scholarly journals Public Private Partnership as a Means of Support of the Infrastructural Development and Economic Security (on the Example of Transport Infrastructure)

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 43-47
Author(s):  
Irina E. Kabanova ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Economic Security ◽  
Public Private Partnership ◽  
Transport Infrastructure ◽  
Private Partnership ◽  
Infrastructural Development

scholarly journals The impact of huge transport PPP projects on Russian Federation socio-economic development

2018 ◽  
Vol 170 ◽  
pp. 05002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alisa Sablina ◽  
Viktor Dubolazov
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
Data Analysis ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Public Private Partnership ◽  
Transport Infrastructure ◽  
Federal State ◽  
Private Partnership ◽  
Service Information ◽  
Socio Economic Development ◽  
The Impact

This article describes the main impact peculiarities of huge transport projects implemented by public-private partnership on Russian Federation socio - economic development. The research was based on the deep data analysis of changing socio-economic indicators of six different Russian regions (including regions of different federal districts), where were implemented (or are being implemented) of huge transport infrastructure projects, implemented by public-private partnership over the past 10 years. The method of statistical data analysis, obtained in the research, was conduct by using STATISTICA software package, Federal state statistics service information and Public-private partnership platform of infrastructural projects in Russian Federation.

scholarly journals Public-Private Partnership as a Mechanism for the Development of Transport Infrastructure in Kherson Region

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (515) ◽  
pp. 217-224
Author(s):  
V. P. Vlasova ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Conflict Of Interest ◽  
Institutional Environment ◽  
Public Private Partnership ◽  
Transport Infrastructure ◽  
Private Partnership ◽  
The Road ◽  
Railway Infrastructure ◽  
Financial Groups

The development of the transport infrastructure of the region remains an important task, which today is solved by means of the mechanism of public-private partnership (PPP). At present, both a sufficient institutional environment and the regulatory support for the implementation of public-private partnership projects have already been created. Kherson region, having an average level of development of transport infrastructure, de facto occupies the near-border position. Therefore, the level of development of infrastructure of the region (in particular, road economy) is of significant strategic importance for the security of the State. The main tasks for the development of transport infrastructure of Kherson region and possible directions of implementation of infrastructure projects are defined. The study showed that only two projects that are not infrastructural are implemented on the basis of PPP in Kherson region. However, the concession of Kherson seaport has been launched – this project is pilot not only in the region, but also in Ukraine. Concluding a concession agreement in seaports is a complex and long-term procedure. Important in the agreement is the determination of the amount of concession payments and the distribution of risks between the project participants. Typically, concessionaires are large international companies (cargo owners or shipowners) or domestic industrial and financial groups that dictate the terms of the contract, so, accordingly, there may be a conflict of interest. This publication defines the essential conditions of this concession project. PPP projects in the road sphere are promising, which should solve a number of problems of the region. The airport «Kherson» is described as a concession object, the scheme of the PPP mechanism concerning it is proposed. It is determined that public-private partnership in the sphere of railway infrastructure is in the process of formation and determination of forms of cooperation.

scholarly journals Analyse des Geschäftsmodells. Verkehrsinfrastrukturgenossenschaft aus Sicht der Stakeholder

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melanie Beck
Keyword(s):  
Public Sector ◽  
Public Private Partnership ◽  
Transport Infrastructure ◽  
Added Value ◽  
Private Company ◽  
Private Partnership ◽  
The Public ◽  
Construction Companies ◽  
Highway Network ◽  
The One

In Deutschland werden zahlreiche Infrastrukturprojekte durch eine Zusammenarbeit der öffentlichen Hand mit einem privaten Unternehmen umgesetzt. Dies geschieht im Rahmen einer Öffentlich-Privaten-Partnerschaft kurz ÖPP bzw. PPP (Public Private Partnership). Auch im Bereich der Verkehrsinfrastruktur erfolgt die Umsetzung vieler Projekte als ÖPP. Privatunternehmen übernehmen den Ausbau, ggfs. Neubau, Erhalt und Betrieb eines vertraglich festgelegten Autobahnabschnittes, mit zumeist einer Vertragslaufzeit von 25-30 Jahren. Erfüllt das Unternehmen die zuvor definierten Leistungen, erhält es von der öffentlichen Hand ein Entgelt. Laut aktuellen Planungen des Bundes sollen ca. 1.280 km des deutschen Autobahnnetzes durch ÖPP-Projekte erneuert werden. Jedoch existiert eine kontroverse Diskussion dieser Projekte sowohl in der Theorie als auch in der Praxis. Zum einen sind, laut Bundesrechnungshof, solche Projekte teurer als eine konventionelle Umsetzung und zum anderen profitieren, gemäß Untersuchung der TU Braunschweig, hiervon besonders große Baukonzerne. Die mittelständischen, regionalen Bauunternehmer haben kaum Möglichkeiten sich bei ÖPP zu beteiligen. Ziel des Forschungsvorhabens war die Analyse einer Verkehrsinfrastrukturgenossenschaft, welche eine Alternative zu den bisherigen ÖPP-Projekten darstellt. Die Grundidee dieser Genossenschaft ist es, sowohl den Baumittelstand zu berücksichtigen, als auch eine regionale Wertschöpfung herbei zu führen. In Germany, numerous infrastructure projects are implemented through cooperation between the public sector and a private company. This is done within the framework of a public-private partnership (short: PPP). In the area of transportation infrastructure, too, many projects are implemented as PPPs. Private companies take over the responsibilities of expansion, new construction (if necessary), maintenance and operation of a contractually defined highway section, usually with a contract term of 25-30 years. If the company fulfills the previously defined services, it receives a payment from the public sector. According to current plans of the federal government, approximately 1,280 km of the German highway network are to be renewed through PPP projects. However, there is a controversial discussion of these projects both in theory and in practice. On the one hand, according to the Federal Audit Office, such projects are more expensive than conventional implementation. On the other hand, according to a study by the Technical University of Braunschweig, large contractors in particular benefit from this. Medium-sized, regional construction companies have hardly any opportunities to participate in PPPs. Goal of the research project was the analysis of a transport infrastructure cooperative, which shows an alternative to the existing PPP projects. The basic idea of this cooperative is the consideration of the midsize contractors sector and to create a regional added value.

PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP: CHARACTERISTICS AND DIFFERENCES FROM PUBLIC PROCUREMENТ

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Larysa Lazebnyk ◽  
◽  
Yevhenii Nuriakhmetov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Sewage Treatment ◽  
Public Private Partnership ◽  
The State ◽  
Economic Life ◽  
Transport Infrastructure ◽  
Practical Implementation ◽  
Value For Money ◽  
Private Prisons ◽  
Private Partnership ◽  
Telecommunications Infrastructure

Рublic-private interactions have become commonplace in the economic life of many countries. Governments, state-owned enterprises and organizations use various forms and mechanisms to attract private capital to fulfill the main responsibilities of the state - the provision of socially important public services related to the development and maintenance of transport infrastructure (roads, bridges, tunnels, parking lots), water supply, social housing, telecommunications infrastructure, sewage treatment plants, museums, schools, hospitals, and in some countries even private prisons. The state turns to such an instrument of contractual agreements with private partners as public- private partnership in order to bridge the gap between available resources and funds needed to finance projects in the above areas, diversify supply, ensure optimal value for money, allocate not only costs but and risks. Using the definition of public-private partnership, which is given by authoritative international organizations, contained in the Law of Ukraine "On Public- Private Partnership" and research, the article describes the key features of public-private partnership. These are the distribution of risks, the conflict of interests of partners, the problem of agency relations, longevity. The main attention is paid to identifying the specifics of PPP from the standpoint of differences from traditional procurement. This analysis distinguishes the requirements for these two types of contracts between public and private entities and identifies factors that may lead to wrong choices and thus discourages the desire to optimize value for money in the provision of socially necessary services. Awareness of the peculiarities of PPP will contribute to the success of its future implementation and practical implementation in Ukraine.

Public Private Partnership Operational Model – A Conceptual Study on Implementing Scientific-Evidence-Based Integrated Risk Management at Regional Level

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 667-677 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanling Lee ◽  
Kenji Watanabe ◽  
Wei-Sen Li ◽  
◽  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Science And Technology ◽  
Disaster Risk ◽  
Economic Security ◽  
Public Private Partnership ◽  
Regional Level ◽  
Economic Losses ◽  
Disaster Resilience ◽  
Private Partnership

The 2004 South-East Asia earthquake and tsunami as well as the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquakes and tsunamis caused the greatest economic losses and challenged the continuity of business operations across the continents. Thereafter, regions most at risk when the 2016 Kaohsiung earthquake shook an electronics hub in Southern Taiwan, where lies at the heart of Apple’s supply chain. The large-scale disasters demonstrate the fragility of supply chains and the importance of enhancing disaster resilience through innovative technology and keen collaboration on information sharing/dissemination, resources allocations and risks communication/awareness across borders. With review of the global and regional lessons learn from the large-scale disasters, the increasing threats from devastating earthquakes and extreme weather call for the actions to enhance economic security. Base on the practical experience of DRR project implementations in decades, APEC identifies several key factors to promote disaster resilience in business sectors while the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction (SFDRR) declared to promote the disaster risk governance and encourages innovation, science and technology DRR approaches on raising the risk awareness and level of preparedness. At regional level of disaster risk management, empowering the cross-cutting collaborations on science and technology as well as enabling the inter-disciplinary information intelligence platform for communications are keys to resilient society and human well-being. This paper aims to identify conceptual model for enhancing regional resilience and connectivity through public-private partnership. The country-level case studies and comprehensive regional reviews for promoting inclusive and disaster resilient development will be cover.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document