scholarly journals The Intersection of Traditional and Modern Terminology as a Barrier in Understanding the Administrative Process

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 292-300
Author(s):  
V. A. Zyuzin
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Administrative Process ◽  
Foreign Countries ◽  
Starting Point ◽  
Legal Foundations ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Court Proceedings ◽  
Administrative Jurisdiction ◽  
Administrative Proceedings

At present, in connection with the constitutional reform carried out in the Russian Federation, the process of reconciliation of the basic categories of administrative law with the Constitution is actively underway. In parallel, in the scientific community of specialists in administrative law and process, there has long been a request for the harmonization of views and concepts for the formation of modern administrative procedural legislation. Such a serious scientific task can be successfully solved only by relying on the letter and spirit of the country's fundamental law as the only indisputable starting point for doctrinal provisions. The catalyst for many years of discussion about the boundaries and essence of the administrative process was the adoption in 2015 of the Code of Administrative Proceedings of the Russian Federation. After the enactment of this code in scientific circulation, the categories of “judicial administrative law” and “judicial administrative process” are actively used, which brings the domestic doctrine closer to the theory of developed foreign countries. However, even in the absence of a law in Russia that defines the legal foundations of an extrajudicial administrative process, one should not forget that the majority of modern representatives of science recognize the existence of an extrajudicial administrative process in the Russian Federation. We are talking about the widest range of administrative cases - about the activities of administrative-public bodies to resolve administrative matters under their jurisdiction, both of a regulatory and protective nature, controversial and indisputable. In this situation, we believe that it is required to conduct a scientific analysis of the terminology used in Russia to study the essence of the administrative process. The article makes an attempt, taking into account foreign and domestic doctrine, to study numerous definitions for suitability for the formation of a uniform understanding of the administrative process in the Russian Federation. The work, in particular, explores the understanding of public administration and administrative justice, compares the content of the terms “administrative jurisdiction” and “administrative procedures” in Russia and in foreign countries. Based on the results of the analysis, it is concluded that the least controversy is caused by the use of the term “administrative proceedings” in relation to out-of-court proceedings and “administrative proceedings” to the judicial trial hearings.

scholarly journals Reflections About the Administrative Process in Modern Russia

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 277-291
Author(s):  
A. A. Grishkovets
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Administrative Process ◽  
Administrative Procedure ◽  
Administrative Procedures ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Administrative Courts ◽  
Administrative Jurisdiction ◽  
Administrative Proceedings ◽  
Administrative Justice

The article deals with the problem of understanding the administrative process in modern Russia. Discussion about its essence has not stopped in the science of administrative law for many years. There are two main points of view. The administrative process is understood in a narrow sense as a jurisdictional activity and in a broad sense as a set of administrative procedures, administrative jurisdiction and administrative justice. The opinion is expressed that the understanding of the administrative process should be based on the understanding of the subject of administrative law. After the adoption of the Code of Administrative Proceedings of the Russian Federation in our country, a real legal basis appeared for the creation of administrative justice, which resolves disputes between a citizen and the state. The legal nature of administrative justice and administrative jurisdiction is not the same. They belong to various subbranches of administrative law. The situation should be preserved when one part of cases of administrative offenses is considered by courts, and the other - by other bodies of administrative jurisdiction. The proposal to consider cases of administrative offenses in accordance with the norms of the Code of Administrative Proceedings is critically assessed. An attempt to create administrative courts in the Russian Federation is analyzed and evaluated. The experience of creating administrative courts in France and Germany is presented. The reasons why the administrative courts were never created are indicated. Administrative cases are considered by courts of general jurisdiction. An attempt to adopt the Administrative and Administrative Procedure Codes of the Russian Federation is analyzed. The Code of Administrative Proceedings of 2015, on the basis of which administrative cases are considered, is, in fact, the Administrative Procedure Code. The proposal to develop and adopt the Federal Law “On Administrative Procedures” is critically assessed. It is concluded that the administrative process is a judicial procedure for considering cases arising from public legal relations according to the norms of the Code of Administrative Proceedings of the Russian Federation, as well as the activities of bodies of administrative jurisdiction, including the court, to consider cases of administrative offenses in the manner established by the Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offenses.

scholarly journals Court proceedings for imposition of administrative sanctions

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 110-116
Author(s):  
L. Terekhova
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Current Trends ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Analysis And Synthesis ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Court Proceedings ◽  
The One ◽  
Administrative Jurisdiction ◽  
Administrative Proceedings ◽  
Administrative Sanctions

The subject. The paper deals with the procedural issues of imposition of administrative sanctions by the courts.The purpose of the paper is to identify how the form of proceedings impacts on the rights and obligations of administrative trial participants.Methodology. The author uses the methods of analysis and synthesis, as well as dialectic approach. The formal-legal interpretation of the Code of Administrative Offences, the Code of Administrative Proceedings, the Commercial Procedure Code of the Russian Federation and is also used.The main results and scope of their application. The rules of the Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation are "average" according to their nature, they are designed for application by a lot of authorities competent to impose administrative sanctions.The focus of the rules of the Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation is to regulate the procedure for imposition of administrative sanctions and to define the punishment for an administrative offense. Therefore, the civil procedural form is not applicable here and the rules of the Civil Procedure Code and Code of Administrative Proceedings of the Russian Federation shouldn’t be used."Procedural form" in cases of administrative offenses considered by arbitration courts is mainly represented by the rules of the Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation. The accused person can receive a little from actually judicial (civil) procedural form.The serious contradictions of the Code of Administrative Offences with the rules of the Commercial Procedure Code of the Russian Federation couldn’t be seen, on the one hand, but, on the other hand, the provisions of the Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation have a different focus. The results of research may be used as the basis of correction of Code of Administrative Offences, the Commercial Procedure Code of the Russian Federation and may also inspire new researches concerning procedural issues of imposition of administrative sanctions by the courts.Conclusions. Participants in simplified administrative proceedings fall into a double trap: they are initially deprived of guarantees of procedural form due to the predominance of the rules of the Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation and are again deprived of the "remains" of procedural form because of using the simplified proceedings. Empowering the courts with the authority of administrative jurisdiction does not correspond to the current trends in the development of legislation.

scholarly journals Judicial Protection of Individuals in an Administrative Procedure by Means of Administrative Proceedings

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 34-41
Author(s):  
Aleksandr I. Stakhov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Public Authorities ◽  
Administrative Process ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Administrative Procedure ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Constitutional Right ◽  
Administrative Proceedings ◽  
Judicial Protection

The article highlights and studies judicial protection of individuals and organizations (individuals) in the administrative process as a special way of implementing justice on the appeals of citizens and their associations for the protection of their rights, freedoms, and legitimate interests in the course of Executive (non-judicial) and judicial administrative processes from the perspective of an integrative understanding of the administrative process. Taking into account the direct effect of the norms of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, the legal basis for judicial protection of individuals in administrative proceedings consists of two components: 1) the constitutional basis for; 2) legal grounds. Conducted a comprehensive analysis of the legal norms that constitute the constitutional basis and a legislative basis for judicial protection of individuals in administrative process, in which: justified the constitutional right of individuals to protection in the administrative process through the administrative procedure; is General conclusion that the subject of this judicial protection are contested in courts decisions and actions (inaction) of administrativepublic bodies and officials; the author substantiates the allocation of administrative court cases on the protection of individuals in administrative proceedings, which are divided into separate categories depending on the nature of the legal consequences of disputed decisions, actions (inaction) of administrative and public authorities and officials, as well as the nature of the dispute being resolved. In accordance with art. 72 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation allocated administrative law and administrative procedural decisions and actions challenged in court, in administrative proceedings, is the typology that best reveals the current level of processualists administrative activities public administration, other administrative public authorities and administrative public officials operating in the Russian Federation, allows you to identify priority areas of optimization of administrative proceedings in cases of settlement of administrative law disputes.

scholarly journals Proceedings for the Resolution of Judicial and Non-Judicial Administrative Disputes as Part of the Administrative Process

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 350-358
Author(s):  
S. A. Poryvaev
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Research Paper ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Public Authorities ◽  
Administrative Process ◽  
Positive Elements ◽  
Modern Development ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Administrative Proceedings

Currently, the process of constitutionalization of administrative law is actively underway in the Russian Federation. It involves the differentiation of administrative and administrative-procedural legislation, as well as the formation of procedures of the administrative process implemented in judicial and non-judicial forms. This, in turn, requires a clear allocation of separate administrative-procedural proceedings, including proceedings for the resolution of administrative disputes. On this basis, the fact is noted that the modern development of administrative law and process should be based on constitutional norms, which implies a significant transformation of the relationship between public authorities and private individuals, turning the latter into a full-fledged subject of administrative legal relations, creating new functions of administrative legal regulation. The research paper analyzes the existing administrative-procedural legislation regulating both non-judicial and judicial procedures for resolving administrative disputes. The specifics of individual legislative acts in this area are studied. In particular, a comparison is made between the general and special procedures for resolving out-of-court administrative disputes. The research paper analyzes the legal regulation of such procedures, the features of individual methods of legislative regulation of the out-of-court procedure for resolving administrative disputes are noted. The article also compares administrative recovery and administrative-rehabilitation administrative disputes. Judicial resolution of administrative disputes has significant specifics due to the special place of the judiciary in a state governed by the rule of law. This is expressed in the special legal consequences of a court decision, as well as in the application of administrative legal principles for more effective protection of the rights and legitimate interests of participants in legal relations. Based on the results of the study, conclusions are drawn about the fact that within the framework of administrative procedure legislation, proceedings are formed to resolve administrative disputes both out of court and in court. It also notes the shortcomings and problems of its legal regulation, suggests ways to eliminate them, which can help improve the analyzed production. The consolidation of the procedures for resolving out-of-court administrative and legal disputes should be carried out in a single legislative act, and not within the framework of separate laws and subordinate legal acts. In addition, the resolution of judicial administrative and legal disputes should also be unified within the framework of the Code of Administrative Proceedings of the Russian Federation, however, taking into account the positive elements that are currently available in the Code of Arbitration Proceedings of the Russian Federation.

scholarly journals Procedure in the cases of administrative offenses within the system of administrative law

2019 ◽  
pp. 22-29
Author(s):  
Evgeniya Sergeevna Izyumova
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Scientific Article ◽  
Administrative Process ◽  
Common Part ◽  
Special Part ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Administrative Proceedings

The relevance of this scientific article is substantiated by the process of reform of the administrative procedural legislation of the Russian Federation. The goal of this work is to determine the place of procedure in the cases of administrative offenses within the system of administrative law. The author studies approaches towards the understanding of the system of administrative law, and explores the main perspectives on the definition of the administrative process, its structure and the place within for the procedure on cases of administrative offenses. The work also deals with the question of the correlation of administrative proceedings and procedure on cases of administrative offenses. A conclusion is made that in both the procedure on cases of administrative offenses is a part of administrative proceedings. A proposal is made on improving the administrative procedural legislation in order to ensure clarity in the question of correlation of “administrative proceedings” and “procedure in the cases of administrative offenses” by passing a codified legislation with highlighting separate chapters in the special part for judicial and non-judicial authorities with a unified common part.

From State Law to Administrative Law and administrative process (To the 85th anniversary of the Sector of Administrative Law and administrative process of the Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences)

2021 ◽  
pp. 77
Author(s):  
Margarita N. Kobzar-Frolova
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Scientific Research ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
The State ◽  
State Law ◽  
Administrative Process ◽  
Scientific Staff ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Government ◽  
Academy Of Sciences

In 1936, the Institute of State Law of the USSR Academy of Sciences underwent an internal reorganization, as a result of which three sectors were formed, one of which was the public law sector. Since that time, the current Sector of Administrative Law and administrative procedure has its history. In the 20–30s of the XX century, the science of administrative law developed poorly, scientists were subjected to political repression for their scientific beliefs. In the mid-30s, the idea of the death of Administrative Law was even replicated. The leading positions were occupied by the science of management. Meanwhile, the scientific staff of the sector continued to develop the science of Administrative Law. With the beginning of the Great Patriotic War, many of them went to the front. The country noted their exploits with state awards. S.S. Studenikin became the first scientist who defended his dissertation for the degree of PhD in Law in Administrative Law (1940). In the 50–60s, in the Sector work was actively carried out to train young specialists in the field of Administrative Law. The name of the Sector has repeatedly changed, but service to the state and science remained unchanged. In the 60s, new directions of scientific research were formed at the Institute, reflecting the issues of strengthening Soviet democracy, forms and methods of people's participation in the leadership of the state and society, etc. The result of the fruitful work of the staff of the Sector was the publication of a number of monographs on Administrative Law. The political and economic transformations of the 80–90s could not but be reflected in the works of the scientific staff of the Sector. In the late 90s - early 2000s, the direction of research in the Sector changed towards the administrative process and the problems of automated control systems. In 2018, the Sector of Administrative Law and administrative process was established. Currently, the scientific staff of the Sector carries out fundamental, exploratory and applied scientific research on the conceptual problems of Administrative Law, administrative process and Financial, Tax, Budget Law. Actively participates in the work on the reform of administrative and tort legislation, legislation regulating control and supervisory activities, are members of the expert subgroups of the Government of the Russian Federation on the development of the draft of the new Administrative Code of the Russian Federation. During its 85-year history, the Sector has given the country and science a lot of honored scientists and honored lawyers, outstanding scientists who have left significant fruits of their scientific research that will be relevant and in demand for a long time.

scholarly journals PROSPECTS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE COURT PROCEEDINGS IN RUSSIA (BASED ON MATERIALS OF THE INTERREGIONAL SCIENTIFIC AND PRACTICAL CONFERENCE)

2020 ◽  
pp. 100-109
Author(s):  
Олеся Витальевна Жукова ◽  
Наталья Олеговна Огаркова
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Administrative Procedure ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Court Proceedings ◽  
Administrative Proceedings ◽  
Practical Conference

В статье представлены основные тезисы выступлений участников межрегиональной научно-практической конференции, посвященной принятию Кодекса административного судопроизводства РФ. Авторами проведен сравнительный анализ практики рассмотрения Верховным Судом РФ административных дел с момента начала действия нового законодательства об административном судопроизводстве. The article presents the main theses of the participants of the interregional scientific and practical conference on the adoption of the Code of administrative procedure of the Russian Federation. The authors have conducted a comparative analysis of the practice of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation in considering administrative cases since the beginning of the new legislation on administrative proceedings.

THE INFLUENCE OF CODIFICATION OF LEGISLATION ON THE CHOICE OF FORMS OF COURT PROCEEDINGS: ADMINISTRATIVE OR CIVIL

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 225-236
Author(s):  
M.B. VELICHKO
Keyword(s):  
Civil Rights ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Correct Choice ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Legal Proceedings ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Court Proceedings ◽  
Administrative Proceedings

The problem of the correct choice of forms of legal proceedings in this article will be considered in a narrow aspect, through the influence of the codification of legislation, analysis of the nature of such rules of law as аrt. 11 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation on the procedure for judicial protection of civil rights, art. 12 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation on how to protect civil rights, art. 13 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation on the invalidation of acts of subjects of public authority. The relevance of the research topic is due to the practical tasks of correctly determining the type of legal proceedings, as well as determining the place and role of administrative proceedings as an independent element of legal regulation and a form of judicial activity, the need to increase its effectiveness in achieving the goals of protecting the rights, freedoms, and legitimate interests of citizens and organizations. The rationale for the existence of the problem in this aspect is that many procedural scientists assign the role of the “life form of material industries” to the procedural branches, as a result of which one of their criteria for differentiating civil and administrative proceedings is the branch affiliation of the method of protection chosen by the plaintiff. In the literature, there are judgments that cases considered in the order of administrative proceedings are clearly defined by law in the Special Part of the Code of Administrative Procedure of the Russian Federation and cannot be expanded and supplemented without introducing appropriate changes to the legislation.

scholarly journals A Review of the Book Selected Scientific Works on Administrative Law and Administrative Activities of Police by M.V. Kostennikov — Domodedovo, 2020. 1000 p.

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 85-87
Author(s):  
Vladimir M. Redkous ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Significant Contribution ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Scientific Heritage ◽  
Administrative Process ◽  
Famous Scientist ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Internal Affairs

The article presents a brief analysis of the scientific heritage and significant contribution to the development of the science of administrative law and administrative process of the honored employee of the internal affairs bodies of the Russian Federation, honorary officer of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, Doctor of Law, Professor, Police Colonel Mikhail Valerievich Kostennikov, summarized and stated in a concentrated form in his Selected Scientific Works on Administrative Law and Administrative Activities of the Police, published in 2020 in honor of the 55th anniversary of the famous scientist.

scholarly journals Public administration in Russia as a subject of administrative procedure

2022 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 55-77
Author(s):  
A. I. Stakhov ◽  
N. V. Landerson ◽  
D. G. Domrachev
Keyword(s):  
Public Administration ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Integrative Approach ◽  
Public Authorities ◽  
Administrative Process ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
The Public ◽  
Administrative Procedure ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Administrative Proceedings

The subject. Doctrinal approaches that reveal the place and role of public authorities, as well as organizations performing the functions of these authorities in the administrative process carried out in the Russian Federation, the principles and norms of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, administrative procedural legislation that form the legal basis of the administrative process in Russia.The purpose of the article is scientific substantiation of the integration of non-judicial bodies carrying out the administrative procedure into a special subsystem of public power, called public administration in the Russian Federation.The methodology. Formal logical and dialectical methods as well as private scientific methods such as method of interpretation of legal norms, method of comparative jurisprudence were used.The main results, scope of application. The article reveals the scientifically based content of the integrative approach to understanding the administrative process in contemporary Russia, taking into account the norms of the Russian Constitution and the analysis of existing doctrinal developments of administrative scientists. The article substantiates the structure of the administrative procedural legislation of the Russian Federation ant it’s constituent entities, which includes the judicial administrative process and the executive (non-judicial) administrative process implemented by the public administration (executive authorities, local self-government bodies, other administrative and public bodies). Administrativeindicating legal norms are distinguished, the analysis of which allows us to reveal the content, form, structure of the judicial administrative process and the executive (extra-judicial) administrative process, as well as to establish an integrative relationship between them with the help of such special categories as “judicial administrative case”, “extra-judicial administrative case”, “administrative proceedings”, “administrative proceedings”. A number of key proposals are put forward to systematize the judicial administrative process and the executive (extrajudicial) administrative process in Russia on the basis of developed scientific positions. The article reveals the question of a scientifically based theory for understanding the administrative and public functions of public administration, as well as the system and structure of public administration in modern Russia.Conclusions. The presented integrative approach to understanding the administrative process and its differentiated systematization for the judicial administrative process and the executive (non-judicial) administrative process are the only true way to develop the Russian model of administrative process. The question of the need to systematize the administrative and public functions implemented by the public administration is raised. It is proposed to develop and adopt a federal law “On Public Administration in the Russian Federation”, the authors substantiate the content of the structure of this law.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document