scholarly journals Analysis of caesarean section rate using WHO’s Robson’s 10-group classification system: a hospital based retrospective study

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 2006
Author(s):  
Devika V. Desai ◽  
Nigamananda Mishra ◽  
Santoshi Prabhu ◽  
Vaishali Jadhav ◽  
Gayatri Savani
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Data Collection ◽  
Caesarean Section Rate ◽  
Previous Caesarean Section ◽  
Time Period ◽  
Vaginal Deliveries ◽  
Retrospective Data Collection ◽  
Group 5 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Background: Maternal morbidity and mortality has been an utmost priority worldwide as it is an indicator of healthcare system. In order to bring it down, it has become the need of the hour to decrease the number of caesarean sections as it is one of the most common cause of morbidity among women. Every institution should have an audit to determine the rate of caesarean section and corresponding indications in order to implement new protocols or modify existing ones to improve caesarean section rates.Methods: All women who underwent caesarean section between time period Jan 2015- Dec 2019 were included. All vaginal deliveries were excluded. Delivery and operative registers, logbooks and online entries were used for data collection in the obstetric and gynecologic department. A retrospective data collection was done, tabulated and entered in excel sheet.Results: Robson’s group 1, group 2, group 5 were the main contributors to overall caesarean section rate. The major indications for caesarean section were found to be as previous caesarean section (33%), non-progress of labor (22%) followed by meconium stained liquor, cephalopelvic disproportion both around 10%.Conclusions: Robson’s group 1, group 2, group 5 were the main contributors to the overall caesarean section rate. The major indications for caesarean section were found as previous caesarean section and non-progress of labor. Further studies are needed for comparison and to make amendments to protocols.

scholarly journals Assessment of Caesarean Section Rates at Kathmandu Model Hospital Using the Robson’s Ten Group Classification System

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 491-494 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rekha Poudel ◽  
Ganesh Dangal ◽  
Aruna Karki ◽  
Hema Kumari Pradhan ◽  
Ranjana Shrestha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Classification System ◽  
Caesarean Section Rate ◽  
Group Classification ◽  
Vaginal Birth ◽  
Previous Caesarean Section ◽  
Group 5 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Vaginal Birth After Caesarean ◽  
Group 1

Background: Aims of this study was to assess the caesarean section rate and identify the indications contributing to the same using the Robson’s Ten Group Classification System at Kathmandu Model Hospital.Methods: This was a retrospective study conducted at Kathmandu Model Hospital among women who underwent caesarean section from 1 January to 31 December, 2018 and were grouped according to Ten Group Classification System. The overall caesarean section rate and the contribution of each group was calculated.Results: The overall caesarean section rate was 66.1% (494 among 747 total deliveries) in 2018. Nullipara, singleton cephalic, >= 37 weeks, spontaneous labor (Group 1) was the major (24.2%) contributor to the overall caesarean section rate followed by previous caesarean section, singleton cephalic, >=37 weeks (Group 5, 22.6%) and nullipara, singleton cephalic, >=37 weeks, induced or caesarean section before labor (Group 2, 18.8%). Also, the caesarean section rate was 49.5% in nullipara, thus increasing the trend of caesarean section for previous caesarean section in future.Conclusions: Efforts must be focused more on Group 1, 2 and 5 to decrease the increasing trend of caesarean section Promoting vaginal delivery in nullipara and facilitating vaginal birth after caesarean are the most relevant areas of intervention. Keywords: Caesarean section; Robson ten group classification system; vaginal birth after caesarean.

scholarly journals Analysis of Caesarean Section Rates Using the Robson Ten-group Classification at a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital in Eastern India: A Cross-sectional Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiralal Konar ◽  
Madhutandra Sarkar ◽  
Sisir Kumar Chowdhury
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Relative Size ◽  
Group Classification ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Care Teaching ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 5 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Introduction: The Robson ten-group classification identifies the women’s groups that make the greatest contribution to the overall rate of Caesarean Section (CS), and thereby helps to optimise CS rates. It also helps to ensure optimum maternal and perinatal outcomes. Aim: This study was undertaken to examine the rates of CS using the Robson ten-group classification, and also to identify the women’s groups that contribute most to CS rates in a tertiary care teaching and referral hospital in Kolkata, India. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional observational study was conducted over a period of one year from May 2012 to April 2013. All pregnant women admitted under the supervision of a particular unit of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and delivered in that hospital during the study period were included. Necessary data collection was done on the following parameters, i.e., previous obstetric history, category of pregnancy, course of labour and delivery, and gestational age. The women were categorised into the ten Robson groups. For each group, the CS rate, relative size of the group, and the percentage contribution made by the group to the overall CS rate were calculated and expressed in percentages. Chi-square test, Z-test and the trial version of Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20.0 were used to analyse the data. Results: The CS rate in the present study was 43.13% (735 out of 1704 deliveries). Not only the largest group in terms of relative size 649 (38.08%), the Robson group 1 had a CS rate of 41.75% (271/649), as well as the largest absolute number of caesarean deliveries. The group 1 made the largest contribution (271) to the overall CS rate (15.9%). The group 5 was the second largest contributing group 155 (9.09%), followed by group 3 96 (5.63%) and group 2 69 (4.04%). In the present study group 5 showed the CS rate of 95.67%, group 3 with CS rate of 24.48% and group 2 with CS rate of 60.52%. Conclusion: The Robson groups 1, 2, 3 and 5 were found to be the major contributors to the overall CS rate. These groups may be targeted for effective interventions to reduce the CS rate. Active management of labour in a primigravida with spontaneous onset, reduction of primary caesarean delivery, promoting vaginal birth after CS, and careful assessment of cases before induction of labour in nulliparous women, are likely to be few effective strategies.

scholarly journals The ten group Robson classification: a retrospective study to identify strategies to optimise caesarean section rates

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 5082
Author(s):  
Spandana S. ◽  
Amarpali K. Shivanna
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Caesarean Section Rate ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Group Classification ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Robson Classification ◽  
Vaginal Deliveries ◽  
Group 5 ◽  
Ongoing Surveillance

Background: Caesarean section rates have been increasing worldwide. For proper assessment, the ten group Robson classification is recommended by WHO for assessing CS rates. We are analyzing the caesarean section rates by classifying the caesarean sections using modified Robson’s ten group classification. Objective of the current study was to estimate caesarean section rates in our hospital and to classify caesarean section using modified Robson’s ten group classification system.Methods: Current retrospective study was conducted in the department of obstetrics and gynaecology in a tertiary care hospital. The medical records were reviewed for a period of 12 months.Results: Total number of deliveries during the study period was 315. The total numbers of caesarean section were 159 and total vaginal deliveries were 156. The caesarean section rate was 50.47%. The main contributors to overall caesarean section rate were group 5 (18.10%), group 2 (13.96%) and group 1 (5.71%). Women with one previous LSCS contributed majorly to the caesarean section rate. Higher CS rate was also seen in both group 2A (69.40%) and group 4A (47.30%) which had underwent induction of labour. More inclination towards trial of labour following CS for women with previous one LSCS can lower CS rates.Conclusions: Modified Robson’s classification is easily implementable and an effective tool for ongoing surveillance. The results can be compared between Institutions, states and countries. Having implemented the Robson classification and identified groups which contributed the most to the overall CS rate, interventions to reduce the same has to be our prime objective.

scholarly journals Rising trends of caesarean section in modern obstetrics: analysis by Robson classification

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. 4468
Author(s):  
Shery Angel Rajakumar ◽  
Sindhura Myneni ◽  
Kamala Roshini M.
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Group Classification ◽  
Health Concern ◽  
Public Health Concern ◽  
Robson Classification ◽  
Obstetrics And Gynaecology ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 5 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Background: Rising caesarean section (CS) rates are a major public health concern worldwide. The main objective of our study was to analyse the CS rates according to Robson ten group classification system (TGCS).Methods: This was a retrospective study conducted in the department of obstetrics and gynaecology at Chettinad hospital and research institute, during a period of 5 years from May 2015 to April 2020. All the women who delivered by CS were included in the study. The data regarding parity, gestational age, onset of labour, number of foetuses and presentation was collected and classified according to Robson TGCS and analysed.Results: A total of 4199 women delivered during the study period. Out of 4199 women 2149 (51.18%) underwent CS. All the women who underwent caesarean section were classified according to Robson TGCS. Group 5 contributed the most (40.81%). Group 2 had the second highest contribution of 33.36%. Group 1 had 6.24%, group 3 and 4 contributed for 1.16% and 4.65% respectively. Group 6 and 7 had 2.84% and 1.68% respectively. Group 8 had 2.28%, group 9 had 0.23% and group 10 constituted 6.75%.Conclusion: As contribution of repeat CS is high among the overall CS rate it is important to reduce the primary CS rates. More analytical studies need to be done based on Robson TGCS to evaluate the indication of CS within each group.

Analysis of caesarean section rates using Robsons ten group classification: the first step

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (8) ◽  
pp. 3481 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sowmya Koteshwara ◽  
Sujatha M. S.
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Group Classification ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Relative Contribution ◽  
Group 5 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Background: The Caesarean section (CS) rate is steadily increasing worldwide including India. The overall CS rates are reported but rarely the women are classified. According to WHO Robson ten –group classification is useful as a global standard for assessing, monitoring and comparing cesarean section rates. Our objective was to classify women delivering in our hospital according to various categories as per the 10-group classification (Robsons classification) and analyzing the CS rate in each group.Methods: This was a cross sectional study conducted at JSS Medical College, Mysore. The data was collected for all women delivering in hospital from January 2016-December 2016 and the women were classified according to Robsons 10 group classification. The proportion of women delivering in each group, the CS rate of each group, and the relative contribution to CS rate from each group was calculated.Results: Among a total of 5016 women delivering during the study period 37.65% of women were delivered by CS. Maximum no of pregnant women belonged to primigravida group (group 1 and 2). Major contributor to CS rate were primigravida (group 2) at 32.2%. Next contributors were group 5 and group 1 at 28.9 % and 18.6% respectively. Overall the three groups 1, 2 and group 5 contributed to 79.7% of the CS rate while the other group contributed to only 21.3% of CS rate.Conclusions: Applying Robsons criteria to classify pregnant women allowed for easy classification to identify the category of women most likely to have CS. Reducing primary CS rate and increasing VBAC rates will help to reduce CS rate. 

scholarly journals Analysis of caesarean delivery using Robson ten group classification system at a tertiary care teaching institute in Kerala, India

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 1990
Author(s):  
Heera Shenoy T. ◽  
Sheela T. Shenoy ◽  
Anaswara T. ◽  
Remash K.
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Classification System ◽  
Caesarean Delivery ◽  
Caesarean Section Rate ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Group Classification ◽  
College Hospital ◽  
Robson Classification ◽  
Group 5 ◽  
Group 2

Background: Globally, the caesarean delivery rate is rising continuously, making caesarean one of the most common surgical procedures. The Robson classification, appreciated by WHO in 2014 and FIGO in 2016 is widely accepted, risk-based, ten-group classification system (TGCS) developed specifically to assess caesarean section rates. The aim of this study was to know the rate of Caesarean section in present hospital, to analyse the Caesarean sections based on Robson’s classification and to determine the contribution and significance of each group on the overall number of Caesarean sections.Methods: All women, who gave birth by Caesarean deliveries done over a period of 1 year (January 2018-December 2018) in Travancore Medical College Hospital in South Kerala India.Results: Group 5 (previous LSCS, single, cephalic >37 weeks) made the greatest contribution to the Caesarean section rate (27.24%). The second highest contributor was Group 2 (Nulliparous, singleton, cephalic, >37 weeks induced labour or caesarean section before labour followed by Group 10 (all single cephalic <36 weeks including previous CS) 18.78%.Conclusions: Limiting the CS rate in low-risk pregnancies is key to lowering the trend of increased CS. If TGCS is used uniformly, CS rates can be compared over time and between units, both nationally and internationally.

scholarly journals Caesarean section audit in a tertiary hospital of North India using Robson’s classification

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 1426
Author(s):  
Ruchi Gupta
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Fetal Distress ◽  
Tertiary Hospital ◽  
Group Classification ◽  
North India ◽  
Effective Strategies ◽  
Group 5 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Failed Induction ◽  
Group 1

Background: In view of upsurging Caesarean section (CS) rate worldwide WHO conducted two multicountry surveys to diagnose the driving determinants. In two WHO surveys increased overall CS rate was observed from 26.4% to 31.2% worldwide except Japan. Both WHO 2014 and FIGO 2016 recommend Robson ten- group classification for monitoring caesarean rate over time because of its clarity, tenacity, resilience and pliability. Our Aim is to classify women delivered in our Hospital as per Robson ten –group classification and access the factor driving caesarean rate in each group.Methods: This is a retrospective study 1671 caesarean section conducted in tertiary hospital over 6 months (July- December) 2018. All the delivering women were classified according to Robson ten-group classification and data was analyzed using Microsoft excel and SPSS 23 software.Results: During the study period there were 5917 deliveries. Of these 1671 deliveries were CS accounting for CS rate of 28.24% . The major contributor to CS rate were women in group 5 followed by primigravida’s in group 1 and 2. Increasing  CS rate was observed in group 1 ,2, 3 and 5. Most common indication for caesarean section was fetal distress , failed induction , previous caesarean , breech and Antepartum hemorrhage.Conclusions: Increasing trend in CS rate is observed in group 1,2 ,3 and 5. In order to reduce CS rate among group 2 better patient selection is required for induction of labour based on Bishop score. In order to reduce CS rate in group 5 promotion of  VBAC deliveries should be encouraged. By classifying women according to Robson group 10 classification  helps in identification of women likely to deliver by caesarean  and to identify effective strategies to optimize the CS rate.

scholarly journals Analysis of Caesarean Section Rates by Robson’s Classification

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (20) ◽  
pp. 1460-1465
Author(s):  
Mudasir Ahmad Dar ◽  
Sameer Ahmed Lone ◽  
Rehana Rashid
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Classification System ◽  
Caesarean Section Rate ◽  
New Delhi ◽  
Foetal Distress ◽  
Spontaneous Labour ◽  
Group 5 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Comprehensive Classification ◽  
Precise Interpretation

BACKGROUND A standard and comprehensive classification system is needed to maintain appropriate Caesarean section (CS) rates like Robson Ten Group Classification System. The present study was conducted to analyse Caesarean section rate and its distribution according to Robson’s classification. METHODS A descriptive study was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Deen Dayal Upadhyay Hospital, Hari Nagar, New Delhi, from August 2018 to May 2019 on pregnant women of more than 28 weeks of gestation admitted for delivery. RESULTS Out of 8099 deliveries, 2924 required Caesarean section. The overall Caesarean section rate was 36.11 %, 1616 (55.27 %) were primary Caesarean section and 1308 (44.73 %) were repeat Caesarean section. Preterm delivery by Caesarean section was in 7.49 %. Majority of Caesarean section were in 37- 40 weeks of gestation (79.42 %). Out of 2924 cases 90.62 %, 8.21 % and 1.17 % were cephalic presentation, breech and other presentations respectively. 32 Caesarean section cases were twin pregnancy, 20.83 % was induced whereas 23.91 % was in spontaneous labour. Previous Caesarean section (44.74 %) was the commonest cause followed by foetal distress (16.82 %). Commonest cause for repeat Caesarean section was foetal distress (25.76 %). Major contributor to overall Caesarean section rate was Robson’s group 5 (38.72 %) followed by group 2 and group 1 i.e 21.64 % and 11.79 % respectively. Least contributor was group 8 (1.09 %). CONCLUSIONS Robson’s classification can help to identify broad categories of women to be targeted to decrease Caesarean section rates. Caesarean section rate can be reduced by decreasing primary Caesarean section, offering trial of labour (TOLAC), strict induction protocols implementation and precise interpretation of foetal heart rate tracings. KEYWORDS Caesarean Section, Robson’s Classification, Malpresentation

scholarly journals Caesarean Section Analysis of the Rate According to Robson Ten Group Classification

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (01) ◽  
pp. 37-42
Author(s):  
Srividhya R ◽  
Jhansi Rani K
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Classification System ◽  
Placenta Previa ◽  
Caesarean Section Rate ◽  
Relative Size ◽  
Group Classification ◽  
Nulliparous Women ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Group 5 ◽  
Group 1

BACKGROUND In current and subsequent births, Caesarean sections bear their own risks for maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. In contrast with vaginal delivery, Caesarean section has increased risk of blood transfusion, hysterectomy and death and the risk of uterine rupture, placenta accreta and placenta previa in future pregnancies is also increased. We wanted to analyse the Caesarean section rate using Robson ten group classification system & identify the leading groups contributing to high caesarean section rates using Robson ten group classification system. METHODS This observational descriptive study enrolled 11,090 women who underwent delivery, of whom 5117 (46.14 %) women delivered vaginally and 5973 (53.86 %) women delivered through Caesarean section. RESULTS Overall caesarean section percentage was 53.86 %. Major contributors for the CSR were Group 5, 2 and 1 in that order. CS rate in Group 5 and 1 is relatively increased. Ratio of relative size of Group 1 and 2 is 1:2 indicating a greater number of prelabour caesarean sections in nulliparous women. Caesarean section rate in Group 1 and 2 was 15.7 % and 20.1 % respectively. The main indications for caesarean sections being fetal distress, non-progressive labour and severe oligohydramnios / anamnios. Relative size of Group 1 and 5 was 47.3 % stating that most of the obstetric population was in Group 1 and 5. Caesarean section rate in Group 3 and Group 4 was relatively higher than expected; this may be due to our institute being a referral center. Group 5 contributed 45.7 % to overall caesarean section rate. CONCLUSIONS Standardisation of indication of Caesarean deliveries, regular audits and definite protocols in hospital will aid in decreasing the Caesarean section rate in hospital. KEYWORDS Kidney Size, Ultrasound Assessment, Age Groups

scholarly journals Cesarean Section Rate at Lumbini Zonal Hospital, Nepal: An Analysis Using the Robson Ten Group Classification System

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-14
Author(s):  
Bishnu Gautam ◽  
◽  
Shree D. Acharya ◽  
Vishnu Prasad Sapkota ◽  
Raut B. Batsal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Care Center ◽  
Caesarean Section Rate ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Group Classification ◽  
World Health ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Group 5 ◽  
Group 1

Background Caesarean section (CS) rates have increased globally. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends the use of the TenGroup Robson classification as the global standard for assessing appropriateness of CS. Nepal has higher-than-global average rates of CS requiring further investigation into appropriateness. Aim This study aims to investigate the caesarean section rates at tertiary care center in Nepal and make analysis based on the group-10 classification. Methods A retrospective cross-sectional study was carried out from 2016 April -2017 March in Lumbini Zonal Hospital, Butwal, Rupendehi, Nepal. 3,817 women who birth over a 12-month period were analyzed using this classification. The caesarean rate, its indications were calculated and categorized into groups according to Robson’s 10-group classification. Results Women with previous CS (Group 5) comprise the largest proportion (9.4%) of the overall 26.41% CS rate. The second largest contributor was a singleton nulliparous woman with cephalic presentation at term (6.6% of total 26.41%). Caesarean section rates in single breech pregnancies were very high (>65%). Robson’s Group 5 was the highest contributors to overall CS rate contributing 35% of all C-sections, followed by Group 2 (24%), and Group 1 (13%). Conclusion The ten-group classification helped to identify the main groups of the subjects who contribute the most to the overall caesarean section rate. This study results suggest that women with previous CS are at risk for having another CS delivery in subsequent pregnancies and therefore there is an urgent need for a dedicated vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC) clinic to support this such women to ensure CS are only done when indicated. Furthermore, reducing the CS rate for nulliparous i.e. Group 1 and 2 would, in the long-term, also reduce the size of Group 5 in the future.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document