scholarly journals Procedure in the cases of administrative offenses within the system of administrative law

2019 ◽  
pp. 22-29
Author(s):  
Evgeniya Sergeevna Izyumova
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Scientific Article ◽  
Administrative Process ◽  
Common Part ◽  
Special Part ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Administrative Proceedings

The relevance of this scientific article is substantiated by the process of reform of the administrative procedural legislation of the Russian Federation. The goal of this work is to determine the place of procedure in the cases of administrative offenses within the system of administrative law. The author studies approaches towards the understanding of the system of administrative law, and explores the main perspectives on the definition of the administrative process, its structure and the place within for the procedure on cases of administrative offenses. The work also deals with the question of the correlation of administrative proceedings and procedure on cases of administrative offenses. A conclusion is made that in both the procedure on cases of administrative offenses is a part of administrative proceedings. A proposal is made on improving the administrative procedural legislation in order to ensure clarity in the question of correlation of “administrative proceedings” and “procedure in the cases of administrative offenses” by passing a codified legislation with highlighting separate chapters in the special part for judicial and non-judicial authorities with a unified common part.

scholarly journals Judicial Protection of Individuals in an Administrative Procedure by Means of Administrative Proceedings

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 34-41
Author(s):  
Aleksandr I. Stakhov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Public Authorities ◽  
Administrative Process ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Administrative Procedure ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Constitutional Right ◽  
Administrative Proceedings ◽  
Judicial Protection

The article highlights and studies judicial protection of individuals and organizations (individuals) in the administrative process as a special way of implementing justice on the appeals of citizens and their associations for the protection of their rights, freedoms, and legitimate interests in the course of Executive (non-judicial) and judicial administrative processes from the perspective of an integrative understanding of the administrative process. Taking into account the direct effect of the norms of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, the legal basis for judicial protection of individuals in administrative proceedings consists of two components: 1) the constitutional basis for; 2) legal grounds. Conducted a comprehensive analysis of the legal norms that constitute the constitutional basis and a legislative basis for judicial protection of individuals in administrative process, in which: justified the constitutional right of individuals to protection in the administrative process through the administrative procedure; is General conclusion that the subject of this judicial protection are contested in courts decisions and actions (inaction) of administrativepublic bodies and officials; the author substantiates the allocation of administrative court cases on the protection of individuals in administrative proceedings, which are divided into separate categories depending on the nature of the legal consequences of disputed decisions, actions (inaction) of administrative and public authorities and officials, as well as the nature of the dispute being resolved. In accordance with art. 72 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation allocated administrative law and administrative procedural decisions and actions challenged in court, in administrative proceedings, is the typology that best reveals the current level of processualists administrative activities public administration, other administrative public authorities and administrative public officials operating in the Russian Federation, allows you to identify priority areas of optimization of administrative proceedings in cases of settlement of administrative law disputes.

scholarly journals Proceedings for the Resolution of Judicial and Non-Judicial Administrative Disputes as Part of the Administrative Process

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 350-358
Author(s):  
S. A. Poryvaev
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Research Paper ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Public Authorities ◽  
Administrative Process ◽  
Positive Elements ◽  
Modern Development ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Administrative Proceedings

Currently, the process of constitutionalization of administrative law is actively underway in the Russian Federation. It involves the differentiation of administrative and administrative-procedural legislation, as well as the formation of procedures of the administrative process implemented in judicial and non-judicial forms. This, in turn, requires a clear allocation of separate administrative-procedural proceedings, including proceedings for the resolution of administrative disputes. On this basis, the fact is noted that the modern development of administrative law and process should be based on constitutional norms, which implies a significant transformation of the relationship between public authorities and private individuals, turning the latter into a full-fledged subject of administrative legal relations, creating new functions of administrative legal regulation. The research paper analyzes the existing administrative-procedural legislation regulating both non-judicial and judicial procedures for resolving administrative disputes. The specifics of individual legislative acts in this area are studied. In particular, a comparison is made between the general and special procedures for resolving out-of-court administrative disputes. The research paper analyzes the legal regulation of such procedures, the features of individual methods of legislative regulation of the out-of-court procedure for resolving administrative disputes are noted. The article also compares administrative recovery and administrative-rehabilitation administrative disputes. Judicial resolution of administrative disputes has significant specifics due to the special place of the judiciary in a state governed by the rule of law. This is expressed in the special legal consequences of a court decision, as well as in the application of administrative legal principles for more effective protection of the rights and legitimate interests of participants in legal relations. Based on the results of the study, conclusions are drawn about the fact that within the framework of administrative procedure legislation, proceedings are formed to resolve administrative disputes both out of court and in court. It also notes the shortcomings and problems of its legal regulation, suggests ways to eliminate them, which can help improve the analyzed production. The consolidation of the procedures for resolving out-of-court administrative and legal disputes should be carried out in a single legislative act, and not within the framework of separate laws and subordinate legal acts. In addition, the resolution of judicial administrative and legal disputes should also be unified within the framework of the Code of Administrative Proceedings of the Russian Federation, however, taking into account the positive elements that are currently available in the Code of Arbitration Proceedings of the Russian Federation.

scholarly journals Reflections About the Administrative Process in Modern Russia

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 277-291
Author(s):  
A. A. Grishkovets
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Administrative Process ◽  
Administrative Procedure ◽  
Administrative Procedures ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Administrative Courts ◽  
Administrative Jurisdiction ◽  
Administrative Proceedings ◽  
Administrative Justice

The article deals with the problem of understanding the administrative process in modern Russia. Discussion about its essence has not stopped in the science of administrative law for many years. There are two main points of view. The administrative process is understood in a narrow sense as a jurisdictional activity and in a broad sense as a set of administrative procedures, administrative jurisdiction and administrative justice. The opinion is expressed that the understanding of the administrative process should be based on the understanding of the subject of administrative law. After the adoption of the Code of Administrative Proceedings of the Russian Federation in our country, a real legal basis appeared for the creation of administrative justice, which resolves disputes between a citizen and the state. The legal nature of administrative justice and administrative jurisdiction is not the same. They belong to various subbranches of administrative law. The situation should be preserved when one part of cases of administrative offenses is considered by courts, and the other - by other bodies of administrative jurisdiction. The proposal to consider cases of administrative offenses in accordance with the norms of the Code of Administrative Proceedings is critically assessed. An attempt to create administrative courts in the Russian Federation is analyzed and evaluated. The experience of creating administrative courts in France and Germany is presented. The reasons why the administrative courts were never created are indicated. Administrative cases are considered by courts of general jurisdiction. An attempt to adopt the Administrative and Administrative Procedure Codes of the Russian Federation is analyzed. The Code of Administrative Proceedings of 2015, on the basis of which administrative cases are considered, is, in fact, the Administrative Procedure Code. The proposal to develop and adopt the Federal Law “On Administrative Procedures” is critically assessed. It is concluded that the administrative process is a judicial procedure for considering cases arising from public legal relations according to the norms of the Code of Administrative Proceedings of the Russian Federation, as well as the activities of bodies of administrative jurisdiction, including the court, to consider cases of administrative offenses in the manner established by the Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offenses.

scholarly journals The Intersection of Traditional and Modern Terminology as a Barrier in Understanding the Administrative Process

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 292-300
Author(s):  
V. A. Zyuzin
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Administrative Process ◽  
Foreign Countries ◽  
Starting Point ◽  
Legal Foundations ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Court Proceedings ◽  
Administrative Jurisdiction ◽  
Administrative Proceedings

At present, in connection with the constitutional reform carried out in the Russian Federation, the process of reconciliation of the basic categories of administrative law with the Constitution is actively underway. In parallel, in the scientific community of specialists in administrative law and process, there has long been a request for the harmonization of views and concepts for the formation of modern administrative procedural legislation. Such a serious scientific task can be successfully solved only by relying on the letter and spirit of the country's fundamental law as the only indisputable starting point for doctrinal provisions. The catalyst for many years of discussion about the boundaries and essence of the administrative process was the adoption in 2015 of the Code of Administrative Proceedings of the Russian Federation. After the enactment of this code in scientific circulation, the categories of “judicial administrative law” and “judicial administrative process” are actively used, which brings the domestic doctrine closer to the theory of developed foreign countries. However, even in the absence of a law in Russia that defines the legal foundations of an extrajudicial administrative process, one should not forget that the majority of modern representatives of science recognize the existence of an extrajudicial administrative process in the Russian Federation. We are talking about the widest range of administrative cases - about the activities of administrative-public bodies to resolve administrative matters under their jurisdiction, both of a regulatory and protective nature, controversial and indisputable. In this situation, we believe that it is required to conduct a scientific analysis of the terminology used in Russia to study the essence of the administrative process. The article makes an attempt, taking into account foreign and domestic doctrine, to study numerous definitions for suitability for the formation of a uniform understanding of the administrative process in the Russian Federation. The work, in particular, explores the understanding of public administration and administrative justice, compares the content of the terms “administrative jurisdiction” and “administrative procedures” in Russia and in foreign countries. Based on the results of the analysis, it is concluded that the least controversy is caused by the use of the term “administrative proceedings” in relation to out-of-court proceedings and “administrative proceedings” to the judicial trial hearings.

CODIFICATION PROBLEMS OF NECESSARY DEFENSE AFFECTING ITS IMPLEMENTATION

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 155-163
Author(s):  
PETRUSHENKOV ALEXANDR ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Educational Institutions ◽  
Scientific Article ◽  
Teaching Staff ◽  
Self Defense ◽  
Special Part ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Legislative Activities

Objectives. The goal of scholarly research is to develop proposals for amendments in criminal law General and Special part of Criminal code of the Russian Federation governing self-defense. The scientific article identifies legislative gaps and contradictions that hinder the effective implementation of the necessary defense and require prompt solutions. Methods. The article analyzes such concepts as “self-defense”, “public assault”, “excess of limits of necessary defense”, “violation of the conditions of lawfulness of necessary defense”, “surprise assault”, “rights defending or other persons, interests of the state”. The use of logical and comparative legal methods allowed us to develop proposals for making changes to the criminal law norms that establish the necessary defense. Conclusions. The article shows the conflicts and gaps legislative recognition of self-defense and, in this regard, the complexity of its implementation in the articles of the Special part of the Criminal code of the Russian Federation and practical application. Changes are proposed to the criminal law norms regulating the necessary defense, both in the General and in the Special part of the Criminal code of the Russian Federation. Sense. The content of the scientific article can be used by the teaching staff of higher educational institutions when teaching the course “Criminal law”. The results of the work can be useful to persons who carry out legislative activities in the field of criminal law. The leitmotif of the article can be used in the preparation of dissertation research.

scholarly journals Leniency programmesfor cartel: mature reforms

2018 ◽  
pp. 24-33
Author(s):  
K. N. Aleshin ◽  
S. V. Maksimov
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Main Factors ◽  
The Law ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
The Right

The problems of interpretation of criminal law and administrative law institutes of active repentance (“leniency programmes”) in relation to cartels are considered.The definition of the effectiveness of the institution of active repentance is given as the ability of this institution to achieve the goals stipulated by law (in the aggregate or in a particular combination): 1) termination of the committed offense (crime) (“surrender”),2) assistance in investigating the relevant administrative offense (crime), 3) compensation for the harm caused by his offense (crime), 4) refusal to commit such offenses (crimes) in the future.The condition of the quadunity of these goals is investigated. It is noted that among the main factors reducing the effectiveness of administrative law and criminal law institutions of active repentance (“leniency programmes”) in relation to a cartel is the legal inconsistency of these institutions.Proposals are being made to amend par. 3 of the Notes to Art. 178 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and Note 1 to Art. 14.32 of the Code of the Russian Federation Code of Administrative Offenses iin order to bring together the relevant institutions of active repentance.The necessity of legislative consolidation of general procedural rules for the implementation of the person who participated in the conclusion of the cartel, the law granted him the right to active repentance is substantiated.

scholarly journals Public danger as a sign of administrative offences

2019 ◽  
pp. 30-36
Author(s):  
Natal'ya Anatol'evna Akhtanina
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Public Discourse ◽  
Statistical Data ◽  
Scientific Literature ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Clear Definition ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Definition Of

The subject of this research is the earlier and currently active norms of administrative legislation regulating the concept of legal offense as well as scientific literature devoted to this topic and statistical data on administrative offenses from the Russian case law. The author analyzes the essence of the signs of administrative offenses. The importance of this topic is substantiated the fact that the concept of legal offense is one of the main categories of the administrative law of the Russian Federation. Analysis is conducted on the various approaches of scholars in administrative law towards definition of this concept. The novelty of this research is defined by the importance of clear definition of the concept of administrative offense due to introduction of the New Code on Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation into public discourse. Considering the sign of public danger of an administrative offense, the author proposes formulating Article 2.1 of the Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offenses in the following way: “Administrative offense is a committed punishable action or inaction of a private or legal entity, posing public danger, and carries administrative liability established by this Code or a law of a subject of the Russian Federation”.

From State Law to Administrative Law and administrative process (To the 85th anniversary of the Sector of Administrative Law and administrative process of the Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences)

2021 ◽  
pp. 77
Author(s):  
Margarita N. Kobzar-Frolova
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Scientific Research ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
The State ◽  
State Law ◽  
Administrative Process ◽  
Scientific Staff ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Government ◽  
Academy Of Sciences

In 1936, the Institute of State Law of the USSR Academy of Sciences underwent an internal reorganization, as a result of which three sectors were formed, one of which was the public law sector. Since that time, the current Sector of Administrative Law and administrative procedure has its history. In the 20–30s of the XX century, the science of administrative law developed poorly, scientists were subjected to political repression for their scientific beliefs. In the mid-30s, the idea of the death of Administrative Law was even replicated. The leading positions were occupied by the science of management. Meanwhile, the scientific staff of the sector continued to develop the science of Administrative Law. With the beginning of the Great Patriotic War, many of them went to the front. The country noted their exploits with state awards. S.S. Studenikin became the first scientist who defended his dissertation for the degree of PhD in Law in Administrative Law (1940). In the 50–60s, in the Sector work was actively carried out to train young specialists in the field of Administrative Law. The name of the Sector has repeatedly changed, but service to the state and science remained unchanged. In the 60s, new directions of scientific research were formed at the Institute, reflecting the issues of strengthening Soviet democracy, forms and methods of people's participation in the leadership of the state and society, etc. The result of the fruitful work of the staff of the Sector was the publication of a number of monographs on Administrative Law. The political and economic transformations of the 80–90s could not but be reflected in the works of the scientific staff of the Sector. In the late 90s - early 2000s, the direction of research in the Sector changed towards the administrative process and the problems of automated control systems. In 2018, the Sector of Administrative Law and administrative process was established. Currently, the scientific staff of the Sector carries out fundamental, exploratory and applied scientific research on the conceptual problems of Administrative Law, administrative process and Financial, Tax, Budget Law. Actively participates in the work on the reform of administrative and tort legislation, legislation regulating control and supervisory activities, are members of the expert subgroups of the Government of the Russian Federation on the development of the draft of the new Administrative Code of the Russian Federation. During its 85-year history, the Sector has given the country and science a lot of honored scientists and honored lawyers, outstanding scientists who have left significant fruits of their scientific research that will be relevant and in demand for a long time.

On the issue of understanding administrative proceedings

2020 ◽  
pp. 135-140
Author(s):  
Valentin Nazarov ◽  
Tat’yana Akimova
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Practical Implementation ◽  
Public Interests ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Legal Proceedings ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Judicial Procedure ◽  
Administrative Proceedings

We point out some trends observed in the development of Russian justice. We note the features of the historical development of the state that have influenced the legislative consolidation of administrative legal proceedings. Exploring the main approaches to the definition of administrative legal proceedings, we conditionally combine them into three large groups and characterize each of them. The various positions of legal scholars on the legal nature of administrative legal proceedings are illustrated. It is indicated that with the adoption of the Code of Administrative Judicial Procedure, there was a separation of administrative proceedings from other types, the result of which is the creation of administrative and legal means to ensure and protect public interests as well as the practical implementation of constitutional legal norms on administrative legal proceedings. We specify that the independent nature of administrative legal proceedings is determined by the specifics of this process. The features characteristic for this type of legal proceedings are analyzed. We express an opinion on the need for a more clear and unambiguous formulation of the subject of regulation of the Code of Administrative Judicial Procedure of the Russian Federation and its normative consolidation. Despite the fact that more than four years have passed since the adoption of the Code, the controversy surrounding the subject of regulation of the Code of Administrative Judicial Procedure of the Russian Federation continues to this day. In addition, we reveal the most important results of the adoption of the Code of Administrative Judicial Procedure.

scholarly journals Problems of Determining the Guilt of Legal Entities in Administrative Law

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 413-417
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Legal Entity ◽  
Central Focus ◽  
Legal Science ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Legal Entities

The problem of determining the guilt of a legal entity for an administrative offense is currently very relevant in legal science. This problem is the central focus of this work. However, in order to fully disclose the problem of determining the guilt of legal entities, the article highlights the problems that are associated with the concept of a legal entity and its essence. The presented paper lists the approaches to determining the essence of a legal entity. The concept of a legal entity in accordance with the Civil Code of the Russian Federation is given. The article analyzes the concept of a legal entity under civil law with the concept of an organization, which is defined in the science of sociology. This article gives the concept of a collective subject. And also, the correlation of the concept of a collective subject and the concept of a legal entity is considered. Further, the article identifies three main approaches to determining the guilt of legal entities in administrative law: subjective, objective and complex, and also expresses the opinion of the authors of the article about the approaches under consideration. The paper presents the author’s conclusions and possible solutions to problems related to the concept of a legal entity and the definition of the legal entity’s guilt in administrative law for administrative offenses.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document