scholarly journals Current Clinical and Pharmacological Approaches to the Prescription of Loop Diuretics in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 595-600
Author(s):  
N. M. Gafurova ◽  
E. V. Shikh ◽  
O. D. Ostroumova
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Diuretic Therapy ◽  
Public Health Problem ◽  
Evidence Base ◽  
Convincing Evidence ◽  
Loop Diuretics ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Randomized Controlled Studies ◽  
Increased Risk

Heart failure (HF) is a growing public health problem with an estimated prevalence of 38 million patients worldwide. Congestion and formation of edema – are typical symptoms of heart failure. Diuretics are the mainstay of therapy in heart failure and are used to relieve congestion and improve exercise tolerance. Also, the administration of diuretics should be considered to reduce the risk of HF hospitalization. Loop diuretics are used by nearly 80% of all chronic HF patients and remain the drugs of choice. Although diuretics are one of the most prescribed classes of drugs, recommendations for their titration scheme for long-term use have not yet been finalized, nor have there been major prospective randomized controlled studies on the effect of diuretics on morbidity and mortality. A Cochrane meta-analysis has shown that in patients with chronic HF, loop and thiazide diuretics might reduce the risk of death and worsening of HF in comparison to placebo and could lead to improved exercise capacity. Guideline recommends the use lowest possible dose of diuretics due to probable electrolyte disturbances, further neurohormonal activation, accelerated kidney function decline, and symptomatic hypotension. Diuretic resistance is associated with an unfavorable prognosis and an increased risk of readmission. There are significant pharmacokinetic differences between the loop diuretics. Compared with furosemide, torasemide has a high bioavailability irrespective of food intake, and carries a longer half‐life and duration of effect; also, the benefits of torasemide are its additional anti-fibrotic and neurohormonal effects. Optimization of diuretic therapy in patients with HF remains a challenge and requires further research, as well as an individual approach to patients, since there is no convincing evidence base.

scholarly journals Obesity as a risk factor for heart failure: overview of systematic reviews

2022 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. e0811124380
Author(s):  
Cleyton Oliveira Bezerra ◽  
Rafael Marinho de Lima Paiva ◽  
Thamires Lucena da Silva ◽  
Vinicius Soares Ribeiro ◽  
Cinthia Caldas Rios ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Obesity Paradox ◽  
Overweight And Obesity ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Overview Of Systematic Reviews

The overweight and population with obesity has an increased risk of mortality from HF. However, some studies point to the existence of an "obesity paradox" where there could be a protective effect on the relative risk of death by HF in these populations with high BMI. In this way, the present study aimed to investigate obesity as a risk factor for heart failure. For this, an overview of systematic reviews was performed by selecting articles from the following databases: "Pubmed", "Scopus" and "SciElo”. A total of 615 articles were found from this initial search, leaving 59 articles for full-text reading, of which 22 articles were included for data extraction using the predefined inclusion criteria. From these 22 studies 73% were meta-analysis and 64% of the studies are of high methodological quality according to AMSTAR-2. Overweight and obesity have demonstrated a close relationship with the onset and increase of mortality by HF, studies have even been found that point to a gene interference in this relationship. In studies reporting on the obesity paradox, the results pointed to a momentary protection from mortality risk.

scholarly journals Use of loop diuretics is strongly associated with increased risk of death in coronary patients without systolic heart failure or renal impairment

2013 ◽  
Vol 34 (suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 878-878
Author(s):  
H. Schartum-Hansen ◽  
K. H. Loeland ◽  
G. F. T. Svingen ◽  
J. E. Nordrehaug ◽  
O. Nygaard
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Renal Impairment ◽  
Systolic Heart Failure ◽  
Loop Diuretics ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Coronary Patients

scholarly journals Prediction of all-cause mortality with malnutrition assessed by controlling nutritional status score in patients with heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Huiyang Li ◽  
Peng Zhou ◽  
Yikai Zhao ◽  
Huaichun Ni ◽  
Xinping Luo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Nutritional Status ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Conut Score

Abstract Objective: The aim of this meta-analysis was to investigate the association between malnutrition assessed by the controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score and all-cause mortality in patients with heart failure. Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Settings: A comprehensively literature search of PubMed and Embase databases was performed until 30 November 2020. Studies reporting the utility of CONUT score in prediction of all-cause mortality among patients with heart failure were eligible. Patients with a CONUT score ≥2 are grouped as malnourished. Predictive values of the CONUT score were summarized by pooling the multivariable-adjusted risk ratios (RR) with 95 % CI for the malnourished v. normal nutritional status or per point CONUT score increase. Participants: Ten studies involving 5196 patients with heart failure. Results: Malnourished patients with heart failure conferred a higher risk of all-cause mortality (RR 1·92; 95 % CI 1·58, 2·34) compared with the normal nutritional status. Subgroup analysis showed the malnourished patients with heart failure had an increased risk of in-hospital mortality (RR 1·78; 95 % CI 1·29, 2·46) and follow-up mortality (RR 2·01; 95 % CI 1·58, 2·57). Moreover, per point increase in CONUT score significantly increased 16% risk of all-cause mortality during the follow-up. Conclusions: Malnutrition defined by the CONUT score is an independent predictor of all-cause mortality in patients with heart failure. Assessment of nutritional status using CONUT score would be helpful for improving risk stratification of heart failure.

scholarly journals Association of dyslipidemia with the severity and mortality of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanli Liu ◽  
Yilong Pan ◽  
Yuyao Yin ◽  
Wenhao Chen ◽  
Xiaodong Li
Keyword(s):  
Fixed Effects ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Case Control Studies ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Potential Association ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Language Restriction ◽  
Newcastle Ottawa Scale

Abstract Background The numbers of confirmed cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and COVID-19 related deaths are still increasing, so it is very important to determine the risk factors of COVID-19. Dyslipidemia is a common complication in patients with COVID-19, but the association of dyslipidemia with the severity and mortality of COVID-19 is still unclear. The aim of this study is to analyze the potential association of dyslipidemia with the severity and mortality of COVID-19. Methods We searched the PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library databases for all relevant studies up to August 24, 2020. All the articles published were retrieved without language restriction. All analysis was performed using Stata 13.1 software and Mantel–Haenszel formula with fixed effects models was used to compare the differences between studies. The Newcastle Ottawa scale was used to assess the quality of the included studies. Results Twenty-eight studies involving 12,995 COVID-19 patients were included in the meta-analysis, which was consisted of 26 cohort studies and 2 case–control studies. Dyslipidemia was associated with the severity of COVID-19 (odds ratio [OR] = 1.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11–1.44, P = 0.038, I2 = 39.8%). Further, patients with dyslipidemia had a 2.13-fold increased risk of death compared to patients without dyslipidemia (95% CI 1.84–2.47, P = 0.001, I2 = 66.4%). Conclusions The results proved that dyslipidemia is associated with increased severity and mortality of COVID-19. Therefore, we should monitor blood lipids and administer active treatments in COVID-19 patients with dyslipidemia to reduce the severity and mortality.

Abstract 2887: Peri-Operative Beta-Blockers in Patients Undergoing Non-cardiac Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of 12,306 Patients from Randomized Trials

Circulation ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 118 (suppl_18) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sripal Bangalore ◽  
Shruthi Chandrashekhar ◽  
Sandeep Pulimi ◽  
Franz H Messerli
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Cardiac Surgery ◽  
Myocardial Ischemia ◽  
Randomized Trials ◽  
Beta Blockers ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Safety Outcomes ◽  
Β Blockers

Background: The 2007 ACC/AHA guideline on perioperative evaluation recommends perioperative β-blockers for non-cardiac surgery. However, some clinical trials seem to be at odds with these recommendations. Methods: PUBMED/EMBASE/CENTRAL search for randomized trials (RCTs) evaluating β-blockers for non-cardiac surgery. Efficacy outcomes of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular (CV) mortality, nonfatal MI, nonfatal stroke, heart failure, and myocardial ischemia (30 days), and safety outcomes of perioperative bradycardia, hypotension, and bronchospasm. Results: Among 33 RCTs which evaluated 12,306 patients, β-blockers were not associated with any significant reduction in the risk of all-cause mortality, CV mortality, or heart failure, but were associated with a 35% decrease in nonfatal MI, 64% decrease in myocardial ischemia at the expense of a 101% increase (Figure ) in nonfatal strokes. The beneficial effects were driven mainly by trials with high-bias risk, while analyses of low-biased trials showed a 28% and 101% increase in all-cause mortality and stroke with only a 29% and 59% reduction in nonfatal MI and 59%myocardial ischemia. For the safety outcomes, β-blockers were associated with a significantly increased risk of peri-op bradycardia and peri-op hypotension. Conclusions: In patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery, we estimate that treatment of 1000 patients with β-blockers results in 16 fewer nonfatal MI, but at the expense of 3 disabling strokes and 45 and 59 patients with clinically significant perioperative bradycardia and hypotension respectively, and suggests an increase in all-cause mortality.

Association between depression and increased risk of readmission in patients with heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 69 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jakrin KEWCHAROEN ◽  
Chol TACHORUEANGWIWAT ◽  
Chanavuth KANITSORAPHAN ◽  
Sakditad SAOWAPA ◽  
Nattapat NITINAI ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure

MO817ALDOSTERONE ANTAGONISTS FOR PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE REQUIRING DIALYSIS

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Takeshi Hasegawa ◽  
Hiroki Nihiwaki ◽  
Erika Ota ◽  
William Levack ◽  
Hisashi Noma
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Kidney Disease ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Kidney Disease ◽  
Standard Care ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cardiovascular Death ◽  
Aldosterone Antagonists ◽  
Mortality And Morbidity ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Increased Risk

Abstract Background and Aims Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) undergoing dialysis are at a particularly high risk of cardiovascular mortality and morbidity. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the benefits and harms of aldosterone antagonists, both non-selective (spironolactone) and selective (eplerenone), in comparison to control (placebo or standard care) in patients with CKD requiring haemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis. Method We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 29 July 2019 using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov. We included individual and cluster randomised controlled trials (RCTs), cross-over trials, and quasi-RCTs that compared aldosterone antagonists with placebo or standard care in patients with CKD requiring dialysis. We used a random-effects model meta-analysis to perform a quantitative synthesis of the data. We used the I2 statistic to measure heterogeneity among the trials in each analysis. We indicated summary estimates as a risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes with their 95% confidence interval (CI). We assessed the certainty of the evidence for each of the main outcomes using the GRADE (Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach. Results We included 16 trials (14 parallel RCTs and two cross-over trials) involving a total of 1,446 patients. Among included studies, 13 trials compared spironolactone to placebo or standard care and one trial compared eplerenone to a placebo. Most studies had an unclear or high risk of bias. Compared to control, aldosterone antagonists reduced the risk of all-cause death for patients with CKD requiring dialysis (9 trials, 1,119 patients: RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.67; moderate certainty of evidence). Aldosterone antagonist also decreased the risk of death due to cardiovascular disease (6 trials, 908 patients: RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.64; moderate certainty of evidence) and cardiovascular and cerebrovascular morbidity (3 trials, 328 patients: RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.76; moderate certainty of evidence). While aldosterone antagonists had an apparent increased risk of gynaecomastia compared with control (4 trials, 768 patients: RR 5.95, 95% CI 1.93 to 18.3; moderate certainty of evidence), the elevated risk of hyperkalaemia due to aldosterone antagonists was uncertain (9 trials, 981 patients: RR 1.41, 95% CI 0.72 to 2.78; low certainty of evidence). Conclusion Based on moderate certainty of the evidence, aldosterone antagonists could reduce the risk of all-cause and cardiovascular death and morbidity due to cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease but increase the risk of gynaecomastia in patients with CKD requiring dialysis.

Abstract 187: Loop Diuretic Therapy in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure among Premier Hospitals

2012 ◽  
Vol 5 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Behnood Bikdeli ◽  
Kelly Strait ◽  
Kumar Dharmarajan ◽  
Chohreh Partovian ◽  
Nancy Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Loop Diuretic ◽  
Acute Decompensated Heart Failure ◽  
Diuretic Therapy ◽  
Loop Diuretics ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Average Daily Dose ◽  
Duration Of Therapy ◽  
Daily Dose ◽  
Hospital Use

Background: Although loop diuretics are frequently used for patients with heart failure (HF), little is known about the variation in patterns of diuretic therapy in US hospitals. We sought to describe such treatment patterns among a diverse group of hospitals. Methods: We studied HF hospitalizations occurring during 2009-10 in Premier Inc. hospitals participating in a collaborative project to pool administrative and charge data, which includes information about drug types, average daily dose, and duration of therapy. We excluded hospitals with less than 25 HF hospitalizations. For ease of comparison, all diuretic doses were converted to bioequivalent doses of intravenous (IV) furosemide: 40mg IV furosemide ∼ 80mg oral furosemide ∼ 20mg (oral or IV) torsemide ∼ 1mg (oral or IV) bumetanide. Summary statistics were calculated. Results: Among 366 studied hospitals (264,675 HF hospitalizations), use of any loop diuretic had an interquartile range (IQR) from 92% to 96% (median: 94%). At the hospital level, the average daily dose IQR varied from 45mg to 64 mg (median: 55 mg) and the median duration of therapy was 4 days (IQR: 4 to 4; median: 4), as was the median length of stay. The IQR for use of furosemide varied from 89% to 94% (median: 92%), and its median average daily dose had an IQR from 40mg to 60 mg (median: 53 mg). Hospital use of bumetanide had an IQR from 2% to 11%, and hospital use of torsemide had an IQR from 0% to 4% (medians of 5% and 1%, respectively). The variation in median average daily dose for bumetanide and torsemide was greater than for furosemide (bumetanide IQR: 79mg to 127 mg, with median of 89 mg; torsemide IQR: 53mg to 120 mg, with median of 80 mg). Use of IV diuretics on the last day before home discharge had an IQR from 16% to 33% (median: 24%) across hospitals. Conclusion: US hospitals administer loop diuretics, particularly furosemide, to the vast majority of HF inpatients. The duration and daily dosage of therapy was similar across most hospitals. In contrast, a minority of hospitals used bumetanide and torsemide for several patients. The daily dosage of these agents showed more marked variation. We observed a high rate of intravenous diuretic use on the last day of hospitalization, with considerable variation across hospitals.

scholarly journals Sudden death in patients with sleep apnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily S. Heilbrunn ◽  
Paddy Ssentongo ◽  
Vernon M. Chinchilli ◽  
Anna E. Ssentongo
Keyword(s):  
Sleep Apnea ◽  
Sudden Death ◽  
Cardiovascular Mortality ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cardiac Mortality ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Risk Of Mortality ◽  
Obstructive Sleep ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
All Cause Mortality

AbstractBackgroundOver 1 billion individuals across the globe experience some form of sleep apnea, and this number is steadily rising. Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) can negatively influence one’s quality of life and potentially increase the risk of mortality. However, this association between OSA and mortality has not been comprehensively and thoroughly explored. This meta-analysis was conducted to conclusively estimate the risk of death for all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality in OSA patients.Study Design4,613 articles from databases including PUBMED, OVID & Joana Briggs, and SCOPUS were comprehensively assessed by two reviewers (AES & ESH) for inclusion criteria. 28 total articles were included, with 22 of them being used for quantitative analysis. Pooled effects of all-cause mortality, cardiac mortality, and sudden death were calculated by utilizing the metaprop function in R Statistical Software and the random-effects model with appropriate 95% confidence intervals.ResultsAnalysis on 42,032 individuals revealed that those with OSA were twice as likely to die from cardiac mortality compared to those without sleep apnea (HR= 1.94, 95%CI 1.39-2.70). Likewise, individuals with OSA were 1.7 times as likely to die from all-cause sudden death compared to individuals without sleep apnea (HR= 1.74, 95%CI 1.40-2.10). There was a significant dose response relationship between severity of sleep apnea and incidence risk of death, where those with severe sleep apnea wereConclusionsIndividuals with obstructive sleep apnea are at an increased risk for all-cause mortality and cardiac mortality. Further research related to appropriate interventions and treatments are necessary in order to reduce this risk and optimize survival in this population.Key MessagesWhat is the key question?Are individuals with sleep apnea at an increased risk for cardiovascular mortality and sudden death?What is the bottom Line?Sleep apnea is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular mortality and sudden death, with a dose response relationship, where those with severe sleep apnea are at the highest risk of mortality.Why read on?This is the first systematic review and meta-analyses to synthesize and quantify the risk of mortality in those with sleep apnea, highlighting important directions for future research.Prospero Registration IDCRD42020164941

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document