LEARNING BY HUMANS, NOT BY ROBOTS: ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, PERSONALIZED LEARNING AND PUBLIC INTEREST

Author(s):  
George Gantzias
Author(s):  
Elana Zeide

This chapter looks at the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in education, which immediately conjures the fantasy of robot teachers, as well as fears that robot teachers will replace their human counterparts. However, AI tools impact much more than instructional choices. Personalized learning systems take on a whole host of other educational roles as well, fundamentally reconfiguring education in the process. They not only perform the functions of robot teachers but also make pedagogical and policy decisions typically left to teachers and policymakers. Their design, affordances, analytical methods, and visualization dashboards construct a technological, computational, and statistical infrastructure that literally codifies what students learn, how they are assessed, and what standards they must meet. However, school procurement and implementation of these systems are rarely part of public discussion. If they are to remain relevant to the educational process itself, as opposed to just its packaging and context, schools and their stakeholders must be more proactive in demanding information from technology providers and setting internal protocols to ensure effective and consistent implementation. Those who choose to outsource instructional functions should do so with sufficient transparency mechanisms in place to ensure professional oversight guided by well-informed debate.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Fen Zhang ◽  
Min She

English reading learning in college education is an efficient means of English learning. However, most of the current English reading learning platforms in colleges and universities only put different English books on the platform in electronic form for students to read, which leads to blindness of reading. Based on artificial intelligence algorithms, this paper builds model function modules according to the needs of English reading and learning management in college education and implements system functions based on artificial intelligence algorithms. Moreover, according to the above design principles of personalized learning model and the characteristics of personalized network learning, this paper designs a personalized learning system based on meaningful learning theory. In addition, this article verifies and analyzes the model performance. The research results show that the model proposed in this paper has a certain effect.


Information ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 275
Author(s):  
Peter Cihon ◽  
Jonas Schuett ◽  
Seth D. Baum

Corporations play a major role in artificial intelligence (AI) research, development, and deployment, with profound consequences for society. This paper surveys opportunities to improve how corporations govern their AI activities so as to better advance the public interest. The paper focuses on the roles of and opportunities for a wide range of actors inside the corporation—managers, workers, and investors—and outside the corporation—corporate partners and competitors, industry consortia, nonprofit organizations, the public, the media, and governments. Whereas prior work on multistakeholder AI governance has proposed dedicated institutions to bring together diverse actors and stakeholders, this paper explores the opportunities they have even in the absence of dedicated multistakeholder institutions. The paper illustrates these opportunities with many cases, including the participation of Google in the U.S. Department of Defense Project Maven; the publication of potentially harmful AI research by OpenAI, with input from the Partnership on AI; and the sale of facial recognition technology to law enforcement by corporations including Amazon, IBM, and Microsoft. These and other cases demonstrate the wide range of mechanisms to advance AI corporate governance in the public interest, especially when diverse actors work together.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 205395172093229
Author(s):  
Niva Elkin-Koren

In recent years, artificial intelligence has been deployed by online platforms to prevent the upload of allegedly illegal content or to remove unwarranted expressions. These systems are trained to spot objectionable content and to remove it, block it, or filter it out before it is even uploaded. Artificial intelligence filters offer a robust approach to content moderation which is shaping the public sphere. This dramatic shift in norm setting and law enforcement is potentially game-changing for democracy. Artificial intelligence filters carry censorial power, which could bypass traditional checks and balances secured by law. Their opaque and dynamic nature creates barriers to oversight, and conceals critical value choices and tradeoffs. Currently, we lack adequate tools to hold them accountable. This paper seeks to address this gap by introducing an adversarial procedure— – Contesting Algorithms. It proposes to deliberately introduce friction into the dominant removal systems governed by artificial intelligence. Algorithmic content moderation often seeks to optimize a single goal, such as removing copyright-infringing materials or blocking hate speech, while other values in the public interest, such as fair use or free speech, are often neglected. Contesting algorithms introduce an adversarial design which reflects conflicting values, and thereby may offer a check on dominant removal systems. Facilitating an adversarial intervention may promote democratic principles by keeping society in the loop. An adversarial public artificial intelligence system could enhance dynamic transparency, facilitate an alternative public articulation of social values using machine learning systems, and restore societal power to deliberate and determine social tradeoffs.


2019 ◽  
Vol 61 (4) ◽  
pp. 110-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jürgen Kai-Uwe Brock ◽  
Florian von Wangenheim

Recent years have seen a reemergence of interest in artificial intelligence (AI) among both managers and academics. Driven by technological advances and public interest, AI is considered by some as an unprecedented revolutionary technology with the potential to transform humanity. But, at this stage, managers are left with little empirical advice on how to prepare and use AI in their firm’s operations. Based on case studies and the results of two global surveys among senior managers across industries, this article shows that AI is typically implemented and used with other advanced digital technologies in firms’ digital transformation projects. The digital transformation projects in which AI is deployed are mostly in support of firms’ existing businesses, thereby demystifying some of the transformative claims made about AI. This article then presents a framework for successfully implementing AI in the context of digital transformation, offering specific guidance in the areas of data, intelligence, being grounded, integrated, teaming, agility, and leadership.


Author(s):  
Haixia Yu ◽  
Jidong Wang ◽  
Mohanraj Murugesan ◽  
A. B. M. Salman Rahman

Recently, the teaching and learning method in the conventional engineering education system needs a group of learners with personalized learning paths. The introduction of technologies like Artificial Intelligence will aid the learners to identify and detect learning opportunities utilizing historical information, present student profile and success data from an institution, and recommend learning measures to enhance their performance. This study proposes an Artificial Intelligence-based Meta-Heuristic Approach (AIMHA) for personalized learning detection systems and quality management. The proposed model has been utilized to optimize learning effectiveness by considering the nature of the learning path and the number of simultaneous visits to every learning action. In addition, a quality resolution can be determined by a meta-heuristic approach. The simulation findings of the learning actions have been utilized to examine the efficiency of the suggested method. The proposed method is evaluated learning activities achieved an efficiency ratio of 92.3%, sensitivity analysis ratio of 88.4%, performance ratio of 92.3%, precision ratio of 94.3% compared to other existing models.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document