scholarly journals Causes of referred otalgia: a hospital-based study

Author(s):  
Aditiya Saraf ◽  
Raies Ahmad Begh ◽  
Deep Jyoti ◽  
Parmod Kalsotra

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> The aim of our study was to evaluate various etiologies of referred otalgia.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> The present study was conducted in the department of ENT, SMGS Hospital, GMC Jammu from January 2019 to January 2020. A total of 65 patients with complaint of pain in ear but normal ear examination was included in our study. All patients underwent complete ENT examination.  </p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> The most common cause for referred otalgia was dental pathology (58.4%), followed by pharyngitis (16.9%), tonsillitis (10.7%), supraglottic cancer (7.6%), cervical spine pathology (3.07%) and peritonsillar abscess (3.07%).</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Otalgia is a symptom with diverse causes. Though many causes are otogenic, referred pain from other regions of head and neck is also very common.</p>

2011 ◽  
Vol 467-469 ◽  
pp. 339-344
Author(s):  
Na Li ◽  
Jian Xin Liu

Head and neck injuries are the most frequent severe injury resulting from traffic accidents. Neck injury mechanisms are difficult to study experimentally due to the variety of impact conditions involved, as well as ethical issues, such as the use of human cadavers and animals. Finite element analysis is a comprehensive computer aided mathematical method through which human head and neck impact tolerance can be investigated. Detailed cervical spine models are necessary to better understand cervical spine response to loading, improve our understanding of injury mechanisms, and specifically for predicting occupant response and injury in auto crash scenarios. The focus of this study was to develop a C1–C2 finite element model with optimized mechanical parameter. The most advanced material data available were then incorporated using appropriate nonlinear constitutive models to provide accurate predictions of response at physiological levels of loading. This optimization method was the first utilized in biomechanics understanding, the C1–C2 model forms the basis for the development of a full cervical spine model. Future studies will focus on tissue-level injury prediction and dynamic response.


2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 390
Author(s):  
Yukihide Koyama ◽  
Koichi Tsuzaki ◽  
Kazuo Ohmori ◽  
Koichiro Ono ◽  
Takeshi Suzuki

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 145-157
Author(s):  
Jibran Ahmed Khan ◽  
Vipin Kumar Pandey

The main aim of this review article is to identify the evidence-based diagnosis and physiotherapy management of musculoskeletal disorder of cervical spine. Neck pain from cervical spine disorders is the most common cause of musculoskeletal disorders. Neck pain can exist alone or with the presence of upper-extremity symptoms. Key words: Neck Pain, Cervical Spine, Joint mobilization, Massage.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. 869-873 ◽  
Author(s):  
James M. Elliott ◽  
Todd B. Parrish ◽  
David M. Walton ◽  
Amy J. Vassallo ◽  
Joel Fundaun ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 340-350
Author(s):  
Muhammad Abdul-Aziz Waheed ◽  
Sazid Hasan ◽  
Lee A. Tan ◽  
Aju Bosco ◽  
Rui Reinas ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (9) ◽  
pp. 1512-1517 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Moses ◽  
Jared C. Tishelman ◽  
Peter L. Zhou ◽  
John Y. Moon ◽  
Bryan M. Beaubrun ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 195-208
Author(s):  
Yoshihiro Katsuura ◽  
Jeremy Bruce ◽  
Samuel Taylor ◽  
Lawrence Gullota ◽  
Han Jo Kim

Study Design: Systematic review. Objective: To assess the current literature regarding the relationship between the shoulder and the spine with regard to (1) overlapping pain pathways; (2) differentiating history, exam findings, and diagnostic findings; (3) concomitant pathology and optimal treatments; and (4) cervical spine-based etiology for shoulder problems. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed according to the guidelines set forth by the Cochrane Collaboration. Studies were included if they examined the clinical, anatomical, or physiological overlap between the shoulder and cervical spine. Two reviewers screened and selected full texts for inclusion according to the objectives of the study. Quality of evidence was graded using OCEBM (Oxford Center for Evidence Based Medicine) and MINORS (Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies) scores. Results: Out of 477 references screened, 76 articles were included for review and grouped into 4 main sections (overlapping pain pathways, differentiating exam findings, concomitant/masquerading pathology, and cervical spine-based etiology of shoulder pathology). There is evidence to suggest cervical spine pathology may cause shoulder pain and that shoulder pathology may cause neck pain. Specific examination tests used to differentiate shoulder and spine pathology are critical as imaging studies may be misleading. Diagnostic injections can be useful to confirm sources of pain as well as predicting the success of surgery in both the shoulder and the spine. There is limited evidence to suggest alterations in the relationship between the spine and the scapula may predispose to shoulder impingement or rotator cuff tears. Moreover, cervical neurological lesions may predispose patients to developing rotator cuff tears. The decision to proceed with shoulder or spine surgery first should be delineated with careful examination and the use of shoulder and spine diagnostic injections. Conclusion: Shoulder and spine pathology commonly overlap. Knowledge of anatomy, pain referral patterns, shoulder kinematics, and examination techniques are invaluable to the clinician in making an appropriate diagnosis and guiding treatment. In this review, we present an algorithm for the identification and treatment of shoulder and cervical spine pathology.


Neurosurgery ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 66 (6) ◽  
pp. E1203-E1204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Udaya K. Kakarla ◽  
Juan Valdivia Valdivia ◽  
Volker K.H. Sonntag ◽  
Nicholas C. Bambakidis

Abstract OBJECTIVE This is a unique case report of a fractured atlantoaxial interspinous multistranded cable leading to intracranial hemorrhage and spinal cord injury. CLINICAL PRESENTATION A 61-year-old woman, with a history of rheumatoid arthritis and C1-C2 interspinous wiring with allograft for atlantoaxial instability, presented with neck pain and progressive decline in mental status. Prior to transfer to our institution from a referral hospital, imaging studies revealed progressive hydrocephalus with interval development of subarachnoid and fourth ventricular hemorrhage. Initial and repeat angiographic work-up was negative for vascular lesions. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a subdural hematoma and signal changes at the cervicomedullary junction. Computed tomography of the cervical spine revealed a fractured interspinous cable, intradural penetration, and atlantoaxial instability. INTERVENTION After ventriculostomy, both the patient's mental status and quadriparesis improved to a C on the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) scale. During surgery, the fractured cable and subdural hematoma were removed revealing an area of spinal cord impalement. She underwent C1-C3 lateral mass fixation with iliac crest autograft for fusion and was discharged to rehabilitation after a ventriculoperitoneal shunt was placed. At her 6-month follow-up, she was independent and had improved to ASIA E. Computed tomography confirmed fusion. CONCLUSION Spinal instrumentation eventually fails from pseudarthrosis and can cause neurological injury. In patients with atlantoaxial instability, direct C1-C2 screw fixation with posterior interspinous wiring using autograft offers the best chance for fusion. Cervical spine pathology can cause intracranial hemorrhage, and unconventional causes of injury must be considered when routine workup is negative.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document