scholarly journals The efficacy of primary closure following incision and drainage of lactational breast abscess over traditional open method

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 3501
Author(s):  
Ruksana Parvin ◽  
Ahmed Sharif ◽  
Mosammat Bilkis Parvin ◽  
Kazi Sohel Iqbal ◽  
Golshan Ara Kohinoor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Closure ◽  
Morbidity Rate ◽  
High Morbidity ◽  
Breast Abscess ◽  
Incision And Drainage ◽  
Open Method ◽  
Medical College ◽  
High Morbidity Rate ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: The incidence of breast abscess ranges from 0.4 to 11% of all lactating mothers. Although breast abscess is a serious common complication of mastitis with high morbidity rate, there is a lack of high-quality randomized trial to demonstrate the best treatments.Methods: The Study was conducted in the Department of Surgery of Universal medical college and hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh and MH Samorita hospital and medical college. It was a randomized controlled trial to see the efficacy of primary closure following incision and drainage of lactational breast abscess over traditional open method. Total 120 population were randomly selected in group A (60 patients) and group B (60 patients) and data was collected with their signed ethical consent. The study was conducted from January 2014 to December 2019. Collected data were classified, edited, coded and entered into the computer for statistical analysis by using Statistical package for social sciences (SPSS) version 22.Results: In patients of group A, most breast abscesses healed successfully with a nicer circumareolar scar, earlier healing, lesser number of hospital visits and lower total cost as compared to patients in group B. There was early resumption of breastfeeding and better patient satisfaction seen in group A.Conclusions: Primary closure of lactational breast abscess following incision and drainage is an effective modality of treatment of lactational breast abscess and it should be the first line of treatment, especially for larger and multilocular breast abscesses while traditional incision and drainage should be reserved for abscesses with gangrenous skin changes, where primary closure is not justified.

P117 THE IMPACT OF ELDERLY ON SURGICAL OUTCOMES AFTER IVOR-LEWIS ESOPHAGECTOMY: REVIEW OF A SINGLE INSTITUTION EXPERIENCE

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Cossu ◽  
P Parise ◽  
F Puccetti ◽  
M Palucci ◽  
R Cerchione ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Morbidity Rate ◽  
High Morbidity ◽  
Consecutive Series ◽  
Ivor Lewis ◽  
High Morbidity Rate ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Esophagectomy is a surgical procedure burdened by a high morbidity rate. The effect of minimally invasive (MI) approach on elderly patients is still not clear. Aim of this study was to analyze the impact of MI approach on post-operative course according to the patient age. Methods A consecutive series of 692 patients underwent to elective oncological esophagectomy between 1997 and 2017. All data were entered into a prospective database. Patients submitted to 3-flield or trans-hiatal esophagectomy were excluded and only Ivor-Lewis open, hybrid or totally minimally invasive esophagectomy were evaluated. Patients were stratified according to age in 3 groups: Group A (≤ 50 years) 53 patients, Group B (> 51 and < 70 years) 269 and Group C (were ≥71 years) 126. Clinical and pathological factors influencing surgical outcome were evaluated. Complications were classified according to Clavien-Dindo (CD). Results As expected outcomes worsened with patients age (CD ≥ 3b: 7.5% group A, 13% group B and 21% group C. p=0.001), mortality (0% group A, 3% group B and 5.5% group C. p=0.035) and length of stay (10 days group A, 11 days group B and 13 days group C. p=0.001). A statistically significant higher incidence of anastomostic leaks was observed among patients submitted to totally MI esophagectomy in group C vs A and B that were respectively 12,5%, 0% and 7%. Major respiratory complications were not statistically different among these 3 three sub-group. Conclusions Old age has a significant impact on outcomes after esophagectomy. In this subset of patients a MI approach could also increase postoperative morbidity. Elderly patients should be carefully selected before to be submitted to MI esophagectomy.

scholarly journals Surgery without knife: an ideal treatment for lactational breast abscess

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 261
Author(s):  
Amandeep Saharan ◽  
Satish Dalal ◽  
Mahavir Singh ◽  
Chisel Bhatia ◽  
Tulit Chhabra
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Study ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Breast Abscess ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Incision And Drainage ◽  
Skin Changes ◽  
Lactating Mothers ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Early Healing

Background: Incidence of breast abscess is 0.4 to 11% of all lactating mothers. Traditionally the treatment of breast abscess has been incision and drainage. Recently aspiration under ultrasound guidance is emerging as another treatment option and rapidly replace incision and drainageMethods: Authors carried out a prospective, randomized study involving 50 lactating women with breast abscess. In group A - 25 patients were managed by ultrasound guided needle aspiration and in group B - 25 patients were managed by incision and drainage.Results: In patients of group A, most breast abscesses resolved with one or two aspirations only, with early healing and lesser number of hospital visits as compared to patients in group B. There was no surgical scar and early resumption of breastfeeding was seen in group A.Conclusions: Ultrasound guided percutaneous aspiration is an effective modality of treatment of lactational breast abscess and it should be the first line of treatment, especially for smaller and unilocular breast abscesses while incision and drainage should be reserved for larger and multilocular abscesses with imminent skin changes.

scholarly journals A Randomized Control Trial for conservative management of parotid abscess in children

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 56-59
Author(s):  
Meenakshi Basnet ◽  
Rajkumar Bedajit ◽  
Bijay Neupane ◽  
Bibek Ghimire
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Protocol ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Computer Assisted ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Incision And Drainage ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Severe Diarrhea ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Incision Drainage

Background: The optimal conservative treatment protocol of parotid abscess in children is evaluated.Material and Methods: This is a randomized, prospective, cross-sectional study conducted between November 2013 and June 2017 in Nobel Medical College and Teaching Hospital. Thirty children (below 14 years age) suffering from parotid abscess diagnosed by ultrasonography were included in this study. Recurrent parotid abscess cases were excluded. The children were divided into 2 groups by computer assisted randomization into15 patients each. Group A were treated with intravenous Clindamycin while group B were given intravenous Ampicilin + Cloxacillin combination. Results: Five patients of group B did not respond to treatment and were then put on intravenous Clindamycin. Three of these patients responded to treatment but 2 developed multi-lobulated fluctuation and required incision + drainage. Remaining 10 patients in group B and all patients in Group A responded to medical treatment without recurrence. Five patients in group B developed severe diarrhea during antibiotic treatment but none of the patients in group A had this complaint. No patient developed any complications like parapharyngeal abscess or septicemia. Conclusion: Parotid abscess in children can be managed conservatively with intravenous Clindamycin without the need for incision and drainage. Journal of Nobel Medical College Volume 7, Number 1, Issue 12, January-June 2018, Page: 56-59 

Comparison between aspiration and incision and drainage of breast abscess

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-15
Author(s):  
Md Fardhus ◽  
AMSM Sharfuzzaman ◽  
Md Nayeem Dewan ◽  
Dipak Chandra Kirttania ◽  
Ahmed Sami AI Hasan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bacterial Colonization ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Cosmetic Outcome ◽  
Breast Abscess ◽  
Incision And Drainage ◽  
Female Patients ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B ◽  
Drainage Group

Background: Breast abscess is defined as an acute inflammatory lump which yields pus on incision/aspiration. The frequency of occurrence is highly related to pregnancy and caused due to nipple cracking by a child during breast feeding and bacterial colonization due to improper nursing technique and incomplete emptying of the breast. Objective: The present study compares the outcome and effectiveness of traditional treatment incision and drainage against needle aspiration in the treatment of breast abscess. Methods: This is a comparative study carried out in department of general surgery, SherE- Bangla Medical College Hospital, Barisal between January 2014 and December 2014. 50 female patients of age between 20-40 years and diagnosed breast abscess with abscess size of 5'7 cm in diameter on ultrasonography were included in the study after taking written consent form. Of these 25 had undergone aspiration of the breast abscess (group A) and 25 had undergone incision and drainage (group B). Results: The mean age of the female patients in group A was 23.42 years and in Group B was 23.31. 91% of the cases were lactating. S. aureus was the common organism isolated in both lactating and non-lactating cases, encountered in 27 patients (54%). Out of that were in the aspirated group 17patients (56.67%). 10 patients were in the incised group (33.33%). The mean healing time and cosmetic outcome was significantly (p =0.001) very good in patients treated with needle aspiration compared to incision and drainage. There was no recurrence of breast abscess observed in needle aspiration group during the study. There was 3.3% recurrence rate observed in the incision and drainage group. Conclusion: Breast abscess in patients with diameter of 5'7 cm can be treated with needle aspiration successfully and with a good cosmetic outcome. Journal of Surgical Sciences (2018) Vol. 22 (1): 11-15

Comparison of Incision and Drainage against Needle Aspiration for the Treatment of Breast Abscess

2012 ◽  
Vol 78 (11) ◽  
pp. 1224-1227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Naeem ◽  
Muhammad Kazim Rahimnajjad ◽  
Nasir Ali Rahimnajjad ◽  
Qazi Jalaluddin Ahmed ◽  
Pyar Ali Fazel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Healing Time ◽  
Breast Abscess ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Incision And Drainage ◽  
Two Samples ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Bacterial Yield ◽  
Point Tenderness

We aim to compare the incision and drainage against ultrasound-guided aspiration for the treatment of breast abscesses. Sixty-four patients were randomly allocated to Group A (incision and drainage) and Group B (needle aspiration). Incision and drainage was done under general, whereas aspiration was done under local anesthesia with antibiotic coverage after the pus sample was taken for cultures. Time taken to resolve symptoms including point tenderness, erythema and hyperthermia, recurrence of breast abscess, and healing time was recorded. Patients were followed until 8 weeks. Culture and sensitivity of the pus were done. Data were analyzed in SPSS 16.0. The mean difference of healing time was significant ( P = 0.001). A total of 93.3 per cent were healed in Group B and 76.6 per cent in Group A ( P = 0.033). Twenty-two samples (34.37%) had no bacterial yield and the remaining 42 samples (65.6%) yielded 11 anaerobic cultures (17.18%) and 31 aerobic cultures (48.4%). Ultrasound-guided aspiration of breast abscesses with the judicious use of antibiotics is a better treatment modality than incision and drainage.

PS01.227: THE IMPACT OF ELDERLY ON SURGICAL OUTCOMES AFTER IVOR-LEWIS ESOPHAGECTOMY: REVIEW OF A SINGLE INSTITUTION EXPERIENCE

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 114-114
Author(s):  
Andrea Cossu ◽  
Paolo Parise ◽  
Francesco Puccetti ◽  
Leonardo Garutti ◽  
Carlo Ferrari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
High Morbidity ◽  
Consecutive Series ◽  
Ivor Lewis ◽  
High Morbidity Rate ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Esophagectomy is a surgical procedure burdened by a high morbidity rate. The effect of minimally invasive (MI) approach on elderly patients is still not clear. Aim of this study was to analyze the impact of MI approach on post-operative course according to the patient age. Methods A consecutive series of 692 patients underwent to elective oncological esophagectomy between 1997 and 2017. All data were entered into a prospective database. Patients submitted to 3-flield or trans-hiatal esophagectomy were excluded and only Ivor-Lewis open, hybrid or totally minimally invasive esophagectomy were evaluated. Patients were stratified according to age in 3 groups: Group A (≤ 50 years) 53 patients, Group B (> 51 and < 70 years) 269 and Group C (were ≥ 71 years) 126. Clinical and pathological factors influencing surgical outcome were evaluated. Complications were classified according to Clavien-Dindo (CD). Results As expected outcomes worsened with patients age (CD ≥ 3b: 7.5% group A, 13% group B and 21% group C. P = 0.001), mortality (0% group A, 3% group B and 5.5% group C. P = 0.035) and length of stay (10 days group A, 11 days group B and 13 days group C. P = 0.001). A statistically significant higher incidence of anastomotic leaks was observed among patients submitted to totally MI esophagectomy in group C vs A and B that were respectively 12,5%, 0% and 7%. Major respiratory complications were not statistically different among these 3 three sub-groups. Conclusion Old age has a significant impact on outcomes after esophagectomy. In this subset of patients a MI approach could also increase postoperative morbidity. Elderly patients should be carefully selected before to be submitted to MI esophagectomy. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

scholarly journals Management of Breast AbscessbyOpen Drainage with Primary Closure versus Standard Incision and Drainage- ARandomised Trial

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monish Raj ◽  
Satyavrat Arya ◽  
Raj Kumar Chejara ◽  
Rohit Chaudhary ◽  
Vignesh Mani
Keyword(s):  
Primary Closure ◽  
Premenopausal Women ◽  
Reproductive Age ◽  
Breast Abscess ◽  
Open Drainage ◽  
Incision And Drainage ◽  
Randomised Study ◽  
Suction Drain ◽  
Group B ◽  
Negative Suction

Introduction: Breast abscess is a localised collection of purulent material within the breast, which can be a complication of mastitis. In women of reproductive age, these are predominantly lactational but non-lactational abscesses are also seen in premenopausal women. Abscesses generally require drainage in conjunction with antibiotics. For the treatment of breast abscesses, surgical incision and drainage are usually carried out under general anaesthesia, as a traditional method. Aim: To compare conventional incision and drainage versus open drainage with primary closure with negative suction drain modalities of treatment of breast abscess in terms of different aspects including duration and quality of healing, number of dressings required, length of hospitalisation, postoperative complications. Materials and Methods: The present study was a randomised study conducted in the Department of General Surgery, Vardhaman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India. There were 30 patients in group A undergoing open drainage with primary closure with negative suction drain and 30 patients in group B undergoing conventional incision and drainage. They were evaluated for the study period of 18 months, between October 2018 and April 2020. The data collected were analysed with Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 17.0. Results: The incidence of breast abscess was more common in age group of 21-30 years with right side affected more than left side. Both the surgical procedures were comparable with each other in terms of incidence of recurrence. The primary closure group fared better with less incidence of postoperative pain (duration of analgesics requirement 2.40 vs 5.43 days), reduced hospital stay (3.63 vs 6.67 days) and dressings requirement was also less (2.33 vs 12.27 days) compared to standard incision and drainage drainage which were statistically significant. Conclusion: Hence, it can be concluded that open drainage with primary closure with negative suction drain placement can be considered as a safe and effective alternative to the standard incision and drainage in patients with breast abscess.

Comparative Study Between Clean Intermittent Self-Catheterization (Cisc) and Continuous Indwelling Catheterization (Cidc) in Relieving Acute Refractory Retention of Urine Due to Benign Enlargement of Prostate (Bep)

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 105-110
Author(s):  
Md Shawkat Alam ◽  
Sudip Das Gupta ◽  
Hadi Zia Uddin Ahmed ◽  
Md Saruar Alam ◽  
Sharif Muhammod Wasimuddin
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Acute Urinary Retention ◽  
Bladder Capacity ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
College Hospital ◽  
Medical College ◽  
High Incidence ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Better Than

Objective: To compare the clean intermittent self-catheterization (CISC) with continuous indwelling catheterization (CIDC) in relieving acute urinary retention (AUR) due to benign enlargement of prostate (BEP). Materials and Methods :A total 60 patients attending in urology department of Dhaka Medical college hospital were included according to inclusion criteria ,Patients were randomized by lottery into two groups namely group –A and group –B for CISC and IDC drainage respectively . Thus total 60 patients 30 in each group completed study. Results : Most men can safely be managed as out-patients after AUR due to BPH. The degree of mucosal congestion and inflammation within the bladder was found to be lower in those using CISC and the bladder capacity in these patients was also found higher.Patients with an IDC had a high incidence of UTIs then that of patients with CISC. During the period of catheterization the incidence of UTI was 43.3% in group B in comparison to 40% in group A; before TURP 36% in group B in comparison to 10% incidence in group A.According to patient’s opinion CISC is better than IDC in the management of AUR. Experiencing bladder spasm, reporting blood in urine, management difficulties, incidence and severity of pain were less in CISC group, and the method of CISC was well accepted by patients as well as their family members. Conclusion: From the current study it may be suggested that CISC is better technique for management of AUR patient due to BPH than IDC. It can also be very helpful when surgery must be delayed or avoided due to any reasons in this group of patients. Bangladesh Journal of Urology, Vol. 21, No. 2, July 2018 p.105-110

Age related volume of cadaver-prostates in Bangladesh

1970 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 74-77
Author(s):  
Rukshana Ahmed ◽  
Shamim Ara
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Gland ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Clinical Settings ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Age Related ◽  
Group A ◽  
Key Words Prostate ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B

Pathological changes in the prostate gland occur commonly with advancing age including inflammation, atrophy, hyperplasia and carcinoma and a change in volume is also evident. Estimation of volume of prostate may be useful in a variety of clinical settings. A cross-sectional descriptive study was designed to see the changes in volume of the prostate with advancing age and done in the Department of Anatomy, Dhaka Medical College, Dhaka from August 2006 to June 2007. The study was performed on 70 post-mortem human prostates collected from the unclaimed dead bodies that were under examination in the Department of Forensic Medicine, Dhaka Medical College, Dhaka. The samples were divided into three age groups; group A (10-20 years), group B (21-40 years) and group C (41-70 years). Volume of the sample was measured by using the ellipsoid formula. The mean ± SD volume of prostate was 7.68 ± 3.64 cm3 in group A, 10.61 ± 3.99 cm3 in group B and 15.40 ± 6.31 cm3 in group C. Mean difference in volume between group A and group C, group B and group C were statistically significant (p<0.001). Statistically significant positive correlation was found between age and volume of prostate (r = + 0.579, p < 0.001). Key Words: Prostate; volume; Bangladeshi. DOI: 10.3329/imcj.v4i2.6501Ibrahim Med. Coll. J. 2010; 4(2): 74-77

scholarly journals Comparative study between two empirical antibiotic regime in the management of childhood malignancy with fever

2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 329-331 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laila Helaly ◽  
Md Zakir Hossain Sarker ◽  
MA Mannan ◽  
Md Tafazzal Hossain ◽  
Shafi Ahmed ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antibiotic Therapy ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Successful Outcome ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Pediatric Hematology ◽  
Pediatric Cancer Patients ◽  
Group A ◽  
Study Population ◽  
Group B ◽  
Oncology Unit

Objective : The present prospective randomized clinical trial was carried out to assess whether combined cefepime and amikacin as empirical antibiotic therapy was more effective than combined ceftriaxone and gentamicin in the treatment of febrile neutropenic children with malignant diseases.Material & Methods : The study was conducted in the Pediatric Hematology and Oncology unit of BSMMU over a period of 2 years. (From January 2006 to December 2007) Hospitalised pediatric cancer patients who developed febrile neutropenia following chemotherapy or radiotherapy were the study population. A total 64 cases were consecutively included in the study and were randomly assigned to either cefepime & amikacin group (Group- A) or ceftriaxone & gentamicin group (Group-B). The Group-A received cefepime 1500 mg/m2/dose infused over 15 minutes in two divided doses intravenously(IV) while amikacin was administered as thrice daily dose of 200 mg/m2/dose. Patients of Group-B received ceftriaxone 1500 mg/m2/dose in two divided doses and gentamicin 60 mg/m2/dose thrice daily IV. The therapy was continued until absolute neutrophil counts reached >1000 neutrophils/mm3. The treatment outcome was considered successful if fever resolves within 4 days and does not recur within 7 days of completion of therapy. Of the 64 patients, 13 cases were excluded from the final analysis.Results : Bacteria were isolated from culture in only 16.7% of cases Group-A and 9.5% of group-B. Patients E. coli was the most common isolate found in blood specimen (37%). Following intervention, 90% of cefepime & amikacin group and 85.6% of ceftriaxone & gentamicin group improved absolute neutrophil count to >1000/mm3 of blood. Persistence of fever after start of study drug and duration of antibiotic therapy were significantly less in the former group than those in later group (p = 0.049 and p = 0.004 respectively). Only 1 patient of group B had recurrence of infection within 7 days of treatment completion. The mean duration of hospital stay was less in the former group (7.97 ± 2.61 days) than that in the latter group (11.00 ± 3.42 days) (p = 0.06). Evaluation of final outcome shows that majority (86.6%) of cefepime & amikacin group had successful outcome, while majority of ceftriaxone & gentamicin group (81%) failed to resolve infection with continuation of fever for > 4 days.Conclusion : The study concluded that combined cefepime and amikacin is a better option for empirical treatment of fever and neutropenia in children with malignancies than combined ceftriaxone and gentamicin (p<0.001).Northern International Medical College Journal Vol.5(2) 2014: 329-331

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document