scholarly journals Droperidol Reduces Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting and Supports the Continuation of Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia with Fentanyl

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. 220-230
Author(s):  
Ikkou Hirata ◽  
Masahiro Iwamoto ◽  
Hiroki` Matsui ◽  
Hiromi Yoshinuma ◽  
Ryohkan Funakoshi

PURPOSE: To examine the impact of adding droperidol to fentanyl-based intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IVPCA) on the discontinuation of IVPCA use due to postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). METHODS: Patients who underwent surgeries other than abdominal surgeries and used IVPCA between April 2014 and March 2018 were selected. Patients using IVPCA with fentanyl alone were compared to patients using droperidol added to IVPCA. Patients were allocated to one of two groups depending on the drug used for IVPCA: 1) control group, fentanyl alone; 2) droperidol group, droperidol with fentanyl. The primary endpoint was the discontinuation of IVPCA due to PONV. Secondary endpoints included PONV within 48 hours after surgery, the number of antiemetics used, pain score, and adverse effects. Propensity score matching was used to control the differences in clinical features among patients. RESULTS: Among the 793 patients initially enrolled in this study, 145 were excluded via propensity score matching; 364 of the remaining patients received IVPCA supplemented with droperidol. Propensity score matching showed that discontinuation of IVPCA due to PONV was significantly decreased in the droperidol group compared to the control group (P = 0.01). Further, compared with the control group, the droperidol group had reduced nausea up to 24 hours after surgery (P < 0.01), and the number of vomiting episodes and use of antiemetics decreased within 12 hours after surgery (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of droperidol to IVPCA is associated with a decrease in PONV, as well as the improved continuation of pain treatment with fentanyl-based IVPCA, similar to IVPCA with morphine. However, it is necessary to monitor the side effects of this treatment.

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 1612 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jong Ho Kim ◽  
Mingi Hong ◽  
Young Joon Kim ◽  
Ho Seok Lee ◽  
Young Suk Kwon ◽  
...  

The impact of body mass index (BMI) on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is controversial, and few studies have focused on their relationship. We investigated the effects of BMI on PONV, taking into account other PONV risk factors. We analyzed adults over the age of 18 years who received general anesthesia between 2015 and 2019, using propensity score matching. Before propensity score matching, odds ratios (ORs) for PONV were lower for overweight (OR, 0.91; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.87–0.96; p < 0.0001) or obese patients (OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.71–0.84; p < 0.0001) than for normal-BMI patients. After matching, the ORs for PONV of overweight (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.80–0.98; p = 0.016) and obese patients (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.63–0.79; p < 0.0001) were low. However, the ORs of underweight patients did not differ from those of normal-BMI patients, irrespective of matching. Therefore, the incidence of PONV may be lower among adults with a higher-than-normal BMI.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. 3477
Author(s):  
Jong Ho Kim ◽  
Man-Sup Lim ◽  
Jun Woo Choi ◽  
Haewon Kim ◽  
Young-Suk Kwon ◽  
...  

Thus far, few studies have compared the effects of sugammadex and cholinesterase inhibitors on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and the results have been controversial. Here, we compared the effects of sugammadex, neostigmine, and pyridostigmine on PONV by means of a five hospital analysis with propensity score matching. We analyzed adults aged ≥ 18 years who underwent general anesthesia between January 2014 and December 2019. Following propensity score matching, 7793 patients were included in each of the neostigmine and sugammadex matched patient groups (absolute standardized difference (ASD), 0.01–0.07), and 10,197 patients were included in each of the pyridostigmine and sugammadex matched patient groups (ASD, 0.01–0.02), while 19,377 patients were included in each of the pyridostigmine and neostigmine matched patient groups. (ASD, 0.01–0.19). The odds of PONV were low in the sugammadex group (odds ratio, 0.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.59–0.72; p < 0.0001) and pyridostigmine group (odds ratio, 0.22; 95% confidence interval, 0.20–0.24; p < 0.0001) compared to the neostigmine group, while there was no difference between sugammadex and pyridostigmine (odds ratio, 0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.86–1.04; p = 0.281). Therefore, sugammadex and pyridostigmine may lower the incidence of PONV compared to neostigmine in patients undergoing general anesthesia.


1996 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 2-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul McConaghy ◽  
David Bland ◽  
Hilary Swales

This single-blind, randomised, controlled trial was undertaken to assess the efficacy of acupuncture (ACP) at the PC.6 (Neiguan) point in the management of established postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in patients receiving parenteral morphine via a Patient-Controlled Analgesia System (PCAS). Eighty patients were recruited on the first postoperative day and 30 were treated with ACP after developing PONV lasting more than 10min. Patients were randomly allocated to receive ACP bilaterally at either PC.6 or at a dummy point near the elbow, with manual stimulation for a total of 4min. Only patients with no knowledge of ACP antiemesis were studied, and each patient was thus unaware of the group to which they were allocated. Patients treated with PC.6 ACP had a greater mean improvement in their visual analogue score for nausea (p<0.05). All patients in the PC.6 group improved their score by 20% or more, while only one third in the control group did so (p<0.001). In the PC.6 group 53% of patients did not require any further antiemetic while receiving PCAS morphine. All patients in the control group required further antiemetic treatment (p<0.001). No adverse effects were recorded.


2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shigeyoshi Yamanaga ◽  
Andrew Mark Posselt ◽  
Chris Earl Freise ◽  
Takaaki Kobayashi ◽  
Mehdi Tavakol ◽  
...  

Background. A single dose of perioperative dexamethasone (8–10 mg) reportedly decreases postoperative nausea, vomiting, and pain but has not been widely used in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN). Methods. We performed a retrospective cohort study of living donors who underwent LDN between 2013 and 2015. Donors who received a lower dose (4–6 mg)  (n=70) or a higher dose (8–14 mg) of dexamethasone (n=100) were compared with 111 donors who did not receive dexamethasone (control). Outcomes and incidence of postoperative nausea, vomiting, and pain within 24 h after LDN were compared before and after propensity-score matching. Results. The higher dose of dexamethasone reduced postoperative nausea and vomiting incidences by 28% (P=0.010) compared to control, but the lower dose did not. Total opioid use was 29% lower in donors who received the higher dose than in control (P=0.004). The higher dose was identified as an independent factor for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting. Postoperative complication rates and hospital stays did not differ between the groups. After propensity-score matching, the results were the same as for the unmatched analysis. Conclusion. A single perioperative injection of 8–14 mg dexamethasone decreases antiemetic and narcotic requirements in the first 24 h, with no increase in surgical complications.


Author(s):  
Goran Marijanovic ◽  
Ljubica Radunovic

Abstract Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a patient-important outcome; patients often rate PONV as worse than postoperative pain. This clinical study was aimed to asses the efficiency of standard aniemetics administration separately or in combination in prevention of PONV in patients who underwent to the same surgical procedure - laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Also, this article could provide a novel information about the best choice for prevention and treatment of PONV. This study included 87 patients divided into four groups according to the postoperative phramacological treatment: First group was control group without treatment, Second group was group of patients with ondasetron treatment in postoperative period, Third group was group of patients with ondasetron+dexamethasone treatment, and fourth group was group of patients with dexamethasone treatment in postoperative period for nausea. PONV was distributed in Ondansetron+Dexamethasone group in the lowest percent (4.5%), which means that this conbination of antiemetics was very effective. Than, Dexamethasone group was in relation with low incidence of PONV (14.3%), and after that were Ondansetron and Control groups. Also smokers and males has lower incidence of PONV, especially in combination with Ondansetron+Dexamethasone treatment. The incidence of PONV is lower in male smokers patients who were underwent to combination of two antiemetics, ondansetron and dexamethasone compared to monotherapy and female non-smokers. Preventive strategies for PONV must include risk stratification followed by prophylactic approach and also testing the newer antiemetics. Because of the high incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting as a patient-important outcome, the preventive strategies should be considered as serious condition which requires multimodal approach.


2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eun Jin Ahn ◽  
Geun Joo Choi ◽  
Hyun Kang ◽  
Chong Wha Baek ◽  
Yong Hun Jung ◽  
...  

We aimed to compare the effects of ramosetron and palonosetron in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in patients that received opioid-based intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) after gynecological laparoscopy. We reviewed the electronic medical records of 755 adults. Patients were classified into two groups, ramosetron (group R,n=589) versus palonosetron (group P,n=166). Based on their confounding factors, 152 subjects in each group were selected after the implementation of propensity score matching. The overall incidence of PONV at postoperative day (POD) 0 was lower in group R compared to group P (26.9% versus 36.8%;P=0.043). The severity of nausea was lower in group R than in group P on postoperative day (POD) 0 (P=0.012). Also, the complete responder proportion of patients was significantly higher in group R compared to that in group P on POD 0 (P=0.043). In conclusion, ramosetron showed a greater efficacy in the prevention of postoperative nausea at POD 0 compared to palonosetron in patients after gynecological laparoscopy.


2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 25
Author(s):  
Reihan Shenasi ◽  
Hamzeh Hoseinzadeh ◽  
Hasan Mohammadpor-Anvari ◽  
Davod Aghamohammadi ◽  
Reza Sari-Motlagh

Bispectral index parameter is used to guide the titration of general anesthesia. This monitoring improves recovery times and hospital discharges, as well as minimizes adverse events. The objective of this study is the comparison of anesthesia depth monitoring by conventional and bispectral index on nausea and vomiting after urological surgery. 180 participants who were scheduled for abdominal urological surgery were studied. Patients before induction of anesthesia were randomize into two groups with and without bispectral index monitoring. Incidence and severity of nausea and vomiting were recorded every 30 minutes for 2 hours and every 6 hours to 24 hours after surgery. The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting in Bispectral index group is 14.4% and 8.9% and in control group 28.9% and 23.3%, respectively. The risk of nausea and vomiting after surgery was reduced by 14.5% and 14.4%, respectively in patients monitored with bispectral index.INTRODUCTIONNausea is the conscious perception of medulla stimulation that is associated with vomiting center and create vomiting response (1). General anesthesia with the use of inhalants can cause nausea and vomiting after surgery (Postoperative nausea and vomiting, PONV). The incidence of PONV is reported about 20-30 percent (2). It seems that multiple-factor can cause PONV and few items such as anesthetic drugs, kind of surgery and personal risk factors is effective on PONV. These factors make into two categories that includes factors out of control by anesthesiologists and factors can control by anesthesiologists.1. Factors out of control by anesthesiologists: some of these factors are age, gender, past history of PONV and motion sickness, smoking, kind of surgery, operating time and anesthesia time, anxiety of patients and parents. 2. Factors controlled by anesthesiologists: these factors are associated of anesthesia settings, including premedications, kind of anesthesia, anesthesia drugs during surPublishedby Australian


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document