scholarly journals Active versus expectant management of preterm premature rupture of membrane before 34 weeks and neonatal outcome

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 501
Author(s):  
Gouda A. P. Kartikeswar ◽  
Dhyey I. Pandya ◽  
Siddharth Madabhushi ◽  
Vivek M. Joshi ◽  
Sandeep Kadam
Keyword(s):  
Gestational Age ◽  
Neonatal Outcome ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Expectant Management ◽  
Active Management ◽  
Respiratory Support ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Premature Rupture ◽  
Preterm Premature Rupture ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: Preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) predisposes the mother for chorioamnionitis, endometritis, bacteremia and neonate to preterm delivery related complication. There is often dilemma regarding the management of PPROM in mothers with gestational age (GA) <34 weeks.Methods: A retrospective cohort study conducted in a tertiary care hospital over two year period. Neonates delivered before 34 weeks were enrolled and categorized into active management (AM) and expectant management (EM) group. Associated risk factors, duration of PPROM and latency period, Neonatal outcomes like sepsis, morbidity, duration of respiratory support, duration of NICU stay compared between groups.Results: Out of total 197 cases, AM group had 91 babies. Active management resulted in earlier delivery [mean GA (SD): 30.88(1.8) VS 31(2.1) weeks], higher number of caesarian section (76.9% versus 53.8%), lesser birth weight {1233.6 (±282.9) versus 1453.39 (±380.6) gm} and more ELBW babies (23.1% versus 7.5%). EM resulted in significantly higher antenatal steroid cover (73.6% in AM versus 89.6% in EM) and lesser need of surfactant for RDS [42.9% versus 28.3%]. Significant difference was found for NICU stay days {mean (SD): 25.46 (16.8) versus 20.94 (17.5)}. No difference found between respiratory support days [median (IQR) 2 (0, 6) versus 2 (0, 7)]. No significant differences found in incidence of maternal chorioamnionitis, NEC, sepsis, BPD and ROP. Early delivery resulted in higher mortality though that was statistically not significant.Conclusions: Gestational age at delivery is more important predictor of neonatal outcome then PPROM in early preterm. 

scholarly journals A comparative study between active and expectant management of premature rupture of membranes at term on fetomaternal and perinatal outcome in rural population

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 2393 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajani Rawat ◽  
Pragati Divedi ◽  
Sukla Debbarma ◽  
Soniya Vishwakarma ◽  
Nupur Mittal
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Neonatal Outcome ◽  
Latency Period ◽  
Expectant Management ◽  
Active Management ◽  
Labour Induction ◽  
Premature Rupture Of Membranes ◽  
Premature Rupture ◽  
Management Group ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: Premature rupture of membranes at term (PROM) is defined as a spontaneous rupture of membranes after 37 completed weeks of gestation and before the onset of regular painful uterine contractions. PROM occurs in 5-10% of all pregnancies of which approximately 80% occur at term. The study aimed to compare the maternal and neonatal outcome in patients with term PROM receiving active induction versus expectant management.Methods: The present study was a prospective randomised controlled trial, conducted on 100 term antenatal women with PROM in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, UPUMS, Saifai from January 2016 to June 2017. 50 antenatal women received immediate induction with oral misoprostol while another 50 antenatal women were expectantly managed for 24 hours. The latency period, PROM delivery interval, maternal and neonatal outcome were compared and subjected to statistical analysis.Results: 42% of active management group and 30% of expectant management group had a latency period of 12-20 hours and results were found to be statistically significant (p value = 0.005). There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of caesarean section, maternal and neonatal morbidity in both the groups.Conclusions: Immediate labour induction in patients with term PROM resulted in significant shortening of latent period and PROM to delivery interval without any increase in caesarean section rate as compared to expectant management group.

scholarly journals Active Versus Expectant Management for Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes at 34–36 Weeks of Gestation and the Associated Adverse Perinatal Outcomes

2020 ◽  
Vol 42 (11) ◽  
pp. 717-725
Author(s):  
Malú Flôres Ferraz ◽  
Thaísa De Souza Lima ◽  
Sarah Moura Cintra ◽  
Edward Araujo Júnior ◽  
Caetano Galvão Petrini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gestational Age ◽  
Perinatal Outcomes ◽  
Expectant Management ◽  
Premature Rupture Of Membranes ◽  
Premature Rupture ◽  
Preterm Premature Rupture ◽  
Management Group ◽  
Group I ◽  
Adverse Perinatal Outcomes ◽  
Group Ii

Abstract Objective To compare the type of management (active versus expectant) for preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) between 34 and 36 + 6 weeks of gestation and the associated adverse perinatal outcomes in 2 tertiary hospitals in the southeast of Brazil. Methods In the present retrospective cohort study, data were obtained by reviewing the medical records of patients admitted to two tertiary centers with different protocols for PPROM management. The participants were divided into two groups based on PPROM management: group I (active) and group II (expectant). For statistical analysis, the Student t-test, the chi-squared test, and binary logistic regression were used. Results Of the 118 participants included, 78 underwent active (group I) and 40 expectant management (group II). Compared with group II, group I had significantly lower mean amniotic fluid index (5.5 versus 11.3 cm, p = 0.002), polymerase chain reaction at admission (1.5 versus 5.2 mg/dl, p = 0.002), time of prophylactic antibiotics (5.4 versus 18.4 hours, p < 0.001), latency time (20.9 versus 33.6 hours, p = 0.001), and gestational age at delivery (36.5 versus 37.2 weeks, p = 0.025). There were no significant associations between the groups and the presence of adverse perinatal outcomes. Gestational age at diagnosis was the only significant predictor of adverse composite outcome (x2 [1] = 3.1, p = 0.0001, R2 Nagelkerke = 0.138). Conclusion There was no association between active versus expectant management in pregnant women with PPROM between 34 and 36 + 6 weeks of gestation and adverse perinatal outcomes.

scholarly journals Latency duration of preterm premature rupture of membranes and neonatal outcome: a retrospective single-center experience

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanna Müller ◽  
Ann-Christin Stähling ◽  
Nora Bruns ◽  
Christel Weiss ◽  
Maria Ai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Respiratory Distress ◽  
Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia ◽  
Gestational Age ◽  
Distress Syndrome ◽  
Neonatal Outcome ◽  
Premature Rupture Of Membranes ◽  
Premature Rupture ◽  
Preterm Premature Rupture ◽  
Latency Duration

AbstractIn preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM), a decision between early delivery with prematurity complications and pregnancy prolongation bearing the risk of chorioamnionitis has to be made. To define disadvantages of delayed prolongation, latency duration of PPROM in expectantly managed pregnancies was investigated. We included those PPROMs > 48 h leading to preterm birth prior 37 weeks’ gestation and retrospectively analyzed 84 preterm infants fulfilling these criteria. The association between latency duration/appearance of PPROM and respiratory outcome (primary outcomes) and neurological outcome (secondary outcomes) was investigated. The study showed that latency duration of PPROM is not associated with clinical or histological chorioamnionitis (p = 0.275; p = 0.332). As the numerous clinical parameters show multicollinearity between each other, we performed a multiple regression analysis to consider this fact. Respiratory distress syndrome is significantly associated with gestational age at PPROM (p < 0.001), and surfactant application is significantly associated with PPROM duration (p = 0.014). The other respiratory parameters including steroids and diuretics therapy, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, and the neurological parameters (intraventricular hemorrhage, Bayley II testing at a corrected age of 24 months) were not significantly associated with PPROM duration or gestational age at PPROM diagnosis.Conclusion: Latency duration of PPROM was not associated with adverse neonatal outcome in expectantly and carefully managed pregnancies, but respiratory distress syndrome was pronounced. The observed effect of pronounced respiratory distress syndrome can be treated with surfactant preparations and was not followed by increased rate of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. What is Known:• In case of preterm premature rupture of membranes, a decision between pregnancy prolongation with the risk of chorioamnionitis and early delivery with prematurity complications has to be made.• Chorioamnionitis is a dangerous situation for the pregnant woman and the fetus.• Impaired neurodevelopmental outcome is strongly correlated with pronounced prematurity due to the increased rate of serious complications. What is New:• Respiratory distress syndrome is significantly associated with gestational age at PPROM, and surfactant application is significantly associated with PPROM duration.• Latency duration of PPROM is not associated with adverse respiratory neonatal outcome (therapy with continuous positive airway pressure, therapy with diuretics and/or steroids, bronchopulmonary dysplasia) in expectantly and carefully managed pregnancies.• Intraventricular hemorrhage and Bayley II testing at a corrected age of 24 months are not associated with latency duration of PPROM when pregnancies are carefully observed.

Impact of Maternal Obesity on Perinatal Outcomes in Preterm Prelabor Rupture of Membranes ≥34 Weeks

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (05) ◽  
pp. 467-474 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tara A. Lynch ◽  
Amol Malshe ◽  
Sarah Colihan ◽  
Jeffrey Meyers ◽  
Dongmei Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Maternal Obesity ◽  
Neonatal Outcome ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Mode Of Delivery ◽  
Perinatal Outcomes ◽  
Expectant Management ◽  
Respiratory Support ◽  
Antibiotic Administration ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Prelabor Rupture Of Membranes

Abstract Objective This study aimed to compare pregnancy outcomes in obese and nonobese women with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM) ≥34 weeks. Study Design The present study is a secondary analysis of a multicenter retrospective cohort of singletons with PPROM from 2011 to 2017. Women with a delivery body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m2 (obese) were compared with women with a BMI < 30 kg/m2 (nonobese). Pregnancies were stratified based on delivery policies of expectant management until 35 weeks versus immediate delivery ≥34 weeks. The primary outcome was a composite neonatal outcome (neonatal sepsis, antibiotic administration for duration >72 hours after delivery or respiratory support). Univariate analysis and general estimating equations models including maternal age, delivery timing, mode of delivery, hospital, and gestational age were used with p < 0.05 level of significance. Results Among 259 pregnancies, 47% were obese. Pregnant women with obesity had increased composite neonatal outcome versus nonobese pregnancies (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.48 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01–2.17]). Obesity was also associated with increased neonatal antibiotic administration for a duration >72 hours after delivery, respiratory support, ventilation, oxygen supplementation, and surfactant administration. When stratified by delivery policies there was no significant difference in perinatal outcomes based on obesity. Conclusion Obese women with PPROM ≥34 weeks have an increased odds of adverse neonatal respiratory and infectious outcomes compared with nonobese women.

scholarly journals Evaluation of maternal and neonatal outcomes in the case of preterm premature rupture of membranes and their relationship to prenatal maternal indicators: Across -sectional descriptive study

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 55
Author(s):  
Mirfat Mohamed Labib El-Kashif ◽  
Azza Mohamed Fathy ◽  
Howaida Amin Hassan Fahmy Elsaba
Keyword(s):  
Neonatal Outcome ◽  
Expectant Management ◽  
Neonatal Outcomes ◽  
Premature Rupture Of Membranes ◽  
Premature Rupture ◽  
Singleton Pregnancy ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Preterm Premature Rupture ◽  
Management Protocol ◽  
Maternal And Neonatal Outcomes

Background and aim: Preterm premature rupture of membranes is one of the most important causes of pregnancy complication and a significant role in the occurrence of perinatal morbidity and mortality. The present study aims to evaluate the maternal and neonatal outcomes in the case of preterm premature rupture of membranes and their relationship to prenatal maternal indicators.Subjects and methods: A cross-sectional descriptive design was used to evaluate 68 pregnant women with a gestational age of 32 to before 37 weeks, and singleton pregnancy complicated by preterm premature rupture of membranes who fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The data were collected by convenience sampling using standardized tools.Results: A linear correlation was used to show a correlation between maternal clinical indicators with the predictive maternal and neonatal outcome using a Spearman Rho correlation coefficient. The most significant neonatal outcomes are neonatal intensive care unit admission, neonatal respiratory distress syndrome, and early neonatal sepsis. More than two-thirds of the studied women had expectant management, and less than one-fourth of them have postnatal sepsis.Conclusion and recommendation: The prenatal maternal indicators are the significant values for maternal and neonatal outcome in case of preterm premature rupture of membranes, so A further larger prospective study is recommended to demonstrate the difference in incidence, management protocol of preterm premature rupture of the membranes in the delivery and maternity health care services.

scholarly journals A study of bacteriological profile and outcome of babies born to mother with Premature rupture of membrane and its correlation with blood and gastric culture

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 2654
Author(s):  
Milind B. Kamble ◽  
Ramchandra Nagargoje ◽  
Sagar G. Chopde
Keyword(s):  
Birth Weight ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Neonatal Outcome ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Specific Treatment ◽  
Active Management ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Membrane Rupture ◽  
Early Onset Sepsis ◽  
History Of

Background: PROM, a condition that occurs when fetal membranes are ruptured at least one hour before onset of labor. While PROM is observed in 10% of all pregnancies, 60-80% of PROM is observed in term and 20-40% in pregnancies less than 37th gestational week. PROM is the most significant reason for preterm labor. The three causes of neonatal death associated with PROM are prematurity, sepsis and pulmonary hypoplasia. Infants born with sepsis have a mortality rate four times higher than those without sepsis. Objective of the study was correlation of blood and gastric culture positive sepsis in PROM newborns. It helps to find out the incidence of PROM in our locality.Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 90 neonates born to healthy mothers with history of PROM more than 18 hours duration, admitted in SNCU/ward at a tertiary care hospital for six months duration from 1st January 2017 to 30 June 2017. Clinical profile of these Newborn with history of PROM was noted such as birth weight, gender, gestation, duration of membrane rupture, history of maternal fever. For all newborns with PROM, sepsis screen had been sent. The neonatal outcome was also recorded, and the data was collected and analyzed by using frequency and percentages.Results: Gram negative bacilli were the commonest cause of neonatal sepsis and male neonates were more prone to infection. PROM and low birth weight especially, ELBW and VLBW are the common high-risk factors for early onset sepsis. Most common organisms isolated in blood and gastric culture were Klebsiella and Staphylococcus aureus respectively.Conclusions: PROM is a high-risk obstetric condition. Active management is needed to enable delivery within 24 hours of PROM as it offers better neonatal outcome. Morbidity and mortality increase as the duration of PROM increases. This can be reduced by early diagnosis, specific treatment and strict infection control practices in neonatal units.

scholarly journals Perinatal outcomes following immediate delivery or expectant management of preterm premature rupture of membranes during the late preterm period

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hayan Kwon ◽  
Suk Ho Kang ◽  
Hyun Sun Ko ◽  
Ja Young Kwon ◽  
Han-sung Kwon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neonatal Sepsis ◽  
Neonatal Death ◽  
Expectant Management ◽  
Neonatal Outcomes ◽  
Late Preterm ◽  
Premature Rupture Of Membranes ◽  
Premature Rupture ◽  
Preterm Premature Rupture ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Maternal Sepsis

Abstract The aim of this study is to evaluate maternal and neonatal outcomes following immediate delivery or expectant management of preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) during the late preterm period at 34+ 0–36+ 6 weeks of pregnancy. We conducted a retrospective study on singleton pregnancies with PPROM during the late preterm period using medical records at twelve tertiary medical centres in Korea from January 2007 to December 2016. Data on demographic characteristics and outcome measures were collected. The primary outcomes were maternal sepsis for maternal outcome and neonatal sepsis and neonatal death for neonatal outcomes. Of the 1,072 women, 782 cases (72.9%) were assigned to the immediate delivery group, and 290 cases (27.1%) were categorized into the expectant management group. There was a significant difference in the rate of clinical neonatal sepsis (immediate delivery, 3.8% vs expectant management, 15.8%; p < 0.0001), however, no differences in maternal sepsis (p = 0.5424), culture-proven neonatal sepsis (p = 0.2108), or neonatal death (p = 0.3899) were observed. In conclusion, expectant management in women with PPROM during the late preterm period does not increase the risk of severe maternal and neonatal morbidities and mortality; however, careful monitoring for chorioamnionitis or fetal compromise should be considered during expectant management.

scholarly journals Perinatal Outcomes Associated with Latency in Late Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 672
Author(s):  
Eui Kyung Choi ◽  
So Yeon Kim ◽  
Ji-Man Heo ◽  
Kyu Hee Park ◽  
Ho Yeon Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Preterm Infants ◽  
Latency Period ◽  
Perinatal Outcomes ◽  
Expectant Management ◽  
Late Preterm ◽  
Premature Rupture ◽  
Antenatal Corticosteroids ◽  
Preterm Premature Rupture ◽  
Antenatal Steroids ◽  
Significant Difference

This study aims to evaluate the perinatal outcomes of preterm premature rupture of membrane (PPROM) with latency periods at 33 + 0–36 + 6 weeks of gestation. This retrospective case-control study included women with singleton pregnancies who delivered at 33 + 0–36 + 6 weeks at Korea University Ansan Hospital in South Korea between 2006–2019. The maternal and neonatal characteristics were compared between different latency periods (expectant delivery ≥72 h vs. immediate delivery <72 h). Data were compared among 345 women (expectant, n = 39; immediate delivery, n = 306). There was no significant difference in maternal and neonatal morbidities between the groups, despite the younger gestational age in the expectant delivery group. Stratified by gestational weeks, the 34-week infants showed a statistically significant lower exposure to antenatal steroids (73.4% vs. 20.0%, p < 0.001), while the incidence of respiratory distress syndrome (12.8%) and the use of any respiratory support (36.8%) was higher than those in the 33-week infants, without significance. Our study shows that a prolonged latency period (≥72 h) did not increase maternal and neonatal morbidities, and a considerable number of preterm infants immediately delivered at 34 weeks experienced respiratory complications. Expectant management and antenatal corticosteroids should be considered in late preterm infants with PPROM.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document