scholarly journals The Russian Cohen doctrine: problems in calculating costs and deductions in the absence of proper documentation

Author(s):  
Zh. G. Popkova

The article provides information about a foreign judicial doctrine (the Cohen Rule) that originated in the court case of 1930 with the participation of George Cohen, Broadway Theater manager and producer. The doctrine under consideration that is still valid in the US tax law does not exclude the application of the approximate amount of taxpayer’s expenses when calculating income taxes in the absence of documents verifying expenses. It is concluded that the domestic regulatory framework applies a similar approach that envisages a fixed deduction for individual entrepreneurs under Article 221 of the Tax Code. It is proposed to introduce a similar regulatory framework for corporate income tax.

2008 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 71-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas K. Barney ◽  
Tonya K. Flesher

Farmers have benefited from unique tax treatment since the beginning of the income tax law. This paper explores agricultural influences on the passage of the income tax in 1913, using both qualitative and quantitative analysis. The results show that agricultural interests were influential in the development and passage of tax/tariff laws. The percentage of congressmen with agricultural ties explains the strong affection for agriculture. Discussion in congressional debates and in agricultural journals was passionate and patriotic in support of equity for farmers. The quantitative analysis reveals that the percentage farm population was a significant predictor of passage of the 16th Amendment by the states and of adoption of state income taxes in the 20th century.


2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 97-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan J. Auerbach

On December 22, 2017, President Donald Trump signed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), the most sweeping revision of US tax law since the Tax Reform Act of 1986. The law introduced many significant changes. However, perhaps none was as important as the changes in the treatment of traditional “C” corporations—those corporations subject to a separate corporate income tax. Beginning in 2018, the federal corporate tax rate fell from 35 percent to 21 percent, some investment qualified for immediate deduction as an expense, and multinational corporations faced a substantially modified treatment of their activities. This paper seeks to evaluate the impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act to understand its effects on resource allocation and distribution. It compares US corporate tax rates to other countries before the 2017 tax law, and describes ways in which the US corporate sector has evolved that are especially relevant to tax policy. The discussion then turns the main changes of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 for the corporate income tax. A range of estimates suggests that the law is likely to contribute to increased US capital investment and, through that, an increase in US wages. The magnitude of these increases is extremely difficult to predict. Indeed, the public debate about the benefits of the new corporate tax provisions enacted (and the alternatives not adopted) has highlighted the limitations of standard approaches in distributional analysis to assigning corporate tax burdens.


2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (88) ◽  
pp. 217-232
Author(s):  
Miloš Vasović

The Serbian Corporate Income Tax Act contains a provision on the beneficial ownership of income (hereinafter: the BO provision), which is one of the conditions for the application of the preferential tax rate on income tax after tax deduction, which is envisaged in Treaties for the avoidance of Double Taxation on income and capital (hereinafter: Double Taxation Treaties/ DTTs). The subject matter of research in this paper is the term "beneficial ownership", which is not defined in the Corportate Income Tax Act. It may ultimately lead to abusing the preferential tax rates from the DTTs in tax planning and "treaty shopping" through the use of conduit companies. Tax experts have different opinions on the legal nature of the BO provision, which is given the function of an anti-abusive measure (on the one hand) and a rule for the attribution of income (on the other hand). The author analyzes the current function of the BO provision envisaged in the Serbian Serbian Corporate Income Tax Act (CITA), and its inadequate application. The author advocates for enacting the BO provision as an anti-abusive measure, and examines the possible application of the BO provision in domestic tax law, with reference to Articles 10, 11, and 12 of the DTTs that Serbia contracted with other states, as well as Articles 10-12 of the OECD Model-Convention on Income and Capital (2017) and Commentaries on these articles. Such an application of the BO provision may preclude "treaty shopping". In final remarks, the author points out why the BO provision should be envisaged as an anti-abusive measure in Serbian tax law.


2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 117-122
Author(s):  
Irham Firdauza Pratama ◽  
Hadi Sutomo

Many cases are related to corrections caused by the occurrence of VAT and Income Tax equalization. The difference in reporting the circulation of business on the VAT SPT with the Corporate Income Tax Return is the object of the tax authorities' examination. Basically, equalization is not to find the same number of circulation businesses but to find the cause of the difference between the VAT Period of Income Tax and the Corporate Income Tax Return. These differences are often due to differences in provisions between Income Taxes and Value Added Taxes, such as tax objects, exchange rates, and so on. The purpose of this study was to find out how to report the circulation of business between the VAT Period of VAT and Corporate Income Tax Returns of PT. AdiyanaTeknikMandiri. To find out the process and analysis of equalization between VAT Period of VAT and Corporate Income Tax Returns at PT. AdiyanaTeknikMandiri. To find out the equalization benefits of the VAT Period SPT with Corporate Income Tax Returns for companies. This study uses a comparative descriptive method with qualitative and quantitative data, namely by analyzing and processing financial statement data and existing fiscal reports, then comparing the circulation of business to the results of calculations according to the VAT Period of VAT and Corporate Income Tax Returns, then processed further to provide an explanation of the difference in business circulation generated. The results of this study indicate that PT. AdiyanaTeknikMandiri that the company in reporting the circulation of its business has not been reported as it should, it is known after equalizing it is known that there is a number of business circulation that has not been reported in the VAT Period SPT report so that it causes a difference in the amount of business circulation between the VAT Period of Income Tax and the Corporate Income Tax Return. Equalization process is carried out by comparing the VAT Period report with the Corporate Income Tax Return, collecting data on business circulation in the ledger, comparing the data obtained, then analyzing the factors that cause the different reporting of business circulation. Equalization benefits for the company, which can be a preventive measure to face a tax audit by the tax authorities, so that the company can explain in accordance with the conditions that occur, equalization can also be a benchmark of compliance and increase the accuracy of taxpayers in reporting the amount of tax obligations in accordance with the applicable law .   Keywords: tax equalization, business circulation, corporate income tax return


2016 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gintaras Cernius ◽  
Liucija Birskyte ◽  
Arturas Balkevicius

Companies in Lithuania have to follow Business Accounting Standards (BAS) when preparing their financial statements. Recording financial transactions according to BAS ensures that the information a company shares with potential lenders and investors gives a true and fair view of its business situation. However, the tax law prescribes its own set of accounting rules, which can result in a difference between what a business shows in financial statements and what it reports on its tax returns. This paper examines whether Lithuanian companies predominantly use tax accounting principles that migrate into their financial statements to create an inaccurate picture of business performance. The method of experts’ evaluation was chosen for that purpose. The results indicate that Lithuanian companies tend to heavily rely on accounting principles prescribed in corporate income tax law thus distorting information contained in financial statements. The paper contributes to the scarce literature on this issue of high relevance to both academics and practitioners.


2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ray Marcel Letlora ◽  
Jantje J. Tinangon ◽  
Lintje Kalangi

The application of PSAK No. 46, Accounting for Income Taxes expected to bridge between accounting and tax laws with provisions. The purpose of this study is to investigate the application of PSAK No. 46 and Act No. 36 of 2008 on corporate income tax on PT.mega Jasakelola. The analytical method used is descriptive analysis. The application of PSAK No.46 of research results 46 top corporate income tax has been applied on PT.Mega Jasakelola especially regarding deferred tax, taxable income and tax payable now. Implementation of Act No. 36 of 2008 on income tax on business services is appropriate PT Mega Jasakelola Taxation existing regulations. PT.Mega Jasakelola has implemented reporting income tax on their annual tax return, in accordance with the provisions of this is evidenced by the positive correction done at the expense of the non- taxable.


2011 ◽  
Vol 11 (Edsus) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amin Purnawan

Fairness in taxation policy can be viewed from: first, the equilibrium relationship between tax authorities and taxpayers,  secondly, equitable allocation of the tax burden on various segments of society according to his ability. Corporate income tax collection system did not reflect the sense of justice because the application of the single rate system of corporation tax burden caused injustice, and the authority of the tax authorities are still too broad. It needs political reconstruction based corporate income tax law of justice based on Pancasila, through structuring and strengthening aspects of philosophy, the subtance and structure of tax law. Progressive tax law by using a new paradigm is expected to display the figure of taxation more equitable and humane, so as to promote awareness of voluntary compliance from tax payer, followed by transparency and responsibility of countries to achieve people’s welfare. Keywords: Reconstruction, Corporate Income Taxes, Juctice


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document