scholarly journals Distant Survival for Patients Undergoing Surgery Using Volatile versus IV Anesthesia for Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus:A Retrospective study.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao-Yan Meng ◽  
Xiu-Ping Zhang ◽  
Hong-Qian Wang ◽  
Weifeng Yu
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Portal Vein ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Cancer Recurrence ◽  
Survival Outcomes ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Underlying Causes ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Whether anesthesia type is associate with the surgical outcome of Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) remains to be determined. This study aims to investigate the impact of volatile inhalational anesthesia (INHA) versus total IV anesthesia (TIVA) on the survival outcomes in HCC patients with PVTT. Methods A cohort of in-patients whom were diagnosed of HCC with PVTT in Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Shanghai, China, from January 1, 2008 to December 24, 2012 were identified. Surgical patients receiving the INHA and TIVA were screened out. The overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS) and several postoperative adverse events were compared according to anesthesia types. Results A total of 1513 patients were included in this study. After exclusions are applied, 263 patients remain in the INHA group and 208 in the TIVA group. Patients receiving INHA have a lower 5-year overall survival rate than that of patients receiving TIVA [12.6% (95% CI, 9.0 to 17.3) vs. 17.7% (95% CI, 11.3 to 20.8), P=0.024]. Results of multivariable Cox-regression analysis also identify that INHA anesthesia is significantly associated with mortality and cancer recurrence after surgery compare to TIVA, with HR (95%CI) of 1.303 (1.065, 1.595) and 1.265 (1.040, 1.539), respectively. Subgroup analysis suggested that in more severe cancer patients, the worse outcome related to INHA might be more significant. Conclusion This retrospective analysis identifies that TIVA has better survival outcomes compare to INHA in HCC patients with PVTT. Future prospective researches are urgent to verify this difference and figure out underlying causes of it.

scholarly journals Distant survival for patients undergoing surgery using volatile versus IV anesthesia for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus: a retrospective study

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao-Yan Meng ◽  
Xiu-Ping Zhang ◽  
Zhe Sun ◽  
Hong-Qian Wang ◽  
Wei-Feng Yu
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Portal Vein ◽  
Tumor Thrombus ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Cancer Recurrence ◽  
Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Underlying Pathophysiology

Abstract Background Whether anesthesia type is associated with the surgical outcome of Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) remains to be determined. This study aims to investigate the impact of volatile inhalational anesthesia (INHA) versus total IV anesthesia (TIVA) on the survival outcomes in HCC patients with PVTT. Methods A cohort of in-patients whom were diagnosed of HCC with PVTT in Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Shanghai, China, from January 1, 2008 to December 24, 2012 were identified. Surgical patients receiving the INHA and TIVA were screened out. The overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS) and several postoperative adverse events were compared according to anesthesia types. Results A total of 1513 patients were included in this study. After exclusions are applied, 263 patients remain in the INHA group and 208 in the TIVA group. Patients receiving INHA have a lower 5-year overall survival rate than that of patients receiving TIVA [12.6% (95% CI, 9.0 to 17.3) vs. 17.7% (95% CI, 11.3 to 20.8), P = 0.024]. Results of multivariable Cox-regression analysis also identify that INHA anesthesia is significantly associated with mortality and cancer recurrence after surgery compare to TIVA, with HR (95%CI) of 1.303 (1.065, 1.595) and 1.265 (1.040, 1.539), respectively. Subgroup analysis suggested that in more severe cancer patients, the worse outcome related to INHA might be more significant. Conclusion This retrospective analysis identifies that TIVA is associated with better outcomes compared with INHA. Future prospective studies clinical and translational studies are required to verify this difference and investigate underlying pathophysiology.

scholarly journals Comparison of overall survival on surgical resection versus transarterial chemoembolization with or without radiofrequency ablation in intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma: A propensity score matching analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chih-Wen Lin ◽  
Yaw-Sen Chen ◽  
Gin-Ho Lo ◽  
Yao-Chun Hsu ◽  
Chia-Chang Hsu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Surgical Resection ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Tace Group ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background: Patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage B hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are recommended to undergo transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE). However, TACE in combination with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is not inferior to surgical resection (SR), and the benefits of surgical resection (SR) for BCLC stage B HCC remain unclear. Hence, this study aims to compare the impact of SR, TACE+RFA, and TACE on analyzing overall survival (OS) in BCLC stage B HCC. Methods: Overall, 428 HCC patients were included in BCLC stage B, and their clinical data and OS were recorded. OS was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis. Results: One hundred forty (32.7%) patients received SR, 231 (53.9%) received TACE+RFA, and 57 (13.3%) received TACE. The OS was significantly higher in the SR group than that in the TACE+RFA group [hazard ratio (HR): 1.78; 95% confidence incidence (CI): 1.15-2.75, p=0.009]. The OS was significantly higher in the SR group than that in the TACE group (HR: 3.17; 95% CI: 2.31-4.36, p<0.0001). Moreover, the OS was significantly higher in the TACE+RFA group than that in the TACE group (HR: 1.82; 95% CI: 1.21-2.74, p=0.004). The cumulative OS rates at 1, 3 and 5 years in the SR, TACE+RFA, and TACE groups were 89.2%, 69.4% and 61.2%, 86.0%, 57.9% and 38.2%, and 69.5%, 37.0% and 15.2%, respectively. After propensity score matching, the SR group still had a higher OS than those of the TACE+RFA and TACE groups. The TACE+RFA group had a higher OS than that of the TACE group. Conclusion: The SR group had higher OS than the TACE+RFA and TACE groups in BCLC stage B HCC. Furthermore, the TACE+RFA group had higher OS than the TACE group.

scholarly journals Indication of Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Should Be Reconsidered in Case of Microvascular Invasion and Multilocular Tumor Occurrence

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 1155
Author(s):  
Jan-Paul Gundlach ◽  
Stephan Schmidt ◽  
Alexander Bernsmeier ◽  
Rainer Günther ◽  
Victor Kataev ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Liver Transplantation ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Microvascular Invasion ◽  
Simultaneous Occurrence ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Disease Free

Liver transplantation (LT) is routinely performed for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in cirrhosis without major vascular invasion. Although the adverse influence of microvascular invasion is recognized, its occurrence does not contraindicate LT. We retrospectively analyzed in our LT cohort the significance of microvascular invasion on survival and demonstrate bridging procedures. At our hospital, 346 patients were diagnosed with HCC, 171 patients were evaluated for LT, and 153 were listed at Eurotransplant during a period of 11 years. Among these, 112 patients received LT and were included in this study. Overall survival after 1, 3 and 5 years was 86.3%, 73.9%, and 67.9%, respectively. Microvascular invasion led to significantly reduced overall (p = 0.030) and disease-free survival (p = 0.002). Five-year disease-free survival with microvascular invasion was 10.5%. Multilocular tumor occurrence with simultaneous microvascular invasion revealed the worst prognosis. In our LT cohort, predominant bridging treatment was transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and the number of TACE significantly correlated with poorer overall survival after LT (p = 0.028), which was confirmed in multiple Cox regression analysis for overall and disease-free survival (p = 0.015 and p = 0.011). Microvascular tumor invasion is significantly associated with reduced prognosis after LT, which is aggravated by simultaneous occurrence of multiple lesions. Therefore, indication strategies for LT should be reconsidered.

Cisplatin-Based versus Carboplatin-Based Chemotherapy for Extra-Pulmonary Neuroendocrine Carcinomas; A Real-World Study.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Omar Abdel-Rahman ◽  
Sheryl L. Koski
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Survival Outcomes ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Platinum Agent ◽  
Extra Pulmonary ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Neuroendocrine Carcinomas

Objective: To assess the survival differences between cisplatin/etoposide versus carboplatin/etoposide chemotherapy regimens in the management of extra-pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs). Methods: Administrative cancer care databases in the province of Alberta, Canada were reviewed, and patients with extra-pulmonary NECs (including those with small cell and large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas) who were treated with either cisplatin/ etoposide or carboplatin/ etoposide, 2004-2019, were reviewed. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were used to compare the survival outcomes according to the type of platinum agent, and multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to assess the impact of the type of platinum agent on overall survival outcomes. Results: A total of 263 eligible patients were included in this analysis. These include 176 patients who received cisplatin/ etoposide and 87 patients who received carboplatin/etoposide. Using Kaplan-Meier survival estimates, patients treated with cisplatin have better overall survival compared to patients treated with carboplatin (P=0.005). Multivariable Cox regression analysis suggested that the following factors were associated with worse overall survival: higher Charlson comorbidity index (HR: 1.17; 95% CI: 1.05-1.30), gastrointestinal primary site (HR: 1.55; 95% CI: 1.12-2.14), stage IV disease (HR: 1.75; 95% CI: 1.28-2.38) and use of carboplatin (HR: 1.40; 95% CI: 1.02-1.92). Conclusions: The current study suggested that cisplatin/etoposide might be associated with better overall survival compared to carboplatin/etoposide among patients with extra-pulmonary NECs. It is unclear if this is related to differences in inherent responsiveness to the two platinum agents, or due to differences in comorbidity burden between the two treatment groups.

Outcomes of advanced gastrointestinal (GI) cancer patients in relationship to opioid use: An individual patient data pooled analysis from eight clinical trials.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 687-687
Author(s):  
Omar Abdel-Rahman ◽  
Hatim Karachiwala ◽  
Jacob C. Easaw
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Survival Outcomes ◽  
Disease Entity ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Gi Cancers ◽  
The Impact

687 Background: The current study aims at assessing the patterns of opioid use, and evaluating the impact of opioid use on survival outcomes among patients with advanced GI cancers who were included in eight clinical trials. Methods: De-identified datasets of eight clinical trials evaluating first-line systemic treatment for advanced GI cancers (NCT01124786; NCT00844649; NCT00290966; NCT00678535; NCT00699374; NCT00272051; NCT00305188; NCT00384176) were accessed from the Project Data Sphere platform. These trials evaluated patients with pancreatic, gastric, hepatocellular and colorectal carcinoma. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate factors predicting the use of opioids. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were used to compare survival outcomes in each disease entity among patients who did or did not receive opioid treatment. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to assess the impact of opioid use on survival outcomes in each disease entity. Results: A total of 3441 participants were included in the current analysis. The following factors predicted a higher probability of opioid use within logistic regression analysis: younger age (P = 0.004), non-white race (P = 0.010), higher ECOG score (P < 0.001) and pancreatic primary site (P < 0.001). Use of opioids was consistently associated with worse overall survival in Kaplan-Meier survival estimates of each disease entity (for pancreatic cancer: P = 0.008; for gastric cancer: P < 0.001; for hepatocellular carcinoma: P < 0.001 and for colorectal cancer: P < 0.001). Within multivariable Cox regression analysis, opioid use was associated with worse overall survival among patients with pancreatic cancer (HR = 1.245; 95% CI: 1.063-1.459; P = 0.007), gastric cancer (HR = 1.725; 95% CI: 1.403-2.122; P < 0.001), hepatocellular carcinoma (HR = 1.841; 95 CI: 1.480-2.290; P < 0.001) and colorectal cancer (HR = 1.651; 95% CI: 1.380-1.975; P < 0.001). Conclusions: Opioid use is consistently associated with worse overall survival among patients with different GI cancers. Further studies are needed to evaluate the underlying mechanisms of this observation.

scholarly journals Comparison of overall survival on surgical resection versus transarterial chemoembolization with or without radiofrequency ablation in intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma: A propensity score matching analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chih-Wen Lin ◽  
Yaw-Sen Chen ◽  
Gin-Ho Lo ◽  
Yao-Chun Hsu ◽  
Chia-Chang Hsu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Surgical Resection ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Tace Group ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background: Patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage B hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are recommended to undergo transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE). However, TACE in combination with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is not inferior to surgical resection (SR), and the benefits of surgical resection (SR) for BCLC stage B HCC remain unclear. Hence, this study aims to compare the impact of SR, TACE+RFA, and TACE on analyzing overall survival (OS) in BCLC stage B HCC.Methods: Overall, 428 HCC patients were included in BCLC stage B, and their clinical data and OS were recorded. OS was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis. Results: One hundred forty (32.7%) patients received SR, 231 (53.9%) received TACE+RFA, and 57 (13.3%) received TACE. The OS was significantly higher in the SR group than that in the TACE+RFA group [hazard ratio (HR): 1.78; 95% confidence incidence (CI): 1.15-2.75, p=0.009]. The OS was significantly higher in the SR group than that in the TACE group (HR: 3.17; 95% CI: 2.31-4.36, p<0.0001). Moreover, the OS was significantly higher in the TACE+RFA group than that in the TACE group (HR: 1.82; 95% CI: 1.21-2.74, p=0.004). The cumulative OS rates at 1, 3 and 5 years in the SR, TACE+RFA, and TACE groups were 89.2%, 69.4% and 61.2%, 86.0%, 57.9% and 38.2%, and 69.5%, 37.0% and 15.2%, respectively. After propensity score matching, the SR group still had a higher OS than those of the TACE+RFA and TACE groups. The TACE+RFA group had a higher OS than that of the TACE group. Conclusion: The SR group had higher OS than the TACE+RFA and TACE groups in BCLC stage B HCC. Furthermore, the TACE+RFA group had higher OS than the TACE group.

scholarly journals Association of Preoperative Coagulability With Incidence and Extent of Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus and Survival Outcomes in Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Hepatectomy: A Large-Scale, Multicenter Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiu-Ping Zhang ◽  
Teng-Fei Zhou ◽  
Jin-Kai Feng ◽  
Zi-Yang Sun ◽  
Zuo-Jun Zhen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Portal Vein ◽  
Tumor Thrombus ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
International Normalized Ratio ◽  
Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus ◽  
Survival Outcomes ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Kaplan Meier

BackgroundOccurrence of portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) worsens the outcomes of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and imparts high economic burden on society. Patients with high risks of having hypercoagulation are more likely to experience thrombosis. Herein, we examined how preoperative international normalized ratio (INR) was related to the incidence and extent of PVTT, and associated with survival outcomes in HCC patients following R0 liver resection (LR).MethodsPatients with HCC and PVTT were enrolled from six major hospitals in China. The overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates of individuals with different INR levels were assessed with Cox regression analysis as well as Kaplan-Meier method.ResultsThis study included 2207 HCC patients, among whom 1005 patients had concurrent PVTT. HCC patients in the Low INR group had a significantly higher incidence of PVTT and more extensive PVTT than the Normal and High INR groups (P&lt;0.005). Of the 592 HCC subjects who had types I/II PVTT following R0 LR, there were 106 (17.9%), 342 (57.8%) and 144 (24.3%) patients in the High, Normal and Low INR groups, respectively. RFS and OS rates were markedly worse in patients in the Low INR group relative to those in the Normal and High INR groups (median RFS, 4.87 versus 10.77 versus 11.40 months, P&lt;0.001; median OS, 6.30 versus 11.83 versus 12.67 months, P&lt;0.001).ConclusionPreoperative INR influenced the incidence and extent of PVTT in HCC. Particularly, patients with HCC and PVTT in the Low INR group had worse postoperative prognosis relative to the High and Normal INR groups.

scholarly journals The impact of portal vein tumor thrombosis on survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with different therapies: A cohort study

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. e0249426
Author(s):  
Aline Mähringer-Kunz ◽  
Verena Steinle ◽  
Roman Kloeckner ◽  
Sebastian Schotten ◽  
Felix Hahn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Liver Cancer ◽  
Portal Vein ◽  
Systemic Therapy ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Portal Vein Tumor Thrombosis ◽  
Main Trunk ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Tumor Thrombosis ◽  
The Impact

Background Portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) is a frequent complication of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), which leads to classification as advanced stage disease (regardless of the degree of PVTT) according to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Classification. For such patients, systemic therapy is the standard of care. However, in clinical reality, many patients with PVTT undergo different treatments, such as resection, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT), or best supportive care (BSC). Here we examined whether patients benefited from such alternative therapies, according to the extent of PVTT. Methods This analysis included therapy-naïve patients with HCC and PVTT treated between January 2005 and December 2016. PVTT was classified according to the Liver Cancer study group of Japan as follows: Vp1 = segmental PV invasion; Vp2 = right anterior or posterior PV; Vp3 = right or left PV; Vp4 = main trunk. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed for each treatment subgroup considering the extent of PVTT. We performed Cox regression analysis with adjustment for possible confounders. To further attenuate selection bias, we applied propensity score weighting using the inverse probability of treatment weights. Results A total of 278 treatment-naïve patients with HCC and PVTT were included for analysis. The median observed OS in months for each treatment modality (resection, TACE/SIRT, sorafenib, BSC, respectively) was 32.4, 8.1, N/A, and 1.7 for Vp1; 10.7, 6.9, 5.5, and 1.2 for Vp2; 6.6, 7.5, 2.9, and 0.6 for Vp3; and 8.0, 3.6, 5.3, and 0.7 for Vp4. Thus, the median OS in the resection group in case of segmental PVTT (Vp1) was significantly longer compared to any other treatment group (all p values <0.01). Conclusions Treatment strategy for HCC with PVTT should not be limited to systemic therapy in general. The extent of PVTT should be considered when deciding on treatment alternatives. In patients with segmental PVTT (Vp1), resection should be evaluated.

scholarly journals In Silico Identification of Contradictory Role of ADAMTS5 in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
pp. 153303382098682
Author(s):  
Zhipeng Zhu ◽  
Jiuhua Xu ◽  
Xiaofang Wu ◽  
Sihao Lin ◽  
Lulu Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Subgroup Analysis ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Enrichment Analysis ◽  
Gene Set Enrichment Analysis ◽  
Clinicopathological Parameters ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
The Impact

Background: ADAMTS5 has different roles in multiple types of cancers and participates in various molecular mechanisms. However, the prognostic value of ADAMTS5 in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) still remains unclear. We carried the study to evaluate the prognostic value and identified underlying molecular mechanisms in HCC. Methods: Firstly, the association of ADAMTS5 expression and clinicopathological parameters was evaluated by in GSE14520. Next, ADAMTS5 expression in HCC was performed using GSE14520, GSE36376, GSE76427 and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) profile. Furthermore, Kaplan-Meier analysis, Univariate and Multivariate Cox regression analysis, subgroup analysis was performed to evaluate the prognostic value of ADAMTS5 in HCC. Finally, GO enrichment analysis, gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) and weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) were performed to revealed underlying molecular mechanisms. Result: The expression of ADAMTS5 was positively correlated with the development of HCC. Next, high ADAMTS5 expression was significantly associated with poorer survival (all P < 0.05) and the impact of ADAMTS5 on all overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), relapse-free survival (RFS), disease specific survival (DSS) and progression free interval (PFI) was specific for HCC among other 29 cancer types. Subgroup analysis showed that ADAMTS5 overexpression was significantly associated with poorer OS in patients with HCC. Finally, ADAMTS5 might participate in the status conversion from metabolic-dominant to extracellular matrix-dominant, and the activation of ECM-related biological process might contribute to high higher mortality risk for patients with HCC. Conclusion: ADAMTS5 may play an important role in the progression of HCC, and may be considered as a novel and effective biomarker for predicting prognosis for patients with HCC.

scholarly journals Identification of a five-gene signature in association with overall survival for hepatocellular carcinoma

PeerJ ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. e11273
Author(s):  
Lei Yang ◽  
Weilong Yin ◽  
Xuechen Liu ◽  
Fangcun Li ◽  
Li Ma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Enrichment Analysis ◽  
Gene Signature ◽  
Gene Set Enrichment Analysis ◽  
Enrichment Score ◽  
Hub Genes ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis

Background Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is considered to be a malignant tumor with a high incidence and a high mortality. Accurate prognostic models are urgently needed. The present study was aimed at screening the critical genes for prognosis of HCC. Methods The GSE25097, GSE14520, GSE36376 and GSE76427 datasets were obtained from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO). We used GEO2R to screen differentially expressed genes (DEGs). A protein-protein interaction network of the DEGs was constructed by Cytoscape in order to find hub genes by module analysis. The Metascape was performed to discover biological functions and pathway enrichment of DEGs. MCODE components were calculated to construct a module complex of DEGs. Then, gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was used for gene enrichment analysis. ONCOMINE was employed to assess the mRNA expression levels of key genes in HCC, and the survival analysis was conducted using the array from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) of HCC. Then, the LASSO Cox regression model was performed to establish and identify the prognostic gene signature. We validated the prognostic value of the gene signature in the TCGA cohort. Results We screened out 10 hub genes which were all up-regulated in HCC tissue. They mainly enrich in mitotic cell cycle process. The GSEA results showed that these data sets had good enrichment score and significance in the cell cycle pathway. Each candidate gene may be an indicator of prognostic factors in the development of HCC. However, hub genes expression was weekly associated with overall survival in HCC patients. LASSO Cox regression analysis validated a five-gene signature (including CDC20, CCNB2, NCAPG, ASPM and NUSAP1). These results suggest that five-gene signature model may provide clues for clinical prognostic biomarker of HCC.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document