Reflections and practices of citing papers in health care science -a focus group study

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (03) ◽  
pp. 235-245
Author(s):  
Suzanne Forsyth Herling ◽  
Karin Frydenlund Jespersen ◽  
Ann Merete Møller
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Focus Group ◽  
Focus Group Study

scholarly journals Seen but not heard – ethnic minorities’ views of primary health care interpreting provision: a focus group study

2010 ◽  
Vol 11 (02) ◽  
pp. 132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Duncan S. Barron ◽  
Caroline Holterman ◽  
Pieter Shipster ◽  
Sherma Batson ◽  
Mohammed Alam
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Primary Health Care ◽  
Focus Group ◽  
Ethnic Minorities ◽  
Focus Group Study ◽  
Primary Health

Investigating the Attitudes of Health-Care Professionals towards the Use of Integrated Care Pathways in a District General Hospital: A Thematic Analysis of Focus Group Discussion

2005 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 57-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tanya Claridge ◽  
Dianne Parker ◽  
Gary Cook
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Focus Group ◽  
Focus Group Discussion ◽  
Thematic Analysis ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Group Discussion ◽  
District General Hospital ◽  
Survey Questionnaire ◽  
Focus Group Study ◽  
Integrated Care Pathways

Context: Integrated care pathways (ICPs) are an increasingly common approach to the standardization and integration of health-care practice in the NHS. They delineate interdisciplinary critical decision points and evidence-based daily treatment regimens for patients in specific disease groups. ICP champions assert that they have the potential to decrease medical errors, increase the accuracy of data capture, increase the efficiency of personnel and ultimately improve the quality of patient care. Despite the theoretical benefits of ICP use, there was anecdotal evidence of staff unease and audit evidence of variable compliance with ICPs at a district general hospital (DGH). Objective: This focus group study was one of the three interdependent methodologies used to investigate the attitudes of health-care professionals towards ICPs in a DGH. It was anticipated that thematic analysis of the focus group discussion would facilitate further the interpretation of qualitative data already analysed in a previous phase of the project, and inform the development of a survey questionnaire investigating the attitudes of the health-care professionals towards ICPs. Design: Ten focus groups comprising on average, six health-care professionals were conducted. The staff involved included doctors, nurses, professions allied to medicine, a member of the Community Health Council and non-clinical managers. The focus groups included staff with a range of seniority and speciality. Results: Analysis of the data achieved facilitated the confirmation and identification of themes underpinning the focus group discussion. These are reported here and illustrated by representative quotations. Conclusion: The focus group study provided a valuable insight into the attitudes regarding ICPs of over 60 health-care professionals. The themes identified were used to facilitate the development of a survey questionnaire to explore them in a quantifiable way. Focus group methodology proved to be a useful way to explore emerging issues in depth, and to observe areas of disagreement among staff.

Limitations in Health-Care System Resources Affecting Adherence of Patient With Psoriasis to Topical Drugs: A Focus Group Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 54-60
Author(s):  
Mathias Tiedemann Svendsen ◽  
Steven R. Feldman ◽  
Sylvia Naiga Tiedemann ◽  
Anne Sofie Stochholm Sørensen ◽  
Cecilie Marie Ringgaard Rivas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Focus Group ◽  
Health Care System ◽  
Continuity Of Care ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Topical Therapy ◽  
Focus Group Study ◽  
Topical Drugs ◽  
System Resources ◽  
Care System

Background: Topical therapy is first-line treatment for patients with mild-to-moderate psoriasis, but low adherence to topical drugs is a barrier to treatment success. Health-care system resources are considered to have an impact on adherence of patient with psoriasis to topical drugs. Objective: To investigate dermatology nurses’ perception of the impact of health-care system resources on topical therapy adherence in patients with psoriasis. Methods: A semistructured focus group study was performed with 6 dermatology nurses and 2 student nurses. Participants were recruited from a dermatology outpatient hospital clinic. The study focused on the dermatology nurses’ perception of the effect health-care system resources (including health-care services provided to patients, how clinics are organized, and how the health-care personnel communicate) have on adherence of patients with psoriasis to topical treatment. The focus group discussion was divided into 3 areas: communication with patients and intercollegial communication, follow-up visits and admissions to consultations by other health-care professions, and how to establish consultations to support adherence of patients with psoriasis to topical drugs. Data were analyzed by a systematic text condensation method based on a phenomenological–hermeneutic approach. Results: Nurses identified a number of health-care system resources that may affect adherence of patients with psoriasis, primarily professional collaboration and communication, continuity of care, and the establishment of nurse consultations. Conclusion: Adherence may by negatively affected by contradictory information about topical drugs due to inadequate interprofessional collaboration among health-care professionals. Improving communication between health-care professionals and patients, ensuring continuity of care, and establishing nurse consultations may improve topical therapy outcomes.

A focus group study of DES daughters: implications for health care providers

2000 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 439-444 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suzanne S. Duke ◽  
Sarah A. Mcgraw ◽  
Nancy E. Avis ◽  
Amanda Sherman
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Focus Group ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Focus Group Study

scholarly journals Workers’ views on involving significant others in occupational health care: a focus group study among workers with a chronic disease

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Nicole C. Snippen ◽  
Haitze J. de Vries ◽  
Astrid R. Bosma ◽  
Sylvia J. van der Burg-Vermeulen ◽  
Mariët Hagedoorn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Chronic Disease ◽  
Focus Group ◽  
Occupational Health ◽  
Significant Others ◽  
Occupational Health Care ◽  
Focus Group Study

21. Optimal care in rheumatoid arthritis: Preliminary findings from a focus group study

2007 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 38
Author(s):  
S. Bernatsky ◽  
D. Feldman ◽  
M. Roper ◽  
E. Rosenberg
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Content Analysis ◽  
Focus Group ◽  
Chronic Diseases ◽  
Computer Assisted ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Focus Group Study ◽  
Optimal Care ◽  
Good Communication

The objective of our work was to identify facilitators of optimal care, as well as potential barriers, for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The design was a focus group study. Individuals with established RA were identified through invitation letters sent using a random sample of the Quebec Arthritis Society mailing list. Patients were eligible for participation if they had a diagnosis of RA confirmed by a rheumatologist and if they had sought care within the McGill Réseau Universitaire Intégré de Santé network. We planned a series of focus group meetings (90 minutes each) to obtain sufficient data in terms of spectrum of ideas. In each moderator-led group, participants were asked to discuss five questions related to quality care. A co-moderator was available to document non-verbal communication, with audio-taping of all sessions and professional transcription for data analysis. Qualitative content analysis, based on grounded theory, was the chosen means of identifying recurring themes and categories. Two focus group sessions have been completed with two more scheduled. Preliminary findings indicate the importance of good communication between family physicians, specialists, and allied health care workers. Final coding of transcripts and computer-assisted content analysis is being completed. However it appears that focus group may be useful in studying optimal care for chronic diseases such as RA. Our preliminary findings emphasize the necessity of good communication among health care providers. Ultimately we hope to generate knowledge that can be transformed into better health for Canadians with arthritis and other chronic diseases.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document