Retrospective Evaluation of Condylar Fractures, Its Epidemiology & Treatment Modalities: Analysis of 63 Cases

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dr Mitul K Bhut ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Retrospective Evaluation ◽  
Condylar Fractures

Success of Treatment Modalities for Labial Fusion: A Retrospective Evaluation of Topical and Surgical Treatments

2009 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 247-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lazarus Mayoglou ◽  
Lori Dulabon ◽  
Nieves Martin-Alguacil ◽  
Donald Pfaff ◽  
Justine Schober
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Retrospective Evaluation ◽  
Labial Fusion ◽  
Surgical Treatments ◽  
Success Of Treatment

scholarly journals Treatment modalities of mandibular condylar fractures

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 169-178
Author(s):  
İsmail Eser Bolat ◽  
Umut Tekin
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Condylar Fractures

Fractures of the Mandibular Condyle

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (06) ◽  
pp. 623-626 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aurora G. Vincent ◽  
Yadranko Ducic ◽  
Robert Kellman
Keyword(s):  
Standard Treatment ◽  
Mandibular Condyle ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Fracture Classification ◽  
Classification Schemes ◽  
Course Of Action ◽  
Condylar Fractures ◽  
Surgical Treatments ◽  
Compare And Contrast ◽  
Open Management

AbstractThere exists no consensus “gold standard” treatment for condylar fractures, and there is continued debate on whether condylar fractures should undergo surgical or conservative management. Herein, we review various techniques of conservative, closed, and open surgical treatments of condylar fractures. Also, we review complications associated with each treatment modality and compare and contrast closed and open management. Standardization of fracture classification schemes and treatment modalities is needed to elucidate the best course of action for each patient and each fracture.

Management of thoracic aortic lesions - the future is endovascular

VASA ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 163-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weidenhagen ◽  
Bombien ◽  
Meimarakis ◽  
Geisler ◽  
A. Koeppel
Keyword(s):  
Thoracic Aorta ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Traumatic Rupture ◽  
Descending Thoracic Aorta ◽  
New Treatment ◽  
Aneurysm Dissection

Open surgical repair of lesions of the descending thoracic aorta, such as aneurysm, dissection and traumatic rupture, has been the “state-of-the-art” treatment for many decades. However, in specialized cardiovascular centers, thoracic endovascular aortic repair and hybrid aortic procedures have been implemented as novel treatment options. The current clinical results show that these procedures can be performed with low morbidity and mortality rates. However, due to a lack of randomized trials, the level of reliability of these new treatment modalities remains a matter of discussion. Clinical decision-making is generally based on the experience of the vascular center as well as on individual factors, such as life expectancy, comorbidity, aneurysm aetiology, aortic diameter and morphology. This article will review and discuss recent publications of open surgical, hybrid thoracic aortic (in case of aortic arch involvement) and endovascular repair in complex pathologies of the descending thoracic aorta.

Current Strategies in the Management of Spinal Metastatic Disease

Swiss Surgery ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 55-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bartanusz ◽  
Porchet
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Cord Compression ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Surgical Approaches ◽  
Spinal Stabilization ◽  
Management Algorithm ◽  
Specific Manner ◽  
Extensive Surgery ◽  
Selection Of

The treatment of metastatic spinal cord compression is complex. The three treatment modalities that are currently applied (in a histologically non-specific manner) are surgery, radiotherapy and the administration of steroids. The development of new spinal instrumentations and surgical approaches considerably changed the extent of therapeutic options in this field. These new surgical techniques have made it possible to resect these tumours totally, with subsequent vertebral reconstruction and spinal stabilization. In this respect, it is important to clearly identify those patients who can benefit from such an extensive surgery. We present our management algorithm to help select patients for surgery and at the same time identifying those for whom primary non-surgical therapy would be indicated. The retrospective review of surgically treated patients in our department in the last four years reveals a meagre application of conventional guidelines for the selection of the appropriate operative approach in the surgical management of these patients. The reasons for this discrepancy are discussed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document