scholarly journals Finding Support & Significance at School- Program Evaluation of a Chronic Absenteeism Reduction Initiative

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather Bundshuh ◽  
Matthew Ohlson ◽  
Anne Swanson
2014 ◽  
Vol 58 (3) ◽  
pp. 262-277
Author(s):  
Jeanne Maree Allen ◽  
Julie Rimes

This article reports on ways in which one Australian independent school seeks to develop and sustain best practice and academic integrity in its programs through a system of ongoing program evaluation, involving a systematic, cyclical appraisal of the school’s suite of six faculties. A number of different evaluation methods have been and continue to be used, each developed to best suit the particular program under evaluation. In order to gain an understanding of the effectiveness of this process, we conducted a study into participants’ perceptions of the strengths and weaknesses of the four program evaluations undertaken between 2009 and 2011. Drawing on documentary analysis of the evaluation reports and analysis of questionnaire data from the study participants, a number of findings were generated. These findings are provided and discussed, together with suggestions about ways in which the conceptualisation and conduct of school program evaluations might be enhanced.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 310-326
Author(s):  
Umi Sumiati As ◽  
I Made Astra ◽  
Rusmono

This evaluation study was conducted aimed to find out how effective the Adiwiyata program was in habituating Kebon BESAR SDN 1 students in Tangerang City. In this study is a program evaluation with a qualitative approach using the CIPP model developed by Stufflebeam which includes 4 (four) components, namely: 1) context (Countek), 2) Input (Input), 3) Process (Process), 4) Results (Product). Data retrieval is done by observation, interviews, documentation studies, and questionnaires. The Adiwiyata school program is evaluated as follows: 1) UKS, 2) Thursday without plastic, 3) Bathroom cleanliness, 4) Learning innovations, 5) Saturday lunch, 6) Biopori, 7) Swimming, 8) Plant nurseries, 9) Parks . Evaluation results have shown that habituation effectiveness reaches 84, 45% results with this indicating that the Adiwiyata school program has a very good contribution to the habituation of Kebon Besar 1 Elementary School students in Tangerang City. The results of this study imply that the school adiwiyata program needs to be implemented as part of how to habituate students. Abstrak Penelitian evaluasi ini dilakukan bertujuan untuk mengetahui seberapa efektif program Adiwiyata dalam pembiasaan peserta didik SDN Kebon BESAR 1 Kota Tangerang. Dalam penelitian ini merupakan evaluasi program dengan pendekatan kualitatif dengan menggunakan model CIPP yang dikembangkan oleh Stufflebeam yang mencakup 4 (empat) komponen yaitu: 1) kontek (Countek), 2) Masukan(Input), 3) Proses (Process), 4) Hasil (Product). Pengambilan data yang dilakukan dengan teknik observasi, wawancara, studi dokumentasi, dan angket. Program Adiwiyata sekolah yang dievaluasi sebagai berikut: 1) UKS, 2) kamis tanpa plastik, 3) Kebersihan kamar mandi, 4) Inovasi pembelajaran, 5) Sabtu bersi, 6) Biopori, 7) Kolam, 8) Pembibitan tanaman, 9) Taman. Hasil evaluasi telah menunjukan bahwa efektifitas pembiasaan mencapai hasil 84, 45 % dengan ini menunjukan bahwa program Adiwiyata sekolah memiliki kontribusi yang sangat baik terhadap pembiasaan peserta didik SDN Kebon Besar 1 Kota Tangerang. Hasil penelitian ini memberikan implikasi bahwa program adiwiyata sekolah perlu dilaksanakan sebagai bagian dari cara pembiasaan peserta didik. Kata kunci : Program Adiwiyata, Evaluasi Program, Pembiasaan


Author(s):  
Kari Morris Carr ◽  
Jill Bradley-Levine

In this article, the authors examine researcher collaboration with stakeholders in the context of a translational research approach used to evaluate an elementary school program. The authors share their experiences as evaluators of this particular program to demonstrate how collaboration with stakeholders evolved when a translational research approach was applied to program evaluation. Beginning with a review of literature regarding stakeholder participation in evaluation and other qualitative research, the article reflects on a method for conceptualizing participant involvement and collaboration within the translational framework. The relationship between researchers and stakeholders is articulated according to this method. We interpose these descriptions with their alignment to Petronio’s (2002, 2007) five types of practical validity for translational research. The paper ends with a consideration of what was learned throughout the evaluation process, including both successes and challenges, by means of the translational model.


1986 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 309-315
Author(s):  
Kit C. Wood ◽  
Sarah E. Peterson ◽  
James S. DeGracie ◽  
James K. Zaharis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allen Rubin
Keyword(s):  

2002 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 229-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kurt A. Heller ◽  
Ralph Reimann

Summary In this paper, conceptual and methodological problems of school program evaluation are discussed. The data were collected in conjunction with a 10 year cross-sectional/longitudinal investigation with partial inclusion of control groups. The experiences and conclusions resulting from this long-term study are revealing not only from the vantage point of the scientific evaluation of new scholastic models, but are also valuable for program evaluation studies in general, particularly in the field of gifted education.


2002 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 214-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heinz Neber ◽  
Kurt A. Heller

Summary The German Pupils Academy (Deutsche Schüler-Akademie) is a summer-school program for highly gifted secondary-school students. Three types of program evaluation were conducted. Input evaluation confirmed the participants as intellectually highly gifted students who are intrinsically motivated and interested to attend the courses offered at the summer school. Process evaluation focused on the courses attended by the participants as the most important component of the program. Accordingly, the instructional approaches meet the needs of highly gifted students for self-regulated and discovery oriented learning. The product or impact evaluation was based on a multivariate social-cognitive framework. The findings indicate that the program contributes to promoting motivational and cognitive prerequisites for transforming giftedness into excellent performances. To some extent, the positive effects on students' self-efficacy and self-regulatory strategies are due to qualities of the learning environments established by the courses.


1982 ◽  
Vol 27 (11) ◽  
pp. 878-879
Author(s):  
Lawrence H. Cohen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document