scholarly journals Inter-Comparison of Two Regional Climate Models (RegCM and WRF) in Downscaling CFSv2 For the Seasonal Prediction of Indian Summer Monsoon

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manas Ranjan Mohanty ◽  
Uma Charan Mohanty
Keyword(s):  
Summer Monsoon ◽  
Indian Summer Monsoon ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Dynamical Downscaling ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Wrf Model ◽  
Daily Rainfall ◽  
Regional Climate Models ◽  
Regional Models ◽  
Vertical Column

Abstract The efficacy of two latest versions of regional climate models (RegCM and WRF) for simulating the Indian summer monsoon (JJAS) is tested in this study. The CFSv2 hindcast outputs are downscaled over the Indian monsoon domain for 11 contrasting monsoon seasons using the regional models. The April start ensembles of the CFSv2 are averaged to generate the initial and lateral boundary conditions for driving the WRF and RegCM. The regional models perform better in simulating the Indian summer monsoon features better than the parent CFSv2 model. The rainfall pattern as well as the intensities are improved with the dynamical downscaling and the errors in the rainfall are minimized over the GCM hindcast. On comparing the two regional models, the RegCM overestimates the rainfall during the excess and normal monsoon seasons. The RCMs improve the skill of rainfall prediction as compared to the GCM and WRF shows better skill in particular. One peculiar finding of this study is that the daily rainfall biases averaged over all the years of simulation shows that the two RCMs show similar biases with RegCM showing stronger biases occasionally. It may be implied that the errors from GCM in the form of the ICBC might be influencing the simulation in the RCMs. The upper air and surface parameters analysis shows that the WRF performs better in representing the semi-permanent features of the Indian summer monsoon which may be helping in improving the rainfall over the RegCM. The wind pattern as well as the relative humidity along the vertical column of the atmosphere are captured better in the WRF model. Diagnostics of CAPE & vertically integrated moisture transport supports the finding of the rainfall being simulated better in the WRF model.

scholarly journals Using high-resolution regional climate models to estimate return levels of daily extreme precipitation over Bavaria

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (11) ◽  
pp. 3573-3598
Author(s):  
Benjamin Poschlod
Keyword(s):  
High Resolution ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Daily Rainfall ◽  
Regional Climate Models ◽  
Reanalysis Data ◽  
Extreme Value ◽  
Return Level ◽  
Gev Distribution ◽  
Return Levels

Abstract. Extreme daily rainfall is an important trigger for floods in Bavaria. The dimensioning of water management structures as well as building codes is based on observational rainfall return levels. In this study, three high-resolution regional climate models (RCMs) are employed to produce 10- and 100-year daily rainfall return levels and their performance is evaluated by comparison to observational return levels. The study area is governed by different types of precipitation (stratiform, orographic, convectional) and a complex terrain, with convective precipitation also contributing to daily rainfall levels. The Canadian Regional Climate Model version 5 (CRCM5) at a 12 km spatial resolution and the Weather and Forecasting Research (WRF) model at a 5 km resolution both driven by ERA-Interim reanalysis data use parametrization schemes to simulate convection. WRF at a 1.5 km resolution driven by ERA5 reanalysis data explicitly resolves convectional processes. Applying the generalized extreme value (GEV) distribution, the CRCM5 setup can reproduce the observational 10-year return levels with an areal average bias of +6.6 % and a spatial Spearman rank correlation of ρ=0.72. The higher-resolution 5 km WRF setup is found to improve the performance in terms of bias (+4.7 %) and spatial correlation (ρ=0.82). However, the finer topographic details of the WRF-ERA5 return levels cannot be evaluated with the observation data because their spatial resolution is too low. Hence, this comparison shows no further improvement in the spatial correlation (ρ=0.82) but a small improvement in the bias (2.7 %) compared to the 5 km resolution setup. Uncertainties due to extreme value theory are explored by employing three further approaches. Applied to the WRF-ERA5 data, the GEV distributions with a fixed shape parameter (bias is +2.5 %; ρ=0.79) and the generalized Pareto (GP) distributions (bias is +2.9 %; ρ=0.81) show almost equivalent results for the 10-year return period, whereas the metastatistical extreme value (MEV) distribution leads to a slight underestimation (bias is −7.8 %; ρ=0.84). For the 100-year return level, however, the MEV distribution (bias is +2.7 %; ρ=0.73) outperforms the GEV distribution (bias is +13.3 %; ρ=0.66), the GEV distribution with fixed shape parameter (bias is +12.9 %; ρ=0.70), and the GP distribution (bias is +11.9 %; ρ=0.63). Hence, for applications where the return period is extrapolated, the MEV framework is recommended. From these results, it follows that high-resolution regional climate models are suitable for generating spatially homogeneous rainfall return level products. In regions with a sparse rain gauge density or low spatial representativeness of the stations due to complex topography, RCMs can support the observational data. Further, RCMs driven by global climate models with emission scenarios can project climate-change-induced alterations in rainfall return levels at regional to local scales. This can allow adjustment of structural design and, therefore, adaption to future precipitation conditions.

The Mesoscale Response to Global Warming over the Pacific Northwest Evaluated Using a Regional Climate Model Ensemble

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-56
Keyword(s):  
Global Warming ◽  
Pacific Northwest ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Wrf Model ◽  
Regional Climate Models ◽  
Winter Precipitation ◽  
Historical Period ◽  
Continental Interior

This paper describes the downscaling of an ensemble of twelve GCMs using the WRF model at 12-km grid spacing over the period 1970-2099, examining the mesoscale impacts of global warming as well as the uncertainties in its mesoscale expression. The RCP 8.5 emissions scenario was used to drive both global and regional climate models. The regional climate modeling system reduced bias and improved realism for a historical period, in contrast to substantial errors for the GCM simulations driven by lack of resolution. The regional climate ensemble indicated several mesoscale responses to global warming that were not apparent in the global model simulations, such as enhanced continental interior warming during both winter and summer as well as increasing winter precipitation trends over the windward slopes of regional terrain, with declining trends to the lee of major barriers. During summer there is general drying, except to the east of the Cascades. April 1 snowpack declines are large over the lower to middle slopes of regional terrain, with small snowpack increases over the lower elevations of the interior. Snow-albedo feedbacks are very different between GCM and RCM projections, with the GCM’s producing large, unphysical areas of snowpack loss and enhanced warming. Daily average winds change little under global warming, but maximum easterly winds decline modestly, driven by a preferential sea level pressure decline over the continental interior. Although temperatures warm continuously over the domain after approximately 2010, with slight acceleration over time, occurrences of temperature extremes increase rapidly during the second half of the 21st century.

scholarly journals Regional Climate Models Add Value to Global Model Data: A Review and Selected Examples

2011 ◽  
Vol 92 (9) ◽  
pp. 1181-1192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frauke Feser ◽  
Burkhardt Rockel ◽  
Hans von Storch ◽  
Jörg Winterfeldt ◽  
Matthias Zahn
Keyword(s):  
Regional Climate Model ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Dynamical Downscaling ◽  
Spatial Scales ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Regional Climate Models ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Model Data ◽  
Polar Lows

An important challenge in current climate modeling is to realistically describe small-scale weather statistics, such as topographic precipitation and coastal wind patterns, or regional phenomena like polar lows. Global climate models simulate atmospheric processes with increasingly higher resolutions, but still regional climate models have a lot of advantages. They consume less computation time because of their limited simulation area and thereby allow for higher resolution both in time and space as well as for longer integration times. Regional climate models can be used for dynamical down-scaling purposes because their output data can be processed to produce higher resolved atmospheric fields, allowing the representation of small-scale processes and a more detailed description of physiographic details (such as mountain ranges, coastal zones, and details of soil properties). However, does higher resolution add value when compared to global model results? Most studies implicitly assume that dynamical downscaling leads to output fields that are superior to the driving global data, but little work has been carried out to substantiate these expectations. Here a series of articles is reviewed that evaluate the benefit of dynamical downscaling by explicitly comparing results of global and regional climate model data to the observations. These studies show that the regional climate model generally performs better for the medium spatial scales, but not always for the larger spatial scales. Regional models can add value, but only for certain variables and locations—particularly those influenced by regional specifics, such as coasts, or mesoscale dynamics, such as polar lows. Therefore, the decision of whether a regional climate model simulation is required depends crucially on the scientific question being addressed.

Regional climate models: 30 years of dynamical downscaling

2020 ◽  
Vol 235 ◽  
pp. 104785 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco J. Tapiador ◽  
Andrés Navarro ◽  
Raúl Moreno ◽  
José Luis Sánchez ◽  
Eduardo García-Ortega
Keyword(s):  
Climate Models ◽  
Dynamical Downscaling ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Regional Climate Models

scholarly journals Differences between downscaling with spectral and grid nudging using WRF

2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (8) ◽  
pp. 3601-3610 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Liu ◽  
A. P. Tsimpidi ◽  
Y. Hu ◽  
B. Stone ◽  
A. G. Russell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Dynamical Downscaling ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Wrf Model ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Spectral Nudging

Abstract. Dynamical downscaling has been extensively used to study regional climate forced by large-scale global climate models. During the downscaling process, however, the simulation of regional climate models (RCMs) tends to drift away from the driving fields. Developing a solution that addresses this issue, by retaining the large scale features (from the large-scale fields) and the small-scale features (from the RCMs) has led to the development of "nudging" techniques. Here, we examine the performance of two nudging techniques, grid and spectral nudging, in the downscaling of NCEP/NCAR data with the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model. The simulations are compared against the results with North America Regional Reanalysis (NARR) data set at different scales of interest using the concept of similarity. We show that with the appropriate choice of wave numbers, spectral nudging outperforms grid nudging in the capacity of balancing the performance of simulation at the large and small scales.

scholarly journals A Maieutic Exploration of Nudging Strategies for Regional Climate Applications Using the WRF Model

2018 ◽  
Vol 57 (8) ◽  
pp. 1883-1906 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tanya L. Spero ◽  
Christopher G. Nolte ◽  
Megan S. Mallard ◽  
Jared H. Bowden
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Weather Prediction ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Wrf Model ◽  
Regional Climate Models ◽  
The United States ◽  
Spectral Nudging ◽  
Temperature And Precipitation ◽  
Quality Health

AbstractThe use of nudging in the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model to constrain regional climate downscaling simulations is gaining in popularity because it can reduce error and improve consistency with the driving data. While some attention has been paid to whether nudging is beneficial for downscaling, very little research has been performed to determine best practices. In fact, many published papers use the default nudging configuration (which was designed for numerical weather prediction), follow practices used by colleagues, or adapt methods developed for other regional climate models. Here, a suite of 45 three-year simulations is conducted with WRF over the continental United States to systematically and comprehensively examine a variety of nudging strategies. The simulations here use a longer test period than did previously published works to better evaluate the robustness of each strategy through all four seasons, through multiple years, and across nine regions of the United States. The analysis focuses on the evaluation of 2-m temperature and precipitation, which are two of the most commonly required downscaled output fields for air quality, health, and ecosystems applications. Several specific recommendations are provided to effectively use nudging in WRF for regional climate applications. In particular, spectral nudging is preferred over analysis nudging. Spectral nudging performs best in WRF when it is used toward wind above the planetary boundary layer (through the stratosphere) and temperature and moisture only within the free troposphere. Furthermore, the nudging toward moisture is very sensitive to the nudging coefficient, and the default nudging coefficient in WRF is too high to be used effectively for moisture.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document