scholarly journals Planning Implementation Success of Syncope Clinical Practice Guidelines in the Emergency Department Using CFIR Framework

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Li ◽  
Susan S. Smyth ◽  
Jessica Miller Clouser ◽  
Colleen A. McMullen ◽  
Vedant Gupta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Family Caregivers ◽  
Implementation Strategy ◽  
Care Pathway ◽  
Implementation Strategies ◽  
Mobile App ◽  
Care Plan ◽  
Local Context ◽  
Successful Implementation

Background and Objectives: Overuse and inappropriate use of testing and hospital admission are common in syncope evaluation and management. Though guidelines are available to optimize syncope care, study suggested that the current clinical guidelines have not significantly impacted resource utilization surrounding emergency department (ED) evaluation of syncope. Matching implementation strategies to barriers and facilitators and tailoring strategies to local context hold significant promise for a successful implementation of clinical practice guideline (CPG). Our team applied implementation science principles to develop a stakeholder-based implementation strategy. Methods and Materials: We partnered with patients, family caregivers, frontline clinicians and staff, and health system administrators at four health systems to conduct quantitative surveys and qualitative interviews for context assessment. The identification of implementation strategies was done by applying the CFIR-ERIC Implementation Strategy Matching Tool and soliciting stakeholders’ inputs. We then co-designed with patients and frontline teams, developed and tested specific strategies. Results: 114 clinicians completed surveys and 32 clinicians and stake-holders participated in interviews. Results from the surveys and interview indicated low awareness of syncope guidelines, and communication challenges with patients, lack of CPG protocol integration into ED workflows, and organizational process to change were recognized as major barriers. Thirty-one patients and their family caregivers participated in interviews and ex-pressed their expectations: clarity regarding their diagnosis, context surrounding care plan and diagnostic testing, and a desire to feel cared about. After identifying change methods to address those barriers, the multilevel, multicomponent implementation strategy, MISSION, included pa-tient educational materials, mentored implementation, academic detailing, Syncope Optimal Care Pathway and corresponding Mobile App, and Lean quality improvement methods. The pilot of MISSION demonstrated feasibility, acceptability and initial success on appropriate testing. Con-clusions: Effect multifaceted implementation strategies that target individuals, teams, and healthcare systems can be employed to plan successful implementation and promote adherence to syncope CPGs.

scholarly journals Planning Implementation Success of Syncope Clinical Practice Guidelines in the Emergency Department Using CFIR Framework

Medicina ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (6) ◽  
pp. 570
Author(s):  
Jing Li ◽  
Susan S. Smyth ◽  
Jessica M. Clouser ◽  
Colleen A. McMullen ◽  
Vedant Gupta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Family Caregivers ◽  
Clinical Practice Guidelines ◽  
Practice Guidelines ◽  
Implementation Strategy ◽  
Implementation Strategies ◽  
Mobile App ◽  
Local Context ◽  
Successful Implementation

Background and Objectives: Overuse and inappropriate use of testing and hospital admission are common in syncope evaluation and management. Though guidelines are available to optimize syncope care, research indicates that current clinical guidelines have not significantly impacted resource utilization surrounding emergency department (ED) evaluation of syncope. Matching implementation strategies to barriers and facilitators and tailoring strategies to local context hold significant promise for a successful implementation of clinical practice guidelines (CPG). Our team applied implementation science principles to develop a stakeholder-based implementation strategy. Methods and Materials: We partnered with patients, family caregivers, frontline clinicians and staff, and health system administrators at four health systems to conduct quantitative surveys and qualitative interviews for context assessment. The identification of implementation strategies was done by applying the CFIR-ERIC Implementation Strategy Matching Tool and soliciting stakeholders’ inputs. We then co-designed with patients and frontline teams, and developed and tested specific strategies. Results: A total of 114 clinicians completed surveys and 32 clinicians and stakeholders participated in interviews. Results from the surveys and interviews indicated low awareness of syncope guidelines, communication challenges with patients, lack of CPG protocol integration into ED workflows, and organizational process to change as major barriers to CPG implementation. Thirty-one patients and their family caregivers participated in interviews and expressed their expectations: clarity regarding their diagnosis, context surrounding care plan and diagnostic testing, and a desire to feel cared about. Identifying change methods to address the clinician barriers and patients and family caregivers expectations informed development of the multilevel, multicomponent implementation strategy, MISSION, which includes patient educational materials, mentored implementation, academic detailing, Syncope Optimal Care Pathway and a corresponding mobile app, and Lean quality improvement methods. The pilot of MISSION demonstrated feasibility, acceptability and initial success on appropriate testing. Conclusions: Effective multifaceted implementation strategies that target individuals, teams, and healthcare systems can be employed to plan successful implementation and promote adherence to syncope CPGs.

scholarly journals Developing implementation strategies to adopt Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) guidelines

BJS Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Y Lam ◽  
Alexandra Howlett ◽  
Duncan McLuckie ◽  
Lori M Stephen ◽  
Scott D N Else ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Implementation Strategy ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Implementation Strategies ◽  
Multidisciplinary Teams ◽  
Successful Implementation ◽  
Care Pathways ◽  
Audit System ◽  
Local Contexts

Abstract Background Strong implementation strategies are critical to the success of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS®) guidelines, though little documentation exists on effective strategies, especially in complex clinical situations and unfamiliar contexts. This study outlines the process taken to adopt a novel neonatal ERAS® guideline. Methods The implementation strategy was approached in a multi-pronged, concurrent but asynchronous fashion. Between September 2019 and January 2020, healthcare providers from various disciplines and different specialties as well as parents participated in the strategy. Multidisciplinary teams were created to consider existing literature and local contexts including potential facilitators and/or barriers. Task forces worked collaboratively to develop new care pathways. An audit system was developed to record outcomes and elicit feedback for revision. Results 32 healthcare providers representing 9 disciplines and 5 specialties as well as 8 parents participated. Care pathways and resources were created. Elements recommended for a successful implementation strategy included identification of champions, multidisciplinary stakeholder involvement, consideration of local contexts and insights, patient/family engagement, education, and creation of an audit system. Conclusion A multidisciplinary and structured process following principles of implementation science was used to develop an effective implementation strategy for initiating ERAS® guidelines.

scholarly journals Engaging Stakeholders to Retrospectively Discern Implementation Strategies in Support of Program Evaluation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacob T. Painter ◽  
Rebecca A. Raciborski ◽  
Monica M. Matthieu ◽  
Ciara Oliver ◽  
David A. Adkins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Program Evaluation ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Data Collection ◽  
Implementation Strategy ◽  
Implementation Strategies ◽  
Successful Implementation ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Main Body ◽  
Strategy Selection ◽  
Evidence Based Practices

Abstract Background: Successful implementation of evidence-based practices is key to healthcare quality improvement. However, it depends on appropriate selection of implementation strategies, the techniques that improve practice adoption or sustainment. When studying implementation of an evidence-based practice as part of a program evaluation, implementation scientists confront a challenge: the timing of strategy selection rarely aligns with the establishment of data collection protocols. Indeed, the exact implementation strategies used by an organization during a quality improvement initiative may be determined during implementation. Nevertheless, discernment of strategies is necessary to accurately estimate implementation effect and cost because this information can support decision making for sustainment, guide replication efforts, and inform the choice of implementation strategies for other evidence-based practices. Main body: We propose an iterative, stakeholder engaged process to discern implementation strategies when strategy choice was not made before data collection began. Stakeholders are centered in the process, providing a list of current and potential implementation activities. These activities are then mapped by an implementation science expert to an established taxonomy of implementation strategies. The mapping is then presented back to stakeholders for member checking and refinement. The final list can be used to survey those engaged in implementation activities in a language they are familiar with. A case study using this process is provided. Conclusion: It is challenging to estimate implementation effort when implementation strategy selection is disconnected from the data collection process. In these cases, a stakeholder-informed process to retrospectively identify implementation strategies by classifying activities performed using an established implementation strategy taxonomy provides the necessary information.

Program description and implementation findings of MyCare: enhancing community mental health care in Tasmania, Australia

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 374
Author(s):  
Renee O'Donnell ◽  
Darshini Ayton ◽  
Bengianni Pizzirani ◽  
Melissa Savaglio ◽  
Debra Fast ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Implementation Strategy ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Implementation Strategies ◽  
Health Programs ◽  
Successful Implementation ◽  
Health Issues ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Mental Health Issues ◽  
Mental Health Programs

Since 2014, Tasmania has experienced unprecedented rates of hospitalisations related to mental health issues. To address reliance on such acute-based care, government funding was invested to enhance community-based care, which, in turn, led to the development of MyCare. This paper represents the initial phase of a larger body of work (i.e. an effectiveness-controlled trial of MyCare) that describes the MyCare program and the successful implementation strategy underpinning the program. The implementation of MyCare was evaluated with 41 key stakeholders (staff, clients and senior executives) using semistructured interviews and focus groups, informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). According to stakeholders, three CFIR constructs that were directly addressed by the program, namely Tension for Change, Evidence Strength and Quality, and Available Resources for Implementation, facilitated the successful implementation of MyCare. In contrast, a feature of the program that impeded implementation was Patient Needs and Resources, which restricted program access to those with the most severe mental health issues. The reporting of implementation strategies underpinning mental health programs is rare. This study describes the implementation strategy underpinning a community-based mental health program that was successful in facilitating program uptake. We encourage other researchers to not only report on implementation findings, which may help avoid replication failure, but also to apply these innovative implementation processes (i.e. address the tension for change and ensure the program is evidence informed and that sufficient resources are available for implementation) within mental health programs to aid successful uptake.

Standardized Screening and Assessment of Older Emergency Department Patients: A Survey of Implementation in Quebec

2007 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jane McCusker ◽  
Josée Verdon ◽  
Nathalie Veillette ◽  
Katherine Berg ◽  
Tina Emond ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Participation Rate ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
Local Context ◽  
Successful Implementation ◽  
Implementation Barriers ◽  
Barriers To Implementation ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Emergency Department Patients

ABSTRACTCost-effective methods have been developed to help busy emergency department (ED) staff cope with the growing number of older patients, including quick screening and assessment tools to identify those at high risk and note their specific needs. This survey, from a sample of key informants from all EDs (n=111) in the province of Quebec (participation rate of 88.2%), investigated the implementation of these tools and barriers to implementation. Questionnaires (administered either by telephone or by self-completion) included characteristics of the ED, characteristics of the respondent, use of tools, and method of implementation. Barriers to the implementation of these tools included lack of resources for screening and follow-up, misunderstandings of the difference between screening and assessment tools, and need for adaptation of the tools to the local context. Education of staff and pre-implementation adaptation and testing are needed for successful implementation.

scholarly journals Implementing immediate postpartum contraception: a comparative case study at 11 hospitals

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle H. Moniz ◽  
Kirsten Bonawitz ◽  
Marisa K. Wetmore ◽  
Vanessa K. Dalton ◽  
Laura J. Damschroder ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Organizational Context ◽  
Implementation Strategies ◽  
Comparative Case Study ◽  
Successful Implementation ◽  
Implementation Success ◽  
Local Conditions ◽  
Maternity Hospitals ◽  
Financial Environment

Abstract Background Immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) is an evidence-based practice, but hospitals face significant barriers to its adoption. Our objective was to examine how organizational context (e.g., size, employee attitudes toward the clinical practice) and implementation strategies (i.e., the actions taken to routinize a clinical practice) drive successful implementation of immediate postpartum LARC services, with a goal of informing the design of future implementation interventions. Methods We conducted a comparative case study of the implementation of inpatient postpartum contraceptive care at 11 US maternity hospitals. In 2017–2018, we conducted site visits that included semi-structured key informant interviews informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Qualitative measures of implementation success included stakeholder satisfaction, routinization, and sustainability of immediate postpartum LARC services. Qualitative content analysis and cross-case synthesis explored relationships among organizational context, implementation strategies, and implementation success. Results We completed semi-structured interviews with 78 clinicians, nurses, residents, pharmacy and revenue cycle staff, and hospital administrators. Successful implementation required three essential conditions: effective implementation champions, an enabling financial environment, and hospital administrator engagement. Six other contextual conditions were influential: trust and effective communication, alignment with stakeholders’ professional values, perception of meeting patients’ needs, robust learning climate, compatibility with workflow, and positive attitudes and adequate knowledge about the clinical practice. On average, sites used 18 (range 11-22) strategies. Strategies to optimize the financial environment and train clinicians and staff were commonly used. Strategies to plan and evaluate implementation and to engage patients emerged as promising to address barriers to practice change, yet were often underused. Conclusions Implementation efforts in maternity settings may be more successful if they select strategies to optimize local conditions for success. Our findings elucidate key contextual conditions to target and provide a menu of promising implementation strategies for incorporating recommended contraceptive services into routine maternity practice. Additional prospective research should evaluate whether these strategies effectively optimize local conditions for successful implementation in a variety of settings.

scholarly journals Training registered nurses to conduct pre-implementation assessment to inform program scale-up: an example from the rural Transitions Nurse Program

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chelsea Leonard ◽  
Heather Gilmartin ◽  
Marina McCreight ◽  
Lynette Kelley ◽  
Ashlea Mayberry ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Data Collection ◽  
Implementation Strategy ◽  
Care Transitions ◽  
Scale Up ◽  
Barriers And Facilitators ◽  
Local Context ◽  
Successful Implementation ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Local Contexts ◽  
Implementation Assessment

Abstract Objectives Adapting evidence-based practices to local settings is critical for successful implementation and dissemination. A pre-implementation assessment evaluates local context to inform implementation, but there is little published guidance for clinician-implementers. The rural Transitions Nurse Program (TNP) is a care coordination intervention that facilitates care transitions for rural veterans. In year 1 of TNP, pre-implementation assessments were conducted by a centralized project team through multi-day visits at five sites nationwide. In year 2, we tested if local site TNP nurses could conduct pre-implementation assessments using evidence-based tools and coaching from the TNP team. This required developing a multicomponent pre-implementation strategy bundle to guide data collection and synthesis. We hypothesized that (1) nurses would find the pre-implementation assessment useful for tailoring TNP to local contexts and (2) nurses would identify similar barriers and facilitators to those identified at first year sites. Methods The bundle included guides for conducting key informant interviews, brainwriting, process mapping, and reflective journaling. We evaluated TNP nurse satisfaction and perceived utility of the structure and process of the training and bundle through pre-post surveys. To assess the outcome of data collection efforts, we interviewed nurses 4 months after completion of the pre-implementation assessment to determine if and how they used pre-implementation findings to tailor implementation of TNP to local contexts. To further assess outcomes, all data that the nurses collected were analyzed thematically. Themes related to barriers and facilitators were compared across years. Findings Five nurses at different VA medical centers used the pre-implementation strategy bundle to collect site-level data and completed pre-post surveys. Findings indicated that the pre-implementation assessment was highly recommended, and the bundle provided adequate training. Nurses felt that pre-implementation work oriented them to the local context and illustrated how to integrate TNP into existing processes. Barriers and facilitators identified by nurses were similar to those collected in year 1 by the TNP research team, including communication challenges, need for buy-in, and logistical concerns. Conclusions This proof-of-concept study suggests that evidence-based tools can effectively guide clinician-implementers through the process of conducting a pre-implementation assessment. This approach positively informed TNP implementation and oriented nurses to their local context prior to implementation.

Clinical Practice Guidelines: The Need for Improved Implementation Strategies

2000 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Glen Randall ◽  
D. Wayne Taylor
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Clinical Practice Guidelines ◽  
Practice Guidelines ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Implementation Strategies ◽  
Successful Implementation ◽  
Minimal Impact ◽  
Effective Implementation ◽  
Clinical Behaviour

Although substantial resources have been spent developing clinical practice guidelines, little effort has been made to evaluate the effectiveness of their implementation. In the absence of effective implementation, CPGs will have minimal impact on changing behaviours. This article critically reviews the literature and identifies a number of reasons why these guidelines have not been implemented successfully. If CPGs are to have a positive impact upon clinical behaviour and practice, then more aggressive and positive implementation strategies are indicated. Five key ingredients for successful implementation of quality CPGs are identified and recommended.

scholarly journals The active involvement of the person being treated by the nursing clinic and with home-based care in the local context of local District n. 1, of the ASUGI of Trieste

ABOUTOPEN ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 58-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raffaela Fonda ◽  
Daniela Ortolan
Keyword(s):  
Care Pathway ◽  
Care Plan ◽  
Local Context ◽  
Evaluation Tool ◽  
Home Setting ◽  
Personalized Care ◽  
Active Involvement ◽  
Home Based ◽  
Home Based Care

Introduction: This contribution describes four different experiences of active engagement along the care pathway of people with chronic illness, performed at home and at the nursing clinic of the ASUGI Health District n. 1 in Trieste by a local care team. Case description: The Home Nursing Service, named SID, of the Local Districts of Trieste is based on the principle of improving the quality of life of citizens by providing adequate home care in the logic of continuity of care, consistently with the needs of the person, after a multidimensional assessment and the construction of a personalized care plan, aimed at increasing engagement and participation. ù Conclusions: This experience contributed to the cultural growth of professionals and to the systematic introduction of the PHE-S® evaluation tool in the home setting, improving also their relational skills.

Moving From Interprofessional Education Toward Interprofessional Practice: Bridging the Translation Gap

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 971-976
Author(s):  
Imran Musaji ◽  
Trisha Self ◽  
Karissa Marble-Flint ◽  
Ashwini Kanade
Keyword(s):  
Interprofessional Education ◽  
Interprofessional Collaboration ◽  
Evaluation Model ◽  
Implementation Strategies ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Successful Implementation ◽  
Interprofessional Practice ◽  
Translational Model ◽  
Key Stakeholders ◽  
Clear Identification

Purpose The purpose of this article was to propose the use of a translational model as a tool for identifying limitations of current interprofessional education (IPE) research. Translational models allow researchers to clearly define next-step research needed to translate IPE to interprofessional practice (IPP). Method Key principles, goals, and limitations of current IPE research are reviewed. A popular IPE evaluation model is examined through the lens of implementation research. The authors propose a new translational model that more clearly illustrates translational gaps that can be used to direct future research. Next steps for translating IPE to IPP are discussed. Conclusion Comprehensive reviews of the literature show that the implementation strategies adopted to date have fostered improved buy-in from key stakeholders, as evidenced by improved attitudes and perceptions toward interprofessional collaboration/practice. However, there is little evidence regarding successful implementation outcomes, such as changed clinician behaviors, changed organizational practices, or improved patient outcomes. The authors propose the use of an IPE to IPP translational model to facilitate clear identification of research gaps and to better identify future research targets.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document