Wellbore Failure During Water-Alternating-Gas Injection by Use of Flow-Stress Coupling Method

SPE Journal ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 22 (01) ◽  
pp. 172-183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahmood Bataee ◽  
Sonny Irawan ◽  
Syahrir Ridha ◽  
Hamed Hematpour ◽  
Zakaria Hamdi

Summary Accurate evaluation of failure pressure is crucial in the design of injection wells. Besides, in-situ stresses play an important role in obtaining the results. Pressure and rock stresses are related together as the role of effective-stress theorem. In fact, pressure changes with stress alteration caused by change in porosity and permeability. Therefore, it should be obtained with the coupling method. Moreover, to calculate pressure, temperature, and stress in the fully coupling method, a huge matrix should be solved, and it takes long processing time to implement it. Therefore, this study developed a wellbore geomechanical model for stability during injection by use of the iterative coupling method. The processing speed was enhanced in this study because the parameters were calculated separately. The parameters of pressure, temperature, saturation, and stress were obtained for the multiphase-flow condition with numerical modeling. Furthermore, in this study, the finite-difference method (FDM) had been used to solve pressure, temperature, and saturation, whereas the finite-volume method (FVM) was applied to solve the wellbore stress. On top of that, the iterative coupling method was used to improve the accuracy of the stress results. As a result, a correction of approximately 20 psi (0.14 MPa) was noted for pressure in relation to stress, which is 1 psi (6.89 kPa). Moreover, the Drucker-Prager failure criterion was used to model the fracturing on the basis of the stress results. Other than that, sensitivity analysis on horizontal maximum (σH) and minimum (σh) stresses showed that by increasing σH, the maximum injection pressures to avoid fracturing had been reduced, whereas in the case for σh, an increment was observed.

We consider three in situ processes which involve fluid flow in the crust: fault creep, aftershocks and dilatancy. Measurements of water level in wells suggest that creep events on the San Andreas fault are coupled with pore pressure changes. Readjustment of transient pore pressure, induced by large shallow earthquakes, possess the correct time constants and magnitudes to explain the occurrence of aftershocks. And finally, temporal changes of travel times in the Gram district (U.S.S.R.) imply that dilatancy may occur in situ.


1988 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 165-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carol Braester ◽  
Rudolf Martinell

Vyredox plants are designed for in situ removal of iron and/or manganese, while Nitredox plants are designed for in situ removal of nitrates and nitrites. Both methods make use of bacteriological processes. A typical unit of a Vyredox plant comprises several injection wells, through which degassed aerated water is injected into the aquifer and a pumping well through which water, partly free of iron or manganese, is abstracted. A typical Nitredox plant comprises a number of injection-pumping wells located on the circumference of two concentric circles and a pumping well in the centre through which water, partly free of nitrates and iron and/or manganese, is produced. Water with the carbon nutrient is injected through the wells located on the outer circle, while the wells located on the inner circle play the role of the Vyredox injection wells. The Nitredox process is associated with the formation of nitrogen, which is removed through the wells located on the inner circle. Vyredox and Nitredox processes include flow phenomena, transport, chemical reactions and bacteriological processes. These phenomena are described and formulated mathematically as a first step in the mathematical modelling of such processes.


2001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard L. Johnson ◽  
Paul C. Johnson ◽  
Tim L. Johnson ◽  
Neil Thomas ◽  
Andrea Leason

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolò Maria della Ventura ◽  
Szilvia Kalácska ◽  
Daniele Casari ◽  
Thomas Edward James Edwards ◽  
Johann Michler ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 39 (7) ◽  
pp. 91-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan N. Jordan ◽  
Eric P. Nichols ◽  
Alfred B. Cunningham

Bioavailability is herein defined as the accessibility of a substrate by a microorganism. Further, bioavailability is governed by (1) the substrate concentration that the cell membrane “sees,” (i.e., the “directly bioavailable” pool) as well as (2) the rate of mass transfer from potentially bioavailable (e.g., nonaqueous) phases to the directly bioavailable (e.g., aqueous) phase. Mechanisms by which sorbed (bio)surfactants influence these two processes are discussed. We propose the hypothesis that the sorption of (bio)surfactants at the solid-liquid interface is partially responsible for the increased bioavailability of surface-bound nutrients, and offer this as a basis for suggesting the development of engineered in-situ bioremediation technologies that take advantage of low (bio)surfactant concentrations. In addition, other industrial systems where bioavailability phenomena should be considered are addressed.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimberly D. Myers ◽  
◽  
Katrina Lee Jewell ◽  
P.S.K. Knappett ◽  
Mehtaz M. Lipsi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document