scholarly journals Prognostic value of the miR-200 family in bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanhui Mei ◽  
Jianbo Zheng ◽  
Ping Xiang ◽  
Cheng Liu ◽  
Yidong Fan
Keyword(s):  
Bladder Cancer ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Publication Bias ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
High Expression ◽  
Cancer Specific Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Hazard Ratios

Abstract Introduction : The association between the miR-200 family and the prognosis of patients with bladder cancer remains controversial. The aim of this study is to evaluate the prognostic value of the miR-200 family in patients with bladder cancer.Methods : Electronic databases were searched to identify the studies that had assessed the association between the miR-200 family and prognosis in patients with bladder cancer. Hazard ratios ( HRs ) and 95% confidence interval ( CI ) for overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) from eligible studies were used to calculate combined hazard ratios. The heterogeneity across the included studies was assessed by Cochrane´s Q test and I 2 statistic. The Begg´s funnel plot and Egger´s linear regression teats were used to evaluate the potential publication bias. The meta-analysis was performed with RevMan 5.3 and Stata SE12.0 according to the PRISMA guidelines.Results : A total of 1152 patients from 8 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The results showed that the high expression of the miR-200 family was associated with better OS (pooled hazard ratio: 0.50, 95% confidence interval: 0.40-0.62), CSS (pooled hazard ratio: 0.36, 95% confidence interval: 0.22-0.59) and RFS (pooled hazard ratio: 0.48, 95% confidence interval: 0.36-0.65). Both Begg's funnel plots test and Egger's test verified that there was no publication bias within the included cohorts. Conclusion : This study suggests that the high expression of the miR-200 family is significantly associated with better prognosis in patients with bladder cancer.

scholarly journals Prognostic value of systemic immune-inflammation index in patients with urologic cancers: a meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yilong Huang ◽  
Yunfeng Gao ◽  
Yushen Wu ◽  
Huapeng Lin
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Multicenter Studies ◽  
Cancer Specific Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Hazard Ratios ◽  
Immune Inflammation ◽  
Urologic Cancers

Abstract Background Several studies have reported that the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) is associated with the prognosis of patients with urologic cancers (UCs). The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the prognostic value of SII in UC patients. Methods We searched public databases for relevant published studies on the prognostic value of SII in UC patients. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were extracted and pooled to assess the relationships between SII and overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). Results A total of 14 studies with 3074 patients were included. From the pooled results, we found that high SII was associated with worse overall survival (OS) in patients with UC (HR 2.58, 95% CI 1.59–4.21). Patients with high SII values also had poorer PFS (HR 1.92, 95% CI 1.29–2.88) and CSS (HR 2.58, 95% CI 1.36–4.91) as well as lower ORRs (HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.22–0.71) than patients with low SII values. In addition, the subgroup analysis of OS and PFS showed that the prognosis of patients with high SII was worse than that of patients with low SII. Conclusions SII might be a promising noninvasive predictor in patients with UC. However, more samples and multicenter studies are needed to confirm the effectiveness of SII in predicting the prognosis of patients with UC.

scholarly journals Prognostic value of aldo-keto reductase family 1 member B10 in solid tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rongqiang Liu ◽  
Shiyang Zheng ◽  
Shengjia Peng ◽  
Qianmin Ge ◽  
Qi Lin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Publication Bias ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Pooled Analysis ◽  
High Expression ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Background: It has been reported that the expression of aldo-keto reductase family 1 member B10 (AKR1B10) is abnormal in various types of cancer, and could be used as a prognostic biomarker. However, the results are controversial. Therefore, the aim of this study was to comprehensively evaluate the prognostic value of AKR1B10 expression in solid tumors by conducting a meta-analysis.Methods: The pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for overall survival and disease-free survival/relapse-free survival were calculated to estimate the prognostic significance of AKR1B10 using the random effects model. Subgroup, meta-regression, and sensitivity analyses were used to investigate sources of heterogeneity. Begg’s test and Egger’s test were used to evaluate publication bias.Results: Eleven studies involving 1,389 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled analysis displayed that high expression of AKR1B10 was not associated with OS(HR=1.22; 95% CI: 0.73–2.04) and DFS/PFS (HR=1.23, 95% CI 0.75–2.01) in solid tumors. Sensitivity analysis indicated that the results of the meta-analysis were stable. Begg’s test and Egger’s test also confirmed the absence of publication bias.Conclusions: We demonstrated that high expression of AKR1B10 was not associated with survival outcomes in patients with solid tumors. Further large-sample, prospective, multi-centric, and well-designed studies are warranted to investigate the prognostic role of AKR1B10 in various cancers.

The prognostic relevance of 14-3-3 expression in cancers: a meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Caihong Li ◽  
Honglan Zhu ◽  
Changlu Liu ◽  
Ya Liu ◽  
Ting Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Size Analysis ◽  
Tumor Type ◽  
Cancer Specific Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Hazard Ratios ◽  
Prognostic Importance ◽  
Patient Prognosis

AbstractObjective: A number of recent clinical studies have identified a relationship between elevated expressions of 14-3-3 and poorer patient prognosis in the context of several cancers. The present meta-analysis was therefore conducted to gain an enhanced understanding of the prognostic importance of 14-3-3 levels in cancer patients. Methods: Two reviewers independently systematically reviewed the Web of Science, Embase, and PubMed databases to identify published, suitable studies through October 2019. The correlation between the level of 14-3-3 and cancer patient survival were assessed based upon pooled HR (hazard ratios) and 95% CI (confidence intervals) derived from chosen studies. Results: In total we were able to identify 22 eligible studies that had enrolled 2676 patients in the present meta-analysis. Assessment of these studies revealed that elevated 14-3-3 level correlated significantly with poorer OS (overall survival) (HR : 1.93, 95% CI : 1.42-2.61) in cancer patients. This was true even when studies were analyzed in subgroups according to tumor type, sample size, analysis type, and method of HR determination. With respect to disease-free survival (DFS), the pooled HR for cancer patients expressing high levels of 14-3-3 was 1.89 (95% CI: 1.56-2.30). Patients with elevated 14-3-3 expression also exhibited reduced CSS (cancer-specific survival) (HR: 3.47, 95% CI: 2.12-5.69).Conclusions: The outcomes indicate that higher level of 14-3-3 correlates with poorer patient prognosis in a range of cancer types.Keywords: Meta-analysis, Prognosis, 14-3-3 Proteins C Continuous...

scholarly journals Prognostic Value of Lactate Dehydrogenase in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weihao Kong ◽  
Xiaomin Zuo ◽  
Hao Liang ◽  
Jingxiong Hu ◽  
Huabing Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Sensitivity Analysis ◽  
Lactate Dehydrogenase ◽  
Publication Bias ◽  
Subgroup Analysis ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Free Survival

Background. Previous studies have shown the prognostic value of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but the results are not persuasive. Therefore, the purpose of our study was to quantitatively explore the prognostic value of LDH in hepatocellular carcinoma.Methods. We searched the Web of Science, Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library for literature published before October 2018 on the prognostic value of LDH in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. The combined hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were utilized to assess the prognostic value of LDH in overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and progression-free survival (PFS) of HCC. Subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis, and metaregression were used to explore the source of heterogeneity. Funnel plots with Begg’s test and Egger’s test were used to detect potential publication biases. Furthermore, combined odds ratios (ORs) were utilized to assess the correlation between LDH and clinicopathological features.Results. A total of 10 nonrandomized controlled studies were included in this meta-analysis. The combined effects of LDH on HCC patients’ OS, RFS/DFS, and PFS were HR = 2.07, 95% CI: 1.63-2.62, P < 0.001; HR = 1.62, 95% CI: 1.37-1.90, P < 0.001; and HR = 1.96, 95% CI: 1.14-3.36, P = 0.014, respectively. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis showed that the outcome was stable, and the results of the metaregression also identified statistical models as an important source of heterogeneity. Potential publication bias was detected in the OS studies, so the trim-and-fill method was used to explore publication bias, and the results showed stability. Furthermore, the combined OR suggests that LDH was significantly correlated with gender, Child-Pugh grade, alpha-fetoprotein, vascular invasion, and tumor size.Conclusions. Preoperative LDH elevation is significantly associated with poor prognosis in patients with HCC, which may be a promising factor in assessing the prognosis of patients with HCC.

scholarly journals Prognostic Role of microRNA-155 in Various Carcinomas: Results from a Meta-Analysis

2013 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 379-386 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing He ◽  
Fengmei Zhang ◽  
Ying Wu ◽  
Wei Zhang ◽  
Xiaoli Zhu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Prognostic Role ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Hazard Ratios ◽  
The Relationship

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have shown that microRNAs (miRNA) have prognostic values in cancers. This meta-analysis seeks to summarize the global predicting role of miR-155 for survival in patients with a variety of carcinomas.METHODS: Eligible studies were identified through multiple search strategies. Data were extracted from studies investigating the relationship between miR-155 expression and survival in cancer patients. Combined hazard ratios (HRs) of miR-155 for outcome were analyzed.RESULTS: A total of 16 studies dealing with various carcinomas were included for this meta-analysis. For overall survival, higher miR-155 expression could significantly predict worse outcome with the pooled HR of 2.057 (95% CI: 1.392–3.039). For relapse or progress-free survival, elevated miR-155 was also a significant predictor, with a combined HR of 1.918 (95% CI: 1.311–2.806,). In addition, subgroup analysis showed that higher expression of miR-155 had the trends to predict worse outcome in lung cancer. However, the HRs did not reach the statistical significance.CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that miR-155 detection has a prognostic value in cancer patients. Regularly measuring miR-155 expression may be useful in clinical practice.

scholarly journals Prognostic value of pretreatment platelet counts in lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuan Yuan ◽  
Hai Zhong ◽  
Liang Ye ◽  
Qian Li ◽  
rong su Fang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Publication Bias ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Lung Cancer Patients ◽  
Platelet Counts

Abstract Background : The prognostic value of elevated pretreatment platelet counts remains controversial in lung cancer patients. We performed the present meta-analysis to determine its precise role in these patients. Methods: We employed a multiple search strategy in the PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases to identify eligible studies. Disease-free survival (DFS)/progression-free survival (PFS)/time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) were used as outcomes with hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity among the studies and publication bias were also evaluated. Results : A total of 40 studies including 16696 lung cancer patients were eligible for the analysis. Overall, the pooled analysis showed that compared with normal platelet counts, elevated pretreatment platelet counts were associated with poorer OS (HR= 1.54, 95% CI: 1.37-1.72, P<0.001) and poorer DFS/PFS/TTP (HR=1.62, 95% CI: 1.33-1.98, P<0.001) in patients with lung cancer. In subgroup analyses, elevated pretreatment platelet counts were also associated with poorer OS and DFS/PFS/TTP in most subgroups. There was no evidence of publication bias. Conclusions : This meta-analysis revealed that elevated pretreatment platelet counts were an independent predictor of OS and DFS/PFS/TTP in lung cancer patients. Large-scale prospective studies and a validation study are warranted.

scholarly journals The Prognostic Roles and Clinical Features of CD44v9 in Human Solid Cancers—A Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuanxiu Deng ◽  
Jie Wang ◽  
Shenhui Ji ◽  
Lu Huang ◽  
Meijiang Feng
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Features ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
High Expression ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Cancer Specific Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Diagnosis And Prognosis

Abstract Background: CD44 is the primary receptor for hyaluronic acid and serves as a marker for cancer stem cells. CD44v9 is one of CD44’s variants and takes part in cancer’s growth and metastasis. However, the prognostic roles and clinical features of CD44v9 in cancers remain unclear. Therefore, we conducted this meta-analysis to summarize the prognostic significance and clinical features of CD44v9 in human solid cancers.Methods: we systematically searched all of related studies in PubMed, the Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane library up to June 2020. We analyzed the pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to assess the prognostic functions and clinical features of CD44v9 in various human solid cancers.Results: In this meta-analysis, we included 1705 cancer patients among 12 studies. Results indicated that high expression of CD44v9 was significantly related to poorer overall survival (OS) (HR=1.60, 95%CI 1.28-1.99, P<0.0001), recurrence-free survival/progression-free survival/disease-free survival (RFS/PFS/DFS).( HR=1.81, 95%CI 1.16-2.84, P=0.009) and disease-specific survival/cancer-specific survival (DSS/CSS) (HR=2.93, 95%CI 1.69-5.10, P<0.001). At the same time, we also found that high expression of CD44v9 increased the possibility of lymphoid infiltrates (OR=1.59, 95%CI 1.16-2.20, P=0.005), vascular invasion (OR=1.57, 95%CI 1.11-2.22, P=0.010) and higher TNM stage (OR=1.63, 95%CI 1.19-2.23, P=0.002).Conclusion: Our results demonstrate that CD44v9 overexpression is associated with worse OS, RFS/PFS/CFS and DSS/CSS in patients with solid cancers, which might be a biomarker in the diagnosis and prognosis of cancers in the future.

scholarly journals Prognostic Value of MicroRNA-182 in Cancers: A Meta-Analysis

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fei Wang ◽  
Shanliang Zhong ◽  
Haijun Zhang ◽  
Wei Zhang ◽  
Hongming Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Cancer Prognosis ◽  
Relapse Free Survival ◽  
Altered Expression ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Chinese Populations ◽  
Hazard Ratios ◽  
Disease Free

Objective. MicroRNA-182 (miR-182) exhibits altered expression in various cancers. The aim of this study was to investigate the predictive value of miR-182 expression for cancer patient survival.Methods. Eligible studies were identified through multiple search strategies, and the hazard ratios (HRs) for patient outcomes were extracted and estimated. A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the prognostic value of miR-182.Results. In total, 14 studies were included. A high miR-182 expression level predicted a worse outcome with a pooled HR of 2.18 (95% CI: 1.53–3.11) in ten studies related to overall survival (OS), especially in Chinese populations. The results of seven studies evaluating disease-free survival/relapse-free survival/recurrence-free interval/disease-specific survival (DFS/RFS/RFI/DSS) produced a pooled HR of 1.77 (95% CI: 0.91–3.43), which was not statistically significant; however, the trend was positive. When disregarding the DSS from one study, the expression of miR-182 was significantly correlated with DFS/RFS/RFI (pooled HR = 2.52, 95% CI: 1.67–3.79).Conclusions. High miR-182 expression is associated with poor OS and DFS/RFS/RFI in some types of cancers, and miR-182 may be a useful prognostic biomarker for predicting cancer prognosis. However, given the current insufficient relevant data, further clinical studies are needed.

scholarly journals Prognostic value of pretreatment platelet counts in lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuan Yuan ◽  
Hai Zhong ◽  
Liang Ye ◽  
Qian Li ◽  
rong su Fang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Publication Bias ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Lung Cancer Patients ◽  
Platelet Counts

Abstract Background : The prognostic value of elevated pretreatment platelet counts remains controversial in lung cancer patients. We performed the present meta-analysis to determine its precise role in these patients. Methods: We employed a multiple search strategy in the PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases to identify eligible studies. Disease-free survival (DFS)/progression-free survival (PFS)/time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) were used as outcomes with hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity among the studies and publication bias were also evaluated. Results : A total of 40 studies including 16696 lung cancer patients were eligible for the analysis. Overall, the pooled analysis showed that compared with normal platelet counts, elevated pretreatment platelet counts were associated with poorer OS (HR= 1.54, 95% CI: 1.37-1.72, P<0.001) and poorer DFS/PFS/TTP (HR=1.62, 95% CI: 1.33-1.98, P<0.001) in patients with lung cancer. In subgroup analyses, elevated pretreatment platelet counts were also associated with poorer OS and DFS/PFS/TTP in most subgroups. There was no evidence of publication bias. Conclusions : This meta-analysis revealed that elevated pretreatment platelet counts were an independent predictor of OS and DFS/PFS/TTP in lung cancer patients. Large-scale prospective studies and a validation study are warranted.

scholarly journals Prognostic Value of Pretreatment Albumin-to-Alkaline Phosphatase Ratio in Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Hailun Xie ◽  
Lishuang Wei ◽  
Shuangyi Tang ◽  
Jialiang Gan
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Alkaline Phosphatase ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Poor Overall Survival ◽  
Cancer Specific Survival ◽  
Free Survival

Background. Recently, it has been reported that the pretreatment albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio (AAPR) is related to the prognosis of various cancers. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to explore the prognostic value of pretreatment AAPR on clinical outcomes in cancer. Methods. PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase were systematically searched for relevant research before May 2020. Stata 12 was utilized to extract the data and the characteristics of each study and to generate a pooled hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) to assess the relationship between pretreatment AAPR and survival outcomes. Results. We included 16 eligible published articles involving 5,716 patients. We found that low pretreatment AAPR was associated with poor overall survival ( HR = 2.12 , 95% CI: 1.80–2.50, P < 0.001 ), cancer-specific survival ( HR = 2.89 , 95% CI: 1.46–5.71, P < 0.001 ), disease-free survival ( HR = 1.91 , 95% CI: 1.43–2.53, P < 0.001 ), and progression-free survival ( HR = 1.93 , 95% CI: 1.49–2.52, P < 0.001 ). However, there was no statistical relationship between pretreatment AAPR and recurrence-free survival, distant-metastasis-free survival, or locoregional relapse-free survival. The correlation between pretreatment AAPR and overall survival did not change significantly when possible confounders were stratified. The sensitivity analysis showed that this study was reliable. Conclusions. Low pretreatment AAPR was significantly associated with adverse clinical outcomes of cancer. Pretreatment AAPR could be a valuable noninvasive prognostic indicator for cancer.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document