Peasant revolts against the peasant revolution

2020 ◽  
pp. 155-167
Author(s):  
Viktor F. Isaychikov
Keyword(s):  
Working Class ◽  
20Th Century ◽  
October Revolution ◽  
Socialist Revolution ◽  
Great October Socialist Revolution ◽  
Class Composition ◽  
Petty Bourgeoisie ◽  
Peasant Revolution ◽  
Social Causes ◽  
Small Working

Тhe peasant revolts, wars, and revolutions known in history had both revolutionary and reactionary sides. A particularly complex interweaving was observed in Russia (USSR) in the first third of the 20th century due to the maximum number of economic structures and classes in the country and four revolutions. The main reason for the struggle of the peasant classes, including re-volts, was poverty, caused by both agrarian overpopulation and social causes, among which the main one before the October revolution was the remnants of feudalism. All four revolutions in Russia were largely peasant revolutions, but they differed in class composition and class leader-ship. As a result of the Great October socialist revolution, a joint dictatorship of the working class and the peasantry (the petty bourgeoisie) was established in the country, not predicted by K. Marx, but foreseen by V.I. Lenin. However, the small working class after V.I. Lenin’s death could not hold on to power, and as a result of the “Stalinist” counter-revolution, an internally unstable dictatorship of the petty bourgeoisie (peasantry) was established in the country. We reveal the class processes in the peasantry that led to revolts and revolutions.

scholarly journals Ways and achievements of Soviet surgery for 20 years October revolution

1938 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
N. V. Sokolov
Keyword(s):  
October Revolution ◽  
Economic Conditions ◽  
Socialist Revolution ◽  
Great October Socialist Revolution ◽  
Tremendous Impact

The Great October Socialist Revolution, which had a tremendous impact on all aspects of life in our country, radically changed social and economic conditions, created conditions for the powerful growth of the country's industrialization, the collectivization of agriculture, could not but influence the thought and practice of Soviet surgeons.

Mapping Logistical Capitalism

2021 ◽  
pp. 026327642199042
Author(s):  
Eugene Brennan
Keyword(s):  
Critical Theory ◽  
20Th Century ◽  
Social Life ◽  
Review Article ◽  
Global Capitalism ◽  
Racial Capitalism ◽  
The Past ◽  
Black Lives Matter ◽  
Class Composition

This review article engages with a rich field of scholarship on logistics that has gathered momentum over the past decade, focusing on two new publications by Laleh Khalili and Martín Arboleda. It contextualizes how and why logistics is bound up with the militarization of contemporary political and social life. I argue that the later 20th century rise of logistics can be better understood as both a response to and symptom of capitalist crisis and I situate this scholarship on war and logistics in relationship to Giovanni Arrighi’s account of crisis and ‘unravelling hegemony’. I also show how logistics provides essential critical and visual resources that contribute to efforts to map global capitalism and to debates on totality and class composition in contemporary critical theory. Finally, contemporary events such as the ongoing Coronavirus crisis and the reemergence of Black Lives Matter are considered in light of this analysis with reference to the centrality of logistics to racial capitalism.

scholarly journals NO VERTIGINOSO PICADEIRO SOVIÉTICO [Marcos Francisco Nery Ferreira]

REPERTÓRIO ◽  
2010 ◽  
pp. 17
Author(s):  
Teatro & Dança Repertório
Keyword(s):  
20Th Century ◽  
Socialist Revolution ◽  
New Man ◽  
Time Period ◽  
Symbiotic Relation ◽  
The Ideal

<div>O desejo por uma arte nova e engajada na Revolução Socialista conduz a importantes reformas artísticas na Rússia no início do século XX. As idéias revolucionárias estimularam as transformações do espetáculo e das práticas artísticas não somente através de sua politização, como também pela busca de uma poética inovadora em conformidade com as aspirações da época. Desta maneira, as atividades circenses e teatrais participavam ativamente desta busca desenfreada, porém numa relação de confl uência e hibridismo. O almejar de uma teatralização do teatro e o ideal de “homem novo” difundido pela vanguarda estão em consonância com as mudanças relativas ao picadeiro. É neste contexto que diversos artistas vão se apropriar das atividades do circo, numa relação de simbiose entre o palco e a pista. A este respeito, Vladimir Maiakóvski e Vsévolod Meyerhold são fi guras significativas.</div><div><br /></div><div><div>The desire for a new art engaged to The Socialist Revolution leads to important artistic reforms in Russia at the beginning of the 20th century. The revolutionary ideas had stimulated transformation in spectacles and artistic practices not only through politicization, but also through the pursuit of innovative poetics, in compliance with the aspirations of the time period. As a result, circus and theatrical activities had actively taken part in this unstoppable pursuit, on a hybrid and confluent relation. The seeking fortheatricalizing theater itself and the ideal "new man", spread by Russian Avantgarde, are balanced with ring related changes. Nevertheless, performers approach circus activities, in a symbiotic relation among stage and arena. Referring to this, Vladimir Maiakóvski and Vsévolod Meyerhold are significant characters.</div></div>

scholarly journals Cenas da precariedade de ontem e de hoje | Scenes of the precariousness of yesterday and today

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 78-92
Author(s):  
José Edilson Amorim
Keyword(s):  
Working Class ◽  
Everyday Life ◽  
20Th Century ◽  
Rio De Janeiro ◽  
The Third ◽  
The Everyday ◽  
The World ◽  
The Face ◽  
The Media ◽  
Media Politics

ResumoA partir de uma crônica de Bráulio Tavares, este artigo reflete sobre cenas da precariedade de ontem e de hoje. A primeira cena está em Lima Barreto, em Recordações do escrivão Isaías Caminha, ao referir a Revolta da Vacina no Rio de Janeiro do século XX, comparada às manifestações de 2013 e 2014 no país; a segunda é a espetacularização da mídia sobre as manifestações de rua em 2013 e 2014, e sobre o processo de impedimento do mandato presidencial de Dilma Rousseff em 2015; a terceira é uma cena da vida cotidiana de uma moça de Brasília em outubro de 2014. As três situações revelam o mundo da classe trabalhadora e seu desamparo em meio ao espetáculo midiático.Palavras-chave: Trabalho. Mídia. Política. Espetáculo. AbstractFrom a chronicle by Bráulio Tavares, this paper reflects about scenes of the precariousness of yesterday and today. The first scene is in Lima Barreto’s novel Recordações do escrivão Isaías Caminha (Memories of the scrivener Isaías Caminha), when referring to the Vaccine Revolt in the Rio de Janeiro of the 20th century, compared to the manifestations of 2013 and 2014 in Brazil; the second is about the media spectacularization of the street manifestations between 2013 e 2014 in Brazil, and also on Dilma Rousseff's impeachment process in 2015; the third one is from the everyday life of a girl from Brasília in October of 2014. All those three situations reveal the world of the working class and its helplessness in the face of the media spectacularization.Keywords: Work. Media. Politics. Spectacle.

Anarchists as individuals: a micro-structural analysis

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dana M. Williams
Keyword(s):  
Structural Analysis ◽  
Cultural Identity ◽  
Working Class ◽  
Union Membership ◽  
Economic Issues ◽  
Class Composition ◽  
Micro Level ◽  
Class Status ◽  
Survey Responses ◽  
Movement Participation

The goal of this chapter is to explore the micro-level characteristics of anarchists. How do anarchists today identify socially and politically? What is the class composition of anarchist movements? In recent decades, some observers have claimed that anarchist movements have changed to focus less on economic issues and are more divorced from the working class. Through the analysis of survey responses, this chapter demonstrates that the union membership of anarchists is related to subjective working-class status, age, residence, economic anarchist ideology, anarchist movement participation, and activist identity. While not conclusive or uncomplicated, these findings call into question the claims that all modern movements (including anarchism) are postmaterialist, and emphasize collective cultural identity to the neglect of economic identity and class.

Being Soviet, Muslim, Modernist, and Fundamentalist in 1950s Central Asia

2019 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
pp. 108-165
Author(s):  
Paolo Sartori ◽  
Bakhtiyar Babajanov
Keyword(s):  
Central Asia ◽  
20Th Century ◽  
October Revolution ◽  
Early 20Th Century ◽  
Soviet Rule ◽  
Present Essay ◽  
Intellectual Traditions ◽  
Transformative Process ◽  
Soviet Central Asia ◽  
Muslim Scholars

AbstractHow far, if at all, did the intellectual legacy of early 20th-century Muslim reformism inform the transformative process which Islam underwent in Soviet Central Asia, especially after WWII? Little has been done so far to analyze the output of Muslim scholars (ʿulamāʾ) operating under Soviet rule from the perspective of earlier Islamic intellectual traditions. The present essay addresses this problem and sheds light on manifestations of continuity among Islamic intellectual practices—mostly puritanical—from the period immediately before the October Revolution to the 1950s. Such a continuity, we argue, profoundly informed the activity of the Spiritual Administration of the Muslims of Central Asia and Kazakhstan (SADUM) established in Tashkent in 1943 and, more specifically, the latter’s attack against manifestations of religiosity deemed “popular,” which were connected to the cult of saints. Thus, this essay posits that the juristic output of Soviet ʻulamā’ in Central Asia originates from and further develops an Islamic reformist thinking, which manifested itself in the region in the late 19th- and early 20th-century. By establishing such an intellectual genealogy, we seek in this article to revise a historiographical narrative which has hitherto tended to decouple scripturalist sensibilities from Islamic reformism and modernism.

From Revolution to Modernising Counter-Revolution in Russia, 1917–28

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-139
Author(s):  
David Camfield
Keyword(s):  
Civil War ◽  
Working Class ◽  
Socialist Revolution ◽  
Ruling Class ◽  
Social Crisis ◽  
Historical Materialist ◽  
Key Issues ◽  
Party State

Abstract This article presents a historical-materialist approach to key issues of revolution and counter-revolution and uses it to analyse what happened in Russia between 1917 and the late 1920s. What took place in 1917 was indeed a socialist revolution. However, by the end of 1918 working-class rule had been replaced with the rule of a working-class leadership layer that was improvising a fragile surplus-extracting state of proletarian origin. The eventual transformation of that layer into a new ruling class represented the triumph of a modernising counter-revolution. The decisive determinants of these developments were material pressures acting, first, on a working class plunged into catastrophic social crisis and war and then, after the Civil War, on the party-state leadership layer that sought to maintain its state against both European capitalist societies and the classes from which it had to extract surpluses. However, aspects of Bolshevik ideology also played a role.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document