scholarly journals Laparoscopic repair of umbilical and paraumbilical hernias: a prospective and interventional study in government hospital

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (9) ◽  
pp. 3283
Author(s):  
Kiren B. Patel ◽  
Mithun V. Barot
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Wound Infection ◽  
Ventral Hernia ◽  
Laparoscopic Repair ◽  
Umbilical Hernia ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Postoperative Hospital Stay ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Drain Removal

Background: Umbilical and ventral hernia occurs as a result of weakness in musculofascial layer of anterior abdominal wall. The most important causes are congenital, acquired, incisional and traumatic. UH and VH can be repair by open surgical procedure. A successful series of laparoscopic repair of umbilical hernia and VH was done by Le blanc in 1993. The cost can be optimised by selection of mesh and optimal uses of transabdominal suture and various fixation devices. This original article reveals methods, techniques, indication, contraindication, post-op pain, operative time, surgical site infection recurrence and outcome of laparoscopic umbilical hernia and paraumbilical hernia repair.Methods: A total of 21 patients of ventral hernia (umbilical, paraumbilical and incisional), who underwent laparoscopic hernia repair from October 2014 to October 2016, were selected have taken part in study with valid consent, in B.J. Medical College Ahmedabad Gujarat. All patient study regarding operative time, postoperative pain, postoperative hospital stay, surgical site infection like wound infection, seroma, hernia defect size, mean drain removal and recurrence.Results: Out of 21 patients male are 33% and female are 67%. Mean age of patients is 45 yrs with range being 18-65 yrs. 28%, 33.33%, and 38.1% of patient had umbilical, paraumbilical and incisional hernia respectively. Mean size defect was 7.8 cm2. Mean operative time in this study is 98.6 minute. Mean drain removal is 2.80 day. Mean postoperative hospital stay was 3.3 days. 4.7% had wound infection, 9.5% had seroma formation. There is 0% recurrence in present study.Conclusions: The laparoscopic approach appears to be safe, effective and acceptable. It is also effective in those who are obese, with co morbidities (complex) and who have recurrence from prior open repair and having ascites.

scholarly journals Comparative study of single dose preoperative antibiotics versus both preoperative and postoperative antibiotics in laparoscopic appendicectomy for nonperforated appendicitis

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (9) ◽  
pp. 3092
Author(s):  
Himabindu Bangaru ◽  
Varun V. Gaiki ◽  
M. V. Ranga Reddy
Keyword(s):  
Single Dose ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Prophylactic Antibiotics ◽  
Postoperative Hospital Stay ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendicectomy ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Preoperative Antibiotics

Background: Antibiotics are being administered both preoperatively and postoperatively even in uncomplicated nonperforated appendicitis. Studies regarding role of postoperative antibiotics in laparoscopic appendicectomy for nonperforated appendicitis are sparse. The aim of the study is therefore to study the efficacy of single dose preoperative antibiotics versus both preoperative and postoperative antibiotics in reducing surgical site infection in laparoscopic appendicectomy for uncomplicated nonperforated acute appendicitis.Methods: This is a prospective study done in general surgery department at Malla Reddy institute of medical sciences from September to April 2016.162 patients with nonperforated appendicitis were randomly allocated into two groups. 80 patients in Group A were given single dose of preoperative prophylactic antibiotics. No further antibiotics were given. 82 patients in Group B were given both preoperative and postoperative antibiotics. Postoperative surgical site infection and duration of postoperative hospital stay were compared between both groups. Statistical analysis was done using ANOVA, Fisher’s Exact test and Chi-square test wherever necessary.Results: There was no significant difference in the rate of surgical site infection in both groups. The mean duration of postoperative hospital stay was shorter in preoperative antibiotics only group (Group A). Age and gender had no significant association with surgical site infection. There was no deep incisional or organ space infection in this study.Conclusions: Single dose prophylactic antibiotics would be sufficient in cases of laparoscopic appendicectomy for simple uncomplicated nonperforated acute appendicitis. Postoperative antibiotic administration would not be necessary in these cases.

Deep Wound Infection in Pediatrics after Open Cardiac Surgery

QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed Ayman Abd-Elhakeem Shoeb ◽  
Ashraf Abd-Elhameed El-Midany ◽  
Waleed Ismail Kamel Ibrahiem ◽  
Waleed Abd-Allah Abd-Elrazzak Atiea
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Cardiac Surgery ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Wound Infection ◽  
Resistant Bacteria ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Sternal Closure ◽  
Delayed Sternal Closure ◽  
Life Threatening

Abstract Surgical site infection (SSI) is a serious complication requiring prolonged hospitalization, intravenous antibiotics, wound care and dressings resulting in increased cost and resistant bacteria. In pediatric cardiac surgery, Median sternotomy is the most frequently used incision for the correction of congenital anomalies. Sternal wound infections (SWIs) are well described complications of cardiac surgery and can occur in 3% to 8% of children. Furthermore, the mortality rate can increase 2-fold after SSIs. Also, SSIs are associated with an increased length of hospital stay, readmissions, and higher health care expenditures. Mediastinitis is a retrosternal wound infection frequently associated with a macroscopically sternal osteomyelitis. Mediastinitis is uncomfortable for patients, is poorly accepted by parents, leads to a prolonged hospital stay repeated surgery and prolonged antibiotic therapy. Mediastinitis are costly for patients, providers, and health-care institutions. In A recent survey among congenital heart programs, the incidence of mediastinitis has been reported to occur in 0.2–1.4%. Gram-positive cocci are the most common pathogen. Gram negative organisms are increasingly recognized, especially in neonates, and are related to delayed sternal closure. Fungal organisms are not infrequently found. Mediastinitis generally presents 2–3 weeks after cardiac surgery. Child often appear irritable, tired, and febrile. The incision is erythematous and painful. Wound separation and purulent drainage from the incision are frequent. Some but not all will also have sternal instability or dehiscence. Associated bacteremia is not uncommon, present in up to 40% of patients. Postoperative mediastinitis is a life-threatening infection and increase health expenditure. Young age, malnutrition, hypothermia, hyperglycemia, longer duration of surgery, long time of delayed sternal closure, postoperative low cardiac output and long ICU stay were a risk factor of mediastinitis. Stick to1999 CDC's Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection and their update in 2017 especially proper timing of antibiotic prophylaxis and post-operative blood glucose management is important in prevention of these life-threatening complication. procalcitonin can be useful biologic marker of infection. Management of mediastinitis consist of debridement and culture-based antibiotics. Primary closure over mediastinal drain or high vacuum drain gave good result, less time consuming, more economic and more cosmetic. Vacuum assisted closure gave excellent result, but more time consuming, less economic and delayed closure is necessary. Larger studies are needed to compare both techniques in effectiveness and coast benefit.

scholarly journals Early Outcome of Laparoscopic Abdomino-perineal Resection (APR) in Low Rectal and Anal Cancer- Our Initial Experience in Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 57-61
Author(s):  
Md Rayhanur Rahman ◽  
Md Shahadat Hossain ◽  
Md Abu Taher ◽  
Md Rashidul Lslam ◽  
Lsmat Jahan Lima ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Anal Canal ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Anal Cancer ◽  
Postoperative Hospital Stay ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Early Outcome ◽  
Perineal Resection ◽  
Medical University

Background: Colorectal cancer is the second most common malignancy in the western countries and the rectum is the most frequent site involved. Carcinoma of the lower part of the rectum involving the anal canal and carcinoma of the anal canal are now successfully managed by laparoscopic abdomino-perineal resection (APR) and postoperative morbidities are less and recovery is uneventful. In the current age of minimally invasive surgery, laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer has been established as equivalent to conventional open surgery in terms of oncological clearance. The purpose of the study is to compare the early outcomes of laparoscopic abdomino-perineal resection (LAPR) surgery in low rectal and anal cancer patients in terms of surgical site infections, postoperative pain, recovery, hospital stay and margin clearance of tumor with that of open abdomino-perineal resection (OAPR) surgery. Methods: This randomized controlled trial was carried out in the Colorectal Surgery Unit of Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka from May, 2012 to April, 2013. 50 patients in low rectal and anal canal cancers were randomized into two groups with 25 patients in conventional open abdomino-perineal resection (OAPR) and rest 25 patients in laparoscopic abdomino-perineal resection (LAPR). Early outcome variables after surgery were evaluated. Results: Demographic data and baseline characteristics are equivalent in both groups of population. Tumors were more common in rectum (80% and 76%), most of the tumors were adenocarcinomas (80% and 72%) and most of the tumors were present in stage-II (40% and 48%) with grade-2 (64% and 52%) in LAPR and OAPR groups respectively. During early post-operative follow up, abdominal surgical site infection was found more in conventional open abdomino-perineal resection (OAPR) patients than that of laparoscopic abdomino-perineal resection (LAPR) patients (p =0.001). Other morbidity and colostomy related complications were not significant in early post-operative period in both groups of population. Degree of pain was also less after laparoscopic abdomino-perineal resection (p=0.001 ). Stoma function occurred earlier after Laparoscopic abdomino-perineal resection (p =0.017) and ambulation, feeding liquid and feeding solid all had no difference for both groups. Shorter mean length of postoperative hospital stay and early hospital discharge was possible after Laparoscopic abdomino-perineal resection (p =0.001 ). Oncologic parameters were equivalent to those with open procedures. Conclusion: The patients undergoing laparoscopic APR for low rectal and anal canal carcinoma have overall superior outcomes in terms of surgical site infection, postoperative pain, postoperative hospital stay and has equivalent oncological clearance as with those with open procedures. Journal of Surgical Sciences (2014) Vol. 18 (2) : 57-61

scholarly journals Opioid Use and Incidence of Surgical Site Infection after Repair of Ventral and Incisional Hernia - A Prospective Clinical Study in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Tirupati

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (22) ◽  
pp. 1841-1845
Author(s):  
Srikanth Reddy Challapalli ◽  
Venkata Prakash Gandikota ◽  
Theja Peddavenkatagiri ◽  
Harsha Vardhan Reddy Gerigi
Keyword(s):  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Ventral Hernia ◽  
Postoperative Period ◽  
Ventral Hernia Repair ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Opioid Users

BACKGROUND Preoperative opioid use is one of the predisposing factors for complications after most of the surgical procedures. This study intends to evaluate the effect of preoperative opiates on the outcomes following repair of ventral hernia. METHODS We conducted a prospective study of patients who underwent consecutive ventral hernia repair for over one year with institutional review board approval. Data were obtained regarding the usage of opioids during the preoperative period, intraoperative period, and postoperative period. Follow-up of the cases was done during the postoperative period. Data were obtained regarding the postoperative complications, duration of hospital stay, and the analyzed results. RESULTS A striking thirty percent of the total sixty patients have satisfied the criteria for the usage of opioids preoperatively. Preoperative history and operative details were found to be almost similar between the two categories of patients (no preoperative opioid use versus preoperative opioid use). The median hospital stay duration trended towards increased patients with opioid usage versus non-opioid users (P = 0.06). The bowel function's return to the normal was delayed in opioid users compared with non-opioid users (P = 0.018). The risk of superficial surgical site infection was increased among patients who used opioids preoperatively than the patients without preoperative opioid usage (55.5 % vs. 9.5 %; P < 0.001) and remained the same after multivariable logistic regression. CONCLUSIONS Among patients who underwent repair of ventral hernia, those with preoperative opioid usage experienced an increased risk of superficial surgical site infection than patients without preoperative opioid usage. KEYWORDS Opioid, Ventral Hernia Repair, Surgical Site Infection

scholarly journals Surgical site infection in mesh repair for ventral hernia in contaminated field: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 63 ◽  
pp. 102173
Author(s):  
Mohamed Maatouk ◽  
Yacine Ben Safta ◽  
Aymen Mabrouk ◽  
Ghassen Hamdi Kbir ◽  
Anis Ben Dhaou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Ventral Hernia ◽  
Mesh Repair ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Contaminated Field

Compare the Incidence of Surgical Site Infection after Appendectomy Wound Irrigation with Normal Saline and Imipenem Solutions

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (8) ◽  
pp. 2184-2186
Author(s):  
Ahmad Shah ◽  
Nazeer Ahmad Sasoli ◽  
Farrukh Sami
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Wound Infection ◽  
Saline Solution ◽  
Abscess Formation ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Wound Irrigation ◽  
Group I ◽  
Perforated Appendix ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group Ii

Objective: To compare the incidence of surgical site infection after appendectomy wound irrigation with regular saline solution and imipenem solution. Study Design: Comparative randomized control trial Place and Duration of Study: Department of Surgery Unit-1, Sandeman Provincial Hospital Quetta from 1st September 2020 to 30th April 2021. Methodology: Eighty patients of both genders were presented in this study. Patients detailed demographics age, sex and body mass index were recorded after taking informed written consent. Patients underwent for appendectomy wound irrigation were included. Patients were equally divided into two equal groups, I and II. Group I had 40 patients and received imipenem and group II irrigated with saline solution with 40 patients. Outcomes were surgical site infection, deep abscess formation was observed post-operatively. Results: The mean age of the patients in group I was 26.11±2.03 years with mean BMI 23.61±3.32 kg/m2 and in group II mean age was 25.14±3.12 years with mean BMI 22.14±4.88 kg/m2. In group I, 32 (80%) patients had inflamed appendix, perforated appendix was in 7 (17.5%) and gangrenous appendix in 1 (2.5%) while in group II inflamed appendix in 34 (85%), perforated appendix in 4 (10%) and gangrenous appendix 2 (5%). Surgical site infection in group I was 3 (7.5%) and abscess formation in 2 (5%) cases while in group II SSI in 6 (15%) and abscess formation in 3 (7.5%) cases. Conclusion: Imipenem irrigation after appendectomy reduces wound infection. Healthcare costs and patient suffering due to infection can be reduced. Keywords: Imipenem solution, Wound irrigation with saline, Appendectomy wound infection

scholarly journals Hubungan Kepatuhan Tim Bedah dalam Penerapan Surgery Safety Checklist dengan Infeksi Luka Operasi dan Lama Rawat Inap pada Pasien Seksio Sesarea di Rumah Sakit Umum Daerah Kabupaten Barru

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 145
Author(s):  
Amiruddin Amiruddin ◽  
Ova Emilia ◽  
Shinta Prawitasari ◽  
Leo Prawirodihardjo
Keyword(s):  
Patient Safety ◽  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Medical Care ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
General Hospital ◽  
Surgical Patient ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Surgical Team ◽  
Duration Of Hospital Stay

Background: Surgical Patient Safety is essential to be carried out in operating theatre to prevent mortality and surgical complication. Patient safety is the basic principal in medical care and a major component of medical care management in hospital (WHO, 2009).Objective: To investigate association between SSC implementation among surgical team, surgical site infection and duration of hospital stay.Method: This is an analytical cross sectional study. Population of this study was women who underwent cesarean section with live birth in Barru general hospital during 1 December 2016-30 April 2017. This study was carried out in Barru general hospital, 137 samples met inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data was obtained from medical records. Maternal outcome were duration of hospital stay, surgical site infection, and maternal mortality. Besides, this study also assesed knowledge and compliance of surgical team in implementation of SSC. The result of this study was analysed with computer statisctics analysis program.Result adn Discussion: One-hundred thirty seven patients met study criteria. Compliance of surgery team in SSC was 64%,. SSC was not implemented precisely in 36% patients (49 patients). There is no significant association between surgical team compliance with surgical site infection in cesarean section patients (p=0.078). A significant association was found between surgical team compliance with duration of hospital stay (p=0.006).Conclusion: The surgical team compliance in implementation of SSC was not yet optimal. An intensive socialization is needed to improve compliance of team in order that SSC implementation run promptly. This was part of efforts to reduce post operative complication and shorten hospital stay.Keywords: SSC, cesarean section, compliance, infection, duration of hospital stay

scholarly journals COMPARATIVE STUDY OF PRE-CAESAREAN VAGINAL WASH WITH 5% POVIDONE – IODINE SOLUTION VERSUS NO WASH IN PREVENTING POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION.

2020 ◽  
pp. 44-46
Author(s):  
Sonali Deshpande ◽  
Shrinivas Gadappa ◽  
Dhanashree Lahane ◽  
Sandeep Mannikatti
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Wound Infection ◽  
Povidone Iodine ◽  
Prophylactic Antibiotic ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Iodine Solution ◽  
Interventional Group ◽  
Vaginal Wash ◽  
Povidone Iodine Solution

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of pre-cesarean vaginal wash using 5% Povidone Iodine solution on rate of post-cesarean section (CS) surgical site infection and compared with No swabbing. Method: A Prospective Randomized controlled Trial was conducted in department of Obstetrics and Gynecology in Government medical college, Aurangabad. In interventional group, vaginal swabbing with a gauze pieces impregnated with 5% Povidone Iodine solution was done for 30 seconds. The swabbing of vagina was not performed in cases assigned to control group, however the standard surgical preparation of abdomen was done in a usual manner for both group. All subject received prophylactic antibiotic cover. Collected data was complied in pre-designed proforma and analysis was done using SPSS 15. Result: The risk of post operative fever and wound infection was significantly reduced in interventional group. No measure difference was noted in seroma and composite wound infection. Also less duration of hospital stay in interventional group was noted. No adverse effect of use of Povidone iodine was reported in the interventional group. Conclusion: Vaginal swabbing with 5% Povidone-iodine pre- LSCS is inexpensive and simple intervention even for low resource setting to decrease surgical site infection.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document