scholarly journals Disease characteristics and treatment patterns of Chinese patients with colorectal cancer: a retrospective study using medical records from China

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruihua Xu ◽  
Wei Wang ◽  
Bo Zhu ◽  
Xiaoyan Lin ◽  
Dong Ma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Medical Records ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Chinese Patients ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
The Third ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Third Line Therapy ◽  
Third Line

Abstract Abstract Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most prevalent cancer in China but few large-scale studies were conducted to understand CRC patients. The current study is aimed to gain a real-world perspectives of CRC patients in China. Methods: Using electronic medical records of sampled patients between 2011 and 2016 from 12 hospitals in China, a retrospective cohort study was conducted to describe demographics and disease prognosis of CRC patients, and examine treatment sequences among metastatic CRC (mCRC) patients. Descriptive, comparative and survival analyses were conducted. Results: Of 8,136 CRC patients, 44% had mCRC. Risks of recurrence after radical surgery increased with tumor, models and metastases (TNM) stage at diagnosis (p<0.001). Among mCRC patients, fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) and other oxaliplatin-based regimens were the most widely-used first-line treatment (42%). Fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan (FOLFIRI) and other irinotecan-based regimens dominated the second-line (40%). There was no a dominated regimen for the third-line. The proportion of patients receiving chemotherapy with targeted biologics increased from less than 20% for the first- and second- lines to 34% for the third-line (p<0.001). The most common sequence from first- to second-line was from FOLFOX and other oxaliplatin-based regimens to FOLFIRI and other irinotecan-based regimens (286/1,200, 24%). Conclusions: As the only nationwide large-scale study among CRC and mCRC patients before more CRC biologics became available in China in 2017 and 2018, our study reported limited numbers of patients using targeted biologics and no a dominant choice for the third-line therapy. Our findings reflected a lack of consensus on the choice of third-line therapy and limited available options in China. It is evident o continue promoting early CRC diagnosis and to increase the accessibility of treatment options for mCRC patients. Our results can also be used as the baseline to assess treatment pattern changes before and after the inclusion of more third-line treatment were approved and covered into the National Health Insurance Plan in China between 2017 - 2018.

scholarly journals Disease characteristics and treatment patterns of Chinese patients with colorectal cancer: a retrospective study using medical records from China

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruihua Xu ◽  
Wei Wang ◽  
Bo Zhu ◽  
Xiaoyan Lin ◽  
Dong Ma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Medical Records ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Chinese Patients ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
The Third ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Third Line

Abstract Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most prevalent cancer in China but few large-scale studies were conducted to understand CRC patients. The current study is aimed to gain a real-world perspectives of CRC patients in China. Methods: Using electronic medical records of sampled patients between 2011 and 2016 from 12 hospitals in China, a retrospective cohort study was conducted to describe demographics and disease prognosis of CRC patients, and examine treatment sequences among metastatic CRC (mCRC) patients. Descriptive, comparative and survival analyses were conducted. Results: Among mCRC patients (3,878/8,136, 48%), the fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) and other oxaliplatin-based regimens were the most widely-used first-line treatment (42%). Fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan (FOLFIRI) and other irinotecan-based regimens dominated the second-line (40%). There was no a dominated regimen for the third-line. The proportion of patients receiving chemotherapy with targeted biologics increased from less than 20% for the first- and second- lines to 34% for the third-line (p<0.001). The most common sequence from first- to second-line was from FOLFOX and other oxaliplatin-based regimens to FOLFIRI and other irinotecan-based regimens (286/1,200, 24%). Conclusions: Our findings reflected a lack of consensus on the choice of third-line therapy and limited available options in China. It is evident o continue promoting early CRC diagnosis and to increase the accessibility of treatment options for mCRC patients. As the only nationwide large-scale study among CRC and mCRC patients before more biologics became available in China, our results can also be used as the baseline to assess treatment pattern changes before and after more third-line treatment were approved and covered into the National Health Insurance Plan in China between 2017 - 2018.

scholarly journals Disease characteristics and treatment patterns of Chinese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective study using medical records from China

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruihua Xu ◽  
Wei Wang ◽  
Bo Zhu ◽  
Xiaoyan Lin ◽  
Dong Ma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Medical Records ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Chinese Patients ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
The Third ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Third Line

Abstract Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most prevalent cancer in China but few large-scale studies were conducted to understand CRC patients. The current study is aimed to gain a real-world perspectives of CRC patients in China. Methods: Using electronic medical records of sampled patients between 2011 and 2016 from 12 hospitals in China, a retrospective cohort study was conducted to describe demographics and disease prognosis of CRC patients, and examine treatment sequences among metastatic CRC (mCRC) patients. Descriptive, comparative and survival analyses were conducted. Results: Among mCRC patients (3,878/8,136, 48%), the fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) and other oxaliplatin-based regimens were the most widely-used first-line treatment (42%). Fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan (FOLFIRI) and other irinotecan-based regimens dominated the second-line (40%). There was no a dominated regimen for the third-line. The proportion of patients receiving chemotherapy with targeted biologics increased from less than 20% for the first- and second- lines to 34% for the third-line (p<0.001). The most common sequence from first- to second-line was from FOLFOX and other oxaliplatin-based regimens to FOLFIRI and other irinotecan-based regimens (286/1,200, 24%).Conclusions: Our findings reflected a lack of consensus on the choice of third-line therapy and limited available options in China. It is evident o continue promoting early CRC diagnosis and to increase the accessibility of treatment options for mCRC patients. As the only nationwide large-scale study among CRC and mCRC patients before more biologics became available in China, our results can also be used as the baseline to assess treatment pattern changes before and after more third-line treatment were approved and covered into the National Health Insurance Plan in China between 2017 - 2018.

Safety and tolerability profile of raltitrexed in Chinese patients with locally advanced or recurrent and metastatic colorectal cancer: A phase IV trial.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 571-571
Author(s):  
Shukui Qin ◽  
Jin Li ◽  
Yunpeng Liu ◽  
Yin Chen ◽  
Nong Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Chinese Patients ◽  
Tolerability Profile ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Third Line Therapy ◽  
Third Line ◽  
Phase Iv

571 Background: The clinical benefit and safety profile associated with raltitrexed in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) were established. However, safety information of raltitrexed in Chinese patients is rare. We aimed to assess the safety of raltitrexed monotherapy in Chinese patients with advanced CRC. Methods: This single-arm, open-label, multi-center, phase IV trial was conducted in 13 hospitals across China between March 2011 and July 2014. Patients with locally advanced or recurrent and metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) received raltitrexed (3mg/m2) as a 15-min infusion on day 1, every 21 days. Treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary objective was safety and the secondary objectives were disease control rate (DCR), progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 215 patients were enrolled, and the safety was assessed in 205 patients. 92 patients had 394 Adverse events (AEs) during the study. A majority (94.4%) of AEs was grade 1/2 and only 5.3% was grade 3/4. Most AEs were either resolved spontaneously or treated successfully with standard medical interventions. Severe AEs were reported by 5.8% (12/205) of patients. The most commonly reported AEs were increase of transaminases, leukopenia, nausea and vomiting. Serum transaminase elevation, an important safety concern associated with raltitrexed therapy, were transient, self-limiting and manageable. No deaths were reported during the study. The DCR in second-line and third-line therapy by raltitrexed reached 49.5% and 37.4%, respectively. The median PFS in second-line and third-line therapy was 1.43 months and 1.47 months, respectively. The median OS was 13.6 months and 8.9 months, respectively. Conclusions: Raltitrexed monotherapy is a safe, well-tolerated and convenient therapy option for Chinese patients. The treatment-associated toxicity is manageable and does not lead to discontinuation of treatment in oncology practice.

scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of regorafenib as beyond second-line therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: an adjusted indirect meta-analysis and systematic review

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 175883592094093
Author(s):  
Yinying Wu ◽  
Yangwei Fan ◽  
Danfeng Dong ◽  
Xuyuan Dong ◽  
Yuan Hu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Third Line Therapy ◽  
Third Line

Background: The evidence base for optimum third-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is not conclusive. Recent studies have demonstrated the efficacy of regorafenib as third-line therapy in mCRC. This indirect meta-analysis compared the efficacy and safety of regorafenib with other available third-line therapies for mCRC. Methods: A literature search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library for studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of fruquintinib, regorafenib, TAS-102, and nintedanib as third-line therapies in patients with mCRC. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were the primary outcomes, while objective response rate (ORR) and safety were the secondary outcomes. Hazard ratio (HR) and relative risk (RR) with their respective 95% confidence interval (CI) were used for analysis of survival, clinical response, and safety data. An adjusted indirect meta-analysis with placebo as the common comparator was performed. Results: We identified eight RCTs comparing regorafenib (two studies), fruquintinib (two studies), TAS-102 (three studies), and nintedanib (one study) against placebo. The OS with regorafenib was significantly better when compared with nintedanib (HR = 0.66; 95% CI: 0.45, 0.95, p = 0.02) but was similar to that of fruquintinib (HR = 1.01; 95% CI: 0.67, 1.52, p = 0.94) and TAS-102 (HR = 0.97; 95% CI: 0.68, 1.38, p = 0.88). The PFS and ORR for regorafenib were slightly better than those of TAS-102 (PFS: HR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.54, 1.37, p = 0.5; ORR: RR = 1.13, 95% CI: 0.11, 11.05, p = 0.92) and nintedanib (PFS: HR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.42, 1.10, p = 0.12; ORR: not reported) but were lower than those for fruquintinib (PFS: HR = 1.53, 95% CI: 0.93, 2.52, p = 0.08; ORR: RR = 0.68269, 95% CI: 0.045, 10.32, p = 0.79). Safety analysis showed that the RR of adverse events (AEs) was lesser in patients treated with regorafenib in comparison with that in patients treated with fruquintinib, but was similar to that in patients treated with nintedanib and TAS-102. Conclusion: Regorafenib has efficacy similar to that of TAS-102 and better safety when compared with fruquintinib. Considering the mechanism of action of regorafenib, which targets multiple factors in the angiogenic pathway, it could be an ideal option for treatment in the beyond second-line setting.

scholarly journals Effects of removing reimbursement restrictions on targeted therapy accessibility for non-small cell lung cancer treatment in Taiwan: an interrupted time series study

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. e022293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason C Hsu ◽  
Chen-Fang Wei ◽  
Szu-Chun Yang
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Targeted Therapies ◽  
Interrupted Time Series ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Third Line Therapy ◽  
Third Line

InterventionsTargeted therapies have been proven to provide clinical benefits to patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Gefitinib was initially approved and reimbursed as a third-line therapy for patients with advanced NSCLC by the Taiwan National Health Insurance (NHI) in 2004; subsequently it became a second-line therapy (in 2007) and further a first-line therapy (in 2011) for patients with epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-positive advanced NSCLC. Another targeted therapy, erlotinib, was initially approved as a third-line therapy in 2007, and it became a second-line therapy in 2008.ObjectivesThis study is aimed towards an exploration of the impacts of the Taiwan NHI reimbursement policies (removing reimbursement restrictions) related to accessibility of targeted therapies.SettingWe retrieved 2004–2013 claims data for all patients with lung cancer diagnoses from the NHI Research Database.Design and outcome measuresUsing an interrupted time series design and segmented regression, we estimated changes in the monthly prescribing rate by patient number and market shares by cost following each modification of the reimbursement policy for gefitinib and erlotinib for NSCLC treatment.ResultsTotally 92 220 patients with NSCLC were identified. The prescribing rate of the targeted therapies increased by 15.58%, decreased by 10.98% and increased by 6.31% following the introduction of gefitinib as a second-line treatment in 2007, erlotinib as a second-line treatment in 2008 and gefitinib as as first line treatment in 2011, respectively. The average time to prescription reduced by 65.84% and 41.59% following coverage of erlotinib by insurance and gefitinib/erlotinib as second-line treatments in 2007–2008 and following gefitinib as the first-line treatment in 2011.ConclusionsThe changes in reimbursement policies had a significant impact on the accessibility of targeted therapies for NSCLC treatment. Removing reimbursement restrictions can significantly increase the level and the speed of drug accessibility.

K-RAS codon 13 mutation in advanced colorectal cancer: A single-center retrospective study investigating prognostic outcomes and treatment strategies.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 633-633
Author(s):  
Vincenzo Dadduzio ◽  
Michele Basso ◽  
Maria Bensi ◽  
Silvia Cona ◽  
Eleonora Cerchiaro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Response To Therapy ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Third Line Therapy ◽  
Third Line

633 Background: Ras genes are markers of resistance to anti-EGFR therapies. Emerging evidences suggest that each mutation, independently from its predictive role of response/resistance to specific treatments, may be expression of different diseases with different biologic behaviours. We collected data of mCRC patients harbouring K-Ras codon 13 mutation to evaluate response to therapy, PFS and OS. Methods: We retrospectively collected data of advanced colorectal cancer patients harbouring K-Ras codon 13 mutation treated at our Institution between 2004 and 2014. Results: A total of n.33 K-Ras codon 13 mutated patients were analysed. N.24 patients (72,7%) had synchronous metastatic disease. None of the patients received anti-EGFR treatment, while n.25 patients received anti-VEGF agent bevacizumab in association to chemotherapy with fluoropirimidines plus oxaliplatin and/or irinotecan (n.21 as frontline therapy, n.4 in second line). ORR was 51,5% (17/33) on first-line therapy, 22,2% (6/27) on second-line therapy and 16,6% (2/12) on third-line therapy. Median PFS was 14,1 months after first-line therapy, 9,3 months after second-line therapy, 6,4 months after third-line therapy. Median OS was 35,5 months (events: 19/33). N.14 patients received metastases surgery with radical intent. OS in this population has not been reached yet at a median follow-up of 38 months, even though all patients had a relapse. OS among patients undergone to systemic only strategy was 31 months. Conclusions: At our knowledge, this is the first report suggesting a favourable prognosis for K-ras codon 13 mutated patients, with a median overall survival even superior to pan-RAS wild-type patients. Indeed, the high percentage of advanced patients at diagnosis (72.7%), the high responsiveness to chemotherapy even in third line, the high percentage of patients converted to surgery (42.4%) in an unselected population, together with the high risk or relapse after surgery, suggest K-ras codon 13 mutated disease is probably a biologically aggressive disease. Nevertheless our data prompt that these patients may benefit aggressive strategies of treatment and multidisciplinary evaluation.

scholarly journals Efficacy of Docetaxel Plus Ramucirumab as Palliative Third-Line Therapy Following Second-Line Immune-Checkpoint-Inhibitor Treatment in Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Stage IV

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 117955492095135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wolfgang M Brueckl ◽  
Martin Reck ◽  
Achim Rittmeyer ◽  
Jens Kollmeier ◽  
Claas Wesseler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor ◽  
Synergistic Effects ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Third Line Therapy ◽  
Third Line ◽  
Third Line Treatment

Background: Antiangiogenic agents have been shown to stimulate the immune system and cause synergistic effects with chemotherapy. Effects might be even stronger after immune-checkpoint-inhibitor (ICI) therapy. The purpose of this analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of ramucirumab plus docetaxel (R + D) as third-line treatment after failure of a first-line platinum-based chemotherapy and a second-line ICI treatment in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) stage IV. Methods: Retrospective data were collected from 9 German thoracic oncology centers. Only patients who had received at least 1 cycle of third-line R + D were included. The numbers of cycles, objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were investigated. Results: Sixty-seven patients met the criteria for inclusion. Third-line treatment with R + D achieved an ORR of 36% and a disease control rate (DCR) of 69%. Median PFS for third-line therapy was 6.8 months with a duration of response (DOR) of 10.2 months. A median OS of 29 months was observed from the start of first-line therapy with a median OS of 11.0 months from the start of third-line treatment. No unexpected toxicities occurred. Conclusion: R + D is a highly effective and safe third-line treatment after failure of second-line programmed cell death protein 1/programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD1/PD-L1)-derived ICI therapy irrespective of NSCLC histology. As there may be synergistic effects of second- and third-line treatments, this sequence is a very suitable option for patients not treated with first-line ICI. In addition, R + D should continue to be investigated as a second-line treatment option after failure of chemotherapy plus ICI in the palliative first–line treatment.

scholarly journals Appropriateness of trifluridine/tipiracil in the clinical practice of third-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlo Barone ◽  
Maria Di Bartolomeo ◽  
Sara Lonardi ◽  
Evaristo Maiello ◽  
Erika Martinelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Daily Practice ◽  
Rand Corporation ◽  
Median Score ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Clinical Scenarios ◽  
Third Line Therapy ◽  
Third Line

Aim: To help to remove misperception of an appropriate position of trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Materials & methods: The RAND Corporation/UCLA Appropriateness Method was used by a panel of Italian experts to develop recommendations concerning daily practice with FTD/TPI. Forty-three clinical scenarios were discussed in two rounds and the resulting statements were rated as appropriate, uncertain or inappropriate, according to the median score. Results: Several topics were dealt with, covering the profile of eligible patients, therapeutic options beyond the second line, the practice of treatment with FTD/TPI, evaluation and efficacy and toxicity, as well as costs and compliance. Conclusion: FTD/TPI is an important therapeutic resource in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer that combines manageability and safety.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document