Comparison of visual acuity in primary and secondary iris claw implantation in western Maharashtra

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 442-447
Author(s):  
Divya Motwani ◽  
Rupali Maheshgauri ◽  
Prachi Bakare ◽  
Deepaswi Bhavsar ◽  
Sucheta Kaul ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Financial Burden ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Visual Outcome ◽  
Tertiary Care Centre ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Patient Will ◽  
Iris Claw Lens ◽  
Iris Claw

A potential complication of cataract surgery is posterior capsular rent, where PCIOL can’t be implanted. Primary Iris claw implantation means that the IC-IOL is implanted in the same setting after cataract removal. While secondary Iris claw lens implant is done in an aphakic eye without capsular support and post cataract surgeries when the eye is left aphakic. To compare the visual outcome in cases of primary and secondary iris claw lens implantation after cataract surgery.This was a hospital-based Prospective Interventional Longitudinal study,conducted on patients in a tertiary care centre, in Western Maharashtra from September 2018 to August 2020. 31 eyes underwent primary iris claw implant and 19 underwent secondary iris claw implant. Highly significant difference in visual acuity preoperatively due aphakia among subjects who underwent secondary iris claw implantation (p=0.000) was seen. Highly significant difference in visual acuity post operatively till 15 days was also seen due to less corneal oedema& inflammation in patients who underwent secondary iris claw implantation. No significant difference in visual acuity was seen on day 40 as lens was put in both the groups and the signs of inflammation had reduced (p=0.759).Overall visual outcome after 40 days is comparable in primary and secondary cases. It is better to do a primary retro fixated iris claw implantation, as in case of a secondary implant the patient will have undue anxiety, to undergo a second surgery along with increased financial burden and patient can develop complications due to aphakia.

scholarly journals Sutureless retropupillary iris claw intraocular lens implantation is a viable option in aphakic patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 350
Author(s):  
Neepa R. Gohil ◽  
Sandeep Kumar Yadav ◽  
Kaumudi Shinde
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Intraocular Lens ◽  
Visual Outcome ◽  
Good Alternative ◽  
Intraocular Lenses ◽  
Intraocular Lens Implantation ◽  
Visual Rehabilitation ◽  
Lens Implantation ◽  
Iris Claw Lens ◽  
Iris Claw

Visual rehabilitation in aphakia has been a challenge with a wide variety of surgical options available for ophthalmologist. We report the visual outcome with retropupillary iris claw lens secondary to intra operative complications and secondary implantation in aphakia. An interventional study on 4 eyes of 4 patients was conducted. Preoperative visual acuity, slit lamp examination and fundus examination were carried out. Anterior vitrectomy and retropupillary fixation of iris claw lens were done. The primary outcome measure was best-corrected visual acuity and secondary postoperative complication was recorded at various intervals. All patients had visual acuity of ≥6/18 postoperatively. Sutureless retropupillary iris claw intraocular lens implantation is a good alternative of scleral-fixated intraocular lenses in aphakic patients.

scholarly journals A comparative study of post-operative astigmatism in superior versus superotemporal scleral incisions in manual small incision cataract surgery in a tertiary care hospital

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 009-015
Author(s):  
Hazra Soumyadeep ◽  
Saha Tapes Kanti
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Tertiary Care Hospital ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Visual Outcome ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Small Incision Cataract Surgery ◽  
Small Incision ◽  
Postoperative Astigmatism ◽  
Number Of Patients

Background: In developing countries, manual small incision cataract surgery is a better alternative and less expensive in comparison to phacoemulsification and thus the incision is an important factor causing high rates of postoperative astigmatism resulting into poor visual outcome. Thus, modifications to the site of the incision is needed to reduce the pre-existing astigmatism and also to prevent postoperative astigmatism. Modification to superotemporal incision relieves pre-existing astigmatism majorly due to its characteristic of neutralizing against-the-rule astigmatism, which is more prevalent among elderly population and thus improves the visual outcome. Aims: To study the incidence, amount and type of surgically induced astigmatism in superior and superotemporal scleral incision in manual SICS. Methodology: It is a randomized, comparative clinical study done on 100 patients attending the OPD of Ophthalmology at a tertiary care hospital, with senile cataract within a period of one year and underwent manual SICS. 50 of them chosen randomly for superior incision and rest 50 with superotemporal incision. MSICS with PCIOL implantation were performed through unsutured 6.5 mm scleral incision in all. Patients were examined post-operatively on 1st day, 7th day, 2nd week and 4th week and astigmatism was evaluated and compared in both groups. Results: It is seen that on postoperative follow up on 4th week, 77.78% of the patients with ATR astigmatism who underwent superior incision had increased astigmatism whereas, only 13.63% of the patients with ATR astigmatism who underwent supero-temporal incision, had increased astigmatism but 81.82% had decreased ATR astigmatism. However, 77.78% of the patients with preoperative WTR astigmatism who underwent supero-temporal incision, had increased astigmatism, whereas 44.45% of the patients with WTR astigmatism preoperatively, had increased astigmatism in contrast to 50% had decreased amount of astigmatism. It is also seen that the supero-temporal incision group had more number of patients (78%) with visual acuity better than 6/9 at 4th postoperative week than superior incision group (42%). Conclusion: This study concludes that superior incision cause more ATR astigmatism postoperatively whereas superotemporal incision causes lower magnitude of WTR astigmatism, which is advantageous for the elderly. Besides superotemporal incision provides better and early visual acuity postoperatively.

scholarly journals Phacoemulsification versus small incision cataract surgery (SICS): which one is a better surgical option for immature cataract in developing countries?

1970 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 95-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
SK Singh ◽  
I Winter ◽  
L Surin
Keyword(s):  
Developing Countries ◽  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Visual Outcome ◽  
P Value ◽  
Small Incision Cataract Surgery ◽  
Mean Values ◽  
Small Incision ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: Several studies have shown comparable visual outcomes of SICS and phacoemulsification (Gogate et al 2007, Ruit et al 2007). Objective: To compare the safety and efficacy of different types of surgical procedures (phacoemulsification versus SICS) for cataract surgery in immature cataract. Material and methods: A prospective randomized controlled trial was carried out involving 93 and 89 patients with immature senile cataract selected for phacoemulsification and SICS respectively. Statistics: Mean values with standard deviations were calculated. P value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. Results: There was no difference between the groups in terms of gender, age and pre-operative visual acuity (p = 0.09). In phacoemulsification group (n=93) more than two thirds and in SICS group (n=89) more than three quarters of the patients had good visual outcome (6/6-6/18) on first postoperative day (p=0.065). Poor outcome (<6/60) was recorded in 6% (phacoemulsification group) and 1% (small incision cataract surgery group). Mean visual acuity was 0.43 ± 0.27 in phacoemulsification group and 0.47 ± 0.24 in SICS group. Mean surgery time was significantly shorter in SICS group (p=0.0003). Statistics: Data were computed and analyzed using the SPSS software program vs 10. The p value of < 0.05 was considered significant. Conclusion: There was no significant difference in visual outcome on first post operative day in between phacoemulsification and SICS technique. However, performing SICS was significantly faster. Small incision cataract surgery with implantation of rigid PMMA lens is a suitable surgical technique to treat immature cataract in developing countries. Keywords: phacoemulsification; small incision cataract surgery (SICS) DOI: 10.3126/nepjoph.v1i2.3682 Nep J Oph 2009;1(2):95-100

scholarly journals Analysis of visual outcome of Neodymium: Yttrium-Aluminum -Garnet (Nd: YAG) laser capsulotomy in patients with Posterior Capsule Opacification

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (8) ◽  
pp. 216-223
Author(s):  
Dr. Deepa R. ◽  
◽  
Dr. V. Panimalar A. Veeramani ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Yttrium Aluminum Garnet ◽  
Visual Outcome ◽  
Posterior Capsular Opacification ◽  
P Value ◽  
Yag Laser ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Yttrium Aluminum ◽  
Neodymium Yttrium

Objective: Posterior capsular opacification (PCO) is a postoperative complication causing decreasedvisual acuity. This study aims to study the efficacy of Nd: YAG laser capsulotomy in posteriorcapsular opacification following cataract surgery by analyzing the visual outcome. Material andMethods: A prospective study included a sample size of 50 eyes of 37 patients with Posteriorcapsular opacification following uneventful cataract surgery with significantly decreased visual acuity.Detailed anterior and posterior segment examination was done, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA)was recorded along with measurement of IOP. Posterior capsulotomy was performed using Nd: YAGlaser (Neodymium: Yttrium-aluminum–garnet) and patients were followed up. Visual acuity wasassessed and complications if any were recorded. Results: It was noted that 74% of the patients atthe end of 1st week and 78% of the patients at the end of 1st and 3rd month had significant visualimprovement following Nd: YAG laser capsulotomy. There was a statistically significant difference inPost Nd: YAG laser BCVA on follow up with P-value <0.001. Complications encountered were the risein IOP in 6% of the population at the end of 1 hour and 1st day of the procedure, iris bleeding wasnoted in 4% of the population, intraocular lens damage in 2 %, and cystoid macular edema in 2 %of the study population.

scholarly journals The impact of cataract surgery upon visual acuity and quality of life in patients with cataract in Tripura

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 167
Author(s):  
Monali Acharya ◽  
Subrata Baidya ◽  
Rituparna Das ◽  
Phani Sarkar ◽  
Himadri Choudhury
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
General Function ◽  
Tertiary Care Centre ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Level Of Satisfaction ◽  
The Impact

Background: The major cause of blindness in India is cataract. Blindness leads to poverty due to reduced productive activity and this leads to reduced quality of life. This study was aimed at evaluating the visual acuity (VA) change pre and post cataract surgery, the post-surgical quality of life (QOL) outcomes and level of satisfaction estimation.Methods: This was a cross sectional, hospital based study carried out in a tertiary care centre in Tripura. It included 200 patients over a period of 1.5 years to compare the VA, QOL, psychosocial status and satisfaction level pre and post cataract surgery. Indian vision function questionnaire 33 (INDVFQ33) was used to assess QOL.Results: Out of 200 patients, in 53% preoperative VA ranged from >20/400 - <20/200 while in 5% patients it was only perception of light. Postoperatively 80% of the patient achieved best corrected VA (BCVA) of 20/30 or better, 18% patient attained BCVA ranging from 20/40 to 20/60. Only 2% had a BCVA of 20/60 or worst.  QOL parameters like mean pre and post -operative general function score, psychosocial scale and visual function scale showed improvement following cataract surgery. 69% of the patients were satisfied with the cataract surgery, whereas 31% were not completely satisfied.Conclusions: The study revealed that there was a marked improvement in VA post cataract surgery and it also influenced the QOL in all scales.

scholarly journals FACTORS AFFECTING VISUAL OUTCOME IN INDIRECT TRAUMATIC OPTIC NEUROPATHY – A RETROSPECTIVE NON-RANDOMIZED STUDY

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-2
Author(s):  
Tharini. S ◽  
Subashini Kaliaperumal ◽  
Ramesh Babu K
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Optic Neuropathy ◽  
Road Traffic ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Visual Outcome ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Traumatic Optic Neuropathy ◽  
Tertiary Care Centre ◽  
Factors Affecting

Purpose To study the demographic profile and factors associated with visual outcome in patients with indirect traumatic optic neuropathy. Methods A retrospective study of patients admitted with indirect traumatic optic neuropathy, in a tertiary care centre in South India, from February 2016 to February 2018 was conducted. Patients with bony impingement on the optic nerve were treated with endoscopic surgical decompression and the rest were treated with low dose steroids. Visual acuity was assessed at presentation, 2 weeks and 3 months. Results The mean age of the patients was 31.6 years (13-75 years). 19(90.4%) patients were male and road traffic accident (95.23%) was the most common cause of injury. Mean time of presentation was 3.6 hours ( 1-7 hours) Vision at presentation was perception of light and above in 8(3.1%) and no perception of Light in 13(61.9%) patients. Visual improvement was seen in 4 out of 18 patients (22.2%) in the steroid group and 1 out of 3 patients (33.3%) in the surgery group. Visual acuity at presentation was significantly associated with final visual outcome (P=0.047). Conclusion Our study demonstrated that visual acuity at presentation was the only factor associated with final vision, irrespective of associated injuries and treatment modalities.

Pediatric Cataract Surgery: Comparison between Ages at Surgery and Contrast Sensitivity Outcomes

2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 50
Author(s):  
Aquirina Caesari Putri ◽  
Rozalina Loebis
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Contrast Sensitivity ◽  
Cataract Extraction ◽  
Significant Negative Correlation ◽  
Natural World ◽  
P Value ◽  
Pediatric Cataract ◽  
Low Contrast ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: Pediatric cataracts are major causes of children’s blindness. Surgery has proven to be beneficial in terms of visual function prognosis. Contrast sensitivity evaluation after surgery is as important as visual acuity considering that natural world consists of various objects in low-to-medium contrasts. The purpose of this study is to analyze the difference of contrast sensitivity outcomes based on ages at surgery. Method: Retrospective data of children with pediatric developmental cataract from July 2013 to November 2015 were collected. All children who underwent cataract surgery at 60-months-old or less were randomized into two groups, ≤24 months and >24-to-60 months. Contrast sensitivity was then examined with preferential-looking method using Hiding Heidi low-contrast test face chart. The main outcome measures were contrast sensitivity of both groups. Age-at-evaluation, cataract onset, duration of follow-up, duration of deprivation and visual acuity were also noted. Result: Of 14 children (23 eyes), 11 eyes (47,8%) were in ≤24 months group, 12eyes (52,2%) were in >24-to-60 months group. All eyes underwent cataract extraction and similar type of intraocular lens implantation. Mean age-at-surgery was 28,2 months±16,8 (SD). Mean contrast sensitivity for each group was 47,50 %±42,29 and 18,33%±27,38, respectively, with p-value 0,031. Further analysis of Spearman’s correlation test demonstrated significant negative correlation (rs = -0,559; p = 0,006) between the two groups. Conclusion: There was statistically significant difference in contrast sensitivity between those who underwent surgery at ≤24 months and >24-to-60 months. Children who underwent surgery at older ages tend to have better contrast sensitivity afterwards.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document