scholarly journals Measuring visfatin levels in saliva: an alternative approach to gestational diabetes screening

Author(s):  
Hacer Eroglu İÇLİ ◽  
Tevfik Berk BİLDACI
2018 ◽  
Vol 68 (suppl 1) ◽  
pp. bjgp18X697469
Author(s):  
Rebecca Ward ◽  
Fahmy W Hanna ◽  
Ann Shelley-Hitchen ◽  
Ellen Hodgson ◽  
Adrian Heald ◽  
...  

BackgroundWomen with gestational diabetes (GDM) have an elevated risk of developing type 2 diabetes (T2DM). NICE Guidance recommends women who develop GDM are screened 6 weeks post-partum and annually thereafter.AimTo evaluate conformity to guidance of screening in women with GDM by 6-week post-partum fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and annual FPG and determine time between delivery and development of T2DM.MethodRecords at a tertiary referral centre were used to identify women (n = 54) diagnosed with GDM by antenatal oral glucose tolerance test between July 1999 and January 2007. Data from laboratory records were used to collect investigations of glycaemic status during the follow-up period (median follow-up 12.4 years, range 9.5–17.1 years).ResultsOf 252 women, 102 (40.2%) did not have a FPG at 6 weeks (+/−2 weeks). Of these, median time to first test was 1.2 years (range 0.04–10.8 years), with only 43.1% followed-up within 1 year. In those who had a 6-week FPG, 17 (11.3%) women had no further tests. A total of 84 (33% of those with gestational diabetes in the index pregnancy) women were diagnosed with T2DM; median time from delivery to diagnosis was 5.2 years (range 0.35–15.95). We found the only significant factor for a follow-up test at 1-year post-partum was the use of insulin.ConclusionOur data suggest an alternative approach is needed for monitoring women with a history of GDM. This needs to be appropriate for a generally healthy group in which traditional screening mechanisms may not be adequate or sufficient.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 215013272110165
Author(s):  
Elaine Seaton Banerjee ◽  
Kyle Shaak ◽  
Nicole Burgess ◽  
Melanie Johnson ◽  
Beth Careyva

Introduction/Objectives: Diabetes and prediabetes impact nearly half of the US adult population and are associated with significant health risks but may be underdiagnosed. Effective screening may improve diagnosis and give patients opportunity to manage their disease. The purpose of this study was to determine screening rates, identify characteristics predictive of screening, and evaluate correct diagnosis of diabetes and prediabetes. Methods: Retrospective chart review of 71 433 patients eligible for diabetes screening, defined by completing A1c test within the 3-year study period. Results: A total of 31.3% of eligible patients received diabetes screening. Factors associated with screening include older age, female sex, non-white race, Hispanic ethnicity, Medicare or Medicaid insurance, higher BMI, and having a medical comorbidity. History of prediabetes or gestational diabetes were the strongest predictors for diabetes screening, but history of gestational diabetes was under-documented. Of those screened, 10.4% had a result consistent with diabetes and 51.8% had a result consistent with prediabetes. However, 52.9% of these patients had a missed diagnosis. Conclusions: Findings of this study indicate the need for uniform coverage for diabetes screening for all insurances, increased documentation of gestational diabetes to improve screening for patients with this history, and improving accurate diagnosis after screening is completed.


2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 132-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Engin Korkmazer ◽  
Neşe Solak ◽  
Vehbi Yavuz Tokgöz

2016 ◽  
Vol 96 (1) ◽  
pp. 106-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanna Koivunen ◽  
Annukka Torkki ◽  
Aini Bloigu ◽  
Mika Gissler ◽  
Anneli Pouta ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hannah R. Lucas ◽  
Roxann C. Williams ◽  
Laura N. Hollar ◽  
Bethany Johnson-Javois ◽  
Heidi B. Miller ◽  
...  

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) increases type 2 diabetes risk; however, postpartum diabetes screening rates are low. Using semi-structured interviews and focus groups, this study investigates the understanding of GDM and its relationship to future diabetes risk and diabetes prevention among patients with public or no insurance (<i>n </i>= 36), health care providers (<i>n </i>= 21), and clinic staff (<i>n </i>= 9) from Federally Qualified Health Centers. Five main themes emerged: <i>1</i>) general understanding of GDM diagnosis with focus on neonatal complications; <i>2</i>) variable recall of diet, exercise, and weight recommendations; <i>3</i>) overwhelming medication and self-monitoring routines; <i>4</i>) short-term focus of type 2 diabetes risk and screening; and <i>5</i>) limited understanding of all options for diabetes prevention. The results may inform diabetes screening and prevention interventions in primary care settings.


2022 ◽  
Vol 226 (1) ◽  
pp. S483-S484
Author(s):  
Sarah E. Miller ◽  
Meryl Sperling ◽  
Giovanna Cruz ◽  
Jay Schulkin ◽  
Stephanie A. Leonard ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (12) ◽  
pp. 1112-1115
Author(s):  
Adriana Sánchez-García ◽  
René Rodríguez-Gutiérrez ◽  
Donato Saldívar-Rodríguez ◽  
Abel Guzmán-López ◽  
Carolina Castillo-Castro ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 110-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yun Jung Choi ◽  
Jimin Kahng ◽  
Joong Hyun Bin ◽  
Hyun Seung Lee ◽  
Jung Hyun Lee ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document