with Disabilities in General Education Settings

2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 331 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Sandra MacLeod ◽  
Leanne S. Hawken ◽  
Robert E. O'Neill ◽  
Kaitlin Bundock
Keyword(s):  
General Education ◽  
Problem Behavior ◽  
Students With Disabilities ◽  
Problem Behaviors ◽  
Secondary Level ◽  
Tier 2 ◽  
Research And Practice ◽  
Tier 2 Interventions ◽  
Teachers And Students ◽  
Tier 3

<p>Secondary level or Tier 2 interventions such as the Check-in Check-out (CICO) intervention effectively reduce problem behaviors of students who are non-responsive to school-wide interventions. However, some students will not be successful with Tier 2 interventions. This study investigated the effects of adding individualized function-based support for four students with disabilities who were not successful in general education settings while receiving only a secondary level intervention. Results indicated that the combination of secondary and individualized function-based interventions effectively decreased problem behavior for all participants. Teachers and students rated the interventions as acceptable and effective. Research and practice implications are discussed.</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document