scholarly journals Tooth Extraction is Risk Factor for Maxillary Sinus Pneumatization : A Case Control Study

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hakan Ocak ◽  
Halis Ali Çolpak ◽  
Umut Demetoğlu ◽  
Damla Soydan ◽  
Erdem Kılıç ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Tooth Extraction ◽  
Proper Time ◽  
Reference Points ◽  
Sudden Increase ◽  
Panoramic Radiographs ◽  
Preprosthetic Surgery ◽  
Sinus Wall ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Teeth Extraction

Abstract Purpose Maxillary sinus pneumatization following teeth extraction may require various treatment plans such as sinus lifting and alveolar grafting procedures to obtain sufficient alveolar bone height for implant surgery. The aim of this study was to identify sinus pneumatization and to help in determining the proper time for preprosthetic surgery following extraction of maxillary sinus related teeth. Methods We evaluated 75 teeth extraction related to maxillary sinus floor. The panoramic radiographs were evaluated before and after extraction of the posterior maxillary teeth. The radiographs were divided into 5 groups according to duration after extraction. Two reference points (the first point corresponds to the nasal spine while the second point corresponds to the most inferior point of the floor of the maxillary sinus wall) were determined on digital panoramic radiographs before and after teeth extraction and the distance between both aforementioned points was measured. Results The amount of pneumatization was found to be increased with time. The pneumatization within the first 6 months was limited. However, a sudden increase of pneumatization after 6th month, especially the highest between 18th and 24th months, was observed. The mean pneumatization amount was found to be highest in the 1st molar group. Conclusion According to the results of the present study, surgeons should not be waited any more than 6 months after tooth extraction for preprosthetic surgery in the posterior maxillary region as long as physiological healing of extraction socket is allowed.

scholarly journals Tooth Extraction As A Risk Factor for Maxillary Sinus Pneumatization : A Case-Control Study

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hakan Ocak ◽  
Halis Ali Çolpak ◽  
Umut Demetoğlu ◽  
Damla Soydan ◽  
Erdem Kılıç ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Tooth Extraction ◽  
Proper Time ◽  
Reference Points ◽  
Sudden Increase ◽  
Panoramic Radiographs ◽  
Preprosthetic Surgery ◽  
Sinus Wall ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Teeth Extraction

Abstract Purpose Maxillary sinus pneumatization following teeth extraction may require various treatment plans such as sinus lifting and alveolar grafting procedures to obtain sufficient alveolar bone height for implant surgery. The aim of this study was to identify sinus pneumatization and to help in determining the proper time for preprosthetic surgery following extraction of maxillary sinus related teeth. Methods We evaluated 75 teeth extraction related to maxillary sinus floor. The panoramic radiographs were evaluated before and after extraction of the posterior maxillary teeth. The radiographs were divided into 5 groups according to duration after extraction. Two reference points (the first point corresponds to the nasal spine while the second point corresponds to the most inferior point of the floor of the maxillary sinus wall) were determined on digital panoramic radiographs before and after teeth extraction and the distance between both aforementioned points was measured. Results The amount of pneumatization was found to be increased with time. The pneumatization within the first 6 months was limited. However, a sudden increase of pneumatization after 6th month, especially the highest between 18th and 24th months, was observed. The mean pneumatization amount was found to be highest in the 1st molar group. Conclusion According to the results of the present study, surgeons should not be waited any more than 6 months after tooth extraction for preprosthetic surgery in the posterior maxillary region as long as physiological healing of extraction socket is allowed.

scholarly journals Tooth Extraction as a Risk Factor for Maxillary Sinus Pneumatization: A Case-control Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hakan Ocak ◽  
Halis Ali Çolpak ◽  
Umut Demetoğlu ◽  
Damla Soydan ◽  
Erdem Kılıç ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Tooth Extraction ◽  
Proper Time ◽  
Reference Points ◽  
Sudden Increase ◽  
Panoramic Radiographs ◽  
Preprosthetic Surgery ◽  
Sinus Wall ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Teeth Extraction

Abstract Purpose Maxillary sinus pneumatization following teeth extraction may require various treatment plans such as sinus lifting and alveolar grafting procedures to obtain sufficient alveolar bone height for implant surgery. The aim of this study was to identify sinus pneumatization and to help in determining the proper time for preprosthetic surgery following extraction of maxillary sinus related teeth. Methods We evaluated 75 teeth extraction related to maxillary sinus floor. The panoramic radiographs were evaluated before and after extraction of the posterior maxillary teeth. The radiographs were divided into 5 groups according to duration after extraction. Two reference points (the first point corresponds to the nasal spine while the second point corresponds to the most inferior point of the floor of the maxillary sinus wall) were determined on digital panoramic radiographs before and after teeth extraction and the distance between both aforementioned points was measured. Results The amount of pneumatization was found to be increased with time. The pneumatization within the first 6 months was limited. However, a sudden increase of pneumatization after 6th month, especially the highest between 18th and 24th months, was observed. The mean pneumatization amount was found to be highest in the 1st molar group. Conclusion According to the results of the present study, surgeons should not be waited any more than 6 months after tooth extraction for preprosthetic surgery in the posterior maxillary region as long as physiological healing of extraction socket is allowed.

scholarly journals Tooth Extraction as a Risk Factor for Maxillary Sinus Pneumatization: A Case-control Study

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hakan Ocak ◽  
Halis Ali Çolpak ◽  
Umut Demetoğlu ◽  
Damla Soydan ◽  
Erdem Kılıç ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Tooth Extraction ◽  
Proper Time ◽  
Reference Points ◽  
Sudden Increase ◽  
Panoramic Radiographs ◽  
Preprosthetic Surgery ◽  
Sinus Wall ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Teeth Extraction

Abstract Purpose Maxillary sinus pneumatization following teeth extraction may require various treatment plans such as sinus lifting and alveolar grafting procedures to obtain sufficient alveolar bone height for implant surgery. The aim of this study was to identify sinus pneumatization and to help in determining the proper time for preprosthetic surgery following extraction of maxillary sinus related teeth. Methods We evaluated 75 teeth extraction related to maxillary sinus floor. The panoramic radiographs were evaluated before and after extraction of the posterior maxillary teeth. The radiographs were divided into 5 groups according to duration after extraction. Two reference points (the first point corresponds to the nasal spine while the second point corresponds to the most inferior point of the floor of the maxillary sinus wall) were determined on digital panoramic radiographs before and after teeth extraction and the distance between both aforementioned points was measured. Results The amount of pneumatization was found to be increased with time. The pneumatization within the first 6 months was limited. However, a sudden increase of pneumatization after 6th month, especially the highest between 18th and 24th months, was observed. The mean pneumatization amount was found to be highest in the 1st molar group. Conclusion According to the results of the present study, surgeons should not be waited any more than 6 months after tooth extraction for preprosthetic surgery in the posterior maxillary region as long as physiological healing of extraction socket is allowed.

Transnasal Endoscopic Medial Maxillary Sinus Wall Transposition with Preservation of the Inferior Turbinate and Nasolacrimal Duct

2015 ◽  
Vol 76 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alice Zhao ◽  
Kristina Piastro ◽  
Anna Butrymowicz ◽  
Tiffany Chen ◽  
Tyler Kenning ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Inferior Turbinate ◽  
Nasolacrimal Duct ◽  
Sinus Wall

Axial Triangle of the Maxillary Sinus, and its Surgical Implication With the Position of Maxillary Sinus Septa During Sinus Floor Elevation: A CBCT Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 415-422
Author(s):  
Junho Jung ◽  
Jung Soo Park ◽  
Seoung-Jin Hong ◽  
Gyu-Tae Kim ◽  
Yong-Dae Kwon
Keyword(s):  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Lateral Sinus ◽  
Sinus Floor Elevation ◽  
Second Molar ◽  
Sinus Wall ◽  
Posterior Maxilla ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Sinus Floor ◽  
Molar Region

The aim of this study was to measure the convexity of the lateral wall of the maxillary (Mx) sinus and identify the locational distribution of antral septa in relation to the zygomaticomaxillary buttress (ZMB), in order to suggest another anatomical consideration and surgical modification of sinus floor elevation procedures. This study was designed as a cross-sectional study, and a total of 134 patients and 161 sinuses containing edentulous alveolar ridges were analyzed. The angle between the anterior and lateral walls of the Mx sinus (lateral sinus angle [LSA]), and the angle between the midpalatal line and the anterior sinus wall (anterior sinus angle [ASA]) were measured. Mean LSAs and ASAs were 105.9° ± 9.86° and 58.4° ± 6.43°, respectively. No significant difference between left and right sides was found (LSA, P = .420; right = 105.5° ± 9.27°; left = 105.5° ± 9.27° and ASA, P = .564; right = 57.9° ± 6.80°; left = 58.8° ± 6.02°). The prevalence of septa was 37.3%, and it was most frequently noted in the second molar region (32.8%), followed by the first molar (20.9%), retromolar (16.4%), and second premolar regions (14.9%). Septa were most frequently located posterior to the ZMB (49.2%), while ZMB was mostly located in the first molar region (66.4%). Narrow LSAs may complicate the surgical approach to the posterior maxilla, especially when sinus elevation should be used in the second molar region. Considering the occasional presence of antral septa, membrane elevation may be complicated when a septum is encountered during the procedure. These results suggest that 3-dimensional examination of the convexity of the Mx sinus should be performed preoperatively to choose proper surgical techniques and minimize surgical complications.

Imaging study of the anatomical variations and the maxillary sinus pathology in patients with missing lateral teeth for the application of dental implants

ORL ro ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 6-12
Author(s):  
Iulian Damian ◽  
Gheorghe-Ionel Comșa
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Preoperative Evaluation ◽  
Anatomical Variations ◽  
Accurate Information ◽  
Maxillary Artery ◽  
Lateral Sinus ◽  
Sinus Wall ◽  
Increased Risk

Preoperative evaluation of maxillary sinus anatomy is very important to avoid surgical complications due to close anatomical relations between the sinus and the posterior maxillary teeth and/or edentulous alveolar ridge. Posterior superior alveolar artery is a branch of the maxillary artery and provides the vascularization of the lateral sinus wall and underlying mucosa. Maxillary artery branches should be taken into consideration during sinus lifting procedures and bone augmentation due to increased risk of bleeding by damaging the artery during the osteotomy. Computed tomography (CT) explores three-dimensional anatomic structures and provides complex and accurate information about them. Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) offers an accurate view of the teeth and surrounding structures at high resolution, despite low-dose radiation used. In this study, the incidence of anatomical variations and sinus pathology were assessed using CBCT. The aim is to evaluate the presence of sinus pathology (sinus mucosal thickening, oro-antral communications, sinus tumors, cysts, polyps), presence and position of the posterior superior alveolar artery. These issues are important because they are about the limits of the dental implants in the posterior maxillary area. The presence of sinus pathology and anatomical variations may predispose to complications and even failures of implantation therapy.  

scholarly journals Associated characteristics and treatment outcomes of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw in patients receiving denosumab or zoledronic acid for bone metastases

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroaki Ikesue ◽  
Moe Mouri ◽  
Hideaki Tomita ◽  
Masaki Hirabatake ◽  
Mai Ikemura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Zoledronic Acid ◽  
Bone Metastases ◽  
Tooth Extraction ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Osteonecrosis Of The Jaw ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Proportional Hazards Regression ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Denosumab Treatment

Abstract Purpose This study aimed to evaluate the association between clinical characteristics and development of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) in patients who underwent dental examinations before the initiation of treatment with denosumab or zoledronic acid, which are bone-modifying agents (BMAs), for bone metastases. Additionally, the clinical outcomes of patients who developed MRONJ were evaluated along with the time to resolution of MRONJ. Methods The medical charts of patients with cancer who received denosumab or zoledronic acid for bone metastases between January 2012 and September 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were excluded if they did not undergo a dental examination at baseline. Results Among the 374 included patients, 34 (9.1%) developed MRONJ. The incidence of MRONJ was significantly higher in the denosumab group than in the zoledronic acid (27/215 [12.6%] vs 7/159 [4.4%], P = 0.006) group. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis revealed that denosumab treatment, older age, and tooth extraction before and after starting BMA treatments were significantly associated with developing MRONJ. The time to resolution of MRONJ was significantly shorter for patients who received denosumab (median 26.8 months) than for those who received zoledronic acid (median not reached; P = 0.024). Conclusion The results of this study suggest that treatment with denosumab, age > 65 years, and tooth extraction before and after starting BMA treatments are significantly associated with developing MRONJ in patients undergoing treatment for bone metastases. However, MRONJ caused by denosumab resolves faster than that caused by zoledronic acid.

scholarly journals Evaluating Endoscopic Ipsilateral Endonasal Corridor Approaches to the Anterolateral Wall of the Maxillary Sinus: A Computerized Tomography Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Navarat Vatcharayothin ◽  
Pornthep Kasemsiri ◽  
Sanguansak Thanaviratananich ◽  
Cattleya Thongrong
Keyword(s):  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Inferior Turbinate ◽  
Radial Access ◽  
Sinus Wall ◽  
Nasal Floor ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Anterolateral Wall ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Maxillary Sinuses

Abstract Introduction The endoscopic access to lesions in the anterolateral wall of the maxillary sinus is a challenging issue; therefore, the evaluation of access should be performed. Objective To assess the accessibility of three endoscopic ipsilateral endonasal corridors. Methods Three corridors were created in each of the 30 maxillary sinuses from 19 head cadavers. Accessing the anterolateral wall of the maxillary sinus was documented with a straight stereotactic navigator probe at the level of the nasal floor and of the axilla of the inferior turbinate. Results At level of the nasal floor, the prelacrimal approach, the modified endoscopic Denker approach, and the endoscopic Denker approach allowed mean radial access to the anterolateral maxillary sinus wall of 42.6 ± 7.3 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 39.9–45.3), 56.0 ± 6.1 (95%CI: 53.7–58.3), and 60.1 ± 6.2 (95%CI: 57.8–62.4), respectively. Furthermore, these approaches provided more lateral access to the maxillary sinus at the level of the axilla of the inferior turbinate, with mean radial access of 45.8 ± 6.9 (95%CI: 43.3–48.4) for the prelacrimal approach, 59.8 ± 4.7 (95% CI:58.1–61.6) for the modified endoscopic Denker approach, and 63.6 ± 5.5 (95%CI: 61.6–65.7) for the endoscopic Denker approach. The mean radial access in each corridor, either at the level of the nasal floor or the axilla of the inferior turbinate, showed a statistically significant difference in all comparison approaches (p < 0.05). Conclusions The prelacrimal approach provided a narrow radial access, which allows access to anteromedial lesions of the maxillary sinus, whereas the modified endoscopic Denker and the endoscopic Denker approaches provided more lateral radial access and improved operational feasibility on far anterolateral maxillary sinus lesions.

scholarly journals Effects of pre-extraction intermittent PTH administration on extraction socket healing in bisphosphonate administered ovariectomized rats

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae-Young Kim ◽  
Hyo-Won Jang ◽  
Jung-In Kim ◽  
In-Ho Cha
Keyword(s):  
Tooth Extraction ◽  
Bisphosphonate Therapy ◽  
Ovariectomized Rats ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Micro Ct ◽  
Micro Computed Tomography ◽  
Extraction Socket ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Socket Healing ◽  
Positive Effect

AbstractThe purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of administering intermittent parathyroid hormone (iPTH) before tooth extraction versus after tooth extraction on the risk of developing MRONJ in experimental animal model. Twenty-five ovariectomized rats received 6 weeks of bisphosphonate therapy. They were classified into 3 groups, based on the timing of the medication, as Control, Pre-PTH and Post-PTH groups. For Control group, normal saline was administered before and after tooth extraction. iPTH was administered during 4 weeks before tooth extraction for Pre-PTH group and after tooth extraction for Post-PTH group. The animals were euthanized 8 weeks after tooth extraction. Macroscopic, histological, micro-computed tomography (micro-CT), and histomorphometric examinations were conducted. The incidences of impaired healing were 11.11% both in Pre-PTH and Post-PTH groups, which was lower than the Control group (42.86%). Bone healing in the extraction socket, based on micro-CT and histomorphometry evaluations, was best in Post-PTH and worst in Control group. The Pre-PTH group showed moderate healing pattern. Despite of limitations in this study, the authors identified Pre-PTH group seems to have positive effect on extraction socket healing. With regard to timing, administering iPTH after tooth extraction was superior to applying it before tooth extraction.

scholarly journals 3D Volumetric Analysis and Anatomical Considerations for Sinus Bone Graft

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 951
Author(s):  
Ji Hyoung Kim ◽  
Hyo Joon Kim ◽  
Ye Joon Jo ◽  
Jun Seok Choi ◽  
Seong Yong Moon
Keyword(s):  
Bone Graft ◽  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Alveolar Bone ◽  
Lateral Wall ◽  
Volumetric Analysis ◽  
Ct Scans ◽  
Sinus Floor Elevation ◽  
Sinus Wall ◽  
Sinus Floor ◽  
The Mean

The aim of this study is to evaluate anatomical considerations and assess the volume of the maxillary sinus bone graft. There were sixty-three patients (eighty-three sinuses) who had taken CT scans for implant surgery. Patients included those whose height of the residual alveolar bone was less than 5 mm. The position of posterior superior alveolar artery, the thickness of the maxillary sinus wall, and the volume of the maxillary sinus according to the amount of sinus floor elevation were measured. The mean vertical distance of posterior superior alveolar artery was 11.91 ± 4.79 mm from 3.03 mm to 24.05 mm. The mean thickness of the lateral wall was 1.71 ± 0.55 mm in the range of 0.74 mm to 3.93 mm. The volume of 3 mm, 5 mm, 7 mm, and 10 mm from the sinus floor was 0.173 ± 0.11 cm3, 0.526 ± 0.25 cm3, 1.068 ± 0.43 cm3, and 2.184 ± 0.74 cm3 on average, respectively. The knowledge of the posterior superior alveolar artery position, the lateral wall thickness, and the volume of the maxillary sinus can help the clinician for sinus bone graft.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document