scholarly journals Applicability of the Five Case Model to African eHealth investment decisions

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean C Broomhead ◽  
Maurice Mars ◽  
Richard E. Scott ◽  
Tom Jones
Keyword(s):  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Technology Development ◽  
Investment Decisions ◽  
Field Testing ◽  
Investment Planning ◽  
African Countries ◽  
Readiness Assessment ◽  
Scarce Resources ◽  
African Health ◽  
Fierce Competition

Abstract Background: eHealth programmes in African countries face fierce competition for scarce resources. Such initiatives should not proceed without adequate appraisal of their probable impacts, thereby acknowledging their opportunity costs and the need for appraisals to promote optimal use of available resources. However, since there is no broadly accepted eHealth impact appraisal framework available to provide guidance, and local expertise is limited, African health ministries have difficulty completing such appraisals. The Five Case Model, used in several countries outside Africa, has the potential to function as a decision-making tool in African eHealth environments and serve as a key component of an eHealth impact model for Africa. Methods: This study identifies internationally recognised metrics and readily accessible data sources to assess the applicability of the model’s five cases to African countries. Results: Ten metrics are identified that align with the Five Case Model’s five cases, including nine component metrics and one summary metric that aggregates the nine. The metrics cover the eHealth environment, human capital and governance, technology development, and finance and economics. Fifty-four African countries are scored for each metric. Visualisation of the metric scores using spider charts reveals profiles of the countries’ relative performance and provides an eHealth Investment Readiness Assessment Tool. Conclusion: The utility of these comparisons to strengthen eHealth investment planning suggests that the five cases are applicable to African countries’ eHealth investment decisions. The potential for the Five Case Model to have a role in an eHealth impact appraisal framework for Africa should be validated through field testing.

scholarly journals Applicability of the Five Case Model to African eHealth investment decisions

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean C Broomhead ◽  
Maurice Mars ◽  
Richard E. Scott ◽  
Tom Jones
Keyword(s):  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Technology Development ◽  
Investment Decisions ◽  
Field Testing ◽  
Investment Planning ◽  
African Countries ◽  
Readiness Assessment ◽  
Scarce Resources ◽  
African Health ◽  
Fierce Competition

Abstract Background: eHealth programmes in African countries face fierce competition for scarce resources. Such initiatives should not proceed without adequate appraisal of their probable impacts, thereby acknowledging their opportunity costs and the need for appraisals to promote optimal use of available resources. However, since there is no broadly accepted eHealth impact appraisal framework available to provide guidance, and local expertise is limited, African health ministries have difficulty completing such appraisals. The Five Case Model, used in several countries outside Africa, has the potential to function as a decision-making tool in African eHealth environments and serve as a key component of an eHealth impact model for Africa. Methods: This study identifies internationally recognised metrics and readily accessible data sources to assess the applicability of the model’s five cases to African countries. Results: Ten metrics are identified that align with the Five Case Model’s five cases, including nine component metrics and one summary metric that aggregates the nine. The metrics cover the eHealth environment, human capital and governance, technology development, and finance and economics. Fifty-four African countries are scored for each metric. Visualisation of the metric scores using spider charts reveals profiles of the countries’ relative performance and provides an eHealth Investment Readiness Assessment Tool. Conclusion: The utility of these comparisons to strengthen eHealth investment planning suggests that the five cases are applicable to African countries’ eHealth investment decisions. The potential for the Five Case Model to have a role in an eHealth impact appraisal framework for Africa should be validated through field testing.

scholarly journals Applicability of the Five Case Model to African eHealth investment decisions

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean C Broomhead ◽  
Maurice Mars ◽  
Richard E. Scott ◽  
Tom Jones
Keyword(s):  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Technology Development ◽  
Investment Decisions ◽  
Field Testing ◽  
Investment Planning ◽  
African Countries ◽  
Readiness Assessment ◽  
Scarce Resources ◽  
African Health ◽  
Fierce Competition

Abstract Background: eHealth programmes in African countries face fierce competition for scarce resources. Such initiatives should not proceed without adequate appraisal of their probable impacts, thereby acknowledging their opportunity costs and the need for appraisals to promote optimal use of available resources. However, since there is no broadly accepted eHealth impact appraisal framework available to provide guidance, and local expertise is limited, African health ministries have difficulty completing such appraisals. The Five Case Model, used in several countries outside Africa, has the potential to function as a decision-making tool in African eHealth environments and serve as a key component of an eHealth impact model for Africa. Methods: This study identifies internationally recognised metrics and readily accessible data sources to assess the applicability of the model’s five cases to African countries. Results: Ten metrics are identified that align with the Five Case Model’s five cases, including nine component metrics and one summary metric that aggregates the nine. The metrics cover the eHealth environment, human capital and governance, technology development, and finance and economics. Fifty-four African countries are scored for each metric. Visualisation of the metric scores using spider charts reveals profiles of the countries’ relative performance and provides an eHealth Investment Readiness Assessment Tool. Conclusion: The utility of these comparisons to strengthen eHealth investment planning suggests that the five cases are applicable to African countries’ eHealth investment decisions. The potential for the Five Case Model to have a role in an eHealth impact appraisal framework for Africa should be validated through field testing.

scholarly journals Applicability of the Five Case Model to African eHealth investment decisions

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean C Broomhead ◽  
Maurice Mars ◽  
Richard E. Scott ◽  
Tom Jones
Keyword(s):  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Technology Development ◽  
Investment Decisions ◽  
Field Testing ◽  
Investment Planning ◽  
African Countries ◽  
Readiness Assessment ◽  
Scarce Resources ◽  
African Health ◽  
Fierce Competition

Abstract Background: eHealth programmes in African countries face fierce competition for scarce resources. Such initiatives should not proceed without adequate appraisal of their probable impacts, thereby acknowledging their opportunity costs and the need for appraisals to promote optimal use of available resources. However, since there is no broadly accepted eHealth impact appraisal framework available to provide guidance, and local expertise is limited, African health ministries have difficulty completing such appraisals. The Five Case Model, used in several countries outside Africa, has the potential to function as a decision-making tool in African eHealth environments and serve as a key component of an eHealth impact model for Africa. Methods: This study identifies internationally recognised metrics and readily accessible data sources to assess the applicability of the model’s five cases to African countries. Results: Ten metrics are identified that align with the Five Case Model’s five cases, including nine component metrics and one summary metric that aggregates the nine. The metrics cover the eHealth environment, human capital and governance, technology development, and finance and economics. Fifty-four African countries are scored for each metric. Visualisation of the metric scores using spider charts reveals profiles of the countries’ relative performance and provides an eHealth Investment Readiness Assessment Tool. Conclusion: The utility of these comparisons to strengthen eHealth investment planning suggests that the five cases are applicable to African countries’ eHealth investment decisions. The potential for the Five Case Model to have a role in an eHealth impact appraisal framework for Africa should be validated through field testing.

scholarly journals Innovation Readiness Assessment toward Research Commercialization: Case of Surfactants for Food Processing

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 180-193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arief Ameir Rahman Setiawan ◽  
Anny Sulaswatty ◽  
Yenny Meliana ◽  
Agus Haryono
Keyword(s):  
Food Processing ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Technology Development ◽  
Readiness Assessment ◽  
Innovation And Technology ◽  
Readiness Level ◽  
Technology Market ◽  
Market Organization ◽  
Further Development ◽  
Glycerol Mono

Determining the readiness of research toward commercialization becomes significant issues encountered by the institution working on research, innovation and technology development. Particularly in food processing area, the issue is much more involving other aspects aside from technological matter, hence, an assessment tool should be consider these aspects altogether to capture integrated perspective. This study explored the use of Innovation Readiness Level to measures the maturity of research from the perspective of technology, market, organization, partnership and risk. Case of surfactant researches in the Research Center for Chemistry, Indonesian Institute of Sciences will be deployed as examples of study. According to the assessment, it has been obtained the surfactant recommended for further development towards commercialization of R D results for food processing, i.e. Glycerol Mono Stearate (GMS), which has reached the level of IRL 3. This finding resulted some implications for improvements strategies to foster the research toward commercialization.

scholarly journals COVID-19 in West Africa: regional resource mobilisation and allocation in the first year of the pandemic

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. e004762
Author(s):  
Césaire Ahanhanzo ◽  
Ermel Ameswue Kpogbe Johnson ◽  
Ejemai Amaize Eboreime ◽  
Sombié Issiaka ◽  
Ben Idrissa Traoré ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
West Africa ◽  
Ebola Virus ◽  
Virus Disease ◽  
First Year ◽  
African Countries ◽  
Response Strategies ◽  
African Health ◽  
The Usa ◽  
Health Organization ◽  
Resource Mobilisation

The world continues to battle the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Whereas many countries are currently experiencing the second wave of the outbreak; Africa, despite being the last continent to be affected by the virus, has not experienced as much devastation as other continents. For example, West Africa, with a population of 367 million people, had confirmed 412 178 cases of COVID-19 with 5363 deaths as of 14 March 2021; compared with the USA which had recorded almost 30 million cases and 530 000 deaths, despite having a slightly smaller population (328 million). Several postulations have been made in an attempt to explain this phenomenon. One hypothesis is that African countries have leveraged on experiences from past epidemics to build resilience and response strategies which may be contributing to protecting the continent’s health systems from being overwhelmed. This practice paper from the West African Health Organization presents experience and data from the field on how countries in the region mobilised support to address the pandemic in the first year, leveraging on systems, infrastructure, capacities developed and experiences from the 2014 Ebola virus disease outbreak.

scholarly journals Development and Validation of the Health-Friendly Activity Index: An Assessment Tool to Improve Consumers’ Health-Related Outcomes

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Young Ho Yun ◽  
Sinae Oh ◽  
Jin Ah Sim ◽  
Sujee Lee ◽  
Eun-Jung Sohn
Keyword(s):  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Field Testing ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Item Questionnaire ◽  
Three Phase ◽  
Health Related ◽  
D 20 ◽  
Development And Validation

Abstract Objectives We developed the Health-Friendly Activity Index (HFAI) to measure the health-friendly activity of corporations or organizations comprehensively. We validated the developed tool and reported on its use as an assessment tool to improve consumers’ health-related outcomes.Study Design This is a cross-sectional studyPUBH-D-20-02610 Development of the HFAI questionnaire followed a three-phase process: item generation, item construction, and validation with field testing. Using relevance and feasibility criteria, we developed a 105-item questionnaire with six domains (Governance and Infrastructure, Needs Assessment, Planning, Implementation, Monitoring and Feedback, and Outcomes). To assess the sensitivity and validity of the questionnaire, we recruited two different groups. We assessed Group One (31 companies) based on their recent sustainability reports and compared their HFAI scores with the Contribution Assessment Tool for Consumer’s Health (CATCH) scores from 400 people from the general Korean population. For Group Two, we recruited 19 worksites and asked them to complete the HFAI and CATCH.Results Each domain of HFAI exhibited a Cronbach’s α coefficient between 0.382 and 1.000 for Group One and a Cronbach’s α coefficient between 0.676 and 0.938 for Group Two.

scholarly journals Recommendations for Effective and Sustainable Regulation of Biopesticides in Nigeria

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine Abey Ashaolu ◽  
Chibuzor Okonkwo ◽  
Elizabeth Njuguna ◽  
Dennis Ndolo
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Management Strategies ◽  
Field Testing ◽  
Key Factors ◽  
African Countries ◽  
Safety Standards ◽  
Natural Substances ◽  
Global Trend ◽  
Scientific Technical ◽  
Micro Organisms

The global trend towards increased demand for organic food, greener environments, and the integration of biological control agents into pest management strategies has greatly enhanced the need for biological pesticides (biopesticides). Biopesticides are generally environmentally friendly and are made from micro-organisms or other natural substances. Despite their great potential, relatively few have been registered and commercialised in Nigeria compared to other African countries such as South Africa and Kenya. Biological active agents are so diverse such that ap-plying the same safety standards or environmental conditions to all of them is almost impossible. A review of risk assessment processes and comparative assessments of Nigeria's biopesticide regulations with other developing African countries and developed regions was conducted. Prolonged field testing, lack of bridged risk assessments and technical checklists have been identified as key factors hampering the timely development and commercialisation of biopesti-cides in Nigeria. Recommendations on necessary changes to the existing Nigeria biopesticide regulations have been made. Risk assessment matrices for microbial and biochemical biopesti-cides and a scientific/technical checklist have also been developed. Harmonisation and data ex-change among other countries in the region will also enhance the advancement of scientific and technical knowledge for sustainable regulation and cross-border trade.

Managed Care Technical Assistance Center Medicaid Managed Care Readiness Assessment Tool

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Acri ◽  
Ashley Ann Fuss ◽  
Patricia Quintero ◽  
Meaghan Baier ◽  
Claire Connolly ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Managed Care ◽  
Technical Assistance ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Medicaid Managed Care ◽  
Readiness Assessment

Advanced Manufacturing Technology Development: A Macroergonomics Perspective

1987 ◽  
Vol 31 (10) ◽  
pp. 1156-1160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle M. Robertson ◽  
Ann Majchzark
Keyword(s):  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Technology Development ◽  
New Technology ◽  
Manufacturing Technology ◽  
Advanced Manufacturing Technology ◽  
Technological Innovations ◽  
Order Effects ◽  
Advanced Manufacturing ◽  
Systematic Assessment ◽  
Manufacturing Technologies

This paper examines and discusses the implications of a macroergonomic perspective for assimilating advanced manufacturing technological innovations into an organization's human infrastructure. A framework for integrating sociotechnical systems and advanced manufacturing technology design is presented which identifies first-and second-order effects of the new technology on the human infrastructure. The Human Infrastructure Impact Statement (HISS) operationalizes these concepts into a systematic assessment tool. This paper ends with a brief list of some of the pertinent macroergonomic decisions that a manager and a macroergonomist must consider in implementing and designing Advance Manufacturing Technologies.

Health leadership in Africa

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francis Omaswa
Keyword(s):  
Complex Relationship ◽  
African Countries ◽  
Health Leadership ◽  
African Health ◽  
National Capacity ◽  
Improve Health ◽  
The Way

Chapter 2 describes the challenge facing African health leaders in stark terms: ‘Until and unless we Africans, individually and collectively, feel the pain and the shame of our condition, we will not have the commitment to take the actions needed to right the situation.’ It describes developments in Africa from the author’s experience over the last 40 years and, in particular, the way in which relationships between donors and African countries has simultaneously helped improve health and slowed down the development of national capacity and systems. This account sets the scene for the following chapters in which individual leaders describe the way they have struggled with this complex relationship as they have worked to improve health in their own countries.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document