scholarly journals PROBLEMS OF LEGAL REGULATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE DELIVERY AND DETENTION

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (91) ◽  
pp. 54-59
Author(s):  
Maksims Bashlikovs

The purpose of this work is to study the problems of legal regulation of administrative delivery and detention in Russian administrative law and the study of possible ways to solve them. This problem is due to the fact that the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation. The delivery time is not specified as a measure to secure proceedings on cases of administrative offenses, which is a flaw in administrative legislation and may violate the rights and freedoms of a person and citizen. And the law does not establish the duration of a person’s time in office space and his waiting for the start of legal proceedings which is a serious legislative gap. The novelty of this work lies in the formulation by Autor’s of modern and effective proposals for the revision of individual issues related to measures of administrative proceedings and the reality of solving these problems. The Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation must be modified accordingly in order to clearly regulate or establish specific time limits for the delivery in police office and the time to wait for the commencement of proceedings. In this paper, the above problems and progressive solutions are discussed in detail.

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 225-236
Author(s):  
M.B. VELICHKO

The problem of the correct choice of forms of legal proceedings in this article will be considered in a narrow aspect, through the influence of the codification of legislation, analysis of the nature of such rules of law as аrt. 11 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation on the procedure for judicial protection of civil rights, art. 12 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation on how to protect civil rights, art. 13 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation on the invalidation of acts of subjects of public authority. The relevance of the research topic is due to the practical tasks of correctly determining the type of legal proceedings, as well as determining the place and role of administrative proceedings as an independent element of legal regulation and a form of judicial activity, the need to increase its effectiveness in achieving the goals of protecting the rights, freedoms, and legitimate interests of citizens and organizations. The rationale for the existence of the problem in this aspect is that many procedural scientists assign the role of the “life form of material industries” to the procedural branches, as a result of which one of their criteria for differentiating civil and administrative proceedings is the branch affiliation of the method of protection chosen by the plaintiff. In the literature, there are judgments that cases considered in the order of administrative proceedings are clearly defined by law in the Special Part of the Code of Administrative Procedure of the Russian Federation and cannot be expanded and supplemented without introducing appropriate changes to the legislation.


2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 350-358
Author(s):  
S. A. Poryvaev

Currently, the process of constitutionalization of administrative law is actively underway in the Russian Federation. It involves the differentiation of administrative and administrative-procedural legislation, as well as the formation of procedures of the administrative process implemented in judicial and non-judicial forms. This, in turn, requires a clear allocation of separate administrative-procedural proceedings, including proceedings for the resolution of administrative disputes. On this basis, the fact is noted that the modern development of administrative law and process should be based on constitutional norms, which implies a significant transformation of the relationship between public authorities and private individuals, turning the latter into a full-fledged subject of administrative legal relations, creating new functions of administrative legal regulation. The research paper analyzes the existing administrative-procedural legislation regulating both non-judicial and judicial procedures for resolving administrative disputes. The specifics of individual legislative acts in this area are studied. In particular, a comparison is made between the general and special procedures for resolving out-of-court administrative disputes. The research paper analyzes the legal regulation of such procedures, the features of individual methods of legislative regulation of the out-of-court procedure for resolving administrative disputes are noted. The article also compares administrative recovery and administrative-rehabilitation administrative disputes. Judicial resolution of administrative disputes has significant specifics due to the special place of the judiciary in a state governed by the rule of law. This is expressed in the special legal consequences of a court decision, as well as in the application of administrative legal principles for more effective protection of the rights and legitimate interests of participants in legal relations. Based on the results of the study, conclusions are drawn about the fact that within the framework of administrative procedure legislation, proceedings are formed to resolve administrative disputes both out of court and in court. It also notes the shortcomings and problems of its legal regulation, suggests ways to eliminate them, which can help improve the analyzed production. The consolidation of the procedures for resolving out-of-court administrative and legal disputes should be carried out in a single legislative act, and not within the framework of separate laws and subordinate legal acts. In addition, the resolution of judicial administrative and legal disputes should also be unified within the framework of the Code of Administrative Proceedings of the Russian Federation, however, taking into account the positive elements that are currently available in the Code of Arbitration Proceedings of the Russian Federation.


2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 84-92
Author(s):  
Vasilii V. Semenchuk

The article deals with the issues of legal regulation and the actual implementation of the procedures for appealing against the actions of officials carrying out operative-investigative activity. It is noted that there is uncertainty in the choice of the type of legal proceedings (criminal or administrative) also as a level of the court for such complaints (court of the subject of the Russian Federation or district court). Another problem is related to the actual assignment responsibility for the plaintiffs to substantiate complaints about covert operative-investigative measures which, as a rule, leads to a refusal to consider them. The authors are invited to introduce a universal appeal procedure in the framework of administrative proceedings. The secret nature of the operative-investigative activity does not allow the plaintiff to fully substantiate the essence of his claims, so this task may be performed by the court. In order to preserve information constituting a state secret, it is necessary to introduce a closed procedure for dealing with such complaints.


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 9-16
Author(s):  
Aleksey V. Stepanov ◽  

The article gives the grounds of the author’s approach to the content of the mechanism of administrative-legal regulation of migration safety and security in Russia (hereinafter referred to as the mechanism of migration security and security). Some specifics of the mechanism of migration safety and security are described. Static and dynamic approaches to understand the content of migration safety and security are pointed. In the context of static approach the author reveals the indications of administrative-legal remedies and enumerates them referred to as the elements of the mechanism of migration security. It is paid the attention on dynamic part of the mechanism of migration security considered as the system of interrelated, specifically ordered, followed each other stages leading with the help of corresponding forms and methods to concrete results — the stage of protection from menaces and the stability of the law and order. In conclusion the author formulates the concept of the mechanism of administrative-legal regulation of safety and security.


Author(s):  
Valentin Nazarov ◽  
Tat’yana Akimova

We point out some trends observed in the development of Russian justice. We note the features of the historical development of the state that have influenced the legislative consolidation of administrative legal proceedings. Exploring the main approaches to the definition of administrative legal proceedings, we conditionally combine them into three large groups and characterize each of them. The various positions of legal scholars on the legal nature of administrative legal proceedings are illustrated. It is indicated that with the adoption of the Code of Administrative Judicial Procedure, there was a separation of administrative proceedings from other types, the result of which is the creation of administrative and legal means to ensure and protect public interests as well as the practical implementation of constitutional legal norms on administrative legal proceedings. We specify that the independent nature of administrative legal proceedings is determined by the specifics of this process. The features characteristic for this type of legal proceedings are analyzed. We express an opinion on the need for a more clear and unambiguous formulation of the subject of regulation of the Code of Administrative Judicial Procedure of the Russian Federation and its normative consolidation. Despite the fact that more than four years have passed since the adoption of the Code, the controversy surrounding the subject of regulation of the Code of Administrative Judicial Procedure of the Russian Federation continues to this day. In addition, we reveal the most important results of the adoption of the Code of Administrative Judicial Procedure.


2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 131-139
Author(s):  
Болотин ◽  
Igor Bolotin

The article summarizes the nature and purpose of the institution of administrative responsibility in the sphere of drugs turnover and psychotropic substances, the results of modern research in this area. The problems of its improvement are considered taking into account emerging challenges and conflicts of the implementation of changes in administrative law from the standpoint of the theory of administrative law and enforcement practices and suggestions for their resolution. The problems of applying administrative expulsion to foreign citizens and people without citizenship on the basis of positions of the European Court of Human Rights, the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, generalization of the practice of the Federal courts are separately identified. The value and arising problems from the implementation of the mechanism of legal motivation of drug users to treatment and rehabilitation are provided, and suggestions on improving administrative legal regulation in this sphere of public relations are presented.


2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 107-113
Author(s):  
Гончарук ◽  
Natalya Goncharuk

The article provides analytical information on anti-corruption in the system of the civil service of the Russian Federation. The article presents the rationale for further elaboration of decisions on combating corruption at the level of administrative law-making and enforcement of administrative law, because the existing legal provisions should find their content in all kinds of legal liability. It is in the field of administrative legal regulation the concrete mechanisms of combating corruption should be enhanced, gaps should be eliminated, creating opportunities for corruption, the formed schemes of corrupt interaction should be destroyed. A similar situation exists in the scientific coverage of the problems of combating corruption. The existing monographic publications and sources on the subject widely present the strategic and tactical aspects, however, questions on the use of administrative procedures and anti-corruption mechanisms need to be further developed.


2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. 57-64
Author(s):  
O. V. Pankova

The paper presents the author’s view of the problem of interaction between international and national administrative law and attempts to determine the place of the Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms in the Russian legal system and the administrative and tort legislation of the country. Based on the analysis of different points of view, the conclusion is enunciated that international treaties ratified by the Russian Federation are incorporated into the general body of administrative legislation; and they constitute a source of administrative law in the part in which they contain legal provisions governing the administrative and legal status of citizens, as well as guarantees of its implementation, including guarantees of equitable justice in cases arising from public law relations and administrative and tort cases. In this regards, the author analyzes the provisions of Article 1.1 of the Administrative Code of the Russian Federation, determining the place and role of universally recognized principles and norms of international law and international treaties of the Russian Federation in the system of sources of administrative and tort law—the author refers the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms to the sources mentioned above. The paper considers this Convention as an international treaty of the Russian Federation that not only regulates interstate relations, but also actively invades the regulation of procedural administrative responsibility, since it establishes the general parameters of a fair trial in administrative and tort cases. The paper also pays attention to the implementation in the draft Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation and the Procedural Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offences of the Constitutional Principle concerning international legal norms in the legal system of the Russian Federation.


JURIST ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 44-53
Author(s):  
Miroslava I. Petrovskaya ◽  

The article is devoted to the justification of the specifics of public administration in the field of forced migration. The specifics of this type of migration, peculiarities of its administrative and legal regulation are revealed. The purpose of the work is to obtain theoretical conclusions and to develop practical recommendations for improving the system of management of forced migration in Russia. The target is public administration in the field of forced migration. The subject of the study is a set of rules of administrative law of the Russian Federation, which establish general provisions of public administration of forced migration, as well as the range of subjects, institutions and mechanisms used in the process of ensuring the functioning of the system of reception of forced migrants. The methodological basis of the study was the methods: dialectical, private methods — systemic-structural, comparative-legal, formal-logical and historical-legal, statistical and other methods of scientific knowledge. Within the framework of the proposed study, ways are outlined to solve the problems identified by the author of organizing the foundations of management in the field of forced migration in Russia. Recent legislative changes that have not yet been the subject of scientific research are under consideration. For the first time since the transfer of migration powers to the system of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation, current changes related to the implementation of powers in the field of forced migration have been analyzed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document