scholarly journals Importance of Scientific Resources Among Local Public Health Practitioners

2015 ◽  
Vol 105 (S2) ◽  
pp. S288-S294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert P. Fields ◽  
Katherine A. Stamatakis ◽  
Kathleen Duggan ◽  
Ross C. Brownson
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Local Public Health ◽  
Health Practitioners ◽  
Public Health Practitioners

scholarly journals Assessing Knowledge and Application of Emergency Risk Communication Principles Among Public Health Workers in China

2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 199-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
James R. Cope ◽  
Melinda Frost ◽  
Li Richun ◽  
Ruiqian Xie
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Risk Communication ◽  
Health Workers ◽  
International Health ◽  
Current Status ◽  
Local Public Health ◽  
Public Health Agencies ◽  
Health Agencies ◽  
Health Practitioners ◽  
Public Health Practitioners

AbstractObjectiveSince 2003, the Chinese National Health and Family Planning Commission (formerly the Ministry of Health) has implemented changes to more effectively communicate risk during public health emergencies. In spite of ongoing improvements, provincial and sub-provincial leaders face barriers, such as established modes of operation, lack of training, shortage of trained risk communicators, and limited understanding and willingness of recipients to mitigate risks.MethodsWe assessed the current status of and barriers to risk communication knowledge and practice among public health practitioners in China. We designed the survey questionnaire to capture information related to the risk communication core capacities required by international health regulations and common risk communication principles.ResultsOur findings showed that risk communication training has successfully developed an awareness of risk communication principles and the ability to implement those principles in practice in China.ConclusionsFuture efforts should focus on areas such as a dedicated risk communication workforce, requirements that public health agencies develop a risk communication plan, and additional training for public health practitioners and their partners. It is critical that the infectious diseases prevention and control law be amended to grant provincial and local public health agencies more autonomy to release information. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2014;0:1-7)

scholarly journals Job Satisfaction and Expected Turnover Among Federal, State, and Local Public Health Practitioners

2016 ◽  
Vol 106 (10) ◽  
pp. 1782-1788 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathon P. Leider ◽  
Elizabeth Harper ◽  
Ji Won Shon ◽  
Katie Sellers ◽  
Brian C. Castrucci
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Job Satisfaction ◽  
Federal State ◽  
Local Public Health ◽  
Health Practitioners ◽  
State And Local ◽  
Public Health Practitioners

Legal Innovations to Advance a Culture of Health

2015 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 904-912
Author(s):  
James G. Hodge ◽  
Kim Weidenaar ◽  
Andy Baker-White ◽  
Leila Barraza ◽  
Brittney Crock Bauerly ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Technical Assistance ◽  
Federal State ◽  
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation ◽  
Local Public Health ◽  
Health Practitioners ◽  
New Ideas ◽  
Laws And Policies ◽  
Public Health Practitioners ◽  
Health Laws

Since its inception in 2010, the Network for Public Health Law (Network) has aligned with federal, state, tribal, and local public health practitioners to assess how law can promote and protect the public’s health. In 2013, Network authors illustrated major trends in public health laws and policies emanating from an internal assessment of thousands of requests for technical assistance nationally. More recently, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF) has invited the Network and other partners to consider new ideas and strategies toward building a “culture of health.” Per Figure 1, RWJF’s conception of a culture of health emphasizes key action areas essential to the promotion of health across all sectors and diverse populations.

scholarly journals Acceptability and utilization of evidence for decision-making: helminth control, sub-Saharan Africa

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (Supplement_4) ◽  
Author(s):  
G Pearson ◽  
B D’Souza ◽  
C Fergus
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Global Health ◽  
Disease Control ◽  
Local Level ◽  
Health Interventions ◽  
Local Public Health ◽  
Health Practitioners ◽  
Decision Making Processes ◽  
Public Health Practitioners

Abstract Background Public health practitioners are part of a larger global health system, responsible for the implementation of disease-specific health interventions, largely financed by external actors through a variety of mechanisms. Emphasis on the need for evidence-informed decision-making often includes rhetoric for the localization of this approach to assist practitioners in resource allocation. In practice its realisation is challenging. This research addresses the following: what are the evidence needs of local public health practitioners? How acceptable are, for example, modeled disease estimates? What decision-making processes occur for implementation? How do evidence and decision-making processes interact? Methods Examining mass drug administration (MDA) for schistosomiasis and soil-transmitted helminths (STH) in the African Great Lakes region (Kenya, Malawi, Tanzania and Uganda), we use qualitative approaches to collect data, including a series of 4 workshops with district- and national-level MoH personnel, key informant interviews and e-survey questionnaires from a sample of relevant local and global organisations including NGOs. Coded data are analysed thematically. Results Preliminary results provide important insights into the sources, types and format of evidence which local public health practitioners find acceptable and useful for decision-making when implementing disease control measures. Conclusions A variety of factors influence local level decision-making with implications for policy aimed at disease control, such as MDA for schistosomiasis and STH, and global health policy and practice more broadly. First, processes of decision-making at different localities are heterogenous and evidence needs of local practitioners are not well understood. Second, evidence development and knowledge synthesis on health interventions are rarely linked in ways that feedback and respond to local implementation, decision-making practices and public health practitioners. Key messages Evidence needs of local public health practitioners need to be accounted for when producing and synthesising evidence. Multiple factors influence local level decision-making with implications for public health disease control policy.

scholarly journals What makes a ‘successful’ collaborative research project between public health practitioners and academics? A mixed-methods review of funding applications submitted to a local intervention evaluation scheme

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter van der Graaf ◽  
Lindsay Blank ◽  
Eleanor Holding ◽  
Elizabeth Goyder
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Health Research ◽  
Collaborative Research ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Public Health Practice ◽  
Rapid Review ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Evaluation Scheme ◽  
Health Practitioners ◽  
Public Health Practitioners

Abstract Background The national Public Health Practice Evaluation Scheme (PHPES) is a response-mode funded evaluation programme operated by the National Institute for Health Research School for Public Health Research (NIHR SPHR). The scheme enables public health professionals to work in partnership with SPHR researchers to conduct rigorous evaluations of their interventions. Our evaluation reviewed the learning from the first five years of PHPES (2013–2017) and how this was used to implement a revised scheme within the School. Methods We conducted a rapid review of applications and reports from 81 PHPES projects and sampled eight projects (including unfunded) to interview one researcher and one practitioner involved in each sampled project (n = 16) in order to identify factors that influence success of applications and effective delivery and dissemination of evaluations. Findings from the review and interviews were tested in an online survey with practitioners (applicants), researchers (principal investigators [PIs]) and PHPES panel members (n = 19) to explore the relative importance of these factors. Findings from the survey were synthesised and discussed for implications at a national workshop with wider stakeholders, including public members (n = 20). Results Strengths: PHPES provides much needed resources for evaluation which often are not available locally, and produces useful evidence to understand where a programme is not delivering, which can be used to formatively develop interventions. Weaknesses: Objectives of PHPES were too narrowly focused on (cost-)effectiveness of interventions, while practitioners also valued implementation studies and process evaluations. Opportunities: PHPES provided opportunities for novel/promising but less developed ideas. More funded time to develop a protocol and ensure feasibility of the intervention prior to application could increase intervention delivery success rates. Threats: There can be tensions between researchers and practitioners, for example, on the need to show the 'success’ of the intervention, on the use of existing research evidence, and the importance of generalisability of findings and of generating peer-reviewed publications. Conclusions The success of collaborative research projects between public health practitioners (PHP) and researchers can be improved by funders being mindful of tensions related to (1) the scope of collaborations, (2) local versus national impact, and (3) increasing inequalities in access to funding. Our study and comparisons with related funding schemes demonstrate how these tensions can be successfully resolved.

scholarly journals After Action Review of the 2019 measles outbreak in Clark County, Washington, U.S.A

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Stoto ◽  
R Piltch-Loeb ◽  
R Wolfe ◽  
R Albrandt ◽  
A Melnick
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Religious Community ◽  
Local Health ◽  
Mutual Aid ◽  
Social Distancing ◽  
Clark County ◽  
After Action Review ◽  
Measles Outbreak ◽  
Health Practitioners ◽  
Public Health Practitioners

Abstract Issue Clark County experienced a measles outbreak that challenged public health authorities. Description of the practice: We conducted a formal After Action Review with state and local health officials, school officials, and others to identify lessons for public health practitioners facing future outbreaks. Results Following the early identification of measles in a child who had recently arrived from Ukraine, active surveillance identified 71 confirmed cases, most in unvaccinated persons under 18 years of age. 4,138 contacts were traced and public health personnel made daily monitoring calls to 816. 53 potential exposure sites in healthcare facilities, schools and other public places were identified and communicated to the public. As a social distancing measure, unvaccinated students, teachers, and staff were excluded from schools in which exposure had occurred. Ascertaining susceptibility status was challenging. The national anti-vaccination sentiment and a parallel outbreak in a New York religious community created challenges in representing community risk while avoiding stigmatization of a community in which the first reported case was identified. Rather than respond to every false claim on social media, the health department developed talking points about emerging issues and engaged the community in dialogue. Lessons Responding to the measles outbreak required innovative approaches to surveillance and contact tracing, social distancing (school exclusions), and emergency risk communication. The response required extensive coordinated efforts of the county and state health departments, school systems, and many other organizations. Mutual aid enabled an influx of resources but managing the surge of responders proved challenging. Key messages Public health emergencies require effective emergency management practices. Carefully conducted After Action Reviews of health emergencies can help public health practitioners identify challenges and innovative practices.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document